Philippines President Defies Public Health, Allows E-Cigarette Bill to Expire

Aug.08.2022
Philippines President Defies Public Health, Allows E-Cigarette Bill to Expire
The Philippines' proposed e-cigarette law facing opposition from health officials and advocates for public health.

On his first day in office, Philippine President Marcos vetoed the bill to establish the special ecological zone at the Bura-gan airport city, sending a message that public interest should prevail over commercial profits.


However, the proposed Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Aerosol Products Regulation Act appears to be anything but. The President allowed the act to lapse on July 25th. While the e-cigarette bill would expand its market base and bring more funding to the tobacco industry, it is seen as harmful to health because it would allow individuals as young as 18 to buy, use, and sell e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, and would lift flavor restrictions on e-cigarette liquids.


The National Health, Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Finance, as well as dozens of medical associations and former health ministers, are strongly lobbying against an electronic cigarette bill. They believe that this puts the country's youth at risk of harmful effects from electronic cigarettes. Former health minister Francisco Duque opposed the claim that electronic cigarettes can help people quit smoking. He said that they typically have the opposite effect as they lead people to engage in more bad habits such as drinking and illegal drug use.


The Philippines is one of the countries with the highest smoking rates among adults and youth around the world. The Global Adult Tobacco Survey in 2015 revealed that nearly 23.8% of Filipino adults used some form of tobacco, with 22.7% of the population being smokers and 18.7% of them being daily smokers.


Approximately 117,000 people die each year in the country due to tobacco-related illnesses such as lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. The cost of treating the four main diseases caused by tobacco use in the Philippines is estimated to be 46.4 billion pesos.


Child rights activists and tobacco control advocates believe that the e-cigarette bill is a "victory for tobacco capital.


The public interest law organization, ImagineLaw, has stated that allowing this bill to become law would be a "betrayal of public health" and a "regrettable development" in light of President Marcos' promise to rebuild the country better.


When the President does not take action after receiving a legislative measure for 30 days, the legislation expires. The previous Congress shelved the e-cigarette bill for five months and on June 24th forwarded a registered copy to Malacañang, just six days before then-President Rodrigo Duterte's term ended.


Health experts and tobacco control advocates are calling for the rejection of the proposed bill, as its provisions conflict with public health goals and international standards, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in late June upholding the FDA's jurisdiction over tobacco products and reaffirming the country's commitment to the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.


Marcos hails from the Ilocos region where tobacco is the main cash crop. Allowing the electronic cigarette bill to expire puts narrow interests ahead of the common good.


Some are calling for the immediate convening of the Legislative-Executive Development Advisory Council (LEDAC) by the President and have pointed out that while the veto power is within the President's rights, its frequent use may strain relations between the executive and legislative branches of government.


In the coming days when meeting with congressional leaders, it should be clear that they will prioritize legislation that serves the public interest, rather than industry profits. The public interest should never be relegated to a secondary position.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning only.


This article does not represent the viewpoint of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truth or accuracy of the article's content. The compilation of this article is only intended for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in the compiler's ability, the translated article may not fully convey the original meaning. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

