FDA Issues Sales Ban on Vuse Solo Menthol E-Cigarette Products

Mar.18.2023
FDA Issues Sales Ban on Vuse Solo Menthol E-Cigarette Products
The FDA bans two Vuse Solo menthol e-cigarette products due to lack of evidence supporting their public health benefit.

On March 17th, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a ban on the sale of two menthol-flavored e-cigarette products from the Vuse Solo brand owned by Reynolds American Inc. The ban is applicable to "Vuse Replacement Cartridge Menthol 4.8% G1" and "Vuse Replacement Cartridge Menthol 4.8% G2".


Currently, Renault is not allowed to sell these products in the United States or they will face enforcement action from the FDA. However, the company can resubmit an application to address the product defects involved in the MDO constraints.


The FDA has requested that applicants disclose whether mint-flavored e-cigarettes are more beneficial compared to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.


The FDA evaluates tobacco products for public health standards before they can be marketed through a Pre-Market Tobacco Application (PMTA). Upon reviewing the company's PMTA, the FDA determined that the application lacked sufficient evidence to prove that allowing the product to be sold would be in the best interest of public health, as required by the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Specifically, the evidence presented by the applicant did not demonstrate that mint-flavored e-cigarettes were less harmful to the adult smoking population compared to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.


Existing evidence, including data from the 2022 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), suggests that non-tobacco flavored e-cigarettes, including mint-flavored e-cigarettes, pose significant risks in terms of attraction, intake, and use among youths. In contrast, data indicates that tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes do not have the same appeal to young people and therefore do not pose the same risks. Given these existing differences in youth risks, the applicant needs to provide strong evidence to demonstrate that the use of their mint-flavored e-cigarette products can greatly reduce cigarette use among adult smokers compared to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.


According to data from The New York Times, Vuse is the second most popular brand among teenage e-cigarette users. The FDA aims to ensure not only that the manufacturers comply, but also that the distributors and retailers comply. Retailers who have any doubts about their inventory should contact Reynolds.


This is not the first action taken by the FDA.


This recent action is just one of many taken by the FDA to ensure that tobacco products sold in the United States undergo scientific review and receive PMTA approval. So far, the agency has received over 26 million PMTA applications and has made decisions on 99% of them. Currently, the FDA has approved 23 flavored electronic cigarettes for sale or distribution in the United States, which are the only ones allowed on the market legally.


The FDA has also rejected millions of non-compliant marketing applications, including 10 non-tobacco-flavored e-cigarette pods under the Vuse Solo brand. On January 24 of this year, the FDA also issued marketing bans (MODs) for two products by Reynolds American Inc., including the Vuse Vibe Tank Menthol 3.0% and Vuse Ciro Cartridge Menthol 1.5%.


In October 2022, the FDA issued an MDO (Modified Risk Order) for several mint-flavored e-cigarette products sold by Logic Technology Development. This was the first time the FDA had issued an MDO for products containing menthol after undergoing scientific review. However, a few days later, Logic received an order from the US Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which temporarily suspended the MDO's enforcement.


References:


The FDA has refused to allow two Vuse Solo menthol e-cigarette products to be marketed.


Related reading:


The FDA has announced that it has rendered decisions on 99% of the PMTA applications for electronic cigarettes, and intends to review the remaining popular products by the end of the year.


The FDA issues a marketing refusal order for two Vuse products.


Renault, a tobacco company owned by British American Tobacco, plans to appeal against the marketing ban imposed by the FDA.


The FDA has filed civil lawsuits and imposed fines against four electronic cigarette liquid manufacturers for the first time.


