Singapore Government Banning E-Cigarettes for Public Health Reasons

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.11.2024
Singapore Government Banning E-Cigarettes for Public Health Reasons
Singapore Deputy Prime Minister Lawrence Wong stated that the ban on e-cigarettes in 2018 was due to public health concerns, not potential tax losses.

Deputy Prime Minister of Singapore, Lawrence Wong, stated that the ban on e-cigarettes in 2018 was driven by public health concerns, rather than worries over potential tax losses. This response comes in regard to Professor James Lim's questioning of whether the prohibition on e-cigarettes was motivated by potential tax revenue losses.

 

In a written response, Huang Xuncai stated that the purpose of the ban is to protect Singaporeans from the harms of e-cigarettes. He emphasized that potential tobacco tax revenue loss did not play a role in this decision.

 

In response to Professor Lin's proposal to legalize and tax e-cigarettes, Huang Xuncai stated that if the government chooses to legalize e-cigarettes and impose taxes, it will face similar challenges as with tobacco products. However, he emphasized that the government has no plans to change its current approach because the primary concern is to protect public health, especially that of young people.

 

In Singapore, e-cigarettes are currently illegal, and offenders may face fines of up to SGD 2,000 (approximately USD 1,480). The government has announced heightened scrutiny on e-cigarettes, including inspections at borders, business districts, shopping malls, and other public places, as well as monitoring illegal sales. Those found in violation of the ban may be subject to fines and potential imprisonment.

 

Notice

1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.

2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.

Copyright

This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.

This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.

Goldman Sachs: Chinese Brands Geek Bar and Breeze Surge in U.S. Market as Juul, Vuse Lose Share
Goldman Sachs: Chinese Brands Geek Bar and Breeze Surge in U.S. Market as Juul, Vuse Lose Share
Chinese brands Geek Bar, Raz, and Breeze are quickly rising in the U.S. e-cigarette market, now holding a combined 25.1% share, Goldman Sachs reports. While Vuse and Juul lost ground, Geek Bar Pulse jumped 729%, Raz 233%, and Breeze 105% over the past year.
May.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dublin Proposes to Ban New E-cigarette Stores in the City Center, With a Vote on May 15
Dublin Proposes to Ban New E-cigarette Stores in the City Center, With a Vote on May 15
The Dublin City Council in Ireland is reviewing Ordinance No. 2503, which aims to prohibit the opening of new e-cigarette stores within the city center. The proposal will undergo its second reading at Dublin City Hall on May 15, followed by a public hearing and vote at a subsequent council meeting.
May.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK E-cigarette Flavor Restrictions Petition Triggers Government Response and Consultation
UK E-cigarette Flavor Restrictions Petition Triggers Government Response and Consultation
A UK petition opposing e-cigarette flavor bans has reached over 12,000 signatures, leading to a government promise for public consultation. Opponents say the ban would harm smoking cessation efforts and boost the black market. The government will assess the issue, aiming to balance youth protection and adult smoking support.
Apr.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Poland’s Disposable Vape Sales Drop 22%, Prices Set to Triple
Poland’s Disposable Vape Sales Drop 22%, Prices Set to Triple
Poland’s new excise tax on tobacco products is set to take effect in July 2025, imposing a levy of 40 zloty (around $10) per disposable e-cigarette containing e-liquid. Although the law has yet to be implemented, the market is already seeing a decline, with disposable vape sales in Q1 2025 down 22% yoy. Once the tax is enforced, prices are expected to rise from around $5 to nearly $13 per unit.
May.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Eco-Friendly Vape Brand No Saint Launches in 500 UK Stores with Sustainable Products and Age Verification
Eco-Friendly Vape Brand No Saint Launches in 500 UK Stores with Sustainable Products and Age Verification
The eco-friendly vape brand No Saint has launched in the UK, entering 500 retail stores. The products emphasize material safety and age restrictions, with flavors designed for a more mature palate. The founder has raised $50 million for the brand.
May.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Iowa's PMTA Registration Bill Suspended: Judge Rules It Violates Federal Preemption
Iowa's PMTA Registration Bill Suspended: Judge Rules It Violates Federal Preemption
A judge in Iowa has ruled to suspend the state's PMTA registration bill (HF 2677) targeting e-cigarette products. The court found that the bill violates the federal preemption clause in the U.S. Constitution, interfering with the exclusive regulatory authority of the FDA. The bill has been put on hold pending further judicial review.
May.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai