Highland Retailers Warned to Adhere to E-Cigarette Regulations

Sep.07.2022
Highland Retailers Warned to Adhere to E-Cigarette Regulations
Retailers warned to comply with laws when selling e-cigarettes in Highland, Scotland; unsafe products seized by officials.

Retailers throughout the highlands have been warned to ensure they comply with the law when selling electronic cigarettes.


The Highland Council's trading standards regulations stipulate that all electronic cigarettes must be purchased from reputable UK suppliers and wholesalers.


Before being sold to consumers, electronic cigarettes should obtain approval from the Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA). Unapproved products have been found to contain dangerously high levels of nicotine.


Retailers who have sold e-cigarettes to individuals under 18 years of age, or who have not implemented an age verification policy, have received fixed penalty notices.


Trade standard officials have discovered a large number of non-compliant electronic cigarettes in the local market, some of which pose a high health risk to potential users.


David MacKenzie, the trade standards manager, expressed concerns regarding the recent explosive growth in the sales of e-cigarettes. He highlighted the challenges in identifying unsafe e-cigarettes in the general supply chain and the lack of important information and warnings for vulnerable consumer groups, such as those with diabetes or heart disease. It is vital that retailers do not sell non-compliant e-cigarettes to the public and they should not sell any type of e-cigarette to children.


Over the past 12 months, officials from the Highland Council's trading standards have seized over 3,000 illegal e-cigarette products from shops in the Highland area.


Disclaimer: 1. The content of this article is compiled from third-party information and is only for industry exchange and learning purposes. 2. This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the article. The compilation of this article is only for industry exchange and research. 3. Due to limited compilation skills, the compiled article may not fully express the same as the original text, please refer to the original text. 4. For any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or international statements and positions, 2FIRSTS fully supports the Chinese government. 5. The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Puerto Rico House Files P.C. 1070 to Ban Flavored Vaping Product Sales to Under-21s
Puerto Rico House Files P.C. 1070 to Ban Flavored Vaping Product Sales to Under-21s
According to a statement from the Puerto Rico House of Representatives, House Speaker Carlos Méndez and Rep. Pedro Julio Santiago announced the filing of House Bill 1070 (P.C. 1070), which would prohibit sales to people under 21 of vaping devices, liquids, or cartridges featuring a flavor and/or aroma other than nicotine.
Jan.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Federal Register notice: FDA seeks comments on “Warning Plans for Certain Tobacco Products”
Federal Register notice: FDA seeks comments on “Warning Plans for Certain Tobacco Products”
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a notice stating it has submitted a proposed information collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Singapore HSA bust links two vape warehouses; Malaysian man jailed 41 weeks
Singapore HSA bust links two vape warehouses; Malaysian man jailed 41 weeks
HSA officers in Singapore staked out a Bishan warehouse after a tip-off and found a Malaysian man in a site containing thousands of vaporisers and components. Checks on his phone led to a second warehouse in Ubi with large quantities of devices and parts.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Texas college data show rapid shifts in top vaping brands, with Geek Bar/Vape surging by 2025
Texas college data show rapid shifts in top vaping brands, with Geek Bar/Vape surging by 2025
A short communication in Drug and Alcohol Dependence examined changes in the most commonly used nicotine vaping brands among Texas college students from 2023 to 2025. The study analyzed 6,049 students aged 18–25 who reported past-30-day nicotine vaping across three repeated cross-sectional spring surveys. The report found that use of Esco Bar, Elf Bar, JUUL, and Puff Bar declined from 2023 to 2025, while Geek Bar/Vape increased.
Feb.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia anti-tobacco groups call for stronger enforcement as unregulated vapes remain on sale offline and online
Malaysia anti-tobacco groups call for stronger enforcement as unregulated vapes remain on sale offline and online
Anti-tobacco groups in Malaysia say the continued sale of unregulated vapes in physical stores and the online availability of vape devices underline the need for comprehensive enforcement.
Mar.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
During the “Toxicological Profile” session at FDA’s Feb 10 PMTA roundtable, officials outlined the carcinogenicity tiering system and Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) framework used in ENDS reviews under the APPH standard. Small manufacturers questioned database transparency, exposure assumptions, and the existence of clear compliance benchmarks. FDA reiterated toxicological risk is assessed case by case within a broader population-level determination.
Feb.11