New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products

Feb.21.2025
New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products
New York State sues e-cigarette giants for illegally marketing flavored products to teenagers, demanding billion-dollar penalties.

According to a report by Reuters on February 21st, the state of New York in the United States filed a lawsuit on Thursday (February 20) against several large e-cigarette manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, accusing them of illegally distributing, marketing, and selling flavored disposable e-cigarettes, including well-known brands such as Puff Bar, Elf Bar, Geek Bar, Breeze, and MYLE. The lawsuit alleges that these companies contributed to the trend of youth e-cigarette use by selling products in cartoon-style packaging and flavors like "Baja Slushie," "Strawberry Cereal Donut Milk," and "OMG Blow Pop.

 

New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products
The Attorney General of New York State accused 13 defendant companies and 3 defendants of selling flavored e-cigarette products that appeal to teenagers. | Image Source: Office of the Attorney General of New York State.

 

According to documents provided by the New York State Attorney General's office, the lawsuit involves a list of manufacturers, distributors, and retailers as follows:

 

  • Puff Bar
  • MYLE Vape
  • Pod Juice
  • Mi-One Brands
  • Happy Distro
  • Demand Vape
  • EVO Brands
  • PVG2
  • Magellan Technology
  • Midwest Goods
  • Safa Goods
  • EVO Brands
  • Price Point Distributors

 

In addition, a lawsuit was filed against the executives of an online e-cigarette retailer, Price Point Distributors, including Weis Khwaja, Hamza Jalili, and Mohammad Jalili.

 

New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products
The Attorney General of New York State accuses 13 defendant companies and 3 defendants of selling flavored e-cigarette products that appeal to teenagers.  | Image Source: Office of the Attorney General of New York State

 

New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products

 

New York Attorney General Letitia James announced that she is seeking billions of dollars in civil fines and restitution from 13 defendant companies and 3 individuals, for widespread violations of local, state, and federal laws. The penalties will be aimed at punishing the companies for their illegal actions, compensating for the impact of their misconduct on public health, recovering all proceeds from their unlawful activities, and creating a fund to address the youth e-cigarette crisis in New York.

 

The statement indicates that the defendants knowingly sold fruit and candy-flavored e-cigarette products to vulnerable children, in violation of state laws prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products that pose health risks, as well as laws prohibiting the sale of e-cigarettes to individuals under 21 years old in 2020.

 

James said:

 

The e-cigarette industry is mirroring tobacco companies: they are making nicotine look cool, getting kids addicted, and in the process, sparking a large-scale public health crisis.

 

The defendants in the case include ELFBARe-cigarette distributor Demand Vape in Buffalo, New York, and Puff Bar in Gardena, California. These companies are accused of misleading the public through advertising to make flavored e-cigarettes appear as simple recreational products.

 

Demand Vape and Puff Bar did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

 

Many e-cigarette companies promote their products as a traditional cigarette alternative for adults, but since 2014, e-cigarettes have become the most commonly used tobacco product among children in the United States.

 

According to the 2024 Youth Tobacco Survey, 5.9% of middle and high school students (approximately 1.63 million children) reported currently using e-cigarettes, with nearly 90% of users using flavored products.

 

In December, the US Supreme Court heard a case regarding whether the FDA has the authority to prevent two e-cigarette companies from selling flavors such as "Jimmy The Juice Man Peachy Strawberry" and "Suicide Bunny Mother's Milk and Cookies".

 

In January 2024, a federal appeals court ruled that the FDA's decisions were arbitrary and inconsistent, although seven other federal appeals courts had previously supported the agency in similar cases. Regardless of the final outcome, Democratic lawmaker James is attempting to close regulatory loopholes through legislation to prevent the FDA from backtracking on regulation.

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Nearly Half of Seoul Vape Vending Machines Bypassed by Fake IDs, Raising Youth Access Concerns
Nearly Half of Seoul Vape Vending Machines Bypassed by Fake IDs, Raising Youth Access Concerns
Seoul city authorities inspected 339 tobacco vending machines at e-cigarette retailers and found that 168, or 49.5%, allowed purchases using fake IDs, showing that unmanned retail terminals and adult-verification systems remain a major enforcement gap after e-cigarettes were brought under tobacco regulation.
Market
Jul.03 by 2Firsts Perspectives
CCPIT Says Trade Friction Index for China-Related Electronics Sector Remains High, With Vape Products Among Areas of Focus
CCPIT Says Trade Friction Index for China-Related Electronics Sector Remains High, With Vape Products Among Areas of Focus
China Council for the Promotion of International Trade (CCPIT) held its July regular press conference on July 31, 2026, releasing the May 2026 Global Economic and Trade Friction Index. CCPIT spokesperson Yang Fan said the global trade friction index stood at 95 in May, remaining at a medium-to-high level. By industry, the electronics sector recorded the highest trade friction index among 13 monitored industries. In China-related trade frictions, the index stood at 93, with electronics products including drones, chips and vape products among areas where friction remained elevated.
Aug.03
PMI to Launch IQOS in Argentina by End-2026 After Regulatory Shift, Targeting About 7 Million Smokers
PMI to Launch IQOS in Argentina by End-2026 After Regulatory Shift, Targeting About 7 Million Smokers
Philip Morris International (PMI) has confirmed plans to bring its IQOS heated tobacco device to Argentina by the end of 2026, after the Argentine government lifted long-standing restrictions and created a regulatory framework for heated tobacco, e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches.
News
Jun.26 by 2Firsts Perspectives
BAT Calls for Retailer Input in Future Nicotine Regulations
BAT Calls for Retailer Input in Future Nicotine Regulations
British American Tobacco (BAT) has called for stronger retailer involvement in shaping future nicotine product regulations in the UK, arguing that frontline market feedback should be considered during policy development. BAT said retailers provide direct insight into consumer behavior, market changes and regulatory implementation challenges. The comments come as the UK nicotine market undergoes regulatory changes, including the disposable vape ban, Vaping Products Duty and efforts to address illicit vape sales.
Jul.29
FDA Proposes Foreign Tobacco Factory Registration Rule to Tighten Import Oversight
FDA Proposes Foreign Tobacco Factory Registration Rule to Tighten Import Oversight
The FDA has proposed a rule requiring foreign tobacco manufacturers to register facilities and list products before exporting to the U.S. If finalized, the rule could affect overseas OEM/ODM factories, contract manufacturers, specification developers, bulk product makers, and repackaging or relabeling firms. FDA says the proposal would help identify unauthorized imported tobacco products, including e-cigarettes.
Special Report
Jun.26
PMI Oral Products Chief Says Lack of Rules May Push Nicotine Pouch Market Into Illicit Trade
PMI Oral Products Chief Says Lack of Rules May Push Nicotine Pouch Market Into Illicit Trade
Nick Ricketts, President of Oral Products at Philip Morris International (PMI), told Logos Press that nicotine pouches should be brought under clear regulatory frameworks covering nicotine limits, flavor rules, age verification, sales controls and marketing standards, arguing that the absence of clear rules or blanket bans may push consumer demand into illegal or semi-legal channels.
Jul.06