FDA Issues MDO for Suorin and blu PLUS+ E-cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.22.2024
FDA Issues MDO for Suorin and blu PLUS+ E-cigarettes
FDA issues sales ban on Suorin and blu PLUS+ e-cigarette products due to lack of scientific evidence and public health standards.

On January 19th, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a Market Denial Order (MDO) against two e-cigarette products, Suorin and blu PLUS+, manufactured by Shenzhen Youme Information Technology Co. Ltd. and Fontem US, LLC respectively. This order prohibits the sale or distribution of these products in the American market, and failure to comply may result in enforcement actions by the FDA. Both companies may choose to submit new applications for these products that are subject to the restrictions imposed by the MDO.

 

The Director of the FDA Center for Tobacco Products, Dr. Brian King, stated, "Thorough scientific scrutiny of tobacco product applications is a crucial pillar of the FDA's comprehensive regulatory approach. Applicants are responsible for ensuring sufficient scientific evidence is included in their applications to meet the necessary public health standards mandated by law. In these cases, such evidence is lacking."

 

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) evaluates pre-market tobacco product applications (PMTAs) based on public health standards, which take into account the risks and benefits of the products for the entire population. After reviewing these companies' PMTAs, the FDA has determined that these applications lack sufficient evidence to demonstrate that allowing these products on the market would be beneficial for public health, as required by the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.

 

The rejected Suorin product is a refillable e-cigarette device called the Suorin Air, along with a refillable empty pod. Consumers have the option to fill the purchased e-cigarette liquid into the pod.

 

The FDA has stated that the application submitted by Niuwo Network Technology Co., Ltd. of Shenzhen lacks sufficient evidence regarding the responsibility for abuse. Abuse responsibility refers to the ability of tobacco products to promote sustained use and develop addictive and dependent behavior.

 

According to the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), 3.8% of middle and high school students who have used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days reported using Suorin brand products during this period.

 

The rejected blu PLUS+ product includes a battery and several pre-filled e-cigarette liquids.

 

blu PLUS+ batteries blu PLUS+® Carolina Bold 2.0 blu PLUS+® Classic Tobacco 1.2 blu PLUS+® Classic Tobacco 2.4 blu PLUS+® Gold Leaf 1.2 blu PLUS+® Gold Leaf 2.4 blu PLUS+® Menthol 1.2 blu PLUS+® Menthol 2.4 Apart from other deficiencies in the application, Fontem US, LLC failed to provide sufficient ingredient information, harmful and potentially harmful constituent (HPHC) yields, and misuse liability information.

 

Furthermore, the applicants have also failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove that the potential benefits of this new flavored product for adult smokers, in terms of complete smoking cessation or significant reduction in tobacco use, outweigh the risks for teenagers. According to a 2023 investigation conducted in New York State, 6.0% of middle and high school students who had used e-cigarettes in the past 30 days reported using blu brand products during this period.

 

The FDA has also issued a Medical Device Order (MDO) for other blu PLUS+ products that were not mentioned above. The FDA has only disclosed the product names that have been currently approved by either the FDA or the manufacturer, in order to avoid revealing confidential business information.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

BENDSTA Urges Prime Minister to Review Bangladesh’s 2025 Tobacco Control Ordinance
BENDSTA Urges Prime Minister to Review Bangladesh’s 2025 Tobacco Control Ordinance
The Bangladesh Electronic Nicotine Delivery System Traders Association (BENDSTA) has urged the prime minister to initiate a comprehensive parliamentary review of the Smoking and Tobacco Products Use (Control) Ordinance, 2025.
Mar.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
New York’s Lawsuit Against Puff Bar and Other Flavored Vape Companies Survives Key Court Challenge
According to Law360, a federal judge ruled that makers and distributors of flavored vape brands such as Puff Bar cannot escape New York’s lawsuit seeking to hold them responsible for the youth vaping epidemic. The court found that the state had adequately alleged the companies misrepresented how safe vaping is.
Apr.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Military Smoking Debate Spotlights E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches as a “Bridge”
U.S. Military Smoking Debate Spotlights E-Cigarettes and Nicotine Pouches as a “Bridge”
At a policy forum hosted by The Hill and sponsored by PMI US, U.S. defense health officials, lawmakers and industry representatives discussed tobacco use in the military and explored the potential role of smoke-free nicotine products — including e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches — as transitional tools to help service members reduce reliance on combustible cigarettes.
PMI
Mar.23
NYC makers turn discarded disposable vapes into “Vape Synth” mini digital instruments
NYC makers turn discarded disposable vapes into “Vape Synth” mini digital instruments
The report says disposable vapes are sold at more than 11 million units per month and often end up in landfills after flavored nicotine juice runs out, along with lithium-ion batteries, microcontrollers, and LEDs, increasing the risk of waste fires. A New York City maker trio known as Paper Bag Team has built “Vape Synth” by cracking open spent Elf Bar cartridges—specifically the EB BC5000—and hacking them into tiny digital instruments.
Feb.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian Vape Industry Proposes State Monopoly on E-Liquid Production as Alternative to Ban
Russian Vape Industry Proposes State Monopoly on E-Liquid Production as Alternative to Ban
Russian business groups are trying to persuade the authorities to abandon plans to ban the sale of e-cigarettes and related liquids at both the federal and regional levels.
Apr.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report|Reynolds’ 337 Patent Case Ends, but a Harsher 337 Compliance Battle Now Targets the Entire Vape Supply Chain
Special Report|Reynolds’ 337 Patent Case Ends, but a Harsher 337 Compliance Battle Now Targets the Entire Vape Supply Chain
The U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) has terminated Investigation 337-TA-1410 after invalidating key vape patent claims asserted by R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company, removing the immediate risk of import bans for dozens of companies. However, a new case—337-TA-1486—has already opened a more consequential legal front, shifting the focus from patent disputes to regulatory compliance across the vape supply chain, including PACT Act reporting, tax compliance, and FDA marketing authorization.
BAT
Mar.11