Study Shows Decrease in Smoking Among Adults with Depression and Substance Use Disorders

Nov.25.2022
Study Shows Decrease in Smoking Among Adults with Depression and Substance Use Disorders
Study shows smoking rates among US adults with depression or substance use disorder have decreased, but more work needs to be done to ensure their tobacco use continues to decline.

A study entitled "Smoking trends among US adults with severe depression or substance use disorders from 2006 to 2019" is reassuring for public health experts who have long been concerned about the high smoking rates among people with mental health disorders.


Furthermore, these individuals are more likely to find it difficult to quit smoking. Therefore, they benefit greatly from additional support in quitting smoking and obtaining safer alternatives, which at least reduces their chances of developing smoking-related diseases.


A study by researchers from the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) and the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), both under the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the United States, suggests that this population may benefit from tobacco use prevention and cessation efforts, which have resulted in significant reductions in smoking rates among the general population.


However, researchers emphasized that disparities still exist and need to be addressed. "These declines represent a public health success story," said Wilson Compton, MD, NIDA deputy director and senior author of the study. "But there is much work to be done to ensure that tobacco use continues to decline, particularly among those with substance use disorders, depression or other mental illnesses. It is critical that healthcare providers promptly address all health issues that patients experience, not just their depression or substance use disorder. This requires integrating smoking cessation therapy into existing behavioral health therapies. The result will be longer, healthier lives for everyone.


Individuals with mental health disorders are being excluded from research. A recent study titled "The inequity of clinical trials testing smoking cessation medication: excluding smokers with mental health disorders" sought to examine the practice and reasoning behind excluding smokers with mental health disorders from such trials.


A research team analyzed the Cochrane systematic review database up to September 2020 to obtain evaluations on the use of drug therapy for smoking cessation. "We included 279 randomized controlled trials from 13 Cochrane reviews. Across all studies, 51 (18.3%) explicitly excluded participants with any mental health disorder (MHD), 152 (54.5%) conditionally excluded based on certain MHD criteria, and 76 (27.2%) did not provide sufficient information to determine inclusion or exclusion. The study found that, compared to studies on nicotine replacement therapy, research on antidepressant drugs for smoking cessation was 3.33 times more likely to conditionally exclude MHD smokers (95% CI 1.38 to 8.01, p=0.007)," the researchers reported.


In fact, their conclusion was that there wasn't enough representation of smokers with MHD (Mental Health Disorders) in clinical trials examining the safety and effectiveness of smoking cessation drugs, but there wasn't enough data collected to explain why. The study emphasized the importance of promoting the participation of this minority group in trials.


Announcement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended only for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS is not able to confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the article's content. The compilation of this article is solely for the purpose of industry-related communication and research.


Due to limitations in our translation ability, this article may not express the same meaning as the original. Therefore, please refer to the original article for accurate information.


2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, and foreign-related discussions and positions.


The copyright for the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21
Research | Swedish Study Finds Oral Lesions in 79% of Examined Nicotine Pouch Users, With Distinct Tissue Responses
Research | Swedish Study Finds Oral Lesions in 79% of Examined Nicotine Pouch Users, With Distinct Tissue Responses
A new Swedish study found oral mucosal lesions in 79% of examined nicotine pouch users and 89% of tobacco-derived snus users, with different tissue-response patterns between the two categories. For manufacturers and regulators, the findings shift attention toward product formulation, flavouring, pouch materials and local oral exposure, not only whether a product contains tobacco. The study found no higher prevalence of caries or periodontal disease, but it could not establish causality, long-term outcomes or differences between individual products or designs.
Special Report
Jul.27
Product | YOOZ Launches Waker Electronic Shisha Device, Expanding Vape Applications Beyond Portable Devices
Product | YOOZ Launches Waker Electronic Shisha Device, Expanding Vape Applications Beyond Portable Devices
YOOZ has introduced the Waker Electronic Shisha device, expanding its vaping portfolio into the electronic shisha category. The device combines a rechargeable hardware platform with dedicated cartridges, featuring a 4,000mAh battery, up to 60W output power, and LED lighting effects. The product has appeared across multiple French retail channels, reflecting the continued expansion of vaping products into new consumption scenarios.
Jul.13
BofA Upgrades Imperial Brands, Says Market Overreacted to Australia Slump
BofA Upgrades Imperial Brands, Says Market Overreacted to Australia Slump
Bank of America upgraded Imperial Brands to “buy” from “neutral,” saying investors have overreacted to the tobacco group’s Australian business downturn and that the share-price pullback has created a more attractive entry point.
Jul.16
Philip Morris Romania Expands IQOS Boutique Network to 120 Locations With Retail 2.0 Store
Philip Morris Romania Expands IQOS Boutique Network to 120 Locations With Retail 2.0 Store
Philip Morris Romania has opened IQOS Boutique Victoriei in Bucharest, expanding the country’s IQOS retail network to 120 points of sale and advancing a Retail 2.0 concept that combines design, technology, interactive art and urban culture.
PMI
Jul.13
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
Ohio Supreme Court Weighs Whether State Consumer Law Can Restrict Flavored Vape Sales
The Ohio Supreme Court is hearing a case involving flavored vape sales and whether state authorities can use consumer protection laws to take action against retailers selling unauthorized vape products. Ohio officials argue that selling unauthorized flavored vapes may constitute consumer deception, while retailers argue that tobacco product regulation falls under federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) authority and that states cannot impose additional restrictions through consumer laws. The case could affect the scope of state-level vape regulation across the United States.
Aug.06