South Africa proposes tax on e-cigarette products

Jul.19.2022
South Africa proposes tax on e-cigarette products
South Africa proposes taxing e-cigarettes to offset risks, but concerns about a rise in illegal trade and unintended consequences remain.

Countries with high taxation, such as South Africa, impose a variety of taxes including income tax (both personal and corporate), value-added tax (VAT), dividend tax, capital gains tax, and estate tax. Now, it appears that e-cigarette users in South Africa should prepare to pay additional taxes.


The South African National Treasury manages the country's economic policies, develops the annual budget for the government, and oversees its finances. The department has announced that it will release a draft of the 2022 Taxation Laws Amendment Bill, including provisions related to Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENDS) and Electronic Non-Nicotine Delivery Systems (ENNDS), in either June or July.


Afterwards, industry stakeholders will have the opportunity to provide written comments on the draft legislation. In addition, the country's permanent finance committee will have its own negotiation process on the draft bill. The legislative proposal is expected to be officially submitted for review in the mid-term budget policy statement in October.


The government has proposed the implementation of a specific consumption tax on non-nicotine and nicotine liquids used in electronic cigarettes. Users will be required to pay a consumption tax per product ranging from 33.60 to 346.00 ZAR ($2.08 to $21.38 USD), depending on the nicotine content and size of the product. The average consumption tax rate for electronic cigarettes is 2.91 CAD per milliliter.


Essentially, if the proposed bill is accepted and becomes law, users will have to pay 2.03 ZAR for every milliliter of e-cigarette liquid containing nicotine, and 0.87 ZAR for every milliliter of e-liquid not containing nicotine. It has been suggested that products with higher nicotine content will have a higher tax rate compared to lower nicotine products.


The draft states, "Unlike traditional tobacco products, many of these products are unregulated in South Africa, prompting the Department of Health to revise current tobacco control legislation to include them in the regulatory framework." "Likewise, governments in other countries have begun to regulate the consumption and use of ENDS through taxation and non-tax measures.


Wesley Grimm, Senior Partner, and Rudi Katzke, Partner, at the Johannesburg-based law firm Webber Wentzel, have stated that the South African Government is proposing to implement existing policy guidelines on products such as tobacco, and apply a specific consumption tax to electronic cigarettes. According to the two partners, demand for electronic cigarettes is largely inelastic, much like other consumable products, and resistance from consumers to the tax may dissipate in the short-term.


At a recent industry stakeholders seminar, the Ministry of Finance did not address the issue in detail. We believe that the Ministry of Finance's proposal of higher tax rates for electronic cigarette products with lower nicotine content than those with higher nicotine content may have an impact on consumer purchasing behavior," said Green.


According to Green, during the ENDS taxation and ENNDS seminar hosted by the Department of Finance, the agency reiterated its stance that the health risks associated with e-cigarettes are "largely unknown." However, one of their goals is to curb (and possibly halt) the use of e-cigarette products, including strict limitations on young users' access to these products.


The Ministry of Finance insists that the electronic cigarette industry must be regulated and taxed within its existing anti-tobacco framework. Grimm and Katsky argue that the proposal to tax e-cigarette products does not necessarily support the government's policy of reducing tobacco consumption. "More specifically, there is not enough data to speculate whether the proposed e-cigarette taxation by the Ministry of Finance will prevent young people from using them.


Taxation on e-cigarette products may have unforeseen consequences. According to Grimm and Katzke, legislators should consider what happened in the traditional tobacco industry from March 2020 to August 2020, when South Africa banned the retail of all traditional tobacco products, ostensibly to help prevent the spread of COVID-19. At the time, the government stated that by cutting off the supply of what it deemed "non-essential items," it hoped to prevent the spread of the virus among people sharing cigarettes, thus avoiding an inundation of sick smokers in the healthcare system.


The tobacco industry has challenged the decision in court, arguing that the measure was disproportionate and counterproductive. In December 2020, the South African High Court agreed and declared the measure unconstitutional. However, according to Grimm and Katzke, the legal tobacco industry has already suffered significant damage.


They added, "Taxing electronic cigarette products is likely to stimulate illegal trade of these products, just as it happened in the combustible tobacco industry." "Many critics of the industry raised this point at the workshop, and the Ministry of Finance has not addressed the proliferation of illegal cigarettes and tobacco trade, nor the possibility that taxing the electronic cigarette industry could stimulate illegal trade of these products.


Before the COVID-19 lockdown in South Africa, illegal tobacco trading already accounted for one-third of the market. During the tobacco ban, it reached unprecedented levels. A recent study by Cape Town University's consumer economics research department found that an estimated 93% of smokers were able to buy cigarettes on the illicit market during the sales ban. Shortly after the ban was lifted, South African Revenue Services Commissioner Edward Kieswetter predicted that investigating and prosecuting the corruption and illegal activity rooted in the four-month period would take years.


