New Zealand Health Committee to Act on Smokefree 2050

Sep.21.2022
New Zealand Health Committee to Act on Smokefree 2050
New Zealand lawmakers receive expert opinions to help achieve a smoke-free New Zealand by 2050.

Nancy Loucas, co-founder of AVCA, a New Zealand advocacy organization, stated that they greatly rely on members of Parliament to read and act upon the valuable opinions submitted to the Parliamentary Health Select Committee. These opinions provide expert and practical solutions to help New Zealand achieve a smoke-free country by 2050.


The Smoke-Free Environments and Regulated Products (Smoked Tobacco) Amendment Act limits the number of retailers who can sell smoked tobacco products in an effort to reduce the appeal and addictive nature of tobacco products. It also prohibits the sale of tobacco products to anyone born after 2009.


The latest smoke-free bill submitted by ASH (Action for Smokefree Aotearoa 2025) was jointly drafted by ASH Chairman Emeritus Professor Robert Beaglehole. The bill describes the current restrictions that limit general retailers to only sell tobacco, menthol, and closed e-cigarette systems, which are deemed counterproductive, flawed, and harmful.


According to the 2020 electronic cigarette law in New Zealand, general retailers such as supermarkets, gas stations and convenience stores are only allowed to sell three flavors, while specialized electronic cigarette shops can sell the full range.


ASH has proposed allowing the sale of two or more alternative fruit flavors in general retailers, believing that this will ensure that former smokers and those trying to quit can access popular flavors that aid in smoking cessation.


There is ample evidence to suggest that the use of fruit and other sweet-flavored electronic liquids is positively associated with smoking cessation among smokers... International evidence from four countries has concluded that individuals who use sweet-flavored e-cigarettes are 1.6 times more likely to stay smoke-free, whereas mint-flavored e-cigarette users are unlikely to remain smoke-free," wrote ASH.


Nancy Loucas commented, "I am glad that ASH has proposed flavor restrictions because they simply do not work and only lead to abnormal outcomes. The increasing presence of 'specialized e-cigarette shops' is actually in convenience stores or attached to them and operated by untrained staff, which is an unintended consequence of the general retail industry banning flavors. This needs urgent addressing.


Dr. Marewa Glover, co-submitter of the Smoke-free Environments (Vaping) Amendment Bill, has called on members of parliament to "reduce barriers to the use of electronic cigarettes." Professor Glover is a leading indigenous tobacco control expert in the world.


I oppose the proposal to ban in the bill. There are more empathetic and cost-effective ways to reduce smoking rates. One of them is to encourage switching to lower risk alternatives... It has been found that using e-cigarettes is more effective in helping people quit smoking than nicotine replacement therapy," wrote Professor Glover.


She pointed out that the government began the Vape2Quit Strong campaign in March 2021 through its health promotion agency. She believes that the campaign requires continued funding and optimization, and has the potential to be effective.


Clive Bates, a renowned international advocate for reducing the harm caused by tobacco based in London, has also submitted a bill to New Zealand aimed at restricting the availability and attractiveness of smoking.


He wrote, "In my view, it is best to concentrate policies and financial measures, supportive communication and healthcare practices on maximizing opportunities for smokers to switch to non-combustible alternatives to smoking products - namely, electronic cigarette products, heated and smokeless tobacco, and oral nicotine products.


Nancy Loucas summarised, "AVCA supports the general intention of this bill, but in order for New Zealand to become and remain smoke-free, a viable, cost-effective, and harm-reducing alternative is needed. This alternative is nicotine e-cigarettes. If parliament is serious about achieving a smoke-free Australia by 2025, they need to take note of the practical, evidence-based solution that is currently available to them.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the content. The compilation of this article is solely for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the level of translation, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original text. Therefore, it is recommended to refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan and international issues and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Opinion | As EU Reviews Tobacco Rules, Experts Warn Against Overlooking Smokers’ Alternatives
Opinion | As EU Reviews Tobacco Rules, Experts Warn Against Overlooking Smokers’ Alternatives
As the European Commission reviews its tobacco and advertising rules, two experts who provided written comments to 2Firsts argue that future EU policy should not overlook adult smokers’ alternatives. Dr Garrett McGovern and Dr Carmen Escrig say regulators should weigh relative risk, adult switching, flavours, consumer behaviour and scientific uncertainty alongside youth protection.
Industry Insight
Jun.01
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
Bringing Tax and Insurance Into Nicotine Regulation: Insights From a Tobacco Harm-Reduction Report
A smoke-free nicotine policy report argues that tobacco harm reduction should move beyond product bans and health warnings into tax policy, insurance pricing and risk-based regulation. While some projections remain open to debate, the report highlights a wider challenge: nicotine products, technologies and consumer behavior have changed sharply over the past decade, and regulatory systems may need new tools to better align tobacco control with harm-reduction goals.
Jun.08
Italian Court Ends Six-Year Cigarette Excise Dispute, Rejecting Damages Claim
Italian Court Ends Six-Year Cigarette Excise Dispute, Rejecting Damages Claim
Italy’s Lazio Regional Administrative Court has dismissed an appeal by Italian Tobacco Manufacturing and Manifattura Italiana Tabacco over the cigarette excise calculation mechanism, upholding the minimum tax burden rules and excluding compensation for smaller tobacco operators.
News
Jun.26 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Imperial Brands Pulls myblu Vape Business From U.S., Citing Prolonged FDA Approval Process
Imperial Brands Pulls myblu Vape Business From U.S., Citing Prolonged FDA Approval Process
Imperial Brands said it will phase out its myblu vaping business in the United States, citing prolonged FDA approval timelines for new vape products. The company said it will instead focus on modern oral nicotine products in the U.S., including the expansion of its Zone brand and new flavors. While overall next-generation product revenue continued to grow, revenue from the category in the Americas declined sharply.
May.12
AHA Journal Study: WS-23 Triples Premature Heartbeats, Raising Concerns Over Vape Cooling Agents
AHA Journal Study: WS-23 Triples Premature Heartbeats, Raising Concerns Over Vape Cooling Agents
A University of Louisville research team published a study in an American Heart Association journal suggesting that synthetic cooling agents used in e-cigarettes, including WS-3 and WS-23, may disrupt cardiac electrical activity and increase arrhythmia risk. In animal experiments, WS-23 tripled premature heartbeats.
Jun.16
UK Parliament Briefing Puts Vape Hardware Design and Materials in Regulatory Focus
UK Parliament Briefing Puts Vape Hardware Design and Materials in Regulatory Focus
The UK Parliament’s Parliamentary Office of Science and Technology (POST) has published a scientific briefing reviewing current evidence on the health effects of vape device components, including heating elements, power settings, metals, plastics, batteries and e-liquid ingredients, signalling growing regulatory attention to device design and whole-product systems beyond e-liquids, flavours and packaging.
Special Report
Jun.29