Fundamental flaws in FDA's tobacco regulation law: expert

Nov.16.2022
Fundamental flaws in FDA's tobacco regulation law: expert
Partner Azim Chowdhury of Keller and Heckman law firm criticizes the FDA's tobacco product regulation for allowing existing products to avoid scrutiny.

Azim Chowdhury, a partner at law firm Keller and Heckman, has criticized the implementation of the 2009 Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA), which gave the agency the power to regulate tobacco products. Chowdhury wrote in Filter magazine that requirements for pre-market authorization of “new” products created almost insurmountable obstacles for potentially reduced risk products, while allowing existing products, including combustible cigarettes, to largely evade FDA scrutiny. Chowdhury proposed several ways in which the FDA could more effectively implement the law, including considering all evidence in pre-market applications for tobacco products, rather than conducting individual reviews. He also suggested that the FDA needed to halt the spread of counterfeit products, which posed greater risks to consumers and threatened small businesses and e-cigarette shops that were already struggling with FDA enforcement.


Finally, the FDA should allocate more resources towards developing reasonable safety, quality, and marketing standards for products.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry-related communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the article's content. The compilation of this article is solely for exchanging and researching within the industry.


Due to limitations in translation abilities, the translated article may not fully express the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete consistency with the Chinese government's stance and statements pertaining to domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign affairs.


The copyrights of compiled information belong to the original media and authors, and in case of infringement, please contact for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

RLX Technology Inc. (NYSE: RLX) Q3 2025 Financial Results: Net Revenue US$158.6 Million; International Business Accounts for 72%
RLX Technology Inc. (NYSE: RLX) Q3 2025 Financial Results: Net Revenue US$158.6 Million; International Business Accounts for 72%
RLX Technology Inc. (NYSE: RLX) announced its unaudited financial results for the third quarter of 2025. The company reported net revenue of RMB 1.13 billion, up 49.3% year-on-year, and adjusted net profit of RMB 295.4 million, up 1.4% quarter-on-quarter. International business contributed 72% of total revenue, reflecting robust financial performance and continued shareholder returns.
Nov.14
Indonesian Police to Crack Down on Etomidate-Laced Vapes
Indonesian Police to Crack Down on Etomidate-Laced Vapes
Indonesia’s National Police Criminal Investigation Department (Bareskrim Polri) will continue to take enforcement action against users and distributors of etomidate-laced vape liquids, even though the substance is not yet classified as a narcotic. Brigadier General Eko Hadi Santoso, Director of Narcotics Crimes, said etomidate is an anaesthetic drug regulated under Health Law No. 17 of 2023, but has not been listed as a narcotic or psychotropic substance.
Oct.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Special Report|China’s Nicotine Pouch Manufacturing Goes Global: A Supply Chain Reshaped and Redirected
2Firsts Special Report|China’s Nicotine Pouch Manufacturing Goes Global: A Supply Chain Reshaped and Redirected
China’s nicotine pouch manufacturing expanded rapidly in 2024 but cooled sharply in 2025. Meanwhile, global demand continued to grow strongly, with multinational tobacco companies increasing investment, prompting some Chinese manufacturers to accelerate the shift of production to Southeast Asia and Europe.
Nov.21
Smoore and EVE Energy Sign Procurement Framework Agreement Covering 2026–2028 Cell Supply
Smoore and EVE Energy Sign Procurement Framework Agreement Covering 2026–2028 Cell Supply
Smoore and EVE Energy have signed a procurement framework agreement for 2026–2028, under which Smoore Group will continue purchasing battery cells and related products. The agreement sets no specific transaction amount; actual figures will be determined by future orders, reflecting both parties’ intention to secure and extend their supply chain cooperation over the next three years.
Nov.21
Irish Cabinet to Consider Bill Banning Sale of Single-Use Vapes
Irish Cabinet to Consider Bill Banning Sale of Single-Use Vapes
Ireland’s Minister for Health, Jennifer Carroll MacNeill, will seek Cabinet approval today for the publication of the Public Health (Single-Use Vapes) Bill 2025, which proposes banning the retail sale of single-use or disposable vapes six months after becoming law. The measure aims to address the growing use of disposable vapes, particularly among young people, and close regulatory gaps around emerging nicotine products such as pouches.
Nov.18 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philip Morris USA Reaches $66M Settlement With Washington State Over MSA Payment Dispute
Philip Morris USA Reaches $66M Settlement With Washington State Over MSA Payment Dispute
Philip Morris USA has reached a settlement with Washington State and agreed to pay $66 million to resolve disputes over annual payments under the 1998 Master Settlement Agreement (MSA) for the period 2005–2015.
Nov.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai