FDA Issues Sales Ban on Vuse Solo Menthol E-Cigarette Products

Mar.18.2023
FDA Issues Sales Ban on Vuse Solo Menthol E-Cigarette Products
The FDA bans two Vuse Solo menthol e-cigarette products due to lack of evidence supporting their public health benefit.

On March 17th, the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a ban on the sale of two menthol-flavored e-cigarette products from the Vuse Solo brand owned by Reynolds American Inc. The ban is applicable to "Vuse Replacement Cartridge Menthol 4.8% G1" and "Vuse Replacement Cartridge Menthol 4.8% G2".


Currently, Renault is not allowed to sell these products in the United States or they will face enforcement action from the FDA. However, the company can resubmit an application to address the product defects involved in the MDO constraints.


The FDA has requested that applicants disclose whether mint-flavored e-cigarettes are more beneficial compared to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.


The FDA evaluates tobacco products for public health standards before they can be marketed through a Pre-Market Tobacco Application (PMTA). Upon reviewing the company's PMTA, the FDA determined that the application lacked sufficient evidence to prove that allowing the product to be sold would be in the best interest of public health, as required by the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Specifically, the evidence presented by the applicant did not demonstrate that mint-flavored e-cigarettes were less harmful to the adult smoking population compared to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.


Existing evidence, including data from the 2022 National Youth Tobacco Survey (NYTS), suggests that non-tobacco flavored e-cigarettes, including mint-flavored e-cigarettes, pose significant risks in terms of attraction, intake, and use among youths. In contrast, data indicates that tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes do not have the same appeal to young people and therefore do not pose the same risks. Given these existing differences in youth risks, the applicant needs to provide strong evidence to demonstrate that the use of their mint-flavored e-cigarette products can greatly reduce cigarette use among adult smokers compared to tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes.


According to data from The New York Times, Vuse is the second most popular brand among teenage e-cigarette users. The FDA aims to ensure not only that the manufacturers comply, but also that the distributors and retailers comply. Retailers who have any doubts about their inventory should contact Reynolds.


This is not the first action taken by the FDA.


This recent action is just one of many taken by the FDA to ensure that tobacco products sold in the United States undergo scientific review and receive PMTA approval. So far, the agency has received over 26 million PMTA applications and has made decisions on 99% of them. Currently, the FDA has approved 23 flavored electronic cigarettes for sale or distribution in the United States, which are the only ones allowed on the market legally.


The FDA has also rejected millions of non-compliant marketing applications, including 10 non-tobacco-flavored e-cigarette pods under the Vuse Solo brand. On January 24 of this year, the FDA also issued marketing bans (MODs) for two products by Reynolds American Inc., including the Vuse Vibe Tank Menthol 3.0% and Vuse Ciro Cartridge Menthol 1.5%.


In October 2022, the FDA issued an MDO (Modified Risk Order) for several mint-flavored e-cigarette products sold by Logic Technology Development. This was the first time the FDA had issued an MDO for products containing menthol after undergoing scientific review. However, a few days later, Logic received an order from the US Third Circuit Court of Appeals, which temporarily suspended the MDO's enforcement.


References:


The FDA has refused to allow two Vuse Solo menthol e-cigarette products to be marketed.


Related reading:


The FDA has announced that it has rendered decisions on 99% of the PMTA applications for electronic cigarettes, and intends to review the remaining popular products by the end of the year.


The FDA issues a marketing refusal order for two Vuse products.


Renault, a tobacco company owned by British American Tobacco, plans to appeal against the marketing ban imposed by the FDA.


The FDA has filed civil lawsuits and imposed fines against four electronic cigarette liquid manufacturers for the first time.


The FDA has scheduled a public hearing on April 12th to discuss the creation of new regulations for the manufacturing of tobacco products.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

AIR Global Starts Debt Refinancing Four Months After Nasdaq Listing With About $400 Million Notes Expected
AIR Global Starts Debt Refinancing Four Months After Nasdaq Listing With About $400 Million Notes Expected
AIR Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of AIR Global, has launched an offering of U.S. dollar-denominated senior unsecured notes, with proceeds primarily intended to repay its existing term loan and revolving credit facility. AIR has not disclosed the final size, maturity or coupon; Refinitiv, citing Moody's, reported an expected issuance of approximately $400 million and a Ba3 rating. AIR had about $412.4 million outstanding under the two bank facilities at June 30 and net debt of $344.8 million. In the first half of 2026, AIR's Al Fakher-led flavored shisha molasses business generated about 99% of company revenue, while New Growth Categories including Crown Switch produced $2.2 million in revenue and remained loss-making on an adjusted EBITDA basis.
Sep.23
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Documents obtained by 2Firsts show that Sweden's Public Health Agency ordered Swedish Match to revise ingredient labels beyond the five ZYN products inspected. The dispute centers on whether flavoring ingredients must be individually disclosed, with Swedish Match citing trade-secret protection and the regulator insisting on full ingredient disclosure. The company faces a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. As of October 22, the agency had received no appeal, despite the company's stated intention to challenge the decision.
Oct.22
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
How Many Nicotine Pouch Factories Does Europe Need? 2Firsts Interviews AIRSCREAM on the OEM Market
At InterTabac 2026, nicotine pouch growth was visible not only in brands but across equipment, raw materials and OEM manufacturing. 2Firsts interviewed AIRSCREAM commercial head Steve Moore on how many pouch factories Europe may ultimately need and where manufacturers can differentiate, from formulation and flavour to pouch materials, production consistency and customer service. The category continues to expand, but questions remain over future capacity, consolidation and the long-term structure of the supply chain.
Sep.18
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As regulators pay closer attention to child safety in nicotine pouches, manufacturers face a practical challenge: how to strengthen child-resistant packaging without unnecessarily reworking products, production lines and regulatory submissions already in place. In a written interview with 2Firsts, Chemular detailed Safeguard’s external packaging approach, its customer-specific testing requirements and possible PMTA pathways. The model remains early-stage, but it offers a new way to think about an increasingly important regulatory and manufacturing issue.
Industry Insight
Sep.19