FDA Issues Sales Ban on Vuse Solo Menthol E-Cigarette Products

Mar.18.2023
FDA Issues Sales Ban on Vuse Solo Menthol E-Cigarette Products
The FDA bans two Vuse Solo menthol e-cigarette products due to lack of evidence supporting their public health benefit.

On March 17th, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a ban on the sale of two menthol-flavored e-cigarette products from the Vuse Solo brand owned by Reynolds American Inc. The ban is applicable to "Vuse Replacement Cartridge Menthol 4.8% G1" and "Vuse Replacement Cartridge Menthol 4.8% G2".


Currently, Renault is not allowed to sell these products in the United States or they will face enforcement action from the FDA. However, the company can resubmit an application to address the product defects involved in the MDO constraints.


The FDA has requested that applicants disclose whether mint-flavored e-cigarettes are more beneficial compared to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.


The FDA evaluates tobacco products for public health standards before they can be marketed through a Pre-Market Tobacco Application (PMTA). Upon reviewing the company's PMTA, the FDA determined that the application lacked sufficient evidence to prove that allowing the product to be sold would be in the best interest of public health, as required by the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Specifically, the evidence presented by the applicant did not demonstrate that mint-flavored e-cigarettes were less harmful to the adult smoking population compared to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.


Existing evidence, including data from the 2022 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), suggests that non-tobacco flavored e-cigarettes, including mint-flavored e-cigarettes, pose significant risks in terms of attraction, intake, and use among youths. In contrast, data indicates that tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes do not have the same appeal to young people and therefore do not pose the same risks. Given these existing differences in youth risks, the applicant needs to provide strong evidence to demonstrate that the use of their mint-flavored e-cigarette products can greatly reduce cigarette use among adult smokers compared to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.


According to data from The New York Times, Vuse is the second most popular brand among teenage e-cigarette users. The FDA aims to ensure not only that the manufacturers comply, but also that the distributors and retailers comply. Retailers who have any doubts about their inventory should contact Reynolds.


This is not the first action taken by the FDA.


This recent action is just one of many taken by the FDA to ensure that tobacco products sold in the United States undergo scientific review and receive PMTA approval. So far, the agency has received over 26 million PMTA applications and has made decisions on 99% of them. Currently, the FDA has approved 23 flavored electronic cigarettes for sale or distribution in the United States, which are the only ones allowed on the market legally.


The FDA has also rejected millions of non-compliant marketing applications, including 10 non-tobacco-flavored e-cigarette pods under the Vuse Solo brand. On January 24 of this year, the FDA also issued marketing bans (MODs) for two products by Reynolds American Inc., including the Vuse Vibe Tank Menthol 3.0% and Vuse Ciro Cartridge Menthol 1.5%.


In October 2022, the FDA issued an MDO (Modified Risk Order) for several mint-flavored e-cigarette products sold by Logic Technology Development. This was the first time the FDA had issued an MDO for products containing menthol after undergoing scientific review. However, a few days later, Logic received an order from the US Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which temporarily suspended the MDO's enforcement.


References:


The FDA has refused to allow two Vuse Solo menthol e-cigarette products to be marketed.


Related reading:


The FDA has announced that it has rendered decisions on 99% of the PMTA applications for electronic cigarettes, and intends to review the remaining popular products by the end of the year.


The FDA issues a marketing refusal order for two Vuse products.


Renault, a tobacco company owned by British American Tobacco, plans to appeal against the marketing ban imposed by the FDA.


The FDA has filed civil lawsuits and imposed fines against four electronic cigarette liquid manufacturers for the first time.


