South Africa's New Tobacco Act Could Destroy E-cigarette Industry

Oct.13.2022
South Africa's New Tobacco Act Could Destroy E-cigarette Industry
South African electronic cigarette industry at risk under new tobacco law, warns VPASA. Ban on flavoured e-cigarettes proposed.

The Vapor Products Association of South Africa (VPASA) has warned that the country's proposed new tobacco law could destroy the e-cigarette industry. Among other provisions, the Tobacco Products and Electronic Delivery Systems Control Bill offers the government a path to ban the sale of flavored e-cigarettes and e-liquids, which anti-tobacco campaigners argue are key to keeping smokers away from cigarettes. VPASA argues that the government has ignored the specialized nature of the legislation, suggesting that the bill wrongly conflates drug use with vaping. "Although the Cabinet statement announcing the passing of the Bill states that the Department of Health has conducted extensive consultations, it does not indicate that stakeholders other than anti-tobacco campaigners have not seen the revised Bill prior to its publication on 29th September," said VPASA CEO Asanda Gcoyi, quoted by the Saturday Star. "Despite calls from industry stakeholders for clarification, this has not been forthcoming." VPASA believes that the proposals on the table are not based on science or verified evidence, and wrongly treat e-cigarettes and smoking as the same thing. "E-cigarettes require a separate set of rules, recognizing that they are not the same as smoking and therefore cannot be regulated in the same way," said Gcoyi.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended solely for industry communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of its contents. The translation of this article is solely for the purposes of industry exchange and research.


Due to limitations in translation skills, the translated article may not fully express the same meaning as the original. Therefore, it is recommended to refer to the original article for accurate understanding.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan or international issues and positions.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to have the content removed.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

NC police intercept vehicle on highway, seize over 600 THC vape cartridges; driver charged with multiple felony drug offenses
NC police intercept vehicle on highway, seize over 600 THC vape cartridges; driver charged with multiple felony drug offenses
Iredell County Sheriff’s deputies arrested a 28-year-old New York man after a northbound I-77 traffic stop led to the seizure of more than 600 THC vape cartridges. The driver faces multiple felony and misdemeanor charges and is being held on a $75,000 secured bond, with a District Court date set for September 25.
Sep.09
The U.S. FDA has issued two notices: seeking public comments on regulations regarding tobacco retailer training programs and sales restrictions
The U.S. FDA has issued two notices: seeking public comments on regulations regarding tobacco retailer training programs and sales restrictions
On August 22, the U.S. FDA issued two notices soliciting public comments on regulations regarding tobacco retailer training programs and restrictions on tobacco sales. Both notices provide a 60-day public comment period under the Paperwork Reduction Act, aiming to protect public health, especially that of children and adolescents, by regulating retailer behavior and restricting tobacco sales.
Aug.22 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kazakhstan Police Seize Illegal E-Cigarettes Worth $4,078 USD in Balkhash
Kazakhstan Police Seize Illegal E-Cigarettes Worth $4,078 USD in Balkhash
Kazakh police crackdown on illegal e-cigarette sales, seizing $4,078 worth of products in "Law and Order" operation.
Aug.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia Crime Prevention Foundation Supports E-Cigarette Ban
Malaysia Crime Prevention Foundation Supports E-Cigarette Ban
MCPF supports Malaysia's e-cigarette ban, citing health risks like lung damage from increased use among non-smokers, especially teens. Since 2019, 41 cases have been reported, with treatment costs expected to hit 369 million ringgit ($87.08 million) by 2030. The foundation calls for stronger regulation and public awareness.
Aug.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Regulatory Landscape of Modern Oral Nicotine in Asia: From Total Bans to Gradual Openings
Regulatory Landscape of Modern Oral Nicotine in Asia: From Total Bans to Gradual Openings
This article provides an overview of the regulatory status of modern oral products (such as nicotine pouches and snus) across different regions in Asia. With high smoking rates and widespread tobacco use, Asia is emerging as an important market for modern oral products, but policies vary dramatically from country to country.
Aug.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
EU Rejects “Royal Smoke” Trademark Application Over Similarity to BAT’s “Royals”
EU Rejects “Royal Smoke” Trademark Application Over Similarity to BAT’s “Royals”
The European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) Opposition Division has rejected Latvian company Baltic Trade Solutions’ application for the “Royal Smoke” trademark, intended for use on e-cigarettes and related products. The decision found the mark too similar to British American Tobacco’s “Royals” cigarette brand, creating a likelihood that average consumers would mistakenly believe the two are connected. Both marks cover products within the “smokers’ articles” category.
Aug.14 by 2FIRSTS.ai