Philippines President Defies Public Health, Allows E-Cigarette Bill to Expire

Aug.08.2022
Philippines President Defies Public Health, Allows E-Cigarette Bill to Expire
The Philippines' proposed e-cigarette law facing opposition from health officials and advocates for public health.

On his first day in office, Philippine President Marcos vetoed the bill to establish the special ecological zone at the Bura-gan airport city, sending a message that public interest should prevail over commercial profits.


However, the proposed Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Aerosol Products Regulation Act appears to be anything but. The President allowed the act to lapse on July 25th. While the e-cigarette bill would expand its market base and bring more funding to the tobacco industry, it is seen as harmful to health because it would allow individuals as young as 18 to buy, use, and sell e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, and would lift flavor restrictions on e-cigarette liquids.


The National Health, Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Finance, as well as dozens of medical associations and former health ministers, are strongly lobbying against an electronic cigarette bill. They believe that this puts the country's youth at risk of harmful effects from electronic cigarettes. Former health minister Francisco Duque opposed the claim that electronic cigarettes can help people quit smoking. He said that they typically have the opposite effect as they lead people to engage in more bad habits such as drinking and illegal drug use.


The Philippines is one of the countries with the highest smoking rates among adults and youth around the world. The Global Adult Tobacco Survey in 2015 revealed that nearly 23.8% of Filipino adults used some form of tobacco, with 22.7% of the population being smokers and 18.7% of them being daily smokers.


Approximately 117,000 people die each year in the country due to tobacco-related illnesses such as lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. The cost of treating the four main diseases caused by tobacco use in the Philippines is estimated to be 46.4 billion pesos.


Child rights activists and tobacco control advocates believe that the e-cigarette bill is a "victory for tobacco capital.


The public interest law organization, ImagineLaw, has stated that allowing this bill to become law would be a "betrayal of public health" and a "regrettable development" in light of President Marcos' promise to rebuild the country better.


When the President does not take action after receiving a legislative measure for 30 days, the legislation expires. The previous Congress shelved the e-cigarette bill for five months and on June 24th forwarded a registered copy to Malacañang, just six days before then-President Rodrigo Duterte's term ended.


Health experts and tobacco control advocates are calling for the rejection of the proposed bill, as its provisions conflict with public health goals and international standards, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in late June upholding the FDA's jurisdiction over tobacco products and reaffirming the country's commitment to the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.


Marcos hails from the Ilocos region where tobacco is the main cash crop. Allowing the electronic cigarette bill to expire puts narrow interests ahead of the common good.


Some are calling for the immediate convening of the Legislative-Executive Development Advisory Council (LEDAC) by the President and have pointed out that while the veto power is within the President's rights, its frequent use may strain relations between the executive and legislative branches of government.


In the coming days when meeting with congressional leaders, it should be clear that they will prioritize legislation that serves the public interest, rather than industry profits. The public interest should never be relegated to a secondary position.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning only.


This article does not represent the viewpoint of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truth or accuracy of the article's content. The compilation of this article is only intended for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in the compiler's ability, the translated article may not fully convey the original meaning. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
The Philippines’ Bureau of Internal Revenue is intensifying enforcement against illicit vape and tobacco products ahead of the Christmas shopping season, directing regional and enforcement offices to strengthen monitoring of production sites, warehouses, distribution channels and retail outlets. The BIR destroyed 240,550 illicit vape products in August with an estimated tax liability of about PHP1.53 billion. A nationwide tax-compliance operation in July also inspected 3,590 businesses involved in tobacco and vapor products.
Regulations
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10
Product | JTI Launches Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop in South Korea, Its First Dual-Color Edition
Product | JTI Launches Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop in South Korea, Its First Dual-Color Edition
JTI Korea launched the Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop limited edition in South Korea on September 1, 2026, marking the first dual-color design in the Ploom AURA range. The device combines a dark green body with teal accents and is accompanied by matching Front Panel, Back Cover and Pocket Bag accessories. The standalone device is priced at KRW 29,000, with three additional device-and-accessory bundles available. The release continues JTI Korea's use of limited colorways and interchangeable accessories to expand the Ploom AURA portfolio without introducing a new hardware platform.
Sep.03
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21
China Tobacco Regulator Deputy Head Visits Laos as Both Sides Strengthen Cooperation on Illegal Tobacco Trade
China Tobacco Regulator Deputy Head Visits Laos as Both Sides Strengthen Cooperation on Illegal Tobacco Trade
China’s official Xinhua News Agency reported that Liu Sanjiang, deputy head and Party group member of China’s tobacco regulator, led a delegation to Laos from July 31 to Aug. 2, 2026, for discussions with Lao authorities on combating cross-border illegal tobacco trade. The two sides discussed areas including law enforcement cooperation, information sharing and efforts to address tobacco-related illegal activities such as counterfeiting and smuggling. The visit highlights cooperation between Chinese and Lao authorities on illicit tobacco control.
News
Aug.05
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-Listed Consumer Goods Group Supreme Sees Vape Duty as Potential Consolidation Opportunity, Holds FY27 Outlook
UK-listed consumer goods group Supreme plc says it continues to expect FY27 trading to meet market expectations as the Vaping Products Duty takes effect on October 1, while maintaining a comparatively positive view of the new tax and compliance regime. Supreme has said the framework could increase compliance complexity for smaller operators and contribute to market consolidation, while its manufacturing, compliance and distribution scale may allow it to gain share. Its 88Vape brand will retain its value positioning.
Sep.18