Ohio Judge Issues Temporary Ban on State Tobacco Legislation

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.22.2024
Ohio Judge Issues Temporary Ban on State Tobacco Legislation
Ohio judge Mark Serrott issued a temporary restraining order on a state law banning tobacco regulation in several cities.

According to a dispatch on April 19, Judge Mark Serrott of Franklin County, Ohio issued a temporary restraining order last Friday (April 19), blocking a state law set to take effect this week. The law aimed to prohibit Columbus, several Franklin County suburbs, Cincinnati, and other Ohio cities from regulating tobacco products.

 

Due to this ruling, the local city ban on the sale of flavored tobacco products will remain temporarily in place. Serot believes that the city may have a chance to win in this case. The judge has scheduled a preliminary injunction hearing for May 17th.

 

Prior to this, fourteen cities in the state filed a lawsuit against the state legislature in Franklin County on Tuesday, April 9, alleging that the law violated the autonomy of local governments.

 

Celote explained that state laws effectively prevent local governments from regulating tobacco, but they seem to overlook a comprehensive state oversight plan, which could infringe on cities' rights under the Ohio Constitution.

 

Basically, what the state legislature did was simply declare that "we want to prevent local governments from regulating tobacco." The Ohio Supreme Court has ruled that for a "general law" to be legal, it must regulate the behavior of citizens, not of cities, as the latter is granted special regulatory authority under the state constitution.

 

Serot also pointed out that while one state law prohibits local governments from regulating tobacco, another law requires the development of a plan to reduce tobacco use in Ohio. The regulation emphasizes that tobacco use should be reduced among "young people, ethnic minorities and rural populations, pregnant women, Medicaid recipients, and other populations that may be affected by tobacco use.

 

Judge Cerote, when issuing the injunction, stated that the city's challenge to the constitutionality of the state law may ultimately be successful, although he also acknowledged that his final ruling may be appealed.

 

Notice

1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.

2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.

Copyright

This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.

This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.