Illegal Operation of Electronic Pods: A Warning for Consumers

Aug.10.2023
Illegal Operation of Electronic Pods: A Warning for Consumers
Illegal trade of electronic pods, a type of tobacco product, has been exposed in Nantong, Jiangsu province.

Heating non-burning cigarettes, commonly known as e-pods, are tobacco products. Some illegal individuals have started engaging in the "business" of purchasing and reselling heating non-burning cigarettes (commonly known as e-pods) without a tobacco retail license. On August 4th, the defendant Ma was prosecuted by the Tongzhou District Procuratorate in Nantong City, Jiangsu Province. The court sentenced Ma to two years and six months of imprisonment for illegal business operations, with a three-year probation period, and imposed a fine of 20,000 yuan.

 

Original flavor, mint flavor, amber flavor, orange flavor, lemon flavor, tropical fruit flavor..." With so many flavors, you might think they are candies or drinks. In fact, these are all flavors of electronic pods. In April 2020, a resident named Xiao Wu from Liyang was curious and searched on online trading platforms, eventually successfully purchasing overseas electronic pods through a person named Zhu. However, after receiving the goods, Xiao Wu felt that the taste of the pods was different from the ones they had tried before, making it seem like they were fake. As a result, Xiao Wu reported the matter to the Liyang Tobacco Monopoly Bureau.

 

In December 2021, the Liyang Tobacco Monopoly Bureau referred a case to the public security authorities for criminal investigation due to potential involvement in criminal activities. Subsequently, the Liyang Public Security Bureau cracked down on illegal business operations conducted by a suspect named Zhu. Following the trail, they apprehended Zhu's supplier, a person named Ma, regarding illegal business operations as well. The case was then transferred to the Tongzhou District public security authorities for further processing. Investigation revealed that Ma had engaged in purchasing services, taking advantage of her frequent trips abroad, to buy electronic pods for her family and friends. "As I began to be approached by more and more people for assistance in purchasing electronic pods, I gradually realized the hidden business opportunities and started my own purchasing business," Ma confessed. Once her purchasing business took off, she was able to establish connections with individuals who could supply her with electronic pods.

 

Under the allure of money, Ms. Ma naively believed she could get away with selling electronic pods in China without the required tobacco retail license. Despite lacking the necessary permit, she continued to engage in this business. She advertised the sale of electronic pods on various online platforms such as WeChat and Xianyu, using specific icons instead of the term "pod" to avoid platform scrutiny. After negotiating prices with customers, Ms. Ma would forward the delivery address and payment to a purchasing agent who had a source for the products. The agent would then directly ship the items to the customers, while Ms. Ma profited from the price difference.

 

On June 2, 2023, the case was transferred to the Tongzhou District Procuratorate for review and prosecution. According to the prosecuting officer Qiu Hua, between August 2021 and July 2022, Ma illegally sold "Marlboro," "Heets," and other brands of IQOS heat-not-burn cigarettes without the necessary licenses from the tobacco regulatory authority. The total amount of illegal operation was over 200,000 yuan, with illegal gains totaling 20,000 yuan.

 

Prosecutors remind that China implements a monopoly licensing system for tobacco, and operating electronic pods without a license may potentially constitute the crime of illegal business operation, especially in severe cases. The country maintains strict regulation on imported e-cigarettes, and the quality and safety of e-cigarettes purchased through overseas sourcing cannot be guaranteed. Moreover, the abundance of flavors in the market may overwhelm consumers, but it is important to note that flavored e-cigarettes are explicitly prohibited from being sold. Therefore, consumers are advised to exercise caution when making purchases.

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Product | JT to Launch MEVIUS Tropical Option in Japan, Expanding Ploom Tobacco Stick Lineup to 32
Japan Tobacco (JT) will launch MEVIUS Tropical Option, a new tobacco stick for Ploom, nationwide in Japan from October 6, 2026. The capsule-format product combines mango-oriented sweetness with menthol cooling, adding a tropical flavor to the MEVIUS Ploom tobacco-stick lineup for the first time. Each pack contains 20 sticks and will launch at JPY 590. The product is compatible with all Ploom devices, and its addition will expand the Ploom tobacco-stick portfolio to 32 variants.
Sep.08
Product | PMJ Adds Bold Ruby to IQOS ILUMA i Lineup in Japan, Convenience-Store Rollout Starts Sept. 29
Product | PMJ Adds Bold Ruby to IQOS ILUMA i Lineup in Japan, Convenience-Store Rollout Starts Sept. 29
Philip Morris Japan (PMJ) launched Bold Ruby as a new regular color for the IQOS ILUMA i and IQOS ILUMA i ONE in Japan on September 16, 2026, priced at JPY 6,980 and JPY 3,980, respectively. Initial sales began through IQOS online and physical channels, with convenience stores and selected tobacco retailers set to follow from September 29. Bold Ruby is a regular rather than limited-edition colorway and is available for the ILUMA i and ILUMA i ONE, but not the ILUMA i PRIME. The release does not involve changes to the devices' core hardware or functions.
Sep.22
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
A U.S. Government Accountability Office audit found that 131,915 tobacco product applications submitted to the FDA since 2018 remained without a final review as of December 31, 2025, with pending applications waiting an average of 1,266 days. GAO also found FDA lacks the data needed to systematically determine whether scientific reviews meet applicable timelines. HHS agreed to upgrade the agency's tracking systems. At the same time, FDA has begun applying lessons from its nicotine pouch PMTA pilot to e-cigarette reviews, while changes to enforcement policy and electronic submissions are making the specific stage of a PMTA increasingly relevant to market access.
FDA
Oct.03
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Product | PIXL Adds 6ml PIXL 5K in UK Alongside 12ml PIXL 8000 as Vape Duty Takes Effect
Product | PIXL Adds 6ml PIXL 5K in UK Alongside 12ml PIXL 8000 as Vape Duty Takes Effect
Vaping brand PIXL has introduced the PIXL 5K reusable prefilled pod device in the UK, featuring a 2ml prefilled pod and a 4ml refill container with a combined e-liquid capacity of 6ml. The device uses 20mg/ml nicotine salt e-liquid and is advertised to deliver up to approximately 5,000 puffs. Available through UK retailers by August 2026, the PIXL 5K sits alongside the existing 12ml PIXL 8000. The UK's Vaping Products Duty took effect on October 1 at £0.22 per millilitre, producing theoretical duty amounts of £1.32 and £2.64 for the two products' respective full refill sets.
product
Oct.10