The FDA has scheduled a public hearing on April 12th to discuss the creation of new regulations for the manufacturing of tobacco products.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
Germany Probes 7.6 Million Illegal Vape Case With Estimated €33.3 Million Tax Loss; Four Chinese Manufacturer Employees Under Investigation, Some Packaging in Enforcement Images Resembles FUMOT Products
Germany Probes 7.6 Million Illegal Vape Case With Estimated €33.3 Million Tax Loss; Four Chinese Manufacturer Employees Under Investigation, Some Packaging in Enforcement Images Resembles FUMOT Products
German prosecutors and customs authorities are conducting a criminal investigation into an alleged cross-border organised vape network. Authorities say that between January 2024 and March 2025, four employees of an unnamed Chinese e-cigarette manufacturer allegedly built a network of sales agents and wholesalers that brought more than 7.6 million nicotine disposable vapes into Germany, causing an estimated €33.3 million in excise-tax losses. The manufacturer has not been named. Some products visible in enforcement images have packaging resembling products from FUMOT’s portfolio. European regulatory records from 2024, FUMOT’s public overseas-sales materials and records involving German vape importer and distribution company Zamu-Pro GmbH also show FUMOT/RandM products and German distribution activity during the period covered by the investigation.
Sep.21
Product | JNR Launches Crown Shisha 100K for International Wholesale, Pairing 58ml Capacity With Triple-Mesh DTL Design
Product | JNR Launches Crown Shisha 100K for International Wholesale, Pairing 58ml Capacity With Triple-Mesh DTL Design
JNR released the Crown Shisha 100K on August 14, 2026, positioning the ultra-high-capacity disposable around a direct-to-lung (DTL) e-shisha experience. The device combines a 58ml e-liquid capacity, triple 1.0Ω mesh coils and a 1,300mAh rechargeable battery, with JNR claiming up to 100,000 puffs. Adjustable airflow, battery and e-liquid status displays, a leather-style exterior and a shisha-inspired sound effect further differentiate the product. JNR is currently promoting the device through international wholesale and distribution channels, while a specific first retail market has not been disclosed.
Aug.31
Japan Survey Finds 49.5% Would Cut Tobacco Use if Prices Rise, 64.6% Show Interest in Nicotine-Free Alternatives
Japan Survey Finds 49.5% Would Cut Tobacco Use if Prices Rise, 64.6% Show Interest in Nicotine-Free Alternatives
A September online survey commissioned by Japanese smoking-accessories company Lightec found that 49.5% of respondents would consider reducing tobacco use if prices rose further, while 25.1% would consider switching to cheaper brands and 14.5% would consider using or combining alternatives such as vapes and nicotine-free herbal sticks. Another 64.6% expressed some level of interest in such alternatives. The survey covered 1,088 respondents aged 20 to 70 and was conducted by a company that sells NICOLESS nicotine-free vaping and herbal-stick products, meaning its findings should not be treated as representative of Japan's smoking population.
DATA
Oct.12
Product | JTI Launches Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop in South Korea, Its First Dual-Color Edition
Product | JTI Launches Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop in South Korea, Its First Dual-Color Edition
JTI Korea launched the Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop limited edition in South Korea on September 1, 2026, marking the first dual-color design in the Ploom AURA range. The device combines a dark green body with teal accents and is accompanied by matching Front Panel, Back Cover and Pocket Bag accessories. The standalone device is priced at KRW 29,000, with three additional device-and-accessory bundles available. The release continues JTI Korea's use of limited colorways and interchangeable accessories to expand the Ploom AURA portfolio without introducing a new hardware platform.
Sep.03
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
Special Report | Altria Subsidiaries Sue FDA to Vacate 2021 PMTA Rule as Agency Moves to Speed Reviews
2Firsts reviewed the original federal court complaint filed by Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY on Sept. 2 challenging FDA’s 2021 PMTA rule. The lawsuit questions whether FDA’s review process complies with the Tobacco Control Act’s 180-day timeline, even as the agency moves to accelerate PMTA reviews and issues more marketing orders. Drawing on the complaint, FDA records, government audits and recent court rulings, 2Firsts examines the legal arguments, supporting evidence and potential implications for the U.S. tobacco review system.
Regulations
Sep.03