Ohio Judge Temporarily Blocks State Law Restricting Tobacco Sales

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.22.2024
Ohio Judge Temporarily Blocks State Law Restricting Tobacco Sales
A judge in Franklin County, Ohio, issued a temporary restraining order on a state law banning tobacco sales in cities.

According to the American media "Internewscast" reported on April 24th, Columbus, Ohio is one of the 14 Ohio cities that filed a lawsuit against the tobacco law two weeks ago. On Friday (April 19th), a judge in Franklin County issued a temporary restraining order against the state law that prohibits cities from regulating the sale of tobacco products. The order prevents the law from taking effect before the scheduled preliminary injunction hearing on May 17th. The law was originally scheduled to go into effect on April 23rd after lawmakers overturned the governor's veto of the legislation earlier this year.

 

As a result, the city's tobacco regulations, including the licensing of local tobacco retailers and the ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products within the city, remain in effect. Columbus City Attorney Zach Klein issued a statement praising the judge's decision and calling the regulation "unconstitutional."

 

Klein said, "I commend the court's decision to support the city, and I look forward to demonstrating to the public that this regulation is not only unconstitutional, but also a harmful policy that threatens public health and undermines our progress in restricting tobacco use, especially among youth smokers."

 

Columbus is not the only city involved in this case, as 14 cities including Bexley, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Dublin, Galena, Grandview Heights, Heath, Hilliard, Oakwood, Reynoldsburg, Upper Arlington, Whitehall, and Worthington have joined together to file a lawsuit over the matter.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Bangladesh High Court Questions Legality of BEZA’s Approval for Philip Morris Nicotine Pouch Factory
Bangladesh High Court Questions Legality of BEZA’s Approval for Philip Morris Nicotine Pouch Factory
The High Court in Bangladesh has asked government bodies to explain why the approval granted to Philip Morris to establish a nicotine pouch factory should not be deemed illegal. Petitioners argue the decision contradicts existing policies and a 2016 Appellate Division ruling that restricts new tobacco-related enterprises. Authorities have ten days to respond.
Nov.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Chonburi Police Raid Major E-Cigarette and Vape Liquid Warehouse Worth Over US$920,000
Chonburi Police Raid Major E-Cigarette and Vape Liquid Warehouse Worth Over US$920,000
Thailand Chonburi provincial police, in coordination with multiple agencies, raided a large-scale warehouse in downtown Chonburi used for producing and distributing e-cigarettes and vape liquids. Two Chinese nationals were arrested, and more than 40 categories of contraband—including vapes, e-liquids, and production equipment—were seized, with an estimated total value exceeding US$920,000 (about 30 million Thai baht).
Nov.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dagestan Proposes Pilot Ban on E-Cigarette Sales, Submits Request to State Duma
Dagestan Proposes Pilot Ban on E-Cigarette Sales, Submits Request to State Duma
The head of Russia’s Republic of Dagestan has proposed a region-wide ban on the retail sale of e-cigarettes and has written to the State Duma seeking to designate Dagestan as a pilot region for a comprehensive e-cigarette sales ban.
Oct.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NYC Reaches Settlement with E-Cigarette Distributors in Flavored Vape Crackdown
NYC Reaches Settlement with E-Cigarette Distributors in Flavored Vape Crackdown
New York City has reached settlement agreements with two e-cigarette wholesalers accused of selling flavored vapes illegally. The companies agreed to stop all flavored vape transactions in the city and face $1,000 fines for future violations. Litigation against other defendants in the broader case continues.
Nov.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian State Duma passes first reading of bill to ban tobacco and e-cigarette sales at public transport stops
Russian State Duma passes first reading of bill to ban tobacco and e-cigarette sales at public transport stops
Russia's State Duma passes first reading of bill banning tobacco and e-cigarette sales at public transport stops. (20 words)
Oct.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NSW Landlords Could Face Jail or $165,000 Fine for Allowing Illegal Vape and Tobacco Sales
NSW Landlords Could Face Jail or $165,000 Fine for Allowing Illegal Vape and Tobacco Sales
According to The Guardian, landlords in New South Wales who knowingly allow tenants to sell illicit tobacco or illegal vapes could face fines of up to AUD 165,000, a year in prison, or both. The new offences are part of the state government’s broader crackdown on Australia’s growing black market for cigarettes and vaping products.
Nov.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai