India's ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco under scrutiny

Dec.08.2022
India's ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco under scrutiny
India bans e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, but experts argue the policy is ineffective and harms consumers.

On December 2, 2019, the upper house of India's parliament approved a ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products citing the World Health Organization's guidelines about the threat posed to young people.


Three years later, consumer advocates and experts in reducing tobacco harm state that the ban has been ineffective, as no safety checks or measures to combat the black market have been implemented, resulting in even greater harm.


According to public health expert and former director of the UK anti-smoking organization Action on Smoking and Health (ASH), Clive Bates, "From a large body of research, we know that electronic cigarettes are far less harmful than smoking and are replacing combustible tobacco. Therefore, allowing the sale of deadly cigarettes while banning electronic cigarettes is a ridiculous policy.


Bates presented information during a webinar organized by the Association of Vapers India (AVI), a non-profit consumer organization representing the interests of 270 million tobacco users in the country.


Jagannath Sarangapani, a member of the AVI that organized the event, said, "This ban has had a negative impact on over 100 million smokers in India, depriving them of their basic rights to health, choice, and a good life.


A web seminar titled "The Necessity of Developing Countries to Reduce Tobacco Harm" was held, with speakers and panel members from around the world, including Asia, Africa, and Latin America where 80% of tobacco users reside.


Every smoker is different and they need all available options to quit smoking. Taking away any one option would harm people and result in deaths," said Charles Gardner, Executive Director of INNCO, an organization made up of consumer groups from 37 countries, and former health commissioner at the U.S. embassy in India.


Peter Dator, of the Philippine consumer organization, stated that this decision could potentially reduce the country's smoking rate and could serve as a model for other developing countries. The regulation provides controlled access for adult smokers while also protecting minors. The law distinguishes between smoking and safer nicotine products.


Dr. Jasjit Ahluwalia, a public health scientist at Brown University in the United States, expressed regret about India's lack of safer nicotine alternatives. "Reducing harm is a well-established concept, but we have not accepted alternative products in tobacco control because we dislike the industry so much that we have forgotten about smokers," he said. Learning that India has banned nicotine alternatives and even research on alternative products, he feels upset. "This is tragic. Science should provide information for policy.


The main author of the "Global State of Tobacco Harm Reduction" report, Harry Shapiro, has raised doubts about the Indian government's justification for the "Protecting Youth" ban. According to Shapiro, "India's latest global youth tobacco survey data reveals that 7 million schoolchildren used cigarettes in the past 30 days, and 3,000 used e-cigarettes. Therefore, this ban is more about money and politics than public health.


Many speakers also emphasized the role played by organizations sponsored by the WHO and Bloomberg in promoting the ban of new nicotine products in developing countries. Joseph Magero, a former tobacco control advocate in Kenya, stated that the WHO's ideological approach had been unsuccessful.


History has shown us time and time again that prohibition does not work. Prohibiting alcohol has led to an illegal market. Banning these products not only fails to achieve public health goals, but instead pushes them into unregulated and uncontrollable black markets," he remarked.


Physicist and director of a consumer non-profit organization, Roberto Sussman, has expressed support for e-cigarette users in India, stating that their situation is similar to ours due to government agencies spreading misinformation about e-cigarettes. However, we must continue to push back, despite bans on sales, as there is a black market for these products and people know that e-cigarettes can be a safer alternative.


Nancy Loucas, Executive Director of CAPHRA (Coalition of Asia-Pacific Tobacco Harm Reduction Advocates), shared some positive views and said, "There is reason to be optimistic. The harm reduction movement has begun in the East and is moving westward.


Starting from New Zealand, the trend of lifting bans on e-cigarettes is spreading to the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia. These countries are now also studying regulatory frameworks, while Thailand is also discussing reversing its ban on e-cigarettes. However, India needs to become the litmus test for a more comprehensive global transformation. With time, we will arrive there.


2FIRSTS will continue to provide ongoing coverage of this topic, with additional updates available on the '2FIRSTSAPP'. Scan the QR code below to download the app.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

French Anti-Tobacco Group Questions PMI’s IQOS “Curiosity” Campaign Over Potential Youth Appeal
French Anti-Tobacco Group Questions PMI’s IQOS “Curiosity” Campaign Over Potential Youth Appeal
According to French anti-tobacco group Générations Sans Tabac, Philip Morris International’s (PMI) IQOS “Curiosity” campaign has drawn attention from public health advocates. The group argues that the campaign uses themes including curiosity, exploration and lifestyle branding that could increase interest among younger audiences. PMI has positioned IQOS as a key part of its smoke-free product strategy, while France maintains strict restrictions on tobacco and nicotine product marketing. The debate highlights ongoing tensions between heated tobacco branding strategies and public health concerns in Europe.
Jul.24
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
A Scottish government impact assessment estimates that proposed vape display and packaging rules could create up to £61 million ($82 million) in compliance costs for businesses, affecting more than 11,000 retail outlets. The estimated costs are mainly linked to inventory adjustments, retail storage changes and the resources required for businesses to understand and implement the new requirements. The measures form part of the UK’s broader efforts to tighten vape regulation, particularly around product displays, packaging and sales practices.
Aug.10
China Discloses First Criminal Case Over Counterfeit Vapes Disguised as “Medical Nebulizers” and “Zero-Nicotine” Products
China Discloses First Criminal Case Over Counterfeit Vapes Disguised as “Medical Nebulizers” and “Zero-Nicotine” Products
Chinese authorities have disclosed the country’s first reported criminal case involving counterfeit vapes marketed as “medical nebulizers” and “zero-nicotine” products. Authorities determined that the products involved were counterfeit vapes and pursued criminal charges for producing and selling counterfeit goods. According to the report, the case resulted in the seizure of 347,000 counterfeit vape pods and 53,700 vape devices, with physical goods valued at 22.13 million yuan.
Aug.04
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia will place e-cigarettes and related nicotine products under its “strategic goods” framework from August 20, 2026. According to TVP World’s report published on August 19, the newly listed items include e-cigarettes, electronic smoking devices, vape liquids and nicotine salts. Individuals who illegally move these products across Russia’s customs border or its state border with other Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) members could face up to five years in prison if shipment values exceed 100,000 rubles (about €1,000), provided all elements of a criminal offence are established.
Aug.20
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
A U.S. appeals court ruled that British American Tobacco (BAT) must continue facing a consumer class action lawsuit over cigarette labels. The ruling allows the case to proceed but does not determine that BAT violated the law or is liable for damages. The case highlights ongoing legal risks facing major tobacco companies related to product labeling, consumer disclosures and product liability claims.
Jul.31
Vietnam’s Vape Crackdown Expands From Ban Proposal to Grassroots Enforcement
Vietnam’s Vape Crackdown Expands From Ban Proposal to Grassroots Enforcement
Vietnam tightens e-cigarette rules. Health Ministry proposes banning production, trade, transport, storage, ads, promotion, sponsorship, and use of e-cigarettes, heated tobacco, and new products. Hanoi also urges residents to report illegal activities, showing enforcement moves from lawmaking to local action.
Jul.08