India's ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco under scrutiny

Dec.08.2022
India's ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco under scrutiny
India bans e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, but experts argue the policy is ineffective and harms consumers.

On December 2, 2019, the upper house of India's parliament approved a ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products citing the World Health Organization's guidelines about the threat posed to young people.


Three years later, consumer advocates and experts in reducing tobacco harm state that the ban has been ineffective, as no safety checks or measures to combat the black market have been implemented, resulting in even greater harm.


According to public health expert and former director of the UK anti-smoking organization Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), Clive Bates, "From a large body of research, we know that electronic cigarettes are far less harmful than smoking and are replacing combustible tobacco. Therefore, allowing the sale of deadly cigarettes while banning electronic cigarettes is a ridiculous policy.


Bates presented information during a webinar organized by the Association of Vapers India (AVI), a non-profit consumer organization representing the interests of 270 million tobacco users in the country.


Jagannath Sarangapani, a member of the AVI that organized the event, said, "This ban has had a negative impact on over 100 million smokers in India, depriving them of their basic rights to health, choice, and a good life.


A web seminar titled "The Necessity of Developing Countries to Reduce Tobacco Harm" was held, with speakers and panel members from around the world, including Asia, Africa, and Latin America where 80% of tobacco users reside.


Every smoker is different and they need all available options to quit smoking. Taking away any one option would harm people and result in deaths," said Charles Gardner, Executive Director of INNCO, an organization made up of consumer groups from 37 countries, and former health commissioner at the U.S. embassy in India.


Peter Dator, of the Philippine consumer organization, stated that this decision could potentially reduce the country's smoking rate and could serve as a model for other developing countries. The regulation provides controlled access for adult smokers while also protecting minors. The law distinguishes between smoking and safer nicotine products.


Dr. Jasjit Ahluwalia, a public health scientist at Brown University in the United States, expressed regret about India's lack of safer nicotine alternatives. "Reducing harm is a well-established concept, but we have not accepted alternative products in tobacco control because we dislike the industry so much that we have forgotten about smokers," he said. Learning that India has banned nicotine alternatives and even research on alternative products, he feels upset. "This is tragic. Science should provide information for policy.


The main author of the "Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction" report, Harry Shapiro, has raised doubts about the Indian government's justification for the "Protecting Youth" ban. According to Shapiro, "India's latest global youth tobacco survey data reveals that 7 million schoolchildren used cigarettes in the past 30 days, and 3,000 used e-cigarettes. Therefore, this ban is more about money and politics than public health.


Many speakers also emphasized the role played by organizations sponsored by the WHO and Bloomberg in promoting the ban of new nicotine products in developing countries. Joseph Magero, a former tobacco control advocate in Kenya, stated that the WHO's ideological approach had been unsuccessful.


History has shown us time and time again that prohibition does not work. Prohibiting alcohol has led to an illegal market. Banning these products not only fails to achieve public health goals, but instead pushes them into unregulated and uncontrollable black markets," he remarked.


Physicist and director of a consumer non-profit organization, Roberto Sussman, has expressed support for e-cigarette users in India, stating that their situation is similar to ours due to government agencies spreading misinformation about e-cigarettes. However, we must continue to push back, despite bans on sales, as there is a black market for these products and people know that e-cigarettes can be a safer alternative.


Nancy Loucas, Executive Director of CAPHRA (Coalition of Asia-Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates), shared some positive views and said, "There is reason to be optimistic. The harm reduction movement has begun in the East and is moving westward.


Starting from New Zealand, the trend of lifting bans on e-cigarettes is spreading to the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia. These countries are now also studying regulatory frameworks, while Thailand is also discussing reversing its ban on e-cigarettes. However, India needs to become the litmus test for a more comprehensive global transformation. With time, we will arrive there.


