Illegal Operation of Electronic Pods: A Warning for Consumers

Aug.10.2023
Illegal Operation of Electronic Pods: A Warning for Consumers
Illegal trade of electronic pods, a type of tobacco product, has been exposed in Nantong, Jiangsu province.

Heating non-burning cigarettes, commonly known as e-pods, are tobacco products. Some illegal individuals have started engaging in the "business" of purchasing and reselling heating non-burning cigarettes (commonly known as e-pods) without a tobacco retail license. On August 4th, the defendant Ma was prosecuted by the Tongzhou District Procuratorate in Nantong City, Jiangsu Province. The court sentenced Ma to two years and six months of imprisonment for illegal business operations, with a three-year probation period, and imposed a fine of 20,000 yuan.

 

Original flavor, mint flavor, amber flavor, orange flavor, lemon flavor, tropical fruit flavor..." With so many flavors, you might think they are candies or drinks. In fact, these are all flavors of electronic pods. In April 2020, a resident named Xiao Wu from Liyang was curious and searched on online trading platforms, eventually successfully purchasing overseas electronic pods through a person named Zhu. However, after receiving the goods, Xiao Wu felt that the taste of the pods was different from the ones they had tried before, making it seem like they were fake. As a result, Xiao Wu reported the matter to the Liyang Tobacco Monopoly Bureau.

 

In December 2021, the Liyang Tobacco Monopoly Bureau referred a case to the public security authorities for criminal investigation due to potential involvement in criminal activities. Subsequently, the Liyang Public Security Bureau cracked down on illegal business operations conducted by a suspect named Zhu. Following the trail, they apprehended Zhu's supplier, a person named Ma, regarding illegal business operations as well. The case was then transferred to the Tongzhou District public security authorities for further processing. Investigation revealed that Ma had engaged in purchasing services, taking advantage of her frequent trips abroad, to buy electronic pods for her family and friends. "As I began to be approached by more and more people for assistance in purchasing electronic pods, I gradually realized the hidden business opportunities and started my own purchasing business," Ma confessed. Once her purchasing business took off, she was able to establish connections with individuals who could supply her with electronic pods.

 

Under the allure of money, Ms. Ma naively believed she could get away with selling electronic pods in China without the required tobacco retail license. Despite lacking the necessary permit, she continued to engage in this business. She advertised the sale of electronic pods on various online platforms such as WeChat and Xianyu, using specific icons instead of the term "pod" to avoid platform scrutiny. After negotiating prices with customers, Ms. Ma would forward the delivery address and payment to a purchasing agent who had a source for the products. The agent would then directly ship the items to the customers, while Ms. Ma profited from the price difference.

 

On June 2, 2023, the case was transferred to the Tongzhou District Procuratorate for review and prosecution. According to the prosecuting officer Qiu Hua, between August 2021 and July 2022, Ma illegally sold "Marlboro," "Heets," and other brands of IQOS heat-not-burn cigarettes without the necessary licenses from the tobacco regulatory authority. The total amount of illegal operation was over 200,000 yuan, with illegal gains totaling 20,000 yuan.

 

Prosecutors remind that China implements a monopoly licensing system for tobacco, and operating electronic pods without a license may potentially constitute the crime of illegal business operation, especially in severe cases. The country maintains strict regulation on imported e-cigarettes, and the quality and safety of e-cigarettes purchased through overseas sourcing cannot be guaranteed. Moreover, the abundance of flavors in the market may overwhelm consumers, but it is important to note that flavored e-cigarettes are explicitly prohibited from being sold. Therefore, consumers are advised to exercise caution when making purchases.

