Innokin Issues Product Recall Notice for Kroma Nova Model

Business by 2FIRSTS
May.20.2024
Innokin Issues Product Recall Notice for Kroma Nova Model
Innokin issues recall notice for all Kroma Nova products due to safety concerns with unique charging solution components.

Recently, the official website of Innokin has issued a product recall notice for the Kroma Nova.

 

The contents of the announcement are as follows:

 

We would like to inform you that the INNOKIN Kroma Nova product is now being recalled. This recall covers all production batches of the Kroma Nova. The Kroma Nova uses a unique charging solution that requires special components specifically designed for this model. Unfortunately, the components from the supplier are defective and may pose a safety risk.

 

In order to ensure customer safety and maintain high standards for our products, we have decided to issue a precautionary recall for the INNOKIN Kroma Nova.

 

Innokin is proud of its high safety standards and complete transparency with customers. We encourage all Innokin customers to contact us at any time when they encounter issues so that our team can promptly address them.

 

Customer: Please contact us at support@innokin.com for further details on the recall process. Enterprise customers: Please contact your sales representative.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Russia's Finance Ministry Proposes Regional Vape Sales Bans from 2026
Russia's Finance Ministry Proposes Regional Vape Sales Bans from 2026
Russian Finance Ministry has drafted amendments allowing regional governments to ban the retail sale of vapes and e-liquids between September 1, 2026, and September 1, 2031. Regions must enact their own legislation and notify the Federal Service for Alcohol and Tobacco Control (Rosalkogoltabakkontrol), which will publish a list of participating regions.
Dec.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysian Langkawi marine police seize vape devices and e-liquid worth US$43,902
Malaysian Langkawi marine police seize vape devices and e-liquid worth US$43,902
In Langkawi, Malaysia, the Marine Police seized various vape devices and e-liquid valued at RM178,400 (about US$43,902.99). Authorities believe the goods were intended to be smuggled out to a neighboring country.
Jan.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
PMI Launches IQOS ILUMA i in the Philippines, Debuts via Official Stores and Online Channels
PMI Launches IQOS ILUMA i in the Philippines, Debuts via Official Stores and Online Channels
PMFTC, the Philippine affiliate of Philip Morris International (PMI), has introduced the heated tobacco device IQOS ILUMA i in the Philippines, featuring induction-heating technology and multiple smart functions. PMI aims to increase the share of smoke-free products to around 66% of its net revenues by 2030. Previously, PMFTC had already launched ZYN nicotine pouch products in Manila.
Nov.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Pakistan Speeds Up Local Nicotine Pouch Production as PMI Unit Prepares to Launch ZYN
Pakistan Speeds Up Local Nicotine Pouch Production as PMI Unit Prepares to Launch ZYN
Pakistan’s smokeless, tobacco-free nicotine pouch market has expanded rapidly in recent years, prompting major tobacco companies to accelerate local investments, with Philip Morris Pakistan Ltd. (PMPKL) set to produce ZYN at its Sahiwal facility.
Dec.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mexico City hands over 50,376 vapes and e-cigarettes for destruction, valued at USD 570,000
Mexico City hands over 50,376 vapes and e-cigarettes for destruction, valued at USD 570,000
Mexico City Head of Government Clara Brugada handed over 50,376 vapes and e-cigarettes in the Zócalo for final destruction. The report puts the value at 10 million pesos (about USD 570,000) and says the goods were seized from a stall and a warehouse in the Historic Center, with one person detained because selling these products is illegal.
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
AG Miyares Argues Vape Ban Consistent with Federal Law, Seeks Dismissal
AG Miyares Argues Vape Ban Consistent with Federal Law, Seeks Dismissal
Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares and Tax Commissioner James J. Alex have asked a federal court to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the state’s ban on flavored e-cigarettes. They argue plaintiffs lack standing because the products are already illegal under federal law. The state denies claims of federal preemption and asserts sovereign immunity, maintaining that its ban aligns with its authority to protect public health.
Nov.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai