EU Outsources Key Tobacco Control Responsibilities to Third Parties

Feb.27.2023
EU Outsources Key Tobacco Control Responsibilities to Third Parties
The EU outsources tobacco control responsibilities to non-elected bodies, causing concerns over accountability and potential conflicts of interest.

The European Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (ETHRA) has stated that the EU has outsourced key responsibilities for tobacco control to unelected organizations. ETHRA coordinates the actions of consumer groups and advocacy organizations throughout Europe. The organization warns that this has raised concerns about accountability and potential conflicts of interest.


EU officials had issued a tender notice for the "Support Action for the Tobacco Control Sector Single Framework Contract" earlier. Recently, they announced that the process has been completed and three contractors have been appointed.


The Spanish research and consultancy firm, Open Evidence, ...


The European Network for Smoking Prevention (ENSP)


Crete University


ETHRA has released a publicly available report which states that as part of their contribution, they will lead an "international consortium". This consortium will include the UK's ICF consultancy company, Brussels-based Milieu legal and policy consultancy, and Vital Strategies funded by Michael Bloomberg.


According to the Consumer Association, the contract will last for four years and is worth 3 million euros (approximately 22.03 million yuan).


According to the statement from ETHRA, the contractor's job will include:


Gather scientific literature, research, or clinical evaluations related to one or more tobacco or nicotine themes.


2. Statistical, market, and measurement analyses related to one or more tobacco or nicotine themes.


Tobacco Control Policy Model,


Behavioral research and analysis of specific issues.


Support for comprehensive health warnings,


Support for tobacco and related product labelling and packaging.


7. Restrictions on ingredients and related content/emission standards.


Support technological investment in information system development.


Conduct a legal assessment for the tobacco control measures of the European Union, countries, and international organizations.


The European Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates (ETHRA) stated that the introductory notes in the tender specifications of the European Health and Digital Executive Agency (HaDEA) provide the legislative background of the EU's tobacco control policies, with the goal of achieving a "smoke-free tobacco generation" by 2040.


To achieve this goal, the plan is to revise the Tobacco Products Directive, which includes measures such as "implementing plain packaging and banning flavors in a completely transparent manner, improving the evaluation of ingredients through existing EU institutions, expanding taxes to new tobacco products, and addressing tobacco advertising, promotion, and sponsorship on the internet and social media.


According to the author of the document, there are concerns about the regulatory framework of the European Union. Currently, there is no systematic approach to dealing with all new tobacco and emerging products, and there is also a lack of flexibility to address rapidly developing products.


Advocates for reducing the harm of tobacco in Europe say, "This appears to be a daunting task for contractors. More importantly, it signifies that the policy-making responsibilities of the European Commission are now being outsourced to third parties. Accountability issues arise as well: when EU member states receive proposals to amend existing legislation, how do they know which proposals come from responsible officials and what role external actors played in shaping EU legislation?


Another issue is the potential conflict of interest with the winning bidder group. Of course, when it comes to the tobacco industry, they have a responsibility to declare that they have no conflict of interest in the tobacco industry. However, their work may have potential conflicts with other industries, such as the pharmaceutical industry that we may not be aware of.


References:


Efforts to Lobby on Behalf of Tobacco Industry The European Union (EU) has been found to be subcontracting its efforts to control tobacco, potentially undermining efforts to combat smoking. Investigations have discovered that the EU is employing companies which have links to the tobacco industry, leading to allegations of lobbying on behalf of the sector. The subcontractors are tasked with implementing tobacco control policies to be carried out across EU member states. Critics have voiced concern that this conflict of interest could threaten progress in reducing rates of smoking across Europe.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippine lawmakers are considering an overhaul of the country's vape excise-tax regime to eliminate the wide gap between taxes on nicotine salt and freebase nicotine liquids and reduce incentives for misdeclaration. House Bill 5364, filed by Rep. Rufus Rodriguez and Rep. Maximo Rodriguez Jr., would impose a unified ₱10-per-milliliter tax on vapor products, with 5% annual increases beginning in 2027. Rodriguez says the proposal could generate an average ₱6 billion in annual collections from 2027 through 2030. The debate comes as the Philippine government considers tobacco, vape and other health-tax reforms to help offset around ₱66 billion in revenue expected to be forgone under a proposed tax-relief package.
Aug.18
Nearly Half of Seoul Vape Vending Machines Bypassed by Fake IDs, Raising Youth Access Concerns
Nearly Half of Seoul Vape Vending Machines Bypassed by Fake IDs, Raising Youth Access Concerns
Seoul city authorities inspected 339 tobacco vending machines at e-cigarette retailers and found that 168, or 49.5%, allowed purchases using fake IDs, showing that unmanned retail terminals and adult-verification systems remain a major enforcement gap after e-cigarettes were brought under tobacco regulation.
Market
Jul.03 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UK Sets Oct. 29 Start for New Vape Retail Rules Covering Age Checks, Giveaways and Discounts
UK Sets Oct. 29 Start for New Vape Retail Rules Covering Age Checks, Giveaways and Discounts
The UK Department of Health and Social Care published new guidance on Aug. 11 outlining the next phase of retail rules under the Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026, which will take effect on Oct. 29, 2026. The measures extend the minimum age of sale of 18 to all vaping and consumer nicotine products and restrict proxy purchasing, promotional giveaways and substantial discounts. Relevant offences in England, Wales and Scotland may carry a £200 fixed penalty notice, while persistent offenders can face temporary sales bans.
Aug.12
French Vape Market Under Pressure as Europe’s First Listed Vape Company Kumulus Vape Reports 7.8% H1 Revenue Decline, Retail Sales Rise 41.5%
French Vape Market Under Pressure as Europe’s First Listed Vape Company Kumulus Vape Reports 7.8% H1 Revenue Decline, Retail Sales Rise 41.5%
Kumulus Vape, Europe’s first publicly listed vape company, reported a 7.8% year-on-year decline in first-half 2026 revenue. Amid changing conditions in France’s vape market, the company said channel diversification helped offset pressure, with physical store sales increasing 41.5% year on year. Listed on Euronext Access Paris in 2019 and later transferred to Euronext Growth Paris, Kumulus Vape is viewed as a representative company of Europe’s vape sector. Its performance highlights the industry’s shift from rapid expansion toward more operationally focused growth.
Jul.27
Virginia Tightens Vape and Tobacco Retail Enforcement, With Fines Up to $15,000 Per Unlisted Product
Virginia Tightens Vape and Tobacco Retail Enforcement, With Fines Up to $15,000 Per Unlisted Product
A new Virginia law that took effect on July 1, 2026, requires retailers to obtain permits to sell liquid nicotine, vape and tobacco products, while directing Virginia ABC to conduct inspections and verify that stores sell only products listed in the state directory.
Jul.20
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06