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Special Report|AIR H1 Revenue Rises 3.7% as Shisha Volumes Fall 9%, Testing Its Shift Beyond Traditional Hookah
Special Report|AIR H1 Revenue Rises 3.7% as Shisha Volumes Fall 9%, Testing Its Shift Beyond Traditional Hookah
AIR’s first half-year results as a listed company offer a new test of how far a traditional hookah business can transform. H1 2026 revenue rose 3.7%, even as Flavored Shisha Molasses shipments fell 9%, with pricing and mix supporting growth. Traditional shisha still generates almost all revenue, while OOKA, Crown Switch, Greentank and U.S. regulatory spending point to accelerating diversification. The next test is whether those investments can become a second business of meaningful scale and profitability.
Capital Markets
Aug.21
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia Liquid Nicotine Returns to Poisons List, Leaving Vape Retail and RM354 Million Tax Collection in Legal Uncertainty
Malaysia’s withdrawal of its appeal in a landmark liquid-nicotine case has left a High Court ruling that struck down the 2023 nicotine exemption in force, bringing liquid and gel nicotine used in vaping products back under the Poisons Act 1952. At the same time, the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act 2024 continues to provide a regulatory framework for vaping products, creating uncertainty over retail sales, taxation and existing inventory. MPs are calling for nicotine vape sales and excise collection to stop, including refunds of more than RM354 million collected since 2023, while industry and consumer groups are asking the government to clarify the current legal position.
Sep.04
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
A federal judge in Texas on Oct. 8 granted a joint request by the FDA and plaintiffs including Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY to stay litigation challenging the agency's 2021 PMTA rule. The court cited FDA's anticipated rulemaking concerning the regulation at issue. FDA announced on Sept. 28 that it intends to reassess the PMTA framework and could initiate new rulemaking to replace it. The parties must file a joint status report within 45 days and every 45 days thereafter. A motion by three Reynolds American companies to intervene remains pending.
Regulations
Oct.10
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia’s Department of Home Affairs has hired Deloitte to provide data analytics, business-process, communications and project-delivery support to the Office of the Illicit Tobacco and E-Cigarette Commissioner. The government says Deloitte personnel do not provide policy advice to the Commissioner or the Australian government, with policy development and decision-making remaining with public officials. The arrangement has nevertheless drawn scrutiny because Deloitte has previously provided professional services to several tobacco and vaping companies.
Sep.03
Wall Street Journal: U.S. FDA Plans Faster Vape and Nicotine Pouch Reviews, Revisit of 2021 PMTA Rule
Wall Street Journal: U.S. FDA Plans Faster Vape and Nicotine Pouch Reviews, Revisit of 2021 PMTA Rule
The Trump administration is preparing changes intended to accelerate FDA market authorization reviews for e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches, according to The Wall Street Journal. The FDA is expected to revisit its 2021 PMTA rule and may simplify some scientific study requirements and shorten review times. The agency has not formally announced the changes. Over the past year, the FDA has already accelerated nicotine-pouch reviews, expanded ENDS authorizations and upgraded its CTP Portal NextGen application system. As of August 2026, 43 nicotine pouch products and 48 e-cigarette products had received FDA marketing authorization.
Sep.24
Ispire Q4 Revenue Rebounds 33% but Full-Year Sales Still Fall 25% as FY2027 Focus Shifts to Malaysia Manufacturing, ODM, Nicotine Pouches and Age Verification
Ispire Q4 Revenue Rebounds 33% but Full-Year Sales Still Fall 25% as FY2027 Focus Shifts to Malaysia Manufacturing, ODM, Nicotine Pouches and Age Verification
Ispire Technology reported FY2026 revenue of about $96 million, down 24.7% year over year, as U.S. cannabis-vapor hardware and European e-cigarette sales declined by $17.4 million and $12.7 million, respectively. Fourth-quarter revenue rose 32.5% to $26.7 million, while quarterly gross margin fell to 6.3%. For FY2027, the company is prioritizing Malaysia manufacturing and vapor ODM while continuing to develop nicotine pouches, IKE Tech age-verification technology and G-Mesh licensing. Ispire has not separately disclosed the revenue or profit contribution of those newer businesses.
Regulations
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives