Philippines President Defies Public Health, Allows E-Cigarette Bill to Expire

Aug.08.2022
Philippines President Defies Public Health, Allows E-Cigarette Bill to Expire
The Philippines' proposed e-cigarette law facing opposition from health officials and advocates for public health.

On his first day in office, Philippine President Marcos vetoed the bill to establish the special ecological zone at the Bura-gan airport city, sending a message that public interest should prevail over commercial profits.


However, the proposed Nicotine and Non-Nicotine Aerosol Products Regulation Act appears to be anything but. The President allowed the act to lapse on July 25th. While the e-cigarette bill would expand its market base and bring more funding to the tobacco industry, it is seen as harmful to health because it would allow individuals as young as 18 to buy, use, and sell e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products, and would lift flavor restrictions on e-cigarette liquids.


The National Health, Food and Drug Administration, Ministry of Education, Ministry of Finance, as well as dozens of medical associations and former health ministers, are strongly lobbying against an electronic cigarette bill. They believe that this puts the country's youth at risk of harmful effects from electronic cigarettes. Former health minister Francisco Duque opposed the claim that electronic cigarettes can help people quit smoking. He said that they typically have the opposite effect as they lead people to engage in more bad habits such as drinking and illegal drug use.


The Philippines is one of the countries with the highest smoking rates among adults and youth around the world. The Global Adult Tobacco Survey in 2015 revealed that nearly 23.8% of Filipino adults used some form of tobacco, with 22.7% of the population being smokers and 18.7% of them being daily smokers.


Approximately 117,000 people die each year in the country due to tobacco-related illnesses such as lung cancer and cardiovascular disease. The cost of treating the four main diseases caused by tobacco use in the Philippines is estimated to be 46.4 billion pesos.


Child rights activists and tobacco control advocates believe that the e-cigarette bill is a "victory for tobacco capital.


The public interest law organization, ImagineLaw, has stated that allowing this bill to become law would be a "betrayal of public health" and a "regrettable development" in light of President Marcos' promise to rebuild the country better.


When the President does not take action after receiving a legislative measure for 30 days, the legislation expires. The previous Congress shelved the e-cigarette bill for five months and on June 24th forwarded a registered copy to Malacañang, just six days before then-President Rodrigo Duterte's term ended.


Health experts and tobacco control advocates are calling for the rejection of the proposed bill, as its provisions conflict with public health goals and international standards, particularly in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in late June upholding the FDA's jurisdiction over tobacco products and reaffirming the country's commitment to the World Health Organization's Framework Convention on Tobacco Control.


Marcos hails from the Ilocos region where tobacco is the main cash crop. Allowing the electronic cigarette bill to expire puts narrow interests ahead of the common good.


Some are calling for the immediate convening of the Legislative-Executive Development Advisory Council (LEDAC) by the President and have pointed out that while the veto power is within the President's rights, its frequent use may strain relations between the executive and legislative branches of government.


In the coming days when meeting with congressional leaders, it should be clear that they will prioritize legislation that serves the public interest, rather than industry profits. The public interest should never be relegated to a secondary position.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning only.


This article does not represent the viewpoint of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truth or accuracy of the article's content. The compilation of this article is only intended for communication and research within the industry.


Due to limitations in the compiler's ability, the translated article may not fully convey the original meaning. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government regarding any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
FDA Revises Import Alert 98-07 Rules, Bringing May Enforcement Priorities Into Unauthorized ENDS Detentions
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has revised the rules under Import Alert 98-07 to incorporate its May 2026 enforcement-priority policy for certain electronic nicotine delivery systems marketed without premarket authorization. The alert continues to allow detention without physical examination, or DWPE, for ENDS lacking required marketing authorization, while directing field divisions to apply the May risk-based framework. When necessary, detention or refusal decisions must also undergo review by the FDA's Center for Tobacco Products. Products including PACHA and Vuse Pro have already emerged as industry examples of the May policy, although enforcement discretion does not constitute FDA marketing authorization.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Special Report | From New York to Washington: How FDA’s Tobacco Center Is Reworking Product Review
Special Report | From New York to Washington: How FDA’s Tobacco Center Is Reworking Product Review
FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products is reshaping how it approaches tobacco product review. Based on 2Firsts’ on-site reporting in New York and Washington, this report traces CTP’s emerging direction: stronger links between PMTA and tobacco harm reduction, more category-specific review, greater emphasis on decision-relevant science, more predictable timelines and expanded use of sPMTA for product modifications. CTP also acknowledged major constraints, including just nine PMTA review teams, persistent backlogs and limits on hiring capacity.
Regulations
Oct.08
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
A U.S. Government Accountability Office audit found that 131,915 tobacco product applications submitted to the FDA since 2018 remained without a final review as of December 31, 2025, with pending applications waiting an average of 1,266 days. GAO also found FDA lacks the data needed to systematically determine whether scientific reviews meet applicable timelines. HHS agreed to upgrade the agency's tracking systems. At the same time, FDA has begun applying lessons from its nicotine pouch PMTA pilot to e-cigarette reviews, while changes to enforcement policy and electronic submissions are making the specific stage of a PMTA increasingly relevant to market access.
FDA
Oct.03
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
2Firsts On-Site | PMI Brings IQOS, ZYN, VEEV and Marlboro Together at Its “Boulevard” at InterTabac 2026
2Firsts On-Site | PMI Brings IQOS, ZYN, VEEV and Marlboro Together at Its “Boulevard” at InterTabac 2026
At InterTabac 2026 in Dortmund, PMI is presenting multiple brands and products along “The PMI Boulevard,” including IQOS, ZYN, VEEV and Marlboro. On-site images captured by 2Firsts show dedicated spaces including the IQOS Boutique, ZYN Café, PMI Gallery and Marlboro Office
Market
Sep.16 by 2Firsts Perspectives
FRE and ALP Push Modern Oral to 48% of Q2 Sales as Turning Point Brands Changes CEO and Lowers Profit-Guidance Ceiling
FRE and ALP Push Modern Oral to 48% of Q2 Sales as Turning Point Brands Changes CEO and Lowers Profit-Guidance Ceiling
Turning Point Brands said Executive Chairman David E. Glazek will become CEO on October 1, replacing Graham Purdy, who is stepping down for personal reasons. The company narrowed its 2026 adjusted EBITDA outlook to $70 million-$80 million from $70 million-$90 million while maintaining Modern Oral gross sales guidance of $330 million-$350 million and net sales guidance of $260 million-$270 million. In the second quarter, Modern Oral net sales rose 128% to $68.4 million and accounted for 48% of company-wide net sales. Adjusted EBITDA fell 50% year over year. TPB shares closed about 10% lower on September 21.
Market
Sep.22 by 2Firsts Perspectives