Is the US Disposable E-cigarette Market in a Bubble?

Mar.09.2022
Is the US Disposable E-cigarette Market in a Bubble?
The US disposable e-cigarette market shows no signs of a bubble, with demand still rising and supply and pricing in balance.

Perhaps there are already some bubbles in the American market," said Li Ming (pseudonym), the general manager of a disposable cigarette butt manufacturer, in an interview with "2FIRSTS." He clearly feels that production pace is slowing down after 2022.

 

Last year, it was difficult to see logistics companies as they were all busy with shipments, but this year they are much easier to schedule with," said Li Ming. "Additionally, logistics prices have decreased by half compared to last year's peak.

 

As the world's largest consumer market of electronic cigarettes, has the United States already experienced a bubble just one year after the boom? To explore this issue, "2FIRSTS" interviewed multiple participants in the disposable cigarette supply chain.

 

Market demand is steadily increasing and there is currently no evidence of overproduction capacity.

 

In 2021, it can be said that the e-cigarette industry has boomed, particularly with the popularity of disposable e-cigarettes in the American market.

 

According to the "2021 Electronic Cigarette Industry Blue Book," the global retail scale of electronic cigarettes reached $80 billion in 2021, a year-on-year increase of 120%; domestic electronic cigarette exports reached 138.3 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 180%; Among them, the proportion of exports to the United States exceeds 50%, and the proportion of disposable cigarettes is 65%, reaching 89.9 billion yuan.

 

If a real bubble were to occur, it would undoubtedly be due to oversupply and an excessive increase in the social inventory of disposable cigarettes.

 

Looking at the demand side, all parties interviewed by "2FIRSTS" agree that the demand in the US market will continue to grow this year.

 

According to Shi Ming, the overseas business executive at Yijiate, the shipment volume of disposable cigarettes this year has continued to experience a relatively rapid growth compared to last year, with an increase of approximately 30%.

 

Shi Ming also stated, "Currently, the penetration rate of electronic cigarettes in the United States is over 30%, and it has a characteristic of being popular among young people. As these young people grow up, there is still a significant potential for growth in the future.

 

Lisa, who has been deeply involved in the American e-cigarette market for many years and has managed multiple brands, believes that "at least this year, there will be no decline in demand for disposable e-cigarettes in the US market.

 

Huang, who has been involved in the electronic cigarette logistics industry for many years, is confident that "the sales volume of disposable e-cigarettes from January to March has not decreased, and the electronic cigarette market in the United States will definitely continue to grow this year.

 

Looking at the supply side, according to a previous interview with Li Ming, the current monthly production capacity of disposable cigarettes in Shenzhen is approximately 30 million to 50 million.

 

According to Shi Ming's estimation, a single-use cigarette consumer in the United States currently consumes about 4 million units per day, averaging one every three days, with a monthly consumption of 40 million units.

 

By comparing the two, it can be concluded that they are basically in a state of supply and demand equilibrium.

 

Moreover, the prices have increased compared to last year, which contradicts the characteristics of a market bubble.

 

Shi Ming stated that, "On one hand, the price of a design model will be higher than a basic model; on the other hand, as demand increases, the price naturally becomes higher.

 

Lisa provided another perspective, stating that the development of new energy vehicle projects in China has led to a severe shortage in the supply of lithium batteries, causing prices to continue rising, which may have an impact on shipment quantities to some extent. In the next three months at least, there will be a certain increase in product prices. The tight supply of lithium batteries also implies that there is basically no increase in social inventory.

 

Huang emphasized that "logistics costs still make up a significant percentage, possibly as much as 20%. The reason for the drop in logistics prices this year is mainly due to insufficient capacity last year, which led to high prices.

 

Overall, it can be concluded that there is currently no bubble in the US market.

 

. The homogenization of products is severe, and the survival conditions of manufacturers vary.

 

While it cannot be said that there is a bubble in the market, the feelings of Li Ming are not unfounded. Both Shi Ming and Lisa mentioned that the phenomenon of homogenization among domestic manufacturers is serious.

 

Due to the low entry barriers for the production of disposable cigarettes, there has been little technological innovation in this industry. Currently, major manufacturers can only focus on the design of the cigarette's appearance.

 

According to Lisa, "The phenomenon of over-indulgence is particularly evident among domestic brand merchants. After last year, the number of competitors increased significantly and more and more investors entered the electronic cigarette industry, leading to an increasing competition among manufacturers.

 

Shi Ming also mentioned that "homogenization is very serious, whether it is the basic model or the design model. The competition for the basic model has reached a white-hot stage, and the design model also faces the same problem. When a one-time cigarette of a certain design becomes popular, it will soon be imitated by other manufacturers.

 

At the same time, the gap between large and small factories is narrowing. Shi Ming stated that "in the early days, there was a difference in suction between products from large and small factories. However, after several years of development, everyone has improved in this area, and the gap is getting smaller.

 

The severe homogenization of products and intense competition has resulted in varying levels of survival among different manufacturers.

 

Currently, there are two main modes of operation for domestic disposable cigarette manufacturers in China - one is to serve as an original equipment manufacturer for foreign brands, while the other is to create their own brand. The former can be further broken down into producing for well-known foreign brands or providing manufacturing services for smaller clients.

 

Shi Ming stated that "manufacturers who work for strong foreign brands can obtain continuous and stable orders, but those who work for small clients may face an unstable situation in terms of orders and can only continuously develop new products for new clients.