US ITC Judge Finds Glas Infringed Two JUUL Vape Patents, Recommends Restrictions on Related Imports——Glas Received FDA Marketing Authorization for Four Vape Pods in May 2026; Proposed Restrictions Remain Under Commission Review
US ITC Judge Finds Glas Infringed Two JUUL Vape Patents, Recommends Restrictions on Related Imports——Glas Received FDA Marketing Authorization for Four Vape Pods in May 2026; Proposed Restrictions Remain Under Commission Review
A U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) administrative law judge issued an initial determination on October 20, 2026, finding that certain Glas vaping devices, cartridges and components infringed 12 claims across two patents asserted by JUUL, constituting a violation of Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930. The judge recommended a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order against the Glas respondents. Five months earlier, the FDA authorized four Glas e-cigarette pods, including mango, blueberry and two menthol variants. The patent investigation concerns device and cartridge structures and is separate from FDA premarket review. The proposed import restrictions have not become final, and their product-level scope remains unresolved.
company
Nov.05
China’s Vape-Related Exports Rose 4.5% in Q3 2026 as 21.6% Growth in Shipments to the UK Offset a Decline in Shipments to the US
China’s Vape-Related Exports Rose 4.5% in Q3 2026 as 21.6% Growth in Shipments to the UK Offset a Decline in Shipments to the US
China's vape-related exports rose 4.5% year over year to $2.86 billion in the third quarter of 2026, led by stronger shipments to the United Kingdom as exports to the United States declined. UK-bound shipments increased 21.6%, adding $81.9 million, while US exports fell 5.2%, or $53.6 million. Growth weakened through the quarter, with September exports down 6.3% globally and 37.8% to the US. Nicotine-containing vape products accounted for more than 82% of the quarterly net increase, while device exports were nearly flat. Nine-month exports totaled $7.82 billion, up 4.0%.
DATA
Oct.26
JAMA Study: U.S. Vape Directories Fail to Sustainably Curb Unlisted Sales as Product Shifts May Redistribute Brand Share 2Firsts Recommended
JAMA Study: U.S. Vape Directories Fail to Sustainably Curb Unlisted Sales as Product Shifts May Redistribute Brand Share 2Firsts Recommended
A study by CDC Foundation researchers found no sustained decline in e-cigarette sales across Alabama, Oklahoma and Louisiana, the first three U.S. states to implement e-cigarette directory laws. Louisiana initially saw a significant sales decline, followed by a rebound and a persistent reduction in product availability. Sales also shifted from nontobacco-flavored disposables toward prefilled cartridges, with Vuse Alto driving much of the increase in menthol cartridges. By April 2025, unlisted products still accounted for more than half of e-cigarette nicotine sales in all three states.
Sep.18
BAT Adds Former Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell to Board as Finance, Legal, Marketing and Regional Leadership Shift
BAT Adds Former Apple General Counsel Bruce Sewell to Board as Finance, Legal, Marketing and Regional Leadership Shift
British American Tobacco has appointed former Apple Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary Bruce Sewell as an independent non-executive director, effective January 1, 2027. He will also join BAT's Audit and Nominations Committees. BAT Chair Luc Jobin highlighted Sewell's experience in technology, government and regulatory affairs, public-company governance and AI-company boards. Over the past 18 months, BAT has changed or announced changes to its CFO, general counsel, CMO and APMEA regional leadership, while the main board has also seen multiple changes. The appointment comes as BAT advances Horizon 2030 and its Fit2Win transformation while expanding New Categories and reshaping parts of its digital, technology and operating structure.
Business
Oct.29
AIR Q3 Sales Rise 11%, but New Products Generate Just $2.1 Million in Nine Months as U.S. Vape Push Awaits FDA Review
AIR Q3 Sales Rise 11%, but New Products Generate Just $2.1 Million in Nine Months as U.S. Vape Push Awaits FDA Review
AIR Global PLC (NASDAQ: AIIR), a producer of flavored shisha tobacco and next-generation nicotine products, reported an 11.1% increase in third-quarter 2026 revenue to $99.8 million and a 7.7% rise in adjusted EBITDA to $30.9 million. Revenue for the first nine months increased 6.0% to $306.7 million, but the company posted a $74.2 million net loss, affected by listing-related expenses and other costs. Its New Growth Categories (NGC) business generated $2.1 million in nine-month revenue and an adjusted EBITDA loss of $10.8 million. AIR maintained its 2026 revenue growth guidance of 4%–6%, while lowering its capital expenditure outlook and raising its year-end leverage forecast from approximately 2.1 times to 2.5 times. The company has submitted a U.S. PMTA for its Crown Switch pod vape, with future contributions from new products dependent on regulatory progress and commercialization.
Capital Markets
Nov.13
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23