Russia Considers Ban on E-cigarette Additives: Industry Voices Concerns

Aug.09.2023
Russia Considers Ban on E-cigarette Additives: Industry Voices Concerns
Russia's Health Ministry is set to introduce a bill prohibiting certain additives in e-cigarettes, including nicotine salts and flavorings.

In a press conference, Artyom Metchelyov, Chairman of the Youth Policy Committee of the State Duma of Russia, announced that the Russian Ministry of Health will soon submit a bill to the Russian Cabinet for review, which aims to ban the use of additives in e-cigarettes.


This list of substances banned from increasing the appeal of nicotine-containing liquids includes:


Food additives, herbal flavoring agents, and their derivatives, including vanillin, cocoa and its derivatives, licorice, spices, and any natural flavorings are prohibited. Synthetic sugars and synthetic or natural sweeteners are also prohibited. Additionally, additives that enhance nicotine addiction, such as nicotine salts, ethanol, ammonium, and ammonia, are banned.


According to a report from the Russian newspaper "News Report" on August 8th, the Russian Union of Nicotine-Containing Product Industry (Союз предприятий индустрии никотиносодержащих изделий, abbreviated as СПИНИ) and the Professional Alliance of Participants in the Russian Market of Electronic Nicotine Systems (Профессиональный альянс участников русского рынка электронных никотиновых систем, abbreviated as ПАУРРЭНС) have sent a letter to Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, requesting the removal of food flavorings and salt-based nicotine from the list of banned substances and additives.


This letter has received support from over 50 industry professionals and experts in the e-cigarette sector. Among them is Lev Grigoriev, Chairman of BABYLON, a leading e-cigarette compliant distributor in Russia, who also opposes the policy change.


Lev Grigoriev stated:


Flavorings are used in all e-cigarette liquids, many of which are not noticeable. Many flavorings are processed using technology and without them, the product would be unusable. In other words, it is illogical to completely ban all flavorings as there is no similar situation in the world.


The Ministry of Health recommends exclusively using liquid products containing propylene glycol and glycerol, much like suggesting a complete ban on all types of alcohol such as wine, liquor, brandy, and so on, and only utilizing pure ethanol.


The second recommendation concerns nicotine salts. What are nicotine salts? From a chemical standpoint, they are simply nicotine. So why does the Ministry of Health believe they can be addictive? Addiction is not caused by nicotine itself, but rather by its concentration.


The recommendation from the Ministry of Health is unlikely to solve the problem it claims to address - reducing the accessibility of nicotine products for minors and teenagers. Examples of similar bans include snus, a tobacco product in Sweden. Although snus is still available on the market, it is supplied illegally without the payment of taxes. This significantly impacts consumers who may be exposed to low-quality and unsafe products. Similarly, if the use of nicotine salts and flavorings is prohibited, the situation would likely be comparable.


What are the recommendations from industry experts regarding the market? It is not to completely ban all flavors, as e-cigarettes are composed of various substances.


Taking into account that minors make up approximately 11.2% of all e-cigarette consumers, we are actively striving to restrict accessibility to underage individuals. However, under the current circumstances, this measure would affect around 90% of adult users.


References:


[1] The business sector has requested not to ban the use of flavorings in vaping products. [2] Vape sellers are requesting not to ban flavorings.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

U.S. Military Could Test Nicotine Pouches and Vapes for Smoking Cessation as Washington Examiner Cites ZYN and Potential $4 Billion Reduction in Related Defense Costs
U.S. Military Could Test Nicotine Pouches and Vapes for Smoking Cessation as Washington Examiner Cites ZYN and Potential $4 Billion Reduction in Related Defense Costs
The House-passed FY2027 National Defense Authorization Act includes a provision authorizing the defense secretary to conduct a one-year smoking-cessation pilot for active-duty service members. Section 707 lists counseling, nicotine gum and patches alongside what the bill calls "electric nicotine delivery systems," nicotine pouches and heat-not-burn products. A recent Washington Examiner op-ed cited ZYN as an example in arguing for the provision, but the legislation does not name any commercial brand or supplier. ZYN is made by PMI-owned Swedish Match USA, with specified products holding FDA marketing authorizations and modified risk orders.
Sep.20
From Product Innovation to Integrated Solutions: NEXTECH Expands Its Global Heated Tobacco Solutions
From Product Innovation to Integrated Solutions: NEXTECH Expands Its Global Heated Tobacco Solutions
NEXTECH launched its NEXE Pro circumferential-heating tobacco stick globally at InterTabac 2026, as the company expands from product innovation into broader heated tobacco solutions. Amid intensifying competition across global HTP markets, NEXTECH is strengthening its R&D, manufacturing and pre-launch support capabilities to serve different types of business customers.
Industry Insight
Sep.15
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for an oral nicotine delivery product designed to let users actively adjust nicotine release. The product embeds two types of nicotine reservoirs with different wall thicknesses and positions inside a deformable matrix. Pressure applied with the tongue or lips can rupture the reservoirs and accelerate nicotine release. In simulated oral tests, several patent examples showed sharply higher peak nicotine release rates as applied force increased from 0 N to 1 N and 3 N. The filing explores a shift from preset release profiles toward user-triggered nicotine delivery.
Sep.01
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
As JUUL2 Wins FDA Authorization, Harm Reduction Journal Highlights the Role of Real-World Evidence in Nicotine Product Regulation
A commentary published in the international open-access, peer-reviewed Harm Reduction Journal argues that randomized controlled trials remain central to evaluating smoking cessation efficacy but cannot alone capture real-world uptake, complete switching, longer-term use and population impact of non-combustible nicotine products such as e-cigarettes, heated tobacco and nicotine pouches. The authors frame impact as “reach × efficacy” and call for real-world evidence to complement RCTs. Three days after publication, the FDA authorized three JUUL2 products and highlighted complete switching among adult smokers in explaining its decision, providing a timely regulatory backdrop to the debate.
Sep.08
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21