A study commissioned by the Vapor Products Association of South Africa (VPASA) in 2021 analyzed the economic impact of the e-cigarette industry in South Africa. The study concluded that the industry had a total value added contribution of ZAR 2.49 billion to GDP, with estimated tax revenue of ZAR 710 million in 2019 (primarily from income and value-added tax). VPASA's report found that over 350,000 South Africans used e-cigarette products, with sales totaling ZAR 1.25 billion in 2019, and the industry providing 3,800 job opportunities.


The South African government is planning to implement a proposed e-cigarette tax in January 2023. These proposals must still go through the normal legislative cycle before becoming law. The discussion document draft will take into account feedback from e-cigarette consumers, manufacturers, and importers, which could impact the proposed tax start date and its final form. The draft bill is expected to be presented as early as June 2022, further clarifying the nature of the proposed e-cigarette tax.


Grimm and Katzke suggest that the government should carefully consider the purpose of imposing taxes on e-cigarette products. They believe that the goal of restricting youth usage and improving the health of South Africans may not only be achieved through taxing e-cigarette products. Instead, there is a need to further understand the safety and efficacy of e-cigarettes, as well as the impact of e-cigarette taxes on consumers.


Grimm and Katzke suggest that the government should provide funding for further research in these areas and continue to work with the industry to develop new tax policies. They also recommend that the government take meaningful and decisive steps to combat illegal cigarette and tobacco trade, promote any successes in this area, and ensure that the legal tobacco industry is better protected from illegal competitors.


I'm sorry, but there is no specific text or context provided for me to translate. Kindly provide the text that needs to be translated.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

PMI Expands Colorado Investment to $1.2 Billion to Boost ZYN Nicotine Pouch Production
PMI Expands Colorado Investment to $1.2 Billion to Boost ZYN Nicotine Pouch Production
Philip Morris International (PMI) is expanding its investment in its Golden, Colorado campus, bringing total investment to approximately $1.2 billion to support its smoke-free products business. The investment will strengthen PMI’s research, production and innovation capabilities in smoke-free products. As one of the world’s largest tobacco companies, PMI has continued advancing its “Smoke-Free Future” strategy through heated tobacco, oral nicotine and other reduced-risk product categories.
PMI
Jul.28
WIRED Investigation: Chinese-Made Vapes Turn to 6-Methyl-Nicotine and Other Analogs, Challenging U.S. Regulation
WIRED Investigation: Chinese-Made Vapes Turn to 6-Methyl-Nicotine and Other Analogs, Challenging U.S. Regulation
U.S. technology and investigative publication WIRED has examined how nicotine analogs are emerging as a new challenge for the country’s vape regulatory framework. The article argues that after the U.S. expanded federal oversight of nicotine products in 2022, some manufacturers began using nicotine-like compounds such as 6-methyl-nicotine that may fall outside existing definitions. Researchers cited by WIRED said some nicotine analogs could be more potent than traditional nicotine, although human health impacts remain unclear. U.S. policymakers are considering broader definitions of nicotine to bring these compounds under federal oversight.
Jul.27
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Deputy Director Edgar Domenech has warned that some Chinese vape companies may be using 6-methyl nicotine, a nicotine analogue, raising new questions over how US regulators should classify emerging nicotine compounds.
Jul.13
Product | PMI Launches Airport-Exclusive IQOS Skylens Limited Edition, Expanding From Japan’s Narita to Travel Retail Markets in 13 Countries Summary
Product | PMI Launches Airport-Exclusive IQOS Skylens Limited Edition, Expanding From Japan’s Narita to Travel Retail Markets in 13 Countries Summary
Philip Morris International (PMI) has introduced the airport-exclusive limited-edition IQOS ILUMA i PRIME Skylens, the company’s first device created specifically for airport travel retail. Inspired by the world of flight and finished in metallic blue, Skylens debuted at Narita International Airport in Japan before expanding into selected airport duty-free and travel-retail channels across 13 countries in Europe, Asia, the Middle East and Africa. The product retains the existing IQOS ILUMA i PRIME platform, with differentiation centered on airport exclusivity, design and travel-retail execution rather than a new heating architecture.
PMI
Aug.19
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
From Border-Logistics Insiders to Retail Service Stations, Australia Mounts a Sweeping Crackdown on the Illicit Nicotine Trade as iGET Vapes Surface in A$80 Million Crime Networks
Australian authorities have disclosed two major enforcement actions that go beyond product seizures and retail closures to examine how illicit tobacco and vape networks operate. On Aug. 14, the Multi Agency Strike Team said seven people had been charged and two criminal networks were valued by authorities at a combined A$80 million, or about US$56.8 million. Investigators allege the groups used bonded warehouses, freight businesses and “trusted insiders” in legitimate industries to circumvent border controls. In a separate operation on Aug. 11, more than 100 service stations were targeted as authorities sought information on illicit tobacco importation, distribution networks and the movement of sales proceeds.
Aug.17