India's ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco under scrutiny

Dec.08.2022
India's ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco under scrutiny
India bans e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, but experts argue the policy is ineffective and harms consumers.

On December 2, 2019, the upper house of India's parliament approved a ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products citing the World Health Organization's guidelines about the threat posed to young people.


Three years later, consumer advocates and experts in reducing tobacco harm state that the ban has been ineffective, as no safety checks or measures to combat the black market have been implemented, resulting in even greater harm.


According to public health expert and former director of the UK anti-smoking organization Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), Clive Bates, "From a large body of research, we know that electronic cigarettes are far less harmful than smoking and are replacing combustible tobacco. Therefore, allowing the sale of deadly cigarettes while banning electronic cigarettes is a ridiculous policy.


Bates presented information during a webinar organized by the Association of Vapers India (AVI), a non-profit consumer organization representing the interests of 270 million tobacco users in the country.


Jagannath Sarangapani, a member of the AVI that organized the event, said, "This ban has had a negative impact on over 100 million smokers in India, depriving them of their basic rights to health, choice, and a good life.


A web seminar titled "The Necessity of Developing Countries to Reduce Tobacco Harm" was held, with speakers and panel members from around the world, including Asia, Africa, and Latin America where 80% of tobacco users reside.


Every smoker is different and they need all available options to quit smoking. Taking away any one option would harm people and result in deaths," said Charles Gardner, Executive Director of INNCO, an organization made up of consumer groups from 37 countries, and former health commissioner at the U.S. embassy in India.


Peter Dator, of the Philippine consumer organization, stated that this decision could potentially reduce the country's smoking rate and could serve as a model for other developing countries. The regulation provides controlled access for adult smokers while also protecting minors. The law distinguishes between smoking and safer nicotine products.


Dr. Jasjit Ahluwalia, a public health scientist at Brown University in the United States, expressed regret about India's lack of safer nicotine alternatives. "Reducing harm is a well-established concept, but we have not accepted alternative products in tobacco control because we dislike the industry so much that we have forgotten about smokers," he said. Learning that India has banned nicotine alternatives and even research on alternative products, he feels upset. "This is tragic. Science should provide information for policy.


The main author of the "Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction" report, Harry Shapiro, has raised doubts about the Indian government's justification for the "Protecting Youth" ban. According to Shapiro, "India's latest global youth tobacco survey data reveals that 7 million schoolchildren used cigarettes in the past 30 days, and 3,000 used e-cigarettes. Therefore, this ban is more about money and politics than public health.


Many speakers also emphasized the role played by organizations sponsored by the WHO and Bloomberg in promoting the ban of new nicotine products in developing countries. Joseph Magero, a former tobacco control advocate in Kenya, stated that the WHO's ideological approach had been unsuccessful.


History has shown us time and time again that prohibition does not work. Prohibiting alcohol has led to an illegal market. Banning these products not only fails to achieve public health goals, but instead pushes them into unregulated and uncontrollable black markets," he remarked.


Physicist and director of a consumer non-profit organization, Roberto Sussman, has expressed support for e-cigarette users in India, stating that their situation is similar to ours due to government agencies spreading misinformation about e-cigarettes. However, we must continue to push back, despite bans on sales, as there is a black market for these products and people know that e-cigarettes can be a safer alternative.


Nancy Loucas, Executive Director of CAPHRA (Coalition of Asia-Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates), shared some positive views and said, "There is reason to be optimistic. The harm reduction movement has begun in the East and is moving westward.


Starting from New Zealand, the trend of lifting bans on e-cigarettes is spreading to the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia. These countries are now also studying regulatory frameworks, while Thailand is also discussing reversing its ban on e-cigarettes. However, India needs to become the litmus test for a more comprehensive global transformation. With time, we will arrive there.


