A federal judge in Alabama has rejected a motion for a summary judgment made by an e-cigarette distributor, who claimed that a wholesaler owed them over $100,000 for unpaid product invoices, as reported by Law360 on January 10th.
In a brief order, Judge Annemarie Carney Axon stated that Safa Goods LLC failed to provide undisputed evidence to support its claim against Perfect Wholesale Inc., and therefore the trial must proceed.
According to the directive, there are currently some controversial issues, including whether the invoice constitutes a valid contract, whether Safa has fulfilled the contract, whether Perfect Wholesale has indeed accepted the goods, and whether the price has been determined in the contract.
Akson did not further elaborate on the reasons for her refusal to support the motion.
Safa filed a lawsuit against Perfect Wholesale in August, alleging that the wholesaler had shipped goods to them between October and December 2021. As of the last shipment, Perfect Wholesale owed $158,745 in outstanding payments.
According to the lawsuit, Safa extended a credit of $55,200 to Perfect Wholesale in February 2022. As of that time, the wholesaler still owed $103,545 and had failed to make payment in response to a letter demanding payment.
In its motion for summary judgment, Safa argues that the invoice is a valid contract, and accuses Perfect Wholesale of breach. Safa further alleges that it has suffered damages due to Perfect Wholesale's failure to make payment.
In response, Perfect Wholesale argued that the invoices were not contracts and Safa failed to fulfill its obligations. They claimed that Safa did not actually place orders for some of the products as claimed, and that the prices or deliveries of other products ordered were not accurate.
Perfect Wholesale has proposed a motion to revoke the inclusion of an evidence display in Safa's response to Perfect Wholesale's objections. They claim that the documents in the display were concealed by Safa during the discovery process, are unverified, and should not be submitted as evidence at this time.
Notice
1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.
2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.
3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.
Copyright
This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com
AI Assistance Disclaimer
This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.
This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.
