As part of the latest tobacco plan passed by the parliament, electronic cigarette devices in South Africa are facing stricter regulation.
South Africa is adopting a tougher stance on tobacco and nicotine, with the health department aiming to stop people, especially children, from smoking and to encourage users to quit. To achieve this goal, the department has presented the Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill, which has recently received approval from the cabinet and will be submitted to parliament. Once it becomes law, it will replace regulations that were established almost 30 years ago.
The legislation in question defines traditional tobacco products as being comprised of tobacco, such as cigarettes. It also defines electronic nicotine delivery systems as devices designed to produce aerosol or vapor for inhalation by users, such as electronic cigarettes. Most regulations that impact traditional tobacco products now extend to electronic cigarettes as well.
The health department will not differentiate between smokers and those who use electronic cigarettes within the scope of the new legislation. Both will be prohibited from smoking in any enclosed public space, as well as some open public areas. Private use of electronic cigarettes in front of children or non-smokers will also be prohibited, as the law applies to traditional tobacco products as well.
Furthermore, the bill contains provisions specifically targeting electronic nicotine delivery systems. The Minister of Health will ultimately be responsible for defining more detailed specifications in multiple regulations, including the content, ingredients, and additives, as well as coloring agents, unique flavors, and emissions of related products.
The bill emphasizes that the minister has the authority to prohibit "any substance or ingredient that produces specific colors, characteristics, flavors, odors, or effects on consumers." This leaves the regulation of the e-liquid used in electronic cigarettes entirely up to the minister.
The industry is hoping for regulation. We must be regulated," said Asanda Gcoyi, CEO of the Vapor Product Association of South Africa (VPASA), in response to news of the progress of the bill in parliament, speaking to Business Insider SA. "But we recommend that the government use e-cigarettes as a product to reduce the harm caused by tobacco.
Although the Cabinet stated that the bill was first released in 2018 and had undergone "extensive consultations with various stakeholders, including the tobacco industry", representatives of manufacturers, wholesalers, and retailers were not included in recent discussions, indicating that initial feedback had been ignored.
South Africa is not the only country considering a ban on flavored e-cigarette liquids. Earlier this year, EU lawmakers proposed a ban on the sale of flavored heated tobacco products, while the US Food and Drug Administration has already banned "unauthorized, kid-friendly, flavor-based e-cigarettes, including fruit and mint.
Although the ban on flavors is meant to reduce young people's use of e-cigarettes and vaping, recent research, such as a study published in the peer-reviewed medical journal Nicotine and Tobacco Research, suggests that restricting flavored tobacco sales has been effective but has not had the expected impact.
South Africa's Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Act also prohibits online retailers. While traditional tobacco products have already been banned from online sales and delivery, e-commerce retailers play an important role in the electronic cigarette industry. "If you look at most of the electronic cigarette industry, including companies ... any entity retailers of any industry] are no longer attractive, especially coming out of Covid. So, if you take away [online electronic cigarette] shops], you've already killed a third of the industry," said Gcoyi.
Statement:
This article is compiled from third-party information solely for industry exchange and learning purposes.
This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS is unable to confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is solely intended for industry discussion and research.
Due to limitations in translation ability, the translated article may not fully capture the original text. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.
2FIRSTS maintains consistent alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong/Macau/Taiwan-related, and foreign issues and stances.
The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact for deletion.
This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.
