EU Outsources Key Tobacco Control Responsibilities to Third Parties

Feb.27.2023
EU Outsources Key Tobacco Control Responsibilities to Third Parties
The EU outsources tobacco control responsibilities to non-elected bodies, causing concerns over accountability and potential conflicts of interest.

The European Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (ETHRA) has stated that the EU has outsourced key responsibilities for tobacco control to unelected organizations. ETHRA coordinates the actions of consumer groups and advocacy organizations throughout Europe. The organization warns that this has raised concerns about accountability and potential conflicts of interest.


EU officials had issued a tender notice for the "Support Action for the Tobacco Control Sector Single Framework Contract" earlier. Recently, they announced that the process has been completed and three contractors have been appointed.


The Spanish research and consultancy firm, Open Evidence, ...


The European Network for Smoking Prevention (ENSP)


Crete University


ETHRA has released a publicly available report which states that as part of their contribution, they will lead an "international consortium". This consortium will include the UK's ICF consultancy company, Brussels-based Milieu legal and policy consultancy, and Vital Strategies funded by Michael Bloomberg.


According to the Consumer Association, the contract will last for four years and is worth 3 million euros (approximately 22.03 million yuan).


According to the statement from ETHRA, the contractor's job will include:


Gather scientific literature, research, or clinical evaluations related to one or more tobacco or nicotine themes.


2. Statistical, market, and measurement analyses related to one or more tobacco or nicotine themes.


Tobacco Control Policy Model,


Behavioral research and analysis of specific issues.


Support for comprehensive health warnings,


Support for tobacco and related product labelling and packaging.


7. Restrictions on ingredients and related content/emission standards.


Support technological investment in information system development.


Conduct a legal assessment for the tobacco control measures of the European Union, countries, and international organizations.


The European Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (ETHRA) stated that the introductory notes in the tender specifications of the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HaDEA) provide the legislative background of the EU's tobacco control policies, with the goal of achieving a "smoke-free tobacco generation" by 2040.


To achieve this goal, the plan is to revise the Tobacco Products Directive, which includes measures such as "implementing plain packaging and banning flavors in a completely transparent manner, improving the evaluation of ingredients through existing EU institutions, expanding taxes to new tobacco products, and addressing tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship on the internet and social media.


According to the author of the document, there are concerns about the regulatory framework of the European Union. Currently, there is no systematic approach to dealing with all new tobacco and emerging products, and there is also a lack of flexibility to address rapidly developing products.


Advocates for reducing the harm of tobacco in Europe say, "This appears to be a daunting task for contractors. More importantly, it signifies that the policy-making responsibilities of the European Commission are now being outsourced to third parties. Accountability issues arise as well: when EU member states receive proposals to amend existing legislation, how do they know which proposals come from responsible officials and what role external actors played in shaping EU legislation?


Another issue is the potential conflict of interest with the winning bidder group. Of course, when it comes to the tobacco industry, they have a responsibility to declare that they have no conflict of interest in the tobacco industry. However, their work may have potential conflicts with other industries, such as the pharmaceutical industry that we may not be aware of.


References:


Efforts to Lobby on Behalf of Tobacco Industry The European Union (EU) has been found to be subcontracting its efforts to control tobacco, potentially undermining efforts to combat smoking. Investigations have discovered that the EU is employing companies which have links to the tobacco industry, leading to allegations of lobbying on behalf of the sector. The subcontractors are tasked with implementing tobacco control policies to be carried out across EU member states. Critics have voiced concern that this conflict of interest could threaten progress in reducing rates of smoking across Europe.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has revised the rules under Import Alert 98-07 to incorporate its May 2026 enforcement-priority policy for certain electronic nicotine delivery systems marketed without premarket authorization. The alert continues to allow detention without physical examination, or DWPE, for ENDS lacking required marketing authorization, while directing field divisions to apply the May risk-based framework. When necessary, detention or refusal decisions must also undergo review by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Products including PACHA and Vuse Pro have already emerged as industry examples of the May policy, although enforcement discretion does not constitute FDA marketing authorization.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UK Vape Tax Countdown: Retailer Vape HQ Estimates 100ml E-liquid Prices Could Rise From £12.99 to £39.39, While Pod Kits Increase Less Than 10%
UK Vape Tax Countdown: Retailer Vape HQ Estimates 100ml E-liquid Prices Could Rise From £12.99 to £39.39, While Pod Kits Increase Less Than 10%
The UK’s Vaping Products Duty (VPD), scheduled to take effect in October 2026, is prompting retailers to assess how different vape categories may be affected. UK retailer Vape HQ has estimated potential price changes under the new volume-based tax system, showing that 100ml shortfill e-liquids could see prices rise from around £12.99 to £39.39, a 203% increase, while 2ml prefilled pod vape kits could rise from £5.99 to £6.52, an increase of about 9%. The estimates highlight how a volume-based tax structure creates uneven cost impacts across product categories.
Aug.19
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s state of Victoria has activated new powers allowing Tobacco Licensing Victoria and police to shut premises suspected of selling, supplying or possessing illicit tobacco for up to 90 days. Longer closures can be ordered by a magistrates’ court. Businesses subject to closure orders must generally cease all trading and will be placed on a public list. Breaching a closure order can carry penalties of up to A$2.5 million and 20 years in prison.
Sep.10
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Japan Tobacco (JT) will launch MEVIUS Tropical Option, a new tobacco stick for Ploom, nationwide in Japan from October 6, 2026. The capsule-format product combines mango-oriented sweetness with menthol cooling, adding a tropical flavor to the MEVIUS Ploom tobacco-stick lineup for the first time. Each pack contains 20 sticks and will launch at JPY 590. The product is compatible with all Ploom devices, and its addition will expand the Ploom tobacco-stick portfolio to 32 variants.
Sep.08
NAS 2026 | FDA CTP Director Says PMTA Pathway Is “Predicated on Tobacco Harm Reduction”
NAS 2026 | FDA CTP Director Says PMTA Pathway Is “Predicated on Tobacco Harm Reduction”
At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, FDA Center for Tobacco Products Director Bret Koplow said the PMTA pathway is “predicated on tobacco harm reduction.” He outlined four CTP priorities: youth prevention, helping adults quit or switch to lower-risk products, improving relative-risk communication, and reducing unauthorized products. Koplow also addressed flavored e-cigarettes, public risk perceptions, industry credibility and efforts to make PMTA reviews more efficient and predictable.
Sep.26