2FIRSTS will continue to provide ongoing coverage of this topic, with additional updates available on the '2FIRSTSAPP'. Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

UK ONS Data: Vaping Rate Among Women Aged 25–34 Reaches 18.3%, Compared With 14.4% for Men
UK ONS Data: Vaping Rate Among Women Aged 25–34 Reaches 18.3%, Compared With 14.4% for Men
The vaping rate among women aged 25 to 34 in Great Britain reached 18.3% in 2025, up from 13.7% in 2024 and 8.3% in 2020, according to data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS). The figure was the highest for this group since records began in 2014 and exceeded the 14.4% recorded among men of the same age. Adults aged 25 to 34 also overtook those aged 16 to 24 as the age group with the highest vaping prevalence. Overall, about 5.4 million adults in Great Britain used e-cigarettes in 2025, broadly unchanged from the previous year.
DATA
Oct.13
Product | Four CrossBar 20K 13mL High-Puff Vapes Listed on Pennsylvania's ENDS Directory, Rated for Up to 20,000 Puffs
Product | Four CrossBar 20K 13mL High-Puff Vapes Listed on Pennsylvania's ENDS Directory, Rated for Up to 20,000 Puffs
Four CrossBar 20K disposable e-cigarettes appeared on Pennsylvania's 163-entry ENDS directory ahead of enforcement beginning October 19, 2026. The devices feature 13mL e-liquid reservoirs, 50mg/mL nicotine, 2,000mAh batteries and 0.9Ω mesh coils, with advertised puff counts of up to 20,000. CrossBar was the only modern high-puff disposable series among the directory's 15 disposable entries. Its packaging emphasizes New York design and Japanese-origin flavoring, while historical CrossBar records identify a registered U.S. tobacco manufacturing-related establishment. The link between the newer 13mL devices and earlier 1.3mL PMTA filings remains unconfirmed.
product
Oct.26
Special Report | How Capital Is Reassessing the Global Tobacco and Modern Nicotine Industry: Lessons from a New York Forum
Special Report | How Capital Is Reassessing the Global Tobacco and Modern Nicotine Industry: Lessons from a New York Forum
Capital is reassessing the global tobacco and modern nicotine industry as heated tobacco, vaping and nicotine pouches reshape demand, profitability and regulation. At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, investors and analysts examined whether smoke-free growth can sustain earnings, how regulation shapes startup value, and whether shareholder engagement can be more effective than divestment. The debate points to a broader shift: tobacco transition is increasingly becoming a capital-allocation, governance and valuation question.
Capital Markets
Oct.05
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Special report|Indonesia's Vape Industry Has 200 Manufacturers and $1.7 Billion in Investment. Could a Regulatory Divide Derail Its Rise as the World's No. 2 Manufacturing Hub After Shenzhen?
Special report|Indonesia's Vape Industry Has 200 Manufacturers and $1.7 Billion in Investment. Could a Regulatory Divide Derail Its Rise as the World's No. 2 Manufacturing Hub After Shenzhen?
Indonesia's Ministry of Industry said at a November 3, 2026, policy forum that the country has about 200 electronic cigarette companies, Rp31 trillion (approximately $1.71 billion) in cumulative industry investment and around 100,000 jobs across the supply chain. The National Narcotics Agency is seeking a comprehensive ban on vape use and circulation, while the industry ministry favors tighter import, product-standard and distribution controls. Indonesia exported approximately $518 million in vaping products in 2025, and Chinese manufacturers including Smoore, GEEKVAPE and Jinjia Group have established local operations. An international logistics specialist interviewed by 2Firsts said more Chinese vape companies began production in Indonesia from the second half of 2025, accompanied by increased shipments of manufacturing equipment and investment in logistics facilities. The regulatory debate comes as Indonesia expands its role in international vaping manufacturing.
Special Report
Nov.05
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
The Philippines’ Bureau of Internal Revenue is intensifying enforcement against illicit vape and tobacco products ahead of the Christmas shopping season, directing regional and enforcement offices to strengthen monitoring of production sites, warehouses, distribution channels and retail outlets. The BIR destroyed 240,550 illicit vape products in August with an estimated tax liability of about PHP1.53 billion. A nationwide tax-compliance operation in July also inspected 3,590 businesses involved in tobacco and vapor products.
Regulations
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives