Malaysian Civil Society Groups Seek Lawsuit to Regulate Vape Sales

Aug.21.2023
Three civil society groups in Malaysia have been granted permission to proceed with their lawsuit against the Health Minister and government over the sale of vape products to children.

Three civil society groups in Malaysia have been granted permission to proceed with their lawsuit against Health Minister Dr Zaliha Mustafa and the Malaysian government. The lawsuit aims to prevent the open selling of vape liquid and vape gels to children. The High Court's decision to grant leave means that the judge will continue to hear the case.

 

The three groups involved in the lawsuit are the Malaysian Council for Tobacco Control, the Malaysian Green Lung Association, and Voice of the Children Sdn Bhd. They had to first obtain the court's permission for the lawsuit to proceed. The government did not object to the application for leave, leading to the High Court granting permission.

 

One aspect of the lawsuit is an application for an interim stay on the health minister's order to remove e-cigarette and vape liquids from the Poisons List. The civil society groups argue that vape liquids should be temporarily included back under the Poisons List until the lawsuit is heard. This would regulate the sale of these products and prevent their open sale to children.

 

Lawyer Edmund Bon, representing the civil society groups, argued for an interim stay due to concerns about the danger to children's health and the potential increase in deaths and healthcare costs associated with e-cigarette and vape use. Bon also pointed out that the non-regulation of vape liquids means that nicotine levels are currently unregulated and legally permissible at any level.

 

The civil society groups previously claimed that the removal of vape liquids from the Poisons List was done to impose a tax on e-cigarette and vape liquids containing nicotine. The Finance Ministry had imposed an excise duty on these products from April 1 onwards. Bon argued that the government would not be financially harmed if the interim stay is granted, as taxes could still be collected if the civil society groups fail in their lawsuit.

 

The Attorney-General's Chambers objected to the interim stay application, stating that there are no special circumstances warranting a stay. However, Bon argued that there are special circumstances and that a stay is different from an injunction.

 

The High Court will make a decision on September 5 regarding the interim stay sought by the civil society groups.


Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Thailand’s DDC Reaffirms Nicotine Pouches Are Regulated Under the Tobacco Products Control Act
Thailand’s DDC Reaffirms Nicotine Pouches Are Regulated Under the Tobacco Products Control Act
Thailand’s Department of Disease Control has warned the public not to believe claims that nicotine pouches are harmless, saying the products contain high levels of nicotine that can enter the bloodstream through the mouth lining and affect the nervous system and brain.
Apr.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
The new regulations on nicotine in Argentina are creating caution, expectations, and doubts about the market, according to a local reference in harm reduction for smoking.
The new regulations on nicotine in Argentina are creating caution, expectations, and doubts about the market, according to a local reference in harm reduction for smoking.
The new Argentine framework for tobacco and nicotine marks a shift from prohibition towards registration, traceability, and health surveillance. Juan Facundo Teme told 2Firsts that adult consumers and some of the commercial sector are cautiously optimistic, although concerns remain about flavors, registration costs, and market access.
May.11
FDA Warns Retailers Over Unauthorized Nicotine Pouches Resembling Candy and Everyday Products
FDA Warns Retailers Over Unauthorized Nicotine Pouches Resembling Candy and Everyday Products
The FDA issued warning letters to eight retailers selling unauthorized nicotine pouches and dissolvable tobacco products resembling candy, breath strips and cough drops. The action highlights rising scrutiny of packaging, youth appeal and accidental ingestion risks, as the agency clarifies enforcement priorities for unauthorized ENDS and nicotine pouch products while maintaining PMTA as the legal market pathway.
Special Report
May.21
Russian Vape GOST Revision Would Limit Capacity, Packaging Design and Warning Labels
Russian Vape GOST Revision Would Limit Capacity, Packaging Design and Warning Labels
Russia is preparing changes to its e-cigarette state standard GOST R 58109–2018. Under a draft order submitted to Rosstandart, the shelf life of vape devices and liquids would be limited to no more than two years, and capacity would be strictly capped at 2 mL for replaceable capsules, 10 mL for disposable systems and 30 mL for refill containers.
Apr.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Altria and Juul Ask Court to Pause Antitrust Case Pending Ninth Circuit Review
Altria and Juul Ask Court to Pause Antitrust Case Pending Ninth Circuit Review
Altria and Juul are asking a California federal court to pause an antitrust case while they appeal a class certification ruling to the Ninth Circuit. The case alleges that Altria’s 2018 investment in Juul, a $12.8 billion deal for a 35% stake.
May.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Australian State Targets Illegal Tobacco Retailers With Tougher Closure Powers
Australian State Targets Illegal Tobacco Retailers With Tougher Closure Powers
According to Reuters, Australia’s state of Victoria introduced legislation to give police and the state tobacco licensing regulator stronger powers to shut businesses selling illegal tobacco, with non-compliant operators facing fines of more than A$2.4 million and up to 20 years in prison.
Jun.05