FDA Issues Marketing Denial Order for Logic Menthol E-cigarette Products

Oct.27.2022
FDA Issues Marketing Denial Order for Logic Menthol E-cigarette Products
FDA issues marketing refusal order for Logic Technology Development's menthol e-cigarette products.

The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued marketing denial orders (MDOs) for several mint-flavored electronic cigarette products sold by Logic Technology Development. These products include Logic Pro Menthol e-cigarette liquid packaging and Logic Power Menthol e-cigarette liquid packaging. This marks the first time the FDA has issued MDOs against menthol products after undergoing scientific review.


This move appears to align with regulatory agencies' goals of banning the use of menthol flavoring in tobacco products. It is expected that the FDA will not approve any flavored electronic cigarette products other than tobacco.


Ensuring that new tobacco products undergo pre-market assessments is a key part of the FDA's efforts to reduce tobacco-related diseases and deaths," said Brian King, director of the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) in a press release. "We remain committed to evaluating new tobacco products based on public health standards, which take into account the risks and benefits of these products for the entire population.


Gregory Conley, Director of Legislative and External Affairs at the American Vaping Association, told tobacco reporters that the FDA's recent ban on menthol-flavored e-cigarettes brings to mind their "fatal flaw" review of PMTAs, which resulted in millions of products being denied. The FDA uses the term "fatal flaw" to submit PMTAs without specific research, and it has been at the center of almost all lawsuits against the agency's PMTA process.


The dysfunction of the FDA is ongoing. Over the past year, the FDA has delayed making a decision on menthol-flavored e-cigarette products," said Conley. "To avoid giving the impression that the FDA is striving to find a balanced approach, they have revealed today that their grand plan for menthol-flavored e-cigarette products will follow the same 'fatal flaw' review process, which has led to dozens of lawsuits being filed against the agency.


After reviewing the premarket tobacco product application (PMTA) of the company, the FDA has determined that these applications "lack sufficient evidence to demonstrate that allowing the product to be marketed would be appropriate for protecting public health (APPH), the applicable standard required by the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.


The FDA stated that the evidence provided in the PMTA refused by Logic did not prove that mint-flavored electronic cigarettes are more effective in promoting "complete conversion or significant reduction in cigarette use" than tobacco-flavored electronic cigarettes.


Logic is now faced with the decision to either resubmit their application or submit a new application in order to address the issues with their MDO-restricted products. However, these actions may be futile as the FDA has stated that for non-tobacco flavored e-cigarettes, including mint-flavored e-cigarettes, "existing evidence indicates known significant risks in terms of youth appeal, uptake, and use.


The FDA conducts a rigorous and scientific review of pre-market tobacco product applications, evaluating data for each product to determine if it meets public health standards," said King. "In this case, the applicant did not provide sufficient scientific evidence to demonstrate that the potential benefits for adult smokers outweigh the risks for youth.


A manuscript of an upcoming article on nicotine and tobacco research has recently been received, which found that California's flavored electronic cigarette and other tobacco sales restrictions have not affected the use of electronic cigarettes among youths.


According to the organization, the MDO letter received by Logic today is not limited to the two products mentioned above. Generally, the FDA only publicly discloses the names of products that the applicant is marketing to avoid potential disclosure of confidential business information. Any product bound by MDO cannot be sold or distributed in the United States, otherwise the FDA may take enforcement action. Without risking enforcement action by the FDA, these products cannot be legally introduced into interstate commerce in the United States. In March, the FDA authorized several tobacco-flavored electronic cigarette products, including devices, under the company's Logic Vapeleaf, Logic Power, and Logic Pro brands.


Apart from ensuring that Logic complies with the directive, the FDA intends to ensure compliance from distributors and retailers. Specifically, the FDA has stated that any new tobacco products sold on the market without prior authorization are considered illegally sold, and their distribution or sale will be subject to enforcement action.


