FDA Issues Marketing Denial Order for 22 SMOK E-cigarette Products

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.17.2024
FDA Issues Marketing Denial Order for 22 SMOK E-cigarette Products
The US FDA has issued a Marketing Denial Order for 22 SMOK brand e-cigarette products from Shenzhen IVPS Technology Co., Ltd.

On January 16th, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued Marketing Denial Orders (MDOs) against 22 SMOK brand e-cigarette products from Shenzhen IVPS Technology Co., Ltd, based in Shenzhen, China. The products that were denied marketing approval included devices, e-liquid cartridges, atomizers, and pods, which are marketed as part of the e-cigarette system but do not contain e-cigarette e-liquid.

 

The FDA explained that the company is prohibited from promoting or distributing these products in the US market, or else they will face enforcement actions by the FDA. After reviewing the company's PMTAs, the FDA concluded that these applications lack sufficient evidence to demonstrate that allowing these products to enter the market would be appropriate for public health, as required by the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Specifically, the applicants failed to provide sufficient data to describe ingredient release, product stability, and product misuse risks.

 

The rejected SMOK e-cigarette products did not come with e-cigarette liquid. Consumers are required to separately purchase and add their own e-cigarette liquid to the device. Therefore, these SMOK products have the potential to be used with any e-cigarette liquid available on the market, including both tobacco and non-tobacco flavors. According to the 2023 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), SMOK is reported as the sixth most popular brand among teenage e-cigarette users, with 11.3% of high school students reporting use of SMOK products in the past 30 days.

 

Dr. Brian King, Director of the Center for Tobacco Products (CTP) at the FDA, stated:

 

Science serves as the foundation of the FDA tobacco product review process, and CTP remains committed to evaluating tobacco products based on public health standards, taking into consideration the risks and benefits posed by such products to the entire population. It is the responsibility of the applicant to provide sufficient scientific evidence to demonstrate that the introduction of a new tobacco product into the market is appropriate for safeguarding public health. In this particular case, the applicant failed to provide this evidence.

 

After undergoing rigorous scientific scrutiny by the FDA, tobacco products that receive a Marketing Denial Order (MDO) are prohibited from being introduced or delivered into interstate commerce. If these products are currently being sold on the market, they must be withdrawn. The manufacturers, distributors, and retailers selling or distributing these products in interstate markets will be in violation of the law and may face enforcement actions. The FDA provides the latest information on MDOs, including updates or changes, such as revocations or relevant court rulings, on its Tobacco Product Marketing Orders webpage. However, companies can submit new applications for products that are subject to these MDOs.

 

The FDA also stated that this action is part of its ongoing efforts to ensure that all new tobacco products cannot be legally marketed until they have undergone science-based evaluation and obtained FDA marketing authorization.

 

Since 2020, the FDA has received over 26 million applications for products and has made decisions on 99% of these applications. So far, the FDA has authorized 23 e-cigarette products and devices with tobacco flavors. To enable retailers, consumers, and others to know which products can be legally marketed, the FDA has provided a list of e-cigarette products and devices that have obtained marketing authorization orders (MGOs). Additionally, the FDA has rejected the marketing applications for millions of products that failed to meet the necessary public health standards required by law.

 

The following is a list of products that have been issued MDOs:

 

  • SMOK OSUB ONE Device
  • SMOK OSUB ONE RPM Cartridge
  • SMOK RPM DC 0.8 Ω MTL Atomizer
  • SMOK OSUB ONE RPM Cartridge 3 Pack
  • SMOK RPM DC 0.8 Ω MTL Atomizer 5 Pack
  • SMOK Nfix Device
  • Nfix DC 0.8 Ω MTL Pod
  • SMOK POZZ Device
  • SMOK POZZ DC 0.8 Ω Pod
  • SMOK RPM 40 Device
  • SMOK RPM Empty Standard Cartridge
  • SMOK RPM Empty Nord Cartridge
  • SMOK RPM Mesh 0.4 Ω Atomizer
  • SMOK Nord DC 0.8 Ω MTL Atomizer
  • SMOK SCAR-P3 Device
  • SMOK SCAR-P3 Empty RPM 2 Cartridge
  • SMOK SCAR-P3 Empty RPM Cartridge
  • SMOK PRM 2 Mesh 0.16 Ω Atomizer
  • SMOK RPM Mesh 0.4 Ω Atomizer
  • SMOK Nord 2 Device
  • SMOK Nord 2 RPM Cartridge
  • SMOK Nord 2 Nord Cartridge

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

State Attorneys General Urge Visa, Mastercard and Others to Stop Processing Illicit E-Cigarette Transactions
State Attorneys General Urge Visa, Mastercard and Others to Stop Processing Illicit E-Cigarette Transactions
Fourteen U.S. state attorneys general sent a joint letter dated April 14, 2026 to Visa, Mastercard, American Express and Discover, asking them to immediately help stop the sale of illicit e-cigarette products by cutting off payment access.
Apr.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Disposable Vape Ban Shifts Purchasing Formats as UK Vape Volume Falls 10.3%
Disposable Vape Ban Shifts Purchasing Formats as UK Vape Volume Falls 10.3%
Data from convenience insight agency Talysis shows that the value of tobacco, vapes and smoking alternatives in the independent convenience sector fell by 4.4% in the first quarter of 2026, while volume fell by 7.8%. The vaping subcategory declined by 3.9% in value and 10.3% in volume over the same period. Talysis said the impact of the disposable vape ban continues to pressure turnover and footfall.
May.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philip Morris Says Its Smoke-Free Transition in Spain Now Has Economic Impact Above EUR 3.3 Billion
Philip Morris Says Its Smoke-Free Transition in Spain Now Has Economic Impact Above EUR 3.3 Billion
Philip Morris said it is accelerating its transition toward smoke-free products in Spain and claimed that the related economic impact now exceeds EUR 3.3 billion. Philip Morris also said that more than 90% of nicotine consumption in Spain still comes from conventional cigarettes, leaving room for growth in smoke-free categories, while regulation and taxation remain major obstacles in its view.
Apr.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Namibia Moves to Tighten Laws on E-Cigarettes and Emerging Nicotine Products
Namibia Moves to Tighten Laws on E-Cigarettes and Emerging Nicotine Products
Namibia is moving to tighten regulation of e-cigarettes and other emerging nicotine products as part of broader tobacco control efforts. Deputy health minister Susan Ndjaleka said the government is reviewing the Tobacco Products Control Act to close regulatory gaps and address emerging tobacco products. Namibia is also working toward joining the Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products in order to curb the black market and protect public revenue.
Apr.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Tobacco Farming in the New Nicotine Era: Why Indian Farmers Struggle to Transition — Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Tobacco Farming in the New Nicotine Era: Why Indian Farmers Struggle to Transition — Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
In this contributed article to 2Firsts, Mumbai-based journalist and harm reduction advocate Samrat Chowdhery examines India’s tobacco transition from the perspective of agriculture, supply chains and regulation. As noted by 2Firsts, India offers a relevant case for understanding how new nicotine technologies may affect not only consumption, trade and policy, but also tobacco farming.
Special Report
May.29
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai