Hyde IQ vs Hyde N-Bar: A Comparison of Disposable Vapes

Sep.08.2022
Hyde IQ vs Hyde N-Bar: A Comparison of Disposable Vapes
Hyde Vape offers top-tier disposable and rechargeable e-cigarettes, each with unique features such as battery indicators and flavor options.

Today, the e-cigarette industry is one of the fastest-growing industries. This is especially true as e-cigarettes have been popular in the market for a long time. Among the different varieties available, disposable e-cigarettes have become the perfect choice for users due to their portability and design. The Hyde Vape brand is one of the best brands that offers disposable e-cigarettes.

 

The two most popular choices from Hyde vape are the Hyde IQ Disposable Vape Pen 5000 Puffs and the Hyde N-Bar 4500 Puffs Rechargeable. However, these electronic cigarette devices have more or less similar functions, making it difficult to choose the better device.

 

For your convenience, we will assist you in understanding the difference between the two in this article.

 

In an attempt to differentiate between Hyde IQ and Hyde N-Bar, we have identified various parameters. We aim to provide a clearer understanding of both product categories.

 

Number of inhalations/suctions.

 

Although both of these electronic cigarette devices are among the best and most durable disposable products on the market, they differ in the number of puffs they can provide.

 

The Hyde IQ can provide an excellent vaping experience with approximately 5000 puffs from a single charge, while the Hyde N-Bar rechargeable vape lasts for about 4500 puffs.

 

Although Hyde N-Bar boasts a 4500 puff count, which is relatively high compared to other disposable e-cigarettes on the market, it falls behind Hyde IQ.

 

Therefore, in terms of maximum suction times, the Hyde IQ performs slightly better than the Hyde N-Bar.

 

Battery indicator light.

 

Regarding battery capacity and lifespan, both Hyde IQ and Hyde N-Bar have rechargeable batteries and are convenient for USB charging.

 

However, the Hyde IQ disposable Vape Pen 5000 Puffs comes equipped with a unique battery indicator light.

 

This innovative battery features indicator lights that display three signals: red when the battery is only at 1-16% capacity, orange when it is at approximately 16-30% capacity, and green when it is at 30-100% capacity.

 

For vapers, this is very convenient. Therefore, in this aspect, Hyde IQ is stealing the show with its innovation.

 

Electronic cigarette liquid or e-liquid.

 

When comparing disposable electronic cigarettes, one important factor to consider is the e-liquid. This type of liquid is contained in various cartridges and contains propylene glycol and nicotine.

 

The Hyde N Bar 4500 Puffs is a rechargeable vape with a pre-filled electronic liquid capacity of 10 milliliters. The liquid contains approximately 5% nicotine.

 

Alternatively, the Hyde IQ comes with a vape juice capacity of 8 milliliters. However, its nicotine content is similar to that of the Hyde N-Bar, at 5%.

 

Therefore, the nominal edge of Hyde N-Bar in terms of e-liquid is approximately 2 milliliters.

 

However, despite the difference in the amount of e-liquid between the two, Hyde IQ produces more puffs and lasts for 1-2 days longer. Therefore, it is clear that the efficiency of Hyde N-Bar is lower than that of Hyde IQ.

 

When it comes to popular choices in e-cigarettes, both Hyde IQ and Hyde N Bar offer a variety of flavors.

 

The Hyde IQ disposable Vape Pen 5000 comes in 20 different flavors including watermelon soda, cranberry orange soda, pink burst, and lemon drop. Each flavor is unique and exciting.

 

On the other hand, Hyde N-Bar offers over 20 flavors including popular choices such as aloe grape, banana and cream, minty O's, peach mango watermelon, Caribbean cola, and tropical flavors.

 

Therefore, in terms of taste, both electronic cigarette devices are comparable.

 

Conclusion

 

The Hyde IQ disposable Vape Pen with 5000 puffs and the Hyde N-Bar 4500 Puffs Rechargeable Vape are two of the best disposable e-cigarettes available in the market. While we have highlighted some distinguishing parameters, it is ultimately up to you to make the best judgment.

 

Statement:

 

This article is compiled from third-party information and is only intended for industry-related communication and learning purposes.

 

This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is intended only for industry-related exchange and research purposes.

 

Due to limitations in translation ability, the article may not fully express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.

 

2FIRSTS aligns fully with the Chinese government when it comes to any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign related statements and positions.

 

The compilation of information is the copyright of the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.

 

This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Canada’s B.C. Passes First Vaping Cost-Recovery Framework, Allowing Government to Sue Manufacturers Over Health Expenses
Canada’s B.C. Passes First Vaping Cost-Recovery Framework, Allowing Government to Sue Manufacturers Over Health Expenses
According to the Nelson Star, British Columbia has passed the Vaping Product Damages and Health Care Costs Recovery Act by a 49–42 vote. The legislation enables the provincial government to seek recovery of future public health costs from vape manufacturers, following models used in opioid and tobacco litigation.
Dec.03
Singapore Charges 14 Over Vape Syndicate Under Organised Crime Act
Singapore Charges 14 Over Vape Syndicate Under Organised Crime Act
Singapore police said 13 people were charged on Oct 30 under the Organised Crime Act over an alleged syndicate supplying vapes locally; a 14th suspect is expected to be charged on Oct 31. All 14 had earlier been charged for possessing, or conspiring to possess, vapes for sale and are remanded. Police said the group allegedly imported vapes from Malaysia. OCA carries up to S$100,000 fine or five years’ jail; vape import/sale offences also face stiff penalties.
Oct.31 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product | Semi-Embedded Display + “Smart Memory System”: OXBAR Launches New Magnetic Vape MAGLINK
Product | Semi-Embedded Display + “Smart Memory System”: OXBAR Launches New Magnetic Vape MAGLINK
OXBAR has launched the MAGLINK vape on its official website, featuring a magnetic structure and a smart memory function. The website lists the device as offering 50,000 puffs, a 1500 mAh battery, and four adjustable power levels. The product has already appeared across multiple Canadian sales channels, where the stated puff count, e-liquid capacity, and other specifications differ notably from those shown on the official site.
Dec.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mexican Congress Postpones Debate on Vape and E-Cigarette Ban
Mexican Congress Postpones Debate on Vape and E-Cigarette Ban
Mexico’s Chamber of Deputies has postponed the debate on a reform to the General Health Law that seeks to completely ban the sale and distribution of electronic cigarettes and vapes. Lawmaker Amancay González Franco (MC) criticized the draft for excluding tobacco heating devices, such as Philip Morris’s IQOS, arguing that these products are even more harmful according to the World Health Organization.
Dec.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jinjia Venture Faces New Judicial Auction, Control Unchanged
Jinjia Venture Faces New Judicial Auction, Control Unchanged
Jinjia Group said its controlling shareholder, Jinjia Venture, will have part of its holdings auctioned by the Shenzhen Nanshan Court, involving 43.4 million shares. Earlier, the Shenzhen Intermediate Court announced another auction of 37.27 million shares. Together they represent 5.56% of total equity. Jinjia said the auctions will not affect company control.
Oct.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts Monitor | FOGER website flags customs & tariff delays; some products out of stock
2Firsts Monitor | FOGER website flags customs & tariff delays; some products out of stock
2Firsts observed on FOGER’s online retail site “FOGER VAPES” that the platform indicates restocking delays due to customs and tariff factors. Several items show limited availability or “sold out” status, with a restock alert feature offered. A previous article on the site also referenced potential tariff changes that may affect pricing.
Nov.05