2FIRSTS will continue to provide ongoing coverage of this topic, with additional updates available on the '2FIRSTSAPP'. Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

South Korea Vape Strategies Diverge as BAT Reconsiders Exit and PMI Takes VEEV to About 14,000 Stores
South Korea Vape Strategies Diverge as BAT Reconsiders Exit and PMI Takes VEEV to About 14,000 Stores
BAT Rothmans says it previously considered exiting South Korea's vaping market because of competitive pressure from unregulated products, but is now reassessing conditions following changes to the country's nicotine regulatory framework. Vuse and other BAT vaping products remain available through existing distribution channels. The statement followed a South Korean media report that interpreted BAT's broader withdrawal from selected Vapour markets as a full exit from South Korea. Meanwhile, Philip Morris International launched VEEV inPRIME in the country in June and began expanding distribution to around 14,000 convenience stores and other retail channels in July. The contrasting moves highlight differing investment strategies as South Korea's regulated vaping market evolves.
Aug.14
Major U.S.  Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
Major U.S. Vape Distributor Demand Vape Pays at Least $300,000 for White House Lobbying Amid Enforcement Pressure
New York vape distributor Ecto World, which operates as Demand Vape, hired political consultant Roger Stone to lobby the Executive Office of the President on regulation of vaping and related products while facing state enforcement and multiple lawsuits. Public lobbying disclosures show that Ecto World paid at least $300,000 for the work through June 30, 2026. Separately, New York State announced in March that more than 28,500 pounds of vaping products tied to the company had been seized, while New York City and the state have pursued legal or enforcement actions. Public records do not show that the lobbying directly changed any specific regulatory or enforcement outcome.
Sep.08
BAT New Categories Revenue Rises 18% in H1 2026 as Broad Portfolio Offers More Ways to Win—and Lose
BAT New Categories Revenue Rises 18% in H1 2026 as Broad Portfolio Offers More Ways to Win—and Lose
British American Tobacco’s New Category revenue rose 18% at constant rates in the first half of 2026. Nicotine-pouch brand Velo expanded rapidly, while Vuse recovered as U.S. enforcement against illicit e-vapor products strengthened. Heated-tobacco platform glo remained under pressure, and cigarettes continued to provide most of the group’s profit and cash. Compared with PMI and JT, BAT has more routes to growth—but also greater regulatory, investment and execution risks across its broader portfolio.
BAT
Jul.30
Product | JT Launches Ploom AURA Glacier White in Japan, Expanding the Device Ecosystem Through Color and Accessories
Product | JT Launches Ploom AURA Glacier White in Japan, Expanding the Device Ecosystem Through Color and Accessories
Japan Tobacco Inc. (JT) has introduced the Ploom AURA Glacier White heated tobacco device in Japan, adding a new color option to the existing Ploom AURA lineup. The device maintains the existing SMART HEATFLOW technology and HEAT SELECT SYSTEM with four heating modes, while expanding the ecosystem through new accessories including front panels, back covers, a car holder and wireless charging covers. The product entered pre-sale in Japan on June 30, 2026, followed by broader retail availability from July 7.
Aug.03
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
As FDA Reshapes PMTA Reviews and ENDS Enforcement Priorities, CTP Acting Director Bret Koplow to Keynote NATO Event for a Retail Network of 66,000-Plus Stores
Bret Koplow, acting director of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Center for Tobacco Products, will deliver a keynote and participate in a fireside chat at the National Association of Tobacco Outlets' Sept. 29-30 conference in Washington. His appearance comes months after the FDA moved to accelerate PMTA reviews and introduced a more differentiated enforcement policy for certain unauthorized ENDS and oral nicotine pouch products. The agency also plans a public list identifying manufacturers and products it does not currently intend to prioritize for enforcement under the May guidance. NATO says its membership includes more than 66,000 retail stores, making product-status transparency and enforcement boundaries directly relevant to the retail sector.
Aug.14
Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List
Charlie’s Says 30 PACHA Vape SKUs Tentatively Identified for FDA’s Non-Priority Enforcement Public List
Charlie’s Holdings said the U.S. Food and Drug Administration notified the company on June 23, 2026, that 30 PACHA vape SKUs with submitted PMTAs had been tentatively identified for inclusion on a planned public-facing FDA webpage. Under enforcement guidance issued by FDA in May, the webpage is intended to identify certain unauthorized products for which the agency generally does not intend to prioritize enforcement of premarket authorization requirements. Charlie’s disclosed the development alongside second-quarter revenue of $3.8 million, up 116% year over year.
Aug.25