Recently, the United States Department of Justice on behalf of the FDA filed a motion for a permanent injunction against six e-cigarette manufacturers in a federal district court. These cases mark the first time the FDA has initiated injunction proceedings to enforce premarket review requirements for new tobacco products under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic (FD&C) Act.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry-related exchange and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article's content. The article's translation is only intended for industry communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in our translation ability, the translated article may not express the exact same meaning as the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on all domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright for compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Zhang Xiaotang Appointed Deputy Director of China’s Tobacco Regulator, Adding Another Finance-Background Official to Top Leadership
Zhang Xiaotang Appointed Deputy Director of China’s Tobacco Regulator, Adding Another Finance-Background Official to Top Leadership
China’s State Council has appointed Zhang Xiaotang as deputy director of the State Tobacco Monopoly Administration, with the regulator’s official website now listing him as a Party leadership group member and deputy director. Zhang previously led Hebei China Tobacco and earlier headed the STMA’s finance and audit department. His appointment follows the elevation earlier this year of former tax official Yao Laiying to head the STMA, adding another senior official with a strong fiscal or financial-management background to China Tobacco’s top leadership in 2026.
News
Sep.20
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
A Scottish government impact assessment estimates that proposed vape display and packaging rules could create up to £61 million ($82 million) in compliance costs for businesses, affecting more than 11,000 retail outlets. The estimated costs are mainly linked to inventory adjustments, retail storage changes and the resources required for businesses to understand and implement the new requirements. The measures form part of the UK’s broader efforts to tighten vape regulation, particularly around product displays, packaging and sales practices.
Aug.10
On-Site Report | After FDA Announces Review of PMTA Framework, CTP Director Details Reform Priorities
On-Site Report | After FDA Announces Review of PMTA Framework, CTP Director Details Reform Priorities
FDA CTP Director Bret Koplow used his FDLI keynote in Washington to outline how the agency is rethinking the PMTA framework. He discussed category-specific review, nicotine pouch and sPMTA pilots, AI-assisted review, a 70% reduction in pending applications, and a major staffing constraint: CTP currently has only nine scientific review teams. He also reaffirmed tobacco harm reduction while stressing youth protection, flavored products, risk communication, and the challenge of unauthorized e-cigarettes.
Regulations
Oct.06
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s Victoria Steps Up Illegal Tobacco Enforcement With Store Closures and Penalties of Up to A$2.5 Million
Australia’s state of Victoria has activated new powers allowing Tobacco Licensing Victoria and police to shut premises suspected of selling, supplying or possessing illicit tobacco for up to 90 days. Longer closures can be ordered by a magistrates’ court. Businesses subject to closure orders must generally cease all trading and will be placed on a public list. Breaching a closure order can carry penalties of up to A$2.5 million and 20 years in prison.
Sep.10
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
Multiple JTI-backed studies in the UK and Ireland indicate that illicit tobacco remains visible across consumer interactions and local markets. In the UK, JTI research found that 31% of respondents said they had been offered illicit tobacco products. In Ireland’s Ennis area, a JTI-commissioned empty pack survey found that 63% of sampled cigarette packs did not carry Irish duty-paid markings. The findings come from industry research rather than official government estimates of illicit tobacco market size, but highlight continued concerns among regulators, legitimate retailers and tobacco companies over illicit trade.
Aug.19
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
Retail Case Study | Wisconsin Vape Market One Year After New Regulations: Johnny Vapes Reports 80% Sales Decline as Consumers Shift Online and Across State Lines
According to WNCY on August 24, 2026, some independent vape retailers in Wisconsin say they have faced significant business pressure one year after new vape regulations took effect. Johnny Vapes, a retailer operating in northeast Wisconsin, said its store count fell from seven locations to four, sales declined by about 80%, and roughly 90% of its inventory was affected. Retailers said some consumers have shifted to online purchases or traveled to neighboring Michigan to buy vape products. The case highlights how local regulations can reshape retail operations, inventory management and consumer purchasing patterns.
Aug.28