FDA Issues Marketing Denial Order for 22 SMOK E-cigarette Products

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.17.2024
FDA Issues Marketing Denial Order for 22 SMOK E-cigarette Products
The US FDA has issued a Marketing Denial Order for 22 SMOK brand e-cigarette products from Shenzhen IVPS Technology Co., Ltd.

On January 16th, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Marketing Denial Orders (MDOs) against 22 SMOK brand e-cigarette products from Shenzhen IVPS Technology Co., Ltd, based in Shenzhen, China. The products that were denied marketing approval included devices, e-liquid cartridges, atomizers, and pods, which are marketed as part of the e-cigarette system but do not contain e-cigarette e-liquid.

 

The FDA explained that the company is prohibited from promoting or distributing these products in the US market, or else they will face enforcement actions by the FDA. After reviewing the company's PMTAs, the FDA concluded that these applications lack sufficient evidence to demonstrate that allowing these products to enter the market would be appropriate for public health, as required by the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Specifically, the applicants failed to provide sufficient data to describe ingredient release, product stability, and product misuse risks.

 

The rejected SMOK e-cigarette products did not come with e-cigarette liquid. Consumers are required to separately purchase and add their own e-cigarette liquid to the device. Therefore, these SMOK products have the potential to be used with any e-cigarette liquid available on the market, including both tobacco and non-tobacco flavors. According to the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), SMOK is reported as the sixth most popular brand among teenage e-cigarette users, with 11.3% of high school students reporting use of SMOK products in the past 30 days.

 

Dr. Brian King, Director of the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) at the FDA, stated:

 

Science serves as the foundation of the FDA tobacco product review process, and CTP remains committed to evaluating tobacco products based on public health standards, taking into consideration the risks and benefits posed by such products to the entire population. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide sufficient scientific evidence to demonstrate that the introduction of a new tobacco product into the market is appropriate for safeguarding public health. In this particular case, the applicant failed to provide this evidence.

 

After undergoing rigorous scientific scrutiny by the FDA, tobacco products that receive a Marketing Denial Order (MDO) are prohibited from being introduced or delivered into interstate commerce. If these products are currently being sold on the market, they must be withdrawn. The manufacturers, distributors, and retailers selling or distributing these products in interstate markets will be in violation of the law and may face enforcement actions. The FDA provides the latest information on MDOs, including updates or changes, such as revocations or relevant court rulings, on its Tobacco Product Marketing Orders webpage. However, companies can submit new applications for products that are subject to these MDOs.

 

The FDA also stated that this action is part of its ongoing efforts to ensure that all new tobacco products cannot be legally marketed until they have undergone science-based evaluation and obtained FDA marketing authorization.

 

Since 2020, the FDA has received over 26 million applications for products and has made decisions on 99% of these applications. So far, the FDA has authorized 23 e-cigarette products and devices with tobacco flavors. To enable retailers, consumers, and others to know which products can be legally marketed, the FDA has provided a list of e-cigarette products and devices that have obtained marketing authorization orders (MGOs). Additionally, the FDA has rejected the marketing applications for millions of products that failed to meet the necessary public health standards required by law.

 

The following is a list of products that have been issued MDOs:

 

  • SMOK OSUB ONE Device
  • SMOK OSUB ONE RPM Cartridge
  • SMOK RPM DC 0.8 Ω MTL Atomizer
  • SMOK OSUB ONE RPM Cartridge 3 Pack
  • SMOK RPM DC 0.8 Ω MTL Atomizer 5 Pack
  • SMOK Nfix Device
  • Nfix DC 0.8 Ω MTL Pod
  • SMOK POZZ Device
  • SMOK POZZ DC 0.8 Ω Pod
  • SMOK RPM 40 Device
  • SMOK RPM Empty Standard Cartridge
  • SMOK RPM Empty Nord Cartridge
  • SMOK RPM Mesh 0.4 Ω Atomizer
  • SMOK Nord DC 0.8 Ω MTL Atomizer
  • SMOK SCAR-P3 Device
  • SMOK SCAR-P3 Empty RPM 2 Cartridge
  • SMOK SCAR-P3 Empty RPM Cartridge
  • SMOK PRM 2 Mesh 0.16 Ω Atomizer
  • SMOK RPM Mesh 0.4 Ω Atomizer
  • SMOK Nord 2 Device
  • SMOK Nord 2 RPM Cartridge
  • SMOK Nord 2 Nord Cartridge

