Malaysia's Proposed Tobacco Control Law Infringes Basic Human Rights.

Aug.02.2022
Malaysia's Proposed Tobacco Control Law Infringes Basic Human Rights.
The proposed Tobacco Control Act in Malaysia violates basic human rights according to the country's leading tobacco industry organization.

According to Malaysia's leading tobacco industry organization, the proposed Tobacco Product Control Act in Malaysia violates basic human rights. The bill was introduced for first reading on July 27th and would prohibit individuals born in or after 2007 from smoking, purchasing, or possessing tobacco and related products. Offenders could face harsh penalties, including imprisonment.


The Malaysian Tobacco Manufacturers' Association (CMTM) has stated that Malaysian adults are protected under Article 6 of the 1999 Consumer Protection Act, which allows them to make their own choices without prejudice or influence.


The organization stated in a declaration on July 31, which was quoted in the Malay Mail, "Furthermore, these laws give authorities too much power as they allow them to check your personal details, raid your home, examine your phone or luggage, and access your personal information.


Then, you must provide them with your password, face arrest, undergo a physical examination, and allow them to search your house without permission.


In the end, we did not create a smoke-free generation, but instead created a generation of criminals punished for purchasing products that others can purchase.


The CMTM also believes that the ban will encourage illegal tobacco trade, which currently holds 60% of the market, estimated to be worth RM5 billion ($1.12 billion USD). The organization stated that individuals will have to conceal their habit and be labeled as criminals.


Meanwhile, according to the Xin Hai Xia Daily, the parliamentary Health, Science, and Innovation Committee has urged the government to ease punishment measures for teenagers caught smoking.


The committee believes that laws should not rely on the threat of imprisonment, but instead should punish juvenile offenders in a practical and proactive manner, such as through community service or mandatory counseling sessions.


Committee chairman Kelvin Yii stated, "We are also concerned about the enforcement powers of the bill itself, especially when it comes to youth and even children.


Strict control of inspections, possible physical examinations, and punishment of children must be put in place to prevent abuse. This is why enforcement guidelines must be very clear and specific to ensure that vulnerable groups, especially the poor, do not become victims of the law.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and intended for industry professionals for educational purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content. The compilation of this article is solely for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation ability, the translated article may not fully reflect the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau or Taiwan-related, and foreign-related statements and positions.


Information compiled belongs to the original media and author, for any copyright infringement kindly contact us for removal.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

France proposes tax on e-liquid in latest budget plan: 30 to 50 euro cents per 10 ml bottle
France proposes tax on e-liquid in latest budget plan: 30 to 50 euro cents per 10 ml bottle
France to introduce tax on e-cigarette liquid in new budget proposal, with rates ranging from 30 to 50 euro cents per 10ml.
Oct.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
InterTabac 2025 Highlights Europe’s Vaping Dilemma: Tighter Regulation, Constrained Innovation
InterTabac 2025 Highlights Europe’s Vaping Dilemma: Tighter Regulation, Constrained Innovation
According to 2Firsts’ on-site observations, the vaping halls at InterTabac 2025 have visibly cooled: fewer exhibitors, a weaker presence from major brands, and scarce stage activations; new product momentum is weak and homogenization has intensified. Tightening regulation and policy uncertainty are squeezing innovation, pushing companies to replicate proven models—overall, a “cautious showcase.”
Sep.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
New York AG Seeks to Shut Down Vape Shops, Ban Owners from Industry
New York AG Seeks to Shut Down Vape Shops, Ban Owners from Industry
New York Attorney General Letitia James has filed a petition seeking to permanently shut down two smoke shops and ban their owners from the vape industry for repeatedly selling illegal flavored vapes to minors and operating without valid licenses. The nearly 50-page complaint names Eysa Sharhan and Ahmed Mozeb and their stores — Pop-In Smoke & Vape LLC, Pufftopia LLC, and Royalty Tobacco LLC — accusing them of a “persistent pattern of illegal activity.”
Oct.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dagestan Proposes Pilot Ban on E-Cigarette Sales, Submits Request to State Duma
Dagestan Proposes Pilot Ban on E-Cigarette Sales, Submits Request to State Duma
The head of Russia’s Republic of Dagestan has proposed a region-wide ban on the retail sale of e-cigarettes and has written to the State Duma seeking to designate Dagestan as a pilot region for a comprehensive e-cigarette sales ban.
Oct.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
R.J. Reynolds Seeks Dismissal of “Carbon Neutral” Lawsuit over Vuse E-Cigarette Claims
R.J. Reynolds Seeks Dismissal of “Carbon Neutral” Lawsuit over Vuse E-Cigarette Claims
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. has moved to dismiss a class-action lawsuit alleging false “carbon neutral” claims for its Vuse e-cigarettes, arguing its statements were based on independent certifications from Verra and Vertis, not misleading consumers.
Oct.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
The Irish government plans to ban disposable e-cigarettes and impose a tax on e-cigarette oils by the end of the year
The Irish government plans to ban disposable e-cigarettes and impose a tax on e-cigarette oils by the end of the year
The Irish government announced a complete ban on disposable e-cigarettes through new legislation. The legislation will require e-cigarette products to adopt the same packaging standards as cigarettes, including standardized colors, images, and flavor descriptions. In-store advertising will also be prohibited, except in specialty stores. This move aims to strengthen regulation and reduce youth exposure to e-cigarettes. The Ministry of Finance also plans to implement a €0.50 per milliliter tax on
Sep.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai