NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects

Jan.08
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.

Key Takeaways

 

• Court and docket: U.S. District Court, E.D. Va. (Richmond Division), No. 3:25-cv-00930-REP 

• Filing: Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment, filed Jan. 6, 2026 

• Parties: NJOY and Altria entities v. ITC, named commissioners and ITC ALJ Doris Johnson Hines 

• Core claims: Appointments Clause, removal protections, and Article III/public-rights analysis; request for permanent injunction 

• Schedule note: evidentiary hearing referenced as beginning April 22, 2026 

 


 

2Firsts, January 8, 2026 – Court filings in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) show NJOY, LLC, NJOY Holdings, Inc., Altria Group, Inc., and related entities filed a Plaintiffs’ Reply in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment seeking summary judgment and a permanent injunction against the challenged ITC proceeding. 

 

The filing lists the defendants as the International Trade Commission and, in their official capacities, Chair and Commissioner Amy A. Karpel, Commissioners David S. Johanson and Jason E. Kearns, and ITC Administrative Law Judge Doris Johnson Hines. 

 

The reply advances constitutional arguments including Appointments Clause issues tied to statutory appointment authority discussed in connection with 19 U.S.C. § 1331, challenges to double for-cause removal protections for ITC ALJs, and Article III arguments relying on SEC v. Jarkesy and related public-rights/private-rights analysis. 

 

On injunctive relief, the filing cites precedent addressing harm from being subjected to an allegedly unconstitutional administrative proceeding and references the pace of the ITC schedule, noting an evidentiary hearing date of April 22, 2026. 

 

The plaintiffs ask the court to grant summary judgment and issue a permanent injunction against the ITC proceeding. 

 

Image Source: U.S. District Court 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FDA Launches Elsa 4.0 and Completes HALO Data Platform Consolidation
FDA Launches Elsa 4.0 and Completes HALO Data Platform Consolidation
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration announced on May 6 that it has advanced its modernization initiative by launching Elsa 4.0, an upgraded internal AI tool, and consolidating more than 40 application and submission data sources, systems and portals into a new platform called HALO. FDA said the integration of HALO and Elsa will allow staff to query data and build workflows without manually uploading documents in each chat.
May.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Adds 18 Tobacco Harmful Constituents and Seeks Comment on 3 More
FDA Adds 18 Tobacco Harmful Constituents and Seeks Comment on 3 More
U.S. Food and Drug Administration published a Federal Register notice finalizing the addition of 18 constituents to the established list of Harmful and Potentially Harmful Constituents in tobacco products. With the update, the list now contains 111 constituents. FDA also proposed adding three more constituents to the list and opened a public comment period ending at 11:59 p.m. ET on May 26, 2026.
Apr.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fifth Circuit Hears Challenge to FDA’s Standard for Reviewing Flavored Vape Applications
Fifth Circuit Hears Challenge to FDA’s Standard for Reviewing Flavored Vape Applications
A three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit heard oral arguments on Tuesday in a case brought by seven small vape-liquid companies challenging the Food and Drug Administration’s denial of marketing authorization for their flavored electronic nicotine products.
Apr.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Imperial Brands Launches 2ml+10ml blu MAX 6000 Vape System
Imperial Brands Launches 2ml+10ml blu MAX 6000 Vape System
mperial Brands has launched blu MAX 6000 in the UK, positioning the product as a higher-puff vape kit with longer-lasting use and replaceable pod+refill options. The device uses a 2ml+10ml click-on box format, with starter kits priced at £10.99 (approximately $14) and replacement pod+refill packs priced at £7.99 (approximately $10).
Market
May.19
EU Novel Tobacco Regulation Trends and Business Response | Guest Contribution by a European Legal and Compliance Expert
EU Novel Tobacco Regulation Trends and Business Response | Guest Contribution by a European Legal and Compliance Expert
Carlos Cabrera, founder of CabLab Law & Advocacy, contributes this article to 2Firsts, arguing that the EU’s evolving approach to novel tobacco regulation may unintentionally reinforce cigarette use by narrowing alternatives. He warns companies to watch signals on flavours, labelling, traceability, nicotine pouch rules and digital marketing, while grounding business decisions in realistic timelines, compliance planning and continuous monitoring.
Apr.22
Canada Vape Enforcement Action Puts VAPME Website, Trademark and China Supply-Chain Links in Focus
Canada Vape Enforcement Action Puts VAPME Website, Trademark and China Supply-Chain Links in Focus
Quebec police seized about 300,000 suspected illegal vape products and froze more than C$1.8 million in funds. Local media said vapme.ca, a website selling flavoured vape products, was shut down during the operation.
Regulations
Jun.18