Pakistan Tobacco Companies Agree to Use New Tracking System

Aug.07.2022
Pakistan Tobacco Companies Agree to Use New Tracking System
Seven tobacco companies in Pakistan agree to use new tracking system, with all companies to use it by July 2022.

As reported by Propakistani, four more tobacco companies have agreed to use Pakistan's new tracking system, bringing the total number of companies using the system to seven.


As of July 2022, all tobacco companies operating in Pakistan are required to use the country's tracking system. Tobacco products may only enter the domestic market if they bear a stamp and unique identification mark.


Prior to this, only three tobacco manufacturers - Pakistan Tobacco Company, Philip Morris International, and Khyber Tobacco Company - utilized this tracking system.


Asia Tobacco, Frontier Leaf Tobacco, Falcon Tobacco, and International Cigarette have now decided to sign an agreement with the Federal Board of Revenue in Pakistan to implement a tracking system in their factories.


Apart from multinational corporations, there are at least 21 tobacco companies operating in Pakistan, with 18 located in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and 3 in the country's federal and provincial tribal areas.


Tobacco companies that have already joined the system insist that it can only be successful if all participants implement it. Critics allege that some opponents engage in illicit trade and fear that the tracking system will expose their illegal activity.


Meanwhile, Pakistan's tracking system has come under attack from anti-smoking groups who argue that the method preserves the tobacco industry and violates the World Health Organization's Protocol to Eliminate Illicit Trade in Tobacco Products.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not represent the viewpoint of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content. The compilation of this article is solely for internal industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in our translation abilities, there may be discrepancies between the original article and the translated version. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete consistency with the Chinese government's stance and views on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign-related issues and statements.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and its authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Alan Zhao: What the Rise of Nicotine Pouches Means for Tobacco Retailers
Alan Zhao: What the Rise of Nicotine Pouches Means for Tobacco Retailers
Alan Zhao argues that nicotine pouches are no longer a niche alternative, but a force quietly reshaping the future of tobacco retail. For distributors and retailers, the real risk is not missing a trend—it is moving too late, after regulation tightens, shelf space hardens and the market begins to choose its winners.
Mar.31 by Alan Zhao | 2Firsts Perspectives
Imperial Brands Pulls myblu Vape Business From U.S., Citing Prolonged FDA Approval Process
Imperial Brands Pulls myblu Vape Business From U.S., Citing Prolonged FDA Approval Process
Imperial Brands said it will phase out its myblu vaping business in the United States, citing prolonged FDA approval timelines for new vape products. The company said it will instead focus on modern oral nicotine products in the U.S., including the expansion of its Zone brand and new flavors. While overall next-generation product revenue continued to grow, revenue from the category in the Americas declined sharply.
May.12
AIR Romania Manufacturing Facility Expected to Begin Operations in Q1 2027
AIR Romania Manufacturing Facility Expected to Begin Operations in Q1 2027
AIR Limited announced on May 7, 2026, that it plans to open a new manufacturing facility of approximately 70,000 square feet in Stefanesti, Bucharest North, Romania. The facility is expected to begin operations by the first quarter of 2027. AIR said that once fully operational, the facility is expected to support more than 150 jobs and be capable of producing more than 4,000 tons of flavored shisha molasses each year.
May.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
North Carolina hemp provider JLT Imports Inc. has filed suit in California federal court seeking cancellation of the “Lost Mary” vape trademark held by Chinese company Imiracle (HK) Ltd.
Mar.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Thai Vape User Numbers Rose More Than 11-Fold in Three Years, Group Says Ban Should Be Reassessed
Thai Vape User Numbers Rose More Than 11-Fold in Three Years, Group Says Ban Should Be Reassessed
A network of e-cigarette users in Thailand has urged the new government to review the country’s vape ban, saying official data show that use has risen sharply despite more than a decade of prohibition.
Mar.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai