New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products

Feb.21
New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products
New York State sues e-cigarette giants for illegally marketing flavored products to teenagers, demanding billion-dollar penalties.

According to a report by Reuters on February 21st, the state of New York in the United States filed a lawsuit on Thursday (February 20) against several large e-cigarette manufacturers, distributors, and retailers, accusing them of illegally distributing, marketing, and selling flavored disposable e-cigarettes, including well-known brands such as Puff Bar, Elf Bar, Geek Bar, Breeze, and MYLE. The lawsuit alleges that these companies contributed to the trend of youth e-cigarette use by selling products in cartoon-style packaging and flavors like "Baja Slushie," "Strawberry Cereal Donut Milk," and "OMG Blow Pop.

 

New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products
The Attorney General of New York State accused 13 defendant companies and 3 defendants of selling flavored e-cigarette products that appeal to teenagers. | Image Source: Office of the Attorney General of New York State.

 

According to documents provided by the New York State Attorney General's office, the lawsuit involves a list of manufacturers, distributors, and retailers as follows:

 

  • Puff Bar
  • MYLE Vape
  • Pod Juice
  • Mi-One Brands
  • Happy Distro
  • Demand Vape
  • EVO Brands
  • PVG2
  • Magellan Technology
  • Midwest Goods
  • Safa Goods
  • EVO Brands
  • Price Point Distributors

 

In addition, a lawsuit was filed against the executives of an online e-cigarette retailer, Price Point Distributors, including Weis Khwaja, Hamza Jalili, and Mohammad Jalili.

 

New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products
The Attorney General of New York State accuses 13 defendant companies and 3 defendants of selling flavored e-cigarette products that appeal to teenagers.  | Image Source: Office of the Attorney General of New York State

 

New York State Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Companies for Marketing Flavorful Products

 

New York Attorney General Letitia James announced that she is seeking billions of dollars in civil fines and restitution from 13 defendant companies and 3 individuals, for widespread violations of local, state, and federal laws. The penalties will be aimed at punishing the companies for their illegal actions, compensating for the impact of their misconduct on public health, recovering all proceeds from their unlawful activities, and creating a fund to address the youth e-cigarette crisis in New York.

 

The statement indicates that the defendants knowingly sold fruit and candy-flavored e-cigarette products to vulnerable children, in violation of state laws prohibiting the sale of flavored tobacco products that pose health risks, as well as laws prohibiting the sale of e-cigarettes to individuals under 21 years old in 2020.

 

James said:

 

The e-cigarette industry is mirroring tobacco companies: they are making nicotine look cool, getting kids addicted, and in the process, sparking a large-scale public health crisis.

 

The defendants in the case include ELFBARe-cigarette distributor Demand Vape in Buffalo, New York, and Puff Bar in Gardena, California. These companies are accused of misleading the public through advertising to make flavored e-cigarettes appear as simple recreational products.

 

Demand Vape and Puff Bar did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

 

Many e-cigarette companies promote their products as a traditional cigarette alternative for adults, but since 2014, e-cigarettes have become the most commonly used tobacco product among children in the United States.

 

According to the 2024 Youth Tobacco Survey, 5.9% of middle and high school students (approximately 1.63 million children) reported currently using e-cigarettes, with nearly 90% of users using flavored products.

 

In December, the US Supreme Court heard a case regarding whether the FDA has the authority to prevent two e-cigarette companies from selling flavors such as "Jimmy The Juice Man Peachy Strawberry" and "Suicide Bunny Mother's Milk and Cookies".

 

In January 2024, a federal appeals court ruled that the FDA's decisions were arbitrary and inconsistent, although seven other federal appeals courts had previously supported the agency in similar cases. Regardless of the final outcome, Democratic lawmaker James is attempting to close regulatory loopholes through legislation to prevent the FDA from backtracking on regulation.

Notice

1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.

2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.

Copyright

This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.

This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.