RJ Reynolds Denied Retrial for Vaping Patent Infringement Case

Jan.16.2023
RJ Reynolds Denied Retrial for Vaping Patent Infringement Case
RJ Reynolds Vapor Co. denied new trial for $95M payment to Altria over Vuse Alto vape pod patent infringement.

RJ Reynolds Vapor Co. has been denied a request to have their September loss reevaluated after being ordered to pay $95 million in damages to Altria Group for violating three vape pod patents with their Vuse Alto electronic cigarettes.


According to reports, Judge N. Carlton Tilley Jr. stated in an opinion released on Thursday in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina that "the jury's disagreement with Reynolds' perspective does not mean the trial was unfair.


Tilley refused the motion made by Reynolds, a subsidiary of BAT, to either retry or reduce the compensation awarded to Altria's customer service company by the jury on September 7th.


In its request for a retrial, Reynolds Vaper argues that "Altria improperly injected provocative evidence regarding allegations of patent infringement against Reynolds in other cases, depriving Reynolds of a fair trial. The erroneous evidence ruling also harmed Reynolds' defense. These errors, taken independently and under the cumulative error doctrine, affected the verdict and thus require a complete retrial.


Altria stated that "this was a fair trial. There is no reason for a retrial, and we are pleased that the jury correctly determined that Reynolds Vapor Company infringed on some of our patents.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Fiscal benefit, not health, strongest indicator for vape bans – Contributed by Samrat Chowdhery
Data shows 75% of nations with state stakes in tobacco trade ban modern substitutes compared to 10% in the free-market group. What is driving these divergent regulations?
Feb.04
Consultation opens for Tasmania’s Public Health Amendment Bill 2026
Consultation opens for Tasmania’s Public Health Amendment Bill 2026
Consultation opened on February 6, 2026 for the Public Health Amendment (Prohibited Tobacco and Other Products) Bill 2026. The Bill intends to address illicit trade in tobacco, nicotine pouches and e-cigarettes, which has increased significantly across Tasmania in recent years. It proposes changes to the Public Health Act 1997 to further protect the health of Tasmanians by reducing the sale and supply of illicit tobacco, vaping and other products, and to strengthen existing tobacco control laws.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Andy Tan Named 2026 SRNT Fellow for Contributions to Nicotine Research
Andy Tan Named 2026 SRNT Fellow for Contributions to Nicotine Research
Andy Tan, Ph.D., has been named a 2026 Fellow of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco (SRNT), an international professional association dedicated to advancing nicotine and tobacco research. Fellows are selected for outstanding research contributions as well as leadership, mentoring, and policy engagement within the field.
Feb.23
FDA Says Flavored ENDS Must Show “Added Benefit” as Small Manufacturers Seek Clearer Switching Benchmarks
FDA Says Flavored ENDS Must Show “Added Benefit” as Small Manufacturers Seek Clearer Switching Benchmarks
During the FDA PMTA roundtable session on “Studies of Adult Benefit,” officials said flavored ENDS must demonstrate “added benefit” over tobacco-flavored products under the APPH standard, including sustained complete switching evidence. Small manufacturers questioned switching benchmarks, study duration, and bridging expectations.
Feb.11
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Vape manufacturers and sellers urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to find that the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) preempts North Carolina’s new law restricting the sale of certain e-cigarette/ENDS products.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product | Refillable up to 30 mL in total and claimed 60,000 puffs: MASKKING launches open-system UCEE MAX
Product | Refillable up to 30 mL in total and claimed 60,000 puffs: MASKKING launches open-system UCEE MAX
E-cigarette brand MASKKING has recently listed its new UCEE MAX on its official website. According to the website, the device features an open, refillable design with a stated 10 mL e-liquid capacity, supports three refills, and claims a total of 60,000 puffs.
Mar.02 by 2FIRSTS.ai