Regulations on Electronic Cigarette Production Enterprises Management

Sep.01.2022
Regulations on Electronic Cigarette Production Enterprises Management
National Tobacco Monopoly Bureau released regulations for electronic cigarette companies relating to establishment, separation, merger, and revocation.

To regulate the establishment, separation, merger, and revocation of electronic cigarette manufacturers and protect the legitimate rights and interests of administrative counterparties in accordance with the law, the State Tobacco Monopoly Bureau has developed the "Management Regulations for the Establishment, Separation, Merger, and Revocation of Electronic Cigarette Manufacturers.


Link: Rules and Regulations for the Establishment, Separation, Merger, and Shutdown of E-cigarette Producing Enterprises.


Title: "Interpretation of Regulations for Management of Establishment, Separation, Merger, and Cancellation of Electronic Cigarette Production Companies" The aforementioned policy outlines guidelines for the management of electronic cigarette production companies concerning their establishment, separation, merger, and cancellation. This policy is meant to provide clarity on the specific procedures and regulations that must be followed in these processes.


This article includes excerpts or reprints from third-party sources. The copyrights belong to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion. Any individual or organization wishing to reprint must contact the author and not directly reprint the content.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Washington Policy Media Flags Surge: China’s Monthly Vape Exports Jump from 2.2M Kg to 14.8M Kg; Crackdown Effectiveness Questioned
Washington Policy Media Flags Surge: China’s Monthly Vape Exports Jump from 2.2M Kg to 14.8M Kg; Crackdown Effectiveness Questioned
The Washington Examiner on December 9, 2025, reported: China's vape export volume to the U.S. rebounded sharply from 2.2 million kilograms to 14.8 million kilograms despite the crackdown. This volatility, confirming the annual multi-billion dollar trade gap, is the "Bullwhip Effect" in action. It transfers massive inventory to the U.S. market, putting the working capital of Chinese manufacturers and the supply chain at severe risk of lock-up and failure. Regulatory escalation is now imminent.
News
Dec.11
Denmark Proposes Sharper Tax Hike: Heated Tobacco Up 132%, Nicotine Pouches Facing 1,000% Increase
Denmark Proposes Sharper Tax Hike: Heated Tobacco Up 132%, Nicotine Pouches Facing 1,000% Increase
According to foreign media, the European Union will examine a strengthened Danish proposal to amend the Tobacco Excise Directive. The plan introduces sharper tax increases on heated tobacco, nicotine pouches and other products. Despite overwhelming public opposition in earlier consultations, the revision continues to move forward, raising concerns about supply chain impacts and potential growth in illicit trade.
Dec.04
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
Denver’s Flavored Tobacco Ban Faces Constitutional Challenge From Vape Trade Group
A Colorado vape industry trade group says Denver’s voter-approved flavored tobacco sales ban is unconstitutional and too vague to enforce. The group is asking a state court for a permanent injunction blocking enforcement of Ordinance 24-1765 and for a declaration allowing flavored tobacco and vape sales, citing state constitutional vagueness concerns and multiple U.S. constitutional issues.
Jan.27 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Juul, NJOY and Altria Clash Over Use of UCSF Public Documents in U.S. Patent Litigation
Juul, NJOY and Altria Clash Over Use of UCSF Public Documents in U.S. Patent Litigation
Juul Labs has asked a U.S. federal court to prevent NJOY and Altria from using documents stored in a public UCSF database in an ongoing patent lawsuit, arguing they are protected by attorney–client privilege. The defendants say the files have long been public and may contain evidence relevant to Juul’s patent conduct.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Alaska Settles with Juul and Altria for $7.8 Million After Five-Year Lawsuit
Alaska Settles with Juul and Altria for $7.8 Million After Five-Year Lawsuit
The State of Alaska has reached a $7.8 million settlement with e-cigarette maker Juul and its investor Altria, concluding a five-year lawsuit alleging the companies targeted Alaskan youth with nicotine products.
Dec.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia appeals to the Fourth Circuit over partial block on flavored vape ban enforcement
Virginia has asked the Fourth Circuit to overturn a district court order that partially blocked enforcement of the commonwealth’s flavored vape ban. In a notice, the state told U.S. District Judge David J. Novak it seeks to upend his December ruling that Virginia’s Chapter 23.2 statute is preempted by the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act and the Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act.
Jan.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai