South Korea Parliament Delays Nicotine Synthesis Tobacco Regulations, Unfair Treatment

Feb.21
South Korea Parliament Delays Nicotine Synthesis Tobacco Regulations, Unfair Treatment
South Korean traditional tobacco retailers face unfair treatment due to delays in regulating synthetic nicotine tobacco products.

According to a report by V. Daum on February 16, about 127,000 traditional tobacco retailers in South Korea are facing unfair treatment due to the continuous delay by the National Assembly and the government in implementing regulatory measures for the Synthetic Nicotine Tobacco Act.


According to industry sources, the failure of the Congressional Planning and Finance Committee to pass an amendment to include synthetic nicotine in the Tobacco Control Act has sparked dissatisfaction within the industry. The Planning and Finance Committee is currently planning to make a decision after further reviewing data from the Planning and Finance Ministry regarding the relaxation of distance restrictions between retailers, the extent of tobacco price increases, and the impact on small businesses.


The e-cigarette manufacturers association criticized Congress and the government for not categorizing synthetic nicotine as a tobacco product, calling it a form of leniency towards non-compliant businesses. The current direction of Congress and the government, which is considering relaxing distance restrictions for sellers who do not have a sales permit, could potentially lead to illegal behavior that disregards established principles. The association further pointed out that regulatory delays only benefit illegal operators and result in a reverse discrimination that undermines policy effectiveness.


According to industry estimates, approximately 127,000 tobacco retailers currently adhere to the legally set distance restrictions for lawful tobacco sales. Therefore, only regulating about 4,000 synthetic nicotine e-cigarette retailers is considered discriminatory towards the many small businesses that comply with regulations.


A professional in the industry pointed out that if synthetic nicotine tobacco retailers are exempted from the requirements of designated retailers, then the tobacco retail designation system established to prevent the unregulated circulation of tobacco will be meaningless. They argue that synthetic nicotine tobacco should be classified under the category of tobacco and regulated in the same way.


According to reports, the Planning Ministry will submit requested synthetic nicotine-related materials to the National Planning and Finance Committee on the 17th. Following the submission, it is expected that a group meeting will be held next week to discuss the relevant legislation.


Notice

1. This article is provided exclusively for professional research purposes related to industry, technology and policy. Any reference to brands or products is made solely for the purpose of objective description and does not constitute an endorsement, recommendation, or promotion of any brand or product.

2. The use of nicotine products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, and heated tobacco products, is associated with significant health risks. Users are required to comply with all relevant laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3. This article is strictly restricted from being accessed or viewed by individuals under the legal age.

Copyright

This article is either an original work by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with the original source clearly indicated. The copyright and usage rights of this article belong to 2Firsts or the original source. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other unauthorized use of this article by any entity or individual is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally responsible. For copyright-related matters, please contact: info@2firsts.com

AI Assistance Disclaimer

This article may have utilized AI to enhance translation and editing efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, errors may occur. Readers are advised to refer to the sources provided for more accurate information.

This article should not be used as a basis for any investment decisions or advice, and 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any errors in the content.