New York's Menthol Cigarette Ban Sparks Controversy

Apr.25.2023
New York's Menthol Cigarette Ban Sparks Controversy
New York debates banning flavored tobacco, including menthol cigarettes, sparking a battle between public health and tobacco companies.

New York Governor Kathy Hochul recently proposed a ban on menthol-flavored cigarettes in the state legislature, making New York the latest battleground in the tobacco wars. The proposed ban would apply to all forms of flavored tobacco, primarily menthol cigarettes, but also include flavored cigars, little cigars, and flavored smokeless tobacco. Although the ban ultimately did not appear in the official report, various groups in New York are engaged in a new discussion over whether or not to ban menthol-flavored cigarettes.


The 'War' of Menthol Cigarettes


Altria Group and Reynolds American, who produce menthol cigarettes in the US, have reportedly hired lobbying groups at a cost of hundreds of thousands of dollars. Since 2020, these companies have also provided at least $135,000 in funding to a convenience store trade group that opposes a proposed ban on menthol cigarettes.


Opponents of the lobbying group include a public health alliance and a national anti-smoking organization, which have spent over $1 million on advertisements in newspapers, television and even Times Square, criticizing tobacco companies and attempting to pressure lawmakers to support Hoehrl's proposal.


Although the ban may have good intentions, it has angered some black leaders who fear that if menthol cigarettes go underground, it could increase conflict between black people and the police.


According to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention in the United States, other opponents of the ban believe it may be discriminatory, as it imposes severe restrictions on the preferred nicotine products of African American smokers, even though African American men have the highest rates of lung cancer.


Some smokers have stated that if the government were to ban the sale of menthol cigarettes, they would switch to flavorless cigarettes.


Lobbying efforts of tobacco companies.


Altria and Reynolds Tobacco Company have hired more than a dozen lobbying firms, including top-tier organizations such as Bolton-St.


According to disclosed documents, their total expenditure in January and February exceeded $400,000. The cigarette manufacturer also signed annual contracts worth over $1.4 million with lobbyists.


Tobacco lobbyists have pointed out that the existing ban on flavored e-cigarettes in New York, as well as other bans on menthol cigarettes in other locations, are not being effectively enforced, as many stores are still selling them. They argue that these bans will only lead smokers to switch to non-menthol cigarettes.


Altria has also exerted its influence through other means: according to campaign documents, it has donated $174,350 to Democratic and Republican candidates and campaign committees in New York since last year.


In a statement, Altria said, "Bans and tax increases will create law enforcement and criminal justice issues, harm vulnerable communities, and result in expected revenue losses for the New York government's funding of important projects such as smoking cessation.


In a statement, Reynolds Tobacco stated that the ban will have little impact on overall cigarette consumption and will lead to illegal cigarette sales. "We believe that there are more effective ways to reduce the harm caused by tobacco than by prohibiting products," the company said.


The alliance supporting the ban includes the American Cancer Society and the Smoke-Free Kids movement, a leading anti-smoking organization. In January and February, the organization paid nearly $1.15 million to lobbying firm Pythia Public for multimedia ads supporting the ban.


Blair Horner, chief lobbyist for the New York Public Interest Research Group, stated:


The scientific validity of mint cigarettes is not in question; it is simply a matter of politics.


Internal disagreements within the Black community.


During the state legislative review, Governor Hoehner proposed implementing a ban on flavored tobacco and suggested raising the tax on every pack of cigarettes by one dollar.


Hohner stated that the ban is aimed at preventing the younger generation from becoming addicted to smoking for life.


While lawmakers have expressed support for tax increases, the future of the menthol ban is far from certain. This issue has created division among black lawmakers, leaving the measure in limbo at the state capitol.


New York State Senator Brad Hoylman-Sigal stated, "Big tobacco companies have always been adept at implying that banning menthol is discriminatory against certain communities.


The debate surrounding the proposed ban has pushed New York to the forefront of the national movement against smoking and the impact of tobacco.


According to data from the FDA, nearly 85% of Black smokers consume menthol products, compared to 30% of White smokers.


“Menthol is a sugar spoon for the tobacco industry, not intended to aid in reducing drug addiction, but to help nicotine become addictive,” said Dr. James Mackey, New York's interim health commissioner.


For tobacco companies, this is about a lot of money: menthol cigarettes account for roughly one-third of national cigarette sales, even as the number of smokers has decreased to historic lows.


Black politicians and religious leaders in the United States are still divided over this issue.


Some people, such as Pastor Carl L. Washington of the New Zion Hill Baptist Church in Harlem, believe that this would unfairly criminalize black and Hispanic smokers, even though the proposed ban applies to sales and not personal possession.


The pastor stated that he had been contacted by lobbyists from both sides of the issue and had even discussed the ban with Hohner. He also stated that he had not received any money from tobacco companies, who are notoriously known for providing financial donations to pastors.


For years, young black men and women have been incarcerated for selling marijuana," he said. "Now, we're trying to ban certain cigarettes. This is America, people have the freedom to choose.


Gwen Carr, mother of Eric Garner, who was killed by a police officer enforcing a cigarette selling regulation in 2014, has publicly voiced her opposition to the proposal.


Crystal Peoples-Stokes is the Democratic Majority Leader in the New York State Assembly.


She is black and against the ban. She says it seems to be exclusionary: "If you want to improve people's health, you should ban all cigarettes.


However, New York State Assemblymember Rodneyse Bichotte, a Black Democrat, introduced a bill to ban menthol cigarettes in the Senate.


She stated that any economic argument against the proposal is outweighed by the thousands of tobacco-related deaths that occur every year. This includes Joe's father who died from lung cancer.


What we are talking about is the killing of black people, which is a systemic issue targeted towards the community.


Contradictory interests entanglement.


The majority of the public opposing the ban is not from tobacco companies, but rather from the 8,000 convenience stores in the state that heavily rely on cigarette sales.


The New York Convenience Store Association has spent at least $11,000 on digital and social media advertising. This association is a trade organization. Their ads carry ominous warnings that a ban will only lead to increased criminal activity in the smuggling of cigarettes and claim that "bans don't work.


According to disclosed lobbying records, Altria has provided over $70,000 to the association for lobbying efforts since 2020. During the same period, Reynolds Tobacco also donated $66,000, making them one of the largest sponsors.


Further reading:


1. Raising cigarette taxes in the state of Yue will worsen unemployment and increase smuggling.


Reference:


The topic of banning menthol cigarettes in New York has become a contentious issue, with emphasis being placed on the usage of "black smokers.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.