Federal Judge Denies E-Cigarette Distributor's Summary Judgment Request

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.11.2024
Federal Judge Denies E-Cigarette Distributor's Summary Judgment Request
Alabama federal judge denies e-cigarette distributor's motion claiming unpaid invoices, orders trial to determine validity.

A federal judge in Alabama has rejected a motion for a summary judgment made by an e-cigarette distributor, who claimed that a wholesaler owed them over $100,000 for unpaid product invoices, as reported by Law360 on January 10th.

 

In a brief order, Judge Annemarie Carney Axon stated that Safa Goods LLC failed to provide undisputed evidence to support its claim against Perfect Wholesale Inc., and therefore the trial must proceed.

 

According to the directive, there are currently some controversial issues, including whether the invoice constitutes a valid contract, whether Safa has fulfilled the contract, whether Perfect Wholesale has indeed accepted the goods, and whether the price has been determined in the contract.

 

Akson did not further elaborate on the reasons for her refusal to support the motion.

 

Safa filed a lawsuit against Perfect Wholesale in August, alleging that the wholesaler had shipped goods to them between October and December 2021. As of the last shipment, Perfect Wholesale owed $158,745 in outstanding payments.

 

According to the lawsuit, Safa extended a credit of $55,200 to Perfect Wholesale in February 2022. As of that time, the wholesaler still owed $103,545 and had failed to make payment in response to a letter demanding payment.

 

In its motion for summary judgment, Safa argues that the invoice is a valid contract, and accuses Perfect Wholesale of breach. Safa further alleges that it has suffered damages due to Perfect Wholesale's failure to make payment.

 

In response, Perfect Wholesale argued that the invoices were not contracts and Safa failed to fulfill its obligations. They claimed that Safa did not actually place orders for some of the products as claimed, and that the prices or deliveries of other products ordered were not accurate.

 

Perfect Wholesale has proposed a motion to revoke the inclusion of an evidence display in Safa's response to Perfect Wholesale's objections. They claim that the documents in the display were concealed by Safa during the discovery process, are unverified, and should not be submitted as evidence at this time.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Samsung's battery explosion case proceeds as court finds manufacturer maintained “sufficient contacts” with the state
Samsung's battery explosion case proceeds as court finds manufacturer maintained “sufficient contacts” with the state
The Minnesota Court of Appeals has ruled that Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., a South Korean battery manufacturer, is subject to Minnesota jurisdiction in a product-liability case involving a vape battery explosion. The court found the company had “sufficient minimum contacts” with the state through extensive business activity.
Oct.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Australia Leads COP11 Seminars as Exploding Illicit Tobacco Market Raises Questions
Australia Leads COP11 Seminars as Exploding Illicit Tobacco Market Raises Questions
Australia sent a delegation to COP11 in Switzerland and is leading three major seminars to showcase its vape and tobacco control policies. But at home, illicit cigarette sales are skyrocketing amid record-high taxes, drawing criticism from the tobacco industry and prompting doubts over policy effectiveness.
Nov.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product | 2Firsts Exclusive: Breaking Down Pachamama 25K, CHUC’s First U.S.-Made Factory Product
Product | 2Firsts Exclusive: Breaking Down Pachamama 25K, CHUC’s First U.S.-Made Factory Product
U.S. e-cigarette company Charlie’s has brought its first domestic manufacturing facility online, launching the disposable Pachamama 25K, which will initially roll out to 300 retail stores in Texas. The device features a 20 ml e-liquid capacity with 5% nicotine, three power modes and a built-in 1000 mAh battery, and is advertised to deliver up to 25,000 puffs.
Dec.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Australia TGA Warns Delivery Platforms: Don’t Promote or Supply Vapes Illegally
Australia TGA Warns Delivery Platforms: Don’t Promote or Supply Vapes Illegally
The Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) warned online delivery platforms not to breach Australian vape laws and said it worked with two major companies to remove non-compliant material. Under the Therapeutic Goods Act 1989, advertising vapes to the public is banned and sales are pharmacy-only; tobacconists and convenience stores cannot supply vapes. TGA will continue enforcement, with severe penalties for breaches.
Oct.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Rolls Out Online PMTA Platform, a Move That 2Firsts Analysts Say Could Pull Grey-Market Products Toward Formal Compliance
FDA Rolls Out Online PMTA Platform, a Move That 2Firsts Analysts Say Could Pull Grey-Market Products Toward Formal Compliance
FDA’s launch of a web-based PMTA system signals faster reviews and, 2Firsts experts say, a possible inflection point for the U.S. e-cigarette market’s shift out of the grey zone.
Dec.04
JUUL Plans to Launch New E-cigarette Juul2 in the U.S., Featuring App-Based Identity Verification and Awaiting Regulatory Approval
JUUL Plans to Launch New E-cigarette Juul2 in the U.S., Featuring App-Based Identity Verification and Awaiting Regulatory Approval
JUUL plans to launch Juul2 with biometric protection system in the US, targeting adult smokers while preventing underage use.
Oct.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai