Russia Considers Ban on E-cigarette Additives: Industry Voices Concerns

Aug.09.2023
Russia Considers Ban on E-cigarette Additives: Industry Voices Concerns
Russia's Health Ministry is set to introduce a bill prohibiting certain additives in e-cigarettes, including nicotine salts and flavorings.

In a press conference, Artyom Metchelyov, Chairman of the Youth Policy Committee of the State Duma of Russia, announced that the Russian Ministry of Health will soon submit a bill to the Russian Cabinet for review, which aims to ban the use of additives in e-cigarettes.


This list of substances banned from increasing the appeal of nicotine-containing liquids includes:


Food additives, herbal flavoring agents, and their derivatives, including vanillin, cocoa and its derivatives, licorice, spices, and any natural flavorings are prohibited. Synthetic sugars and synthetic or natural sweeteners are also prohibited. Additionally, additives that enhance nicotine addiction, such as nicotine salts, ethanol, ammonium, and ammonia, are banned.


According to a report from the Russian newspaper "News Report" on August 8th, the Russian Union of Nicotine-Containing Product Industry (Союз предприятий индустрии никотиносодержащих изделий, abbreviated as СПИНИ) and the Professional Alliance of Participants in the Russian Market of Electronic Nicotine Systems (Профессиональный альянс участников русского рынка электронных никотиновых систем, abbreviated as ПАУРРЭНС) have sent a letter to Russian Finance Minister Anton Siluanov, requesting the removal of food flavorings and salt-based nicotine from the list of banned substances and additives.


This letter has received support from over 50 industry professionals and experts in the e-cigarette sector. Among them is Lev Grigoriev, Chairman of BABYLON, a leading e-cigarette compliant distributor in Russia, who also opposes the policy change.


Lev Grigoriev stated:


Flavorings are used in all e-cigarette liquids, many of which are not noticeable. Many flavorings are processed using technology and without them, the product would be unusable. In other words, it is illogical to completely ban all flavorings as there is no similar situation in the world.


The Ministry of Health recommends exclusively using liquid products containing propylene glycol and glycerol, much like suggesting a complete ban on all types of alcohol such as wine, liquor, brandy, and so on, and only utilizing pure ethanol.


The second recommendation concerns nicotine salts. What are nicotine salts? From a chemical standpoint, they are simply nicotine. So why does the Ministry of Health believe they can be addictive? Addiction is not caused by nicotine itself, but rather by its concentration.


The recommendation from the Ministry of Health is unlikely to solve the problem it claims to address - reducing the accessibility of nicotine products for minors and teenagers. Examples of similar bans include snus, a tobacco product in Sweden. Although snus is still available on the market, it is supplied illegally without the payment of taxes. This significantly impacts consumers who may be exposed to low-quality and unsafe products. Similarly, if the use of nicotine salts and flavorings is prohibited, the situation would likely be comparable.


What are the recommendations from industry experts regarding the market? It is not to completely ban all flavors, as e-cigarettes are composed of various substances.


Taking into account that minors make up approximately 11.2% of all e-cigarette consumers, we are actively striving to restrict accessibility to underage individuals. However, under the current circumstances, this measure would affect around 90% of adult users.


References:


[1] The business sector has requested not to ban the use of flavorings in vaping products. [2] Vape sellers are requesting not to ban flavorings.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
WIRED Investigation: Chinese-Made Vapes Turn to 6-Methyl-Nicotine and Other Analogs, Challenging U.S. Regulation
WIRED Investigation: Chinese-Made Vapes Turn to 6-Methyl-Nicotine and Other Analogs, Challenging U.S. Regulation
U.S. technology and investigative publication WIRED has examined how nicotine analogs are emerging as a new challenge for the country’s vape regulatory framework. The article argues that after the U.S. expanded federal oversight of nicotine products in 2022, some manufacturers began using nicotine-like compounds such as 6-methyl-nicotine that may fall outside existing definitions. Researchers cited by WIRED said some nicotine analogs could be more potent than traditional nicotine, although human health impacts remain unclear. U.S. policymakers are considering broader definitions of nicotine to bring these compounds under federal oversight.
Jul.27
Malaysia Police Seize RM12.7 Million in Illegal Vapes and Cigarettes as Probe Points to Sea Shipments From China
Malaysia Police Seize RM12.7 Million in Illegal Vapes and Cigarettes as Probe Points to Sea Shipments From China
Police in Malaysia’s Selangor state seized illegal vape products and contraband cigarettes worth about RM12.7 million (approximately $3 million) in two enforcement operations. According to New Straits Times and The Star, the vape-related operation uncovered 131,036 boxes of vape products, 4,900 bottles of e-liquid and 25,510 vape devices, valued at about RM9.4 million. Police said preliminary investigations indicated that some illegal vape products entered Malaysia through sea shipments from China before moving through storage and distribution networks.
Aug.10
2Firsts Compliance Solutions Hosts PMTA Briefing on FDA Review Signals After JUUL2 Authorization
2Firsts Compliance Solutions Hosts PMTA Briefing on FDA Review Signals After JUUL2 Authorization
Following recent FDA authorizations for JUUL2 and ZYN ULTRA, 2Firsts Compliance Solutions held an online PMTA briefing on Sept. 4 to examine what the decisions may signal about review efficiency, scientific evidence and U.S. market access. Nearly 30 participants from brands, manufacturers, compliance service providers and investment firms joined the discussion.
2Firsts Events
Sep.06
Former FDA Scientist Questions ZYN Review Over Pouch Material and Microplastic Risk
Former FDA Scientist Questions ZYN Review Over Pouch Material and Microplastic Risk
A former FDA toxicologist has questioned whether the agency fully assessed the material used in ZYN nicotine pouches before authorizing them for sale, raising concerns over possible microplastic exposure, according to STAT and The Examination.
Jul.16
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21