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Cochrane 2026 Update Adds Nine Trials, Keeps High-Certainty Finding That Nicotine E-Cigarettes Improve Quit Rates Over NRT
Cochrane 2026 Update Adds Nine Trials, Keeps High-Certainty Finding That Nicotine E-Cigarettes Improve Quit Rates Over NRT
Cochrane’s 2026 update of its living review on electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation included 80 randomized controlled trials involving 29,861 adult smokers, with nine trials added in this update. The review retained its high-certainty conclusion that nicotine e-cigarettes increase smoking cessation rates compared with nicotine replacement therapy. In absolute terms, about 10 in 100 people using nicotine e-cigarettes may quit smoking for at least six months, compared with about 6 in 100 using NRT. The review found no clear difference in serious adverse event rates between the two groups, while longer-term safety and the relative effectiveness of newer device types remain less certain.
Sep.07
Why AIRSCREAM Built its European Production Hub for Regulated Market Growth
Why AIRSCREAM Built its European Production Hub for Regulated Market Growth
AIRSCREAM’s production hub in the Czech Republic brings nicotine pouch manufacturing, e-liquid bottling, product documentation, warehousing and international logistics into one operation, giving brands and commercial partners a practical platform from which to launch, expand and enter new markets.
Market
Sep.16 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Special Report|From CrossBar 20K to 6-Methyl Nicotine KUMI: Two Routes Into U.S. State Vape Directories?
Special Report|From CrossBar 20K to 6-Methyl Nicotine KUMI: Two Routes Into U.S. State Vape Directories?
Several U.S. states have incorporated the September 9, 2020 PMTA filing deadline into eligibility rules for certain vaping products. CrossBar 20K drew attention after appearing on Pennsylvania's 163-entry directory. A broader 2Firsts investigation found that related registration businesses also listed KUMI and CROSSBAR SIX products, with 171 KUMI-related entries across Louisiana, Nebraska and Wisconsin. Corporate records link Scott Silverman to Blue Nine LLC and VR Products I LLC. PMTA compliance expert Mr. K said historical applications and nicotine-analogue products may offer two different approaches to state-directory access.
Regulations
Oct.26
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Documents obtained by 2Firsts show that Sweden's Public Health Agency ordered Swedish Match to revise ingredient labels beyond the five ZYN products inspected. The dispute centers on whether flavoring ingredients must be individually disclosed, with Swedish Match citing trade-secret protection and the regulator insisting on full ingredient disclosure. The company faces a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. As of October 22, the agency had received no appeal, despite the company's stated intention to challenge the decision.
Oct.22
U.S. Rep. Krishnamoorthi Questions FDA Over Planned PMTA Rewrite, Seeks Communications With Altria and Reynolds
U.S. Rep. Krishnamoorthi Questions FDA Over Planned PMTA Rewrite, Seeks Communications With Altria and Reynolds
U.S. Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi on Oct. 6 questioned the FDA over its plan to reassess and potentially replace the 2021 PMTA regulatory framework, asking the agency to identify provisions it may change or eliminate, state whether current scientific evidentiary standards will be maintained, and disclose communications with Altria, Reynolds and other parties challenging the rule. Krishnamoorthi led a congressional investigation into JUUL and youth vaping in 2019 and has since remained active on e-cigarette regulation and enforcement.
Regulations
Oct.08