JUUL Announces Layoffs and New Funding Amid Challenges

Nov.18.2022
JUUL Announces Layoffs and New Funding Amid Challenges
JUUL announced layoffs and new funding to deal with lawsuits, government bans, and increased competition in the e-cigarette market.

Electronic cigarette brand JUUL announced layoffs of several hundred employees on Thursday, as it copes with lawsuits, government bans, and fierce competition from other e-cigarette brands. JUUL stated that it received new funding to maintain operations, including a challenging plan to challenge the FDA's ban on its products. According to sources, the layoffs include 400 employees, which is part of JUUL's plan to cut its operational budget by 30% to 40%, with details kept anonymous. The new funding reportedly comes from two early JUUL investors: Nicholas Pritzker from Hyatt Hotels and private equity expert Riaz Valani from San Francisco. In recent weeks, analysts speculated that JUUL may soon declare bankruptcy or sell itself to another company. However, Thursday's announcement delayed the next steps in this direction. A JUUL spokesperson stated in an email that "this investment will enable JUUL Labs to maintain business operations, advance its appeal of the FDA's premarket tobacco product application decisions, and support product innovation and scientific research." Five years ago, JUUL became the leading brand in the US e-cigarette market due to the popularity of flavors like mango, mint, and crème brûlée. However, the company's rise was driven by the use of teenagers, some of whom became addicted to JUUL's high-nicotine pods. Strong opposition to teenage e-cigarette use led to a series of government actions forcing the company to gradually exit the market. Since 2019, JUUL has abandoned all US advertising and discontinued most flavors. The biggest blow came in June when the FDA denied the company's application to keep its products on the market as an alternative to adult smoking, putting JUUL's future in uncertainty. The FDA stated that JUUL did not adequately address key issues regarding possible chemical leaks from its device. During JUUL's appeal, the FDA temporarily suspended its initial decision. Another setback occurred in September when the company's largest investor, tobacco giant Altria, announced plans to re-enter the e-cigarette market. After acquiring nearly $13 billion worth of JUUL's shares, Altria withdrew its own e-cigarette from the market in 2018. But with JUUL's declining prospects, the investment has lost more than 95% of its value, leading Altria to exit its non-compete agreement. This decision means that JUUL will soon be forced to compete with Altria, the maker of Marlboro, and long-time rival Vuse from Reynolds American for retail shelf space. Vuse recently surpassed JUUL to become the leading e-cigarette brand in the US. JUUL's share of this $5.5 billion retail market has dropped from a peak of 75% a few years ago to around 33%. While JUUL is no longer popular among US youths, the company remains a target for politicians in Washington and across the US seeking to crack down on teenage e-cigarette use. In September, JUUL announced it will pay $440 million to settle investigations into its marketing practices and contribution to the surge in adolescent e-cigarette use across nearly 30 states. But the company still faces nine independent lawsuits from other states. Thousands of individual lawsuits brought by individuals and families have been consolidated in a California federal court.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is provided for industry-related discussions and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of its content. The compilation of this article is solely intended for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in our ability to accurately translate, this article may not perfectly reflect the wording of the original text. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong/Macau/Taiwan-related, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Glas Says FDA Scientific Review Backed Several Flavored Products Before Senior Leaders Blocked Them
Glas Says FDA Scientific Review Backed Several Flavored Products Before Senior Leaders Blocked Them
Glas says newly released internal FDA records show agency scientific reviewers supported authorization for several flavored G2 products before senior leadership halted them. According to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, FDA’s Office of Science first recommended marketing authorization for all eight products in December 2025 and later supported six of them in February 2026. FDA ultimately authorized only the G2 device and one tobacco-flavored pod in March.
Apr.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Philip Morris Korea Names Lee Hong-seok as New CEO Effective May 1
Philip Morris Korea Names Lee Hong-seok as New CEO Effective May 1
Philip Morris Korea said on April 29 that it has appointed Lee Hong-seok, head of its smoke-free products division, as its new chief executive officer, with his term beginning on May 1. Yoon Hee-kyung, who took office in 2023, will step down after about three years in the role.
Apr.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Portugal and Other Countries Submit Objections in Brussels Over UK Smoke-Free Generation Bill
Portugal and Other Countries Submit Objections in Brussels Over UK Smoke-Free Generation Bill
Portugal is among the countries opposing the UK Tobacco and Vapes Bill, which would ban tobacco sales to people born on or after Jan. 1, 2009. According to the report, Portugal, Croatia, the Czech Republic, Greece, Italy, Slovakia and Romania have submitted reasoned opinions and formal observations to Brussels, arguing that the bill breaches post-Brexit arrangements including the Windsor Framework.
Apr.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report| War continues to shape the Ukrainian tobacco market
Special Report| War continues to shape the Ukrainian tobacco market
Four years into the war, Ukraine’s tobacco market is being reshaped by stress-driven consumption, tax pressure, youth e-cigarette use and a growing illicit segment. Surveys point to rising tobacco and nicotine product use, while higher excise duties and shadow trade are adding new complexity to the market.
Apr.17
Italy Formally Submits Detailed Opinion to EU Obstructing Ireland's Disposable Vape Ban
Italy Formally Submits Detailed Opinion to EU Obstructing Ireland's Disposable Vape Ban
Italy's Ministry of Enterprises and Made in Italy has submitted a detailed opinion against Ireland's proposed "Public Health (Single Use Vapes) Bill 2025." Italy argued that the comprehensive ban on disposable vapes lacks scientific evidence, violates the EU principle of the free movement of goods, and conflicts with the existing Tobacco Products Directive.
Apr.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai