Illegal Operation of Electronic Pods: A Warning for Consumers

Aug.10.2023
Illegal Operation of Electronic Pods: A Warning for Consumers
Illegal trade of electronic pods, a type of tobacco product, has been exposed in Nantong, Jiangsu province.

Heating non-burning cigarettes, commonly known as e-pods, are tobacco products. Some illegal individuals have started engaging in the "business" of purchasing and reselling heating non-burning cigarettes (commonly known as e-pods) without a tobacco retail license. On August 4th, the defendant Ma was prosecuted by the Tongzhou District Procuratorate in Nantong City, Jiangsu Province. The court sentenced Ma to two years and six months of imprisonment for illegal business operations, with a three-year probation period, and imposed a fine of 20,000 yuan.

 

Original flavor, mint flavor, amber flavor, orange flavor, lemon flavor, tropical fruit flavor..." With so many flavors, you might think they are candies or drinks. In fact, these are all flavors of electronic pods. In April 2020, a resident named Xiao Wu from Liyang was curious and searched on online trading platforms, eventually successfully purchasing overseas electronic pods through a person named Zhu. However, after receiving the goods, Xiao Wu felt that the taste of the pods was different from the ones they had tried before, making it seem like they were fake. As a result, Xiao Wu reported the matter to the Liyang Tobacco Monopoly Bureau.

 

In December 2021, the Liyang Tobacco Monopoly Bureau referred a case to the public security authorities for criminal investigation due to potential involvement in criminal activities. Subsequently, the Liyang Public Security Bureau cracked down on illegal business operations conducted by a suspect named Zhu. Following the trail, they apprehended Zhu's supplier, a person named Ma, regarding illegal business operations as well. The case was then transferred to the Tongzhou District public security authorities for further processing. Investigation revealed that Ma had engaged in purchasing services, taking advantage of her frequent trips abroad, to buy electronic pods for her family and friends. "As I began to be approached by more and more people for assistance in purchasing electronic pods, I gradually realized the hidden business opportunities and started my own purchasing business," Ma confessed. Once her purchasing business took off, she was able to establish connections with individuals who could supply her with electronic pods.

 

Under the allure of money, Ms. Ma naively believed she could get away with selling electronic pods in China without the required tobacco retail license. Despite lacking the necessary permit, she continued to engage in this business. She advertised the sale of electronic pods on various online platforms such as WeChat and Xianyu, using specific icons instead of the term "pod" to avoid platform scrutiny. After negotiating prices with customers, Ms. Ma would forward the delivery address and payment to a purchasing agent who had a source for the products. The agent would then directly ship the items to the customers, while Ms. Ma profited from the price difference.

 

On June 2, 2023, the case was transferred to the Tongzhou District Procuratorate for review and prosecution. According to the prosecuting officer Qiu Hua, between August 2021 and July 2022, Ma illegally sold "Marlboro," "Heets," and other brands of IQOS heat-not-burn cigarettes without the necessary licenses from the tobacco regulatory authority. The total amount of illegal operation was over 200,000 yuan, with illegal gains totaling 20,000 yuan.

 

Prosecutors remind that China implements a monopoly licensing system for tobacco, and operating electronic pods without a license may potentially constitute the crime of illegal business operation, especially in severe cases. The country maintains strict regulation on imported e-cigarettes, and the quality and safety of e-cigarettes purchased through overseas sourcing cannot be guaranteed. Moreover, the abundance of flavors in the market may overwhelm consumers, but it is important to note that flavored e-cigarettes are explicitly prohibited from being sold. Therefore, consumers are advised to exercise caution when making purchases.

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
The UK’s Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme will take effect on October 1, 2026. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK will face a flat excise duty of £2.20 per 10ml, whether or not they contain nicotine. Newly manufactured or imported products released onto the UK market from October 1 will require a valid duty stamp, while eligible existing unstamped inventory can continue to be sold through March 31, 2027. From April 1, 2027, all vaping products outside duty suspension must carry a valid stamp.
Sep.03
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26
Snowplus Enters Japan’s FamilyMart Network With Zero-Nicotine NEO Line and Kishidan Campaign
Snowplus Enters Japan’s FamilyMart Network With Zero-Nicotine NEO Line and Kishidan Campaign
Snowplus distributor H&S said the zero-nicotine, zero-tar NEO vaping line will begin rolling out across FamilyMart stores in Japan from September 14, 2026, excluding some locations. The DASH line will also be sold at selected FamilyMart stores in southern Kyushu and Okinawa. Snowplus simultaneously named Japanese rock band Kishidan as a brand ambassador, combining convenience-store distribution with a broader consumer marketing push in Japan.
Sep.15
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21
Australia Tobacco Tax Debate Spreads Within Labor as NSW Premier Minns Reaffirms Support for a Cut
Australia Tobacco Tax Debate Spreads Within Labor as NSW Premier Minns Reaffirms Support for a Cut
Australia’s tobacco excise debate is increasingly exposing differences within the governing Labor Party. New South Wales Labor Premier Chris Minns reaffirmed on September 8 that he supports reducing tobacco excise, arguing that current tax settings are pushing consumers toward cheaper black-market cigarettes. Federal Health Minister Mark Butler continues to oppose an excise cut, while Treasurer Jim Chalmers and Assistant Treasurer Daniel Mulino have recently stopped short of ruling out future changes. The divergence follows the opposition Coalition’s proposal to cut tobacco excise by 80%.
Sep.08
Australia’s One Nation Proposes 75% Tobacco Tax Cut, Says Lower Prices Could Hit Illicit Market
Australia’s One Nation Proposes 75% Tobacco Tax Cut, Says Lower Prices Could Hit Illicit Market
Australia’s One Nation party has proposed cutting tobacco excise by 75%, arguing that lower legal cigarette prices could narrow the gap with illicit tobacco and reduce demand for black-market products. The proposal comes as Australia continues expanding enforcement against illicit tobacco supply chains through border controls, retail inspections and organised-crime investigations. Supporters argue high taxes have contributed to illicit-market growth, while opponents warn that lower tobacco prices could undermine public-health goals. The proposal is a party policy position and has not been adopted by the Australian government.
Aug.18