The FDA has scheduled a public hearing on April 12th to discuss the creation of new regulations for the manufacturing of tobacco products.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

California Lawmakers Pass Disposable Nicotine Vape Ban, With Sales Prohibition Set for 2028
California Lawmakers Pass Disposable Nicotine Vape Ban, With Sales Prohibition Set for 2028
According to CBS Los Angeles on August 27, 2026, California lawmakers have passed Assembly Bill 762, which would phase out disposable, battery-embedded nicotine vapes in the state. If signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, manufacturing and importation of the covered products would be prohibited beginning January 1, 2027, followed by a sales ban on January 1, 2028. Driven primarily by concerns over electronic waste, lithium-battery fires and environmental pollution, the legislation would further shift California’s legal vape market toward rechargeable, refillable or replaceable-pod devices.
Aug.28
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Elf Bar Vape Explosion and Amputation Claim Spurs Coverage Suit, U.S. Insurer MUSIC Seeks Ruling It Owes No Duty to Defend or Indemnify Distributor i5
Mesa Underwriters Specialty Insurance Company has asked a federal court in Washington to declare that it has no duty to defend or indemnify vape distributor i5 Distribution in a product liability case involving an Elf Bar BC5000. The plaintiff alleges that the disposable vape caught fire and exploded in his pocket, causing severe burns and ultimately requiring an above-the-knee amputation of his left leg. MUSIC is relying on a tobacco, nicotine or nicotine replacement products exclusion and a premises limitation endorsement. The court has not ruled on the coverage dispute.
News
Sep.10
From a 2017 Launch to 48% of South Korea’s Heated Tobacco Market, KT&G Looks Back on a Decade of lil
From a 2017 Launch to 48% of South Korea’s Heated Tobacco Market, KT&G Looks Back on a Decade of lil
KT&G announced on Aug. 13, 2026, that it has opened “lil Archive,” a brand exhibition space in Seoul showcasing the evolution, technology platforms and future direction of its heated tobacco brand lil since its launch in 2017. KT&G said lil now spans three major platforms — lil SOLID, lil HYBRID and lil AIBLE — with more than 30 dedicated consumables, and held a 48% share of South Korea's heated tobacco market in the second quarter of 2026. The opening comes as lil enters its 10th year, with KT&G continuing to position the brand for expansion beyond its domestic market.
Aug.14
UK Vape Tax Countdown: Retailer Vape HQ Estimates 100ml E-liquid Prices Could Rise From £12.99 to £39.39, While Pod Kits Increase Less Than 10%
UK Vape Tax Countdown: Retailer Vape HQ Estimates 100ml E-liquid Prices Could Rise From £12.99 to £39.39, While Pod Kits Increase Less Than 10%
The UK’s Vaping Products Duty (VPD), scheduled to take effect in October 2026, is prompting retailers to assess how different vape categories may be affected. UK retailer Vape HQ has estimated potential price changes under the new volume-based tax system, showing that 100ml shortfill e-liquids could see prices rise from around £12.99 to £39.39, a 203% increase, while 2ml prefilled pod vape kits could rise from £5.99 to £6.52, an increase of about 9%. The estimates highlight how a volume-based tax structure creates uneven cost impacts across product categories.
Aug.19
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
The Philippines’ Bureau of Internal Revenue is intensifying enforcement against illicit vape and tobacco products ahead of the Christmas shopping season, directing regional and enforcement offices to strengthen monitoring of production sites, warehouses, distribution channels and retail outlets. The BIR destroyed 240,550 illicit vape products in August with an estimated tax liability of about PHP1.53 billion. A nationwide tax-compliance operation in July also inspected 3,590 businesses involved in tobacco and vapor products.
Regulations
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
InterTabac 2026: Further Sessions on Regulation, Market Access and Innovation Confirmed; 2FIRSTS to Host China Market Forum
InterTabac 2026: Further Sessions on Regulation, Market Access and Innovation Confirmed; 2FIRSTS to Host China Market Forum
InterTabac 2026 will bring together international experts to discuss European regulation, tax policy, Track & Trace, market access, retail impacts, consumer behavior and innovation. Sessions will also examine Poland’s tobacco-growing perspective and the growing fragmentation of Europe’s tobacco and nicotine market. Media partner 2FIRSTS will host the second “2FIRSTS Connect at InterTabac” on September 16, focusing on developments in China’s tobacco and nicotine industry.
Aug.06