Illegal Operation of Electronic Pods: A Warning for Consumers

Aug.10.2023
Illegal Operation of Electronic Pods: A Warning for Consumers
Illegal trade of electronic pods, a type of tobacco product, has been exposed in Nantong, Jiangsu province.

Heating non-burning cigarettes, commonly known as e-pods, are tobacco products. Some illegal individuals have started engaging in the "business" of purchasing and reselling heating non-burning cigarettes (commonly known as e-pods) without a tobacco retail license. On August 4th, the defendant Ma was prosecuted by the Tongzhou District Procuratorate in Nantong City, Jiangsu Province. The court sentenced Ma to two years and six months of imprisonment for illegal business operations, with a three-year probation period, and imposed a fine of 20,000 yuan.

 

Original flavor, mint flavor, amber flavor, orange flavor, lemon flavor, tropical fruit flavor..." With so many flavors, you might think they are candies or drinks. In fact, these are all flavors of electronic pods. In April 2020, a resident named Xiao Wu from Liyang was curious and searched on online trading platforms, eventually successfully purchasing overseas electronic pods through a person named Zhu. However, after receiving the goods, Xiao Wu felt that the taste of the pods was different from the ones they had tried before, making it seem like they were fake. As a result, Xiao Wu reported the matter to the Liyang Tobacco Monopoly Bureau.

 

In December 2021, the Liyang Tobacco Monopoly Bureau referred a case to the public security authorities for criminal investigation due to potential involvement in criminal activities. Subsequently, the Liyang Public Security Bureau cracked down on illegal business operations conducted by a suspect named Zhu. Following the trail, they apprehended Zhu's supplier, a person named Ma, regarding illegal business operations as well. The case was then transferred to the Tongzhou District public security authorities for further processing. Investigation revealed that Ma had engaged in purchasing services, taking advantage of her frequent trips abroad, to buy electronic pods for her family and friends. "As I began to be approached by more and more people for assistance in purchasing electronic pods, I gradually realized the hidden business opportunities and started my own purchasing business," Ma confessed. Once her purchasing business took off, she was able to establish connections with individuals who could supply her with electronic pods.

 

Under the allure of money, Ms. Ma naively believed she could get away with selling electronic pods in China without the required tobacco retail license. Despite lacking the necessary permit, she continued to engage in this business. She advertised the sale of electronic pods on various online platforms such as WeChat and Xianyu, using specific icons instead of the term "pod" to avoid platform scrutiny. After negotiating prices with customers, Ms. Ma would forward the delivery address and payment to a purchasing agent who had a source for the products. The agent would then directly ship the items to the customers, while Ms. Ma profited from the price difference.

 

On June 2, 2023, the case was transferred to the Tongzhou District Procuratorate for review and prosecution. According to the prosecuting officer Qiu Hua, between August 2021 and July 2022, Ma illegally sold "Marlboro," "Heets," and other brands of IQOS heat-not-burn cigarettes without the necessary licenses from the tobacco regulatory authority. The total amount of illegal operation was over 200,000 yuan, with illegal gains totaling 20,000 yuan.

 

Prosecutors remind that China implements a monopoly licensing system for tobacco, and operating electronic pods without a license may potentially constitute the crime of illegal business operation, especially in severe cases. The country maintains strict regulation on imported e-cigarettes, and the quality and safety of e-cigarettes purchased through overseas sourcing cannot be guaranteed. Moreover, the abundance of flavors in the market may overwhelm consumers, but it is important to note that flavored e-cigarettes are explicitly prohibited from being sold. Therefore, consumers are advised to exercise caution when making purchases.

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Product | PIXL Adds 6ml PIXL 5K in UK Alongside 12ml PIXL 8000 as Vape Duty Takes Effect
Product | PIXL Adds 6ml PIXL 5K in UK Alongside 12ml PIXL 8000 as Vape Duty Takes Effect
Vaping brand PIXL has introduced the PIXL 5K reusable prefilled pod device in the UK, featuring a 2ml prefilled pod and a 4ml refill container with a combined e-liquid capacity of 6ml. The device uses 20mg/ml nicotine salt e-liquid and is advertised to deliver up to approximately 5,000 puffs. Available through UK retailers by August 2026, the PIXL 5K sits alongside the existing 12ml PIXL 8000. The UK's Vaping Products Duty took effect on October 1 at £0.22 per millilitre, producing theoretical duty amounts of £1.32 and £2.64 for the two products' respective full refill sets.
product
Oct.10
German Customs Seize 115,800 Vapes in €1.4 Million Tax Case
German Customs Seize 115,800 Vapes in €1.4 Million Tax Case
Germany's Magdeburg Main Customs Office seized 115,800 untaxed e-cigarettes containing a combined 4.366 million mL of e-liquid during four truck inspections between August 10 and September 4, 2026. The seizures prevented an estimated €1.397 million in tax losses and set a record for the customs office's jurisdiction. Criminal proceedings have been initiated against four truck drivers. The case follows a separate German investigation involving more than 7.6 million illicit vapes and an estimated €33.3 million in excise-tax losses.
Enforcement
Oct.13
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As regulators pay closer attention to child safety in nicotine pouches, manufacturers face a practical challenge: how to strengthen child-resistant packaging without unnecessarily reworking products, production lines and regulatory submissions already in place. In a written interview with 2Firsts, Chemular detailed Safeguard’s external packaging approach, its customer-specific testing requirements and possible PMTA pathways. The model remains early-stage, but it offers a new way to think about an increasingly important regulatory and manufacturing issue.
Industry Insight
Sep.19
Special Report | From New York to Washington: How FDA’s Tobacco Center Is Reworking Product Review
Special Report | From New York to Washington: How FDA’s Tobacco Center Is Reworking Product Review
FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products is reshaping how it approaches tobacco product review. Based on 2Firsts’ on-site reporting in New York and Washington, this report traces CTP’s emerging direction: stronger links between PMTA and tobacco harm reduction, more category-specific review, greater emphasis on decision-relevant science, more predictable timelines and expanded use of sPMTA for product modifications. CTP also acknowledged major constraints, including just nine PMTA review teams, persistent backlogs and limits on hiring capacity.
Regulations
Oct.08
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
NAS 2026 | FDA CTP Director Says PMTA Pathway Is “Predicated on Tobacco Harm Reduction”
NAS 2026 | FDA CTP Director Says PMTA Pathway Is “Predicated on Tobacco Harm Reduction”
At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, FDA Center for Tobacco Products Director Bret Koplow said the PMTA pathway is “predicated on tobacco harm reduction.” He outlined four CTP priorities: youth prevention, helping adults quit or switch to lower-risk products, improving relative-risk communication, and reducing unauthorized products. Koplow also addressed flavored e-cigarettes, public risk perceptions, industry credibility and efforts to make PMTA reviews more efficient and predictable.
Sep.26