 

Regarding companies that establish their own brand, Lisa stated that "consumers tend to buy familiar brands, and unless Chinese brands are highly linked to American customers, it is difficult for them to enter the American market.

 

Shi Ming also agrees that the association between a brand and its dealers can affect sales, but he has a different perspective on Chinese brands. He believes that "since their inception, they have intentionally downplayed their image as Chinese brands, and foreign consumers cannot distinguish whether or not they are Chinese brands. Currently, there are several Chinese brands that are selling well.

 

In addition, with the penetration of single-use cigarettes into the fast-moving consumer goods channels, there are more and more dominant distributors. Although the 30-day payment period for goods has not changed, there are increasing numbers of distributors requesting this payment period. The market is gradually shifting towards a buyer's market.

 

In addition, the shortage of lithium battery supply and the requirement for manufacturers to purchase goods in cash have put higher demands on the cash flow of both small and large factories.

 

Therefore, it is not difficult to understand Li Ming's feelings about the slowdown in pace. However, regardless, all of the interviewees believed that blindly pursuing growth in scale is not a sustainable strategy.

 

Li Ming stated, "In order to achieve high-quality development, we must shift our focus from seeking growth through the past to seeking transformation.

 

Shi Ming stated, "In the absence of technological innovation, we can only make products with a more industrial design on the outside.

 

Lisa believes that in order to succeed, one must create more competitive products that stand out from the crowd, streamline the supply chain to obtain more competitive prices and delivery times, and establish a strong brand identity through effective marketing. Once a reputation for quality has been established in the marketplace, obtaining orders and customers will be much easier.

 

Disclaimer: This article is for reference only and does not constitute any investment advice. Enterprises should use the information and views in this article with caution and seek advice from authoritative departments or legal institutions when necessary.

 

Reference: "2021 E-cigarette Industry Blue Book" by the E-cigarette Industry Committee of the China Electronic Commerce Association and the Juju Think Tank.

 


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
On-Site Report | CTP Details PMTA Backlog, 180-Day Review Goal and sPMTA Process
On-Site Report | CTP Details PMTA Backlog, 180-Day Review Goal and sPMTA Process
FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products detailed new PMTA review data and process changes at the 2026 FDLI conference. Pending PMTAs fell from about 450,000 at the start of 2025 to 135,000 by September 2026. CTP also discussed its 180-day review goal, current sPMTA pilot, alternate-supplier planning, more than 50,300 pending SE reports, and lessons from the nicotine pouch pilot already being applied to ENDS review.
Regulations
Oct.07
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Swedish Match Faces Broader Labeling Order After ZYN Inspection, Documents Obtained by 2Firsts Show
Documents obtained by 2Firsts show that Sweden's Public Health Agency ordered Swedish Match to revise ingredient labels beyond the five ZYN products inspected. The dispute centers on whether flavoring ingredients must be individually disclosed, with Swedish Match citing trade-secret protection and the regulator insisting on full ingredient disclosure. The company faces a conditional penalty of SEK 2 million per month for noncompliance. As of October 22, the agency had received no appeal, despite the company's stated intention to challenge the decision.
Oct.22
Product | JT Launches Three Autumn-Limited Ploom Tobacco Sticks in Japan Across EVO, MEVIUS and CAMEL Brands
Product | JT Launches Three Autumn-Limited Ploom Tobacco Sticks in Japan Across EVO, MEVIUS and CAMEL Brands
Japan Tobacco Inc. (JT) launched three limited-edition autumn tobacco sticks for its Ploom heated tobacco devices in Japan on October 16, 2026, under the EVO, MEVIUS and CAMEL brands. All three are regular tobacco variants with seasonal packaging. Each pack contains 20 sticks, priced at ¥620, ¥590 and ¥570, respectively, including tax. The products are compatible with all Ploom devices and are sold in limited quantities exclusively through the CLUB JT online store while supplies last.
product
Oct.20
PMI Expands U.S. ZYN Portfolio With New 1.5 mg and 8 mg Strengths, Moves Toward a Unified 20-Pouch-Per-Can Format
PMI Expands U.S. ZYN Portfolio With New 1.5 mg and 8 mg Strengths, Moves Toward a Unified 20-Pouch-Per-Can Format
Philip Morris International is expanding its U.S. ZYN nicotine pouch portfolio with new 1.5 mg and 8 mg strengths and plans to move its core 3 mg and 6 mg dry-pouch products from 15 to 20 pouches per can in the fourth quarter of 2026. ZYN ULTRA is also commercially available, with FDA authorization covering 10 products at 9 mg and one 11 mg Smooth product. PMI U.S. lists the new 1.5 mg and 8 mg strengths as commercially available, but as of September 10 they do not appear on the FDA’s public authorization list. Public materials do not identify which PMTA submissions cover the two new strengths or their current review status.
Sep.11
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
A federal judge in Texas on Oct. 8 granted a joint request by the FDA and plaintiffs including Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY to stay litigation challenging the agency's 2021 PMTA rule. The court cited FDA's anticipated rulemaking concerning the regulation at issue. FDA announced on Sept. 28 that it intends to reassess the PMTA framework and could initiate new rulemaking to replace it. The parties must file a joint status report within 45 days and every 45 days thereafter. A motion by three Reynolds American companies to intervene remains pending.
Regulations
Oct.10