Minnesota's Flavored Tobacco Ban Facing Challenges in Legislature

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.19.2024
Minnesota's Flavored Tobacco Ban Facing Challenges in Legislature
Minnesota's flavored tobacco ban faces challenges as supporters rally at Capitol, urging lawmakers to prioritize youth health and safety.

According to a report by Valley News Live on April 19th, it is feared that the ban on flavored tobacco in Minnesota may not pass this year.

 

On Thursday (the 18th), students, educators, and parents gathered at the Minnesota State Capitol to express their support for the bill. Supporters argued that flavored tobacco products may attract the attention of children and teenagers, leading them to become addicted to nicotine at a young age.

 

The bill, drafted by state representative Ethan Cha, was put on hold during last month's House Commerce Committee hearing. However, both chambers did not adopt the House version of the bill and instead moved forward with the Senate version, which does not include the ban on flavored tobacco.

 

The lawmaker stated that the only chance for the ban to pass is if it is adopted in a committee meeting between the House of Representatives and the Senate, and called on all supporters to continue putting pressure on the lawmakers.

 

Although the bill may not be implemented this year, lawmakers at the state capitol have clearly stated that they plan to continue their fight against flavored tobacco products, with Cheh and other legislators possibly reintroducing the bill next year.

 

If the bill ultimately passes, Minnesota will become the third state in the United States, following California and Massachusetts, to ban all flavored tobacco products.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

2Firsts Observation | Element Vape Launches “Made in USA” Section as Product Pages Show “Assembled in USA” and “Made in USA” Labels
2Firsts Observation | Element Vape Launches “Made in USA” Section as Product Pages Show “Assembled in USA” and “Made in USA” Labels
Element Vape, a U.S. online vaping retailer, uses origin labels such as “Made in USA” and “Assembled in USA” across disposable vape product pages and a dedicated collection page, grouping items under “Made in USA Disposable Vapes,” but the platform does not disclose on its public pages the applicable standards or evidentiary basis for these different claims.
Jan.20 by 2FIRSTS.ai
PMI Faces Setback in India: Global Regulatory Fragmentation Complicates Its Smoke-Free Transition
PMI Faces Setback in India: Global Regulatory Fragmentation Complicates Its Smoke-Free Transition
India has reaffirmed its 2019 ban on e-cigarettes and heated tobacco devices, effectively blocking Philip Morris International (PMI) from launching IQOS in the country despite years of lobbying. Together with Taiwan, China’s conditional opening of heated tobacco products, and Japan’s planned 2026 excise tax hikes, these moves highlight increasingly divergent national regulatory pathways—an external uncertainty shaping PMI’s smoke-free growth trajectory.
Feb.12
Mexico’s ENCODAT 2025 finds smoking rate falls as vaping rises
Mexico’s ENCODAT 2025 finds smoking rate falls as vaping rises
Results from Mexico’s ENCODAT 2025 indicate a structural shift in tobacco and nicotine use: past-month combustible tobacco use among the general population (ages 12–65) declined to 15.1%, down from 17.6% in 2016, while past-month e-cigarette use increased to 2.6%, up from 1.1%.
Dec.25 by 2FIRSTS.ai
2Firsts “Decisive 2026” Concludes: Reviewing the 2025 U.S. Market and Mapping Compliance Pathways Ahead
2Firsts “Decisive 2026” Concludes: Reviewing the 2025 U.S. Market and Mapping Compliance Pathways Ahead
2Firsts hosted “Decisive 2026” in Shenzhen, bringing together industry perspectives to examine major shifts in the U.S. new tobacco market in 2025 and their global implications. Sessions covered U.S. market dynamics, technical insights from recently PMTA-authorized products, an investor lens on tobacco capital markets, and 2025 news/product highlights. The event underscored a structural shift from “gray business” toward compliance and sustainable growth, expected to become clearer by 2026.
Jan.09
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
During the “Toxicological Profile” session at FDA’s Feb 10 PMTA roundtable, officials outlined the carcinogenicity tiering system and Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) framework used in ENDS reviews under the APPH standard. Small manufacturers questioned database transparency, exposure assumptions, and the existence of clear compliance benchmarks. FDA reiterated toxicological risk is assessed case by case within a broader population-level determination.
Feb.11
Azerbaijan’s Milli Majlis passes final reading bill banning e-cigarettes and their components
Azerbaijan’s Milli Majlis passes final reading bill banning e-cigarettes and their components
Azerbaijan’s Milli Majlis adopted in final reading a bill banning the import, export, production, storage, wholesale and retail sale, and use of electronic cigarettes and their components, through amendments to the law On Tobacco and Tobacco Products. The document states that nicotine-containing electronic cigarettes are included within the concept of tobacco products and sets out a definition of electronic cigarettes.
Dec.31 by 2FIRSTS.ai