Switching to E-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products Reduces Vascular Damage and Smoking-Related Illnesses: Study

Aug.16.2022
Switching to E-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products Reduces Vascular Damage and Smoking-Related Illnesses: Study
CoEHAR researchers found using e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products can reduce smoking-related diseases. Their study challenges misconceptions about vaping.

Researchers from the Center of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction (CoEHAR) involved in the Replica project have discovered that switching to electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products can reduce the incidence of vascular damage and smoking-related diseases. The findings challenge the prevailing misconception that using e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products is just as harmful as smoking.


The study has been published by an independent laboratory affiliated with the Replica Project, whose scientists are world leaders in harm reduction. The latest research assessed the damage caused to endothelial cells, which release substances that control the dilation and contraction of blood vessels, by cigarette smoke compared to electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products.


Damage to the inner lining of blood vessels known as endothelial damage is a primary pathology that leads to diseases such as atherosclerosis, with smoking being the main culprit. Smoking can impair the normal function of the endothelium, cause damage to the vascular system, and lead to the development of high blood pressure and atherosclerosis. Smoking and exposure to smoke toxins are related to the impairment of the repair mechanism needed for endothelial homeostasis, such as the inhibition of endothelial cell migration.


Reducing exposure to smoke toxins may mitigate the harmful effects on endothelial and cardiovascular disease development. Numerous international studies have investigated the impact of smoking on endothelial cell migration and associated vascular damage, particularly a study by Taylor et al. (2017). Compared to cigarette smoke, exposure to electronic cigarette aerosol significantly reduces inhibition of in vitro (in a test tube) endothelial cell migration. This means that endothelial cells exposed to electronic cigarette aerosol retain their ability to effectively heal small wounds in blood vessels, unlike those exposed to cigarette smoke and toxins, which severely limit their wound repair capacity.


One of CoEHAR's most successful projects is the Replica project, in which researchers have replicated some of the most significant international studies in the field of reducing tobacco harm via an independent laboratory network. They have demonstrated a reduction in the toxicity of electronic cigarettes and have established reference standards for scientific research. The goal of CoEHAR's scientists is to conduct a multicenter replication study to validate the results of Taylor and his colleagues.


A study titled "Comparative evaluation of e-cigarette aerosol and cigarette smoke on endothelial cell migration: a replication study" compared the effects of three commercial e-cigarette delivery systems and traditional cigarettes. Following international scientific standards and utilizing the latest technology and tools, the data collected by researchers at CoEHAR confirmed the findings of Taylor and colleagues: e-cigarettes do not induce inhibition of endothelial cell migration in vitro compared to cigarette smoke, thus reducing harm caused by tobacco smoke. Furthermore, CoEHAR researchers compared the results of two different heated tobacco products, which demonstrated significantly less impact than observed with cigarette smoke.


According to Professor Massimo Caruso, co-project leader of the Replica initiative, "As previously demonstrated by the Replica research team, the harm caused by electronic nicotine delivery systems is significantly lower than the harm caused by cigarette smoke. An interesting fact is that using non-combustible products can reduce vascular damage and prevent the likelihood of smoking-related diseases such as atherosclerosis and hypertension. Our research once again challenges the notion that electronic cigarettes or heated tobacco will cause similar damage to combustible cigarettes.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is only meant for industry-related communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of its content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research.


Due to limitations in the translation process, the translated article may not fully reflect the original expression. Therefore, please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS is fully aligned with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The compilation of information is subject to the copyright ownership of the original media outlet and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to request removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As regulators pay closer attention to child safety in nicotine pouches, manufacturers face a practical challenge: how to strengthen child-resistant packaging without unnecessarily reworking products, production lines and regulatory submissions already in place. In a written interview with 2Firsts, Chemular detailed Safeguard’s external packaging approach, its customer-specific testing requirements and possible PMTA pathways. The model remains early-stage, but it offers a new way to think about an increasingly important regulatory and manufacturing issue.
Industry Insight
Sep.19
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang files patent for pressure-triggered, on-demand oral nicotine release
China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for an oral nicotine delivery product designed to let users actively adjust nicotine release. The product embeds two types of nicotine reservoirs with different wall thicknesses and positions inside a deformable matrix. Pressure applied with the tongue or lips can rupture the reservoirs and accelerate nicotine release. In simulated oral tests, several patent examples showed sharply higher peak nicotine release rates as applied force increased from 0 N to 1 N and 3 N. The filing explores a shift from preset release profiles toward user-triggered nicotine delivery.
Sep.01
Special Report | How Capital Is Reassessing the Global Tobacco and Modern Nicotine Industry: Lessons from a New York Forum
Special Report | How Capital Is Reassessing the Global Tobacco and Modern Nicotine Industry: Lessons from a New York Forum
Capital is reassessing the global tobacco and modern nicotine industry as heated tobacco, vaping and nicotine pouches reshape demand, profitability and regulation. At the 2026 New Approaches Summit in New York, investors and analysts examined whether smoke-free growth can sustain earnings, how regulation shapes startup value, and whether shareholder engagement can be more effective than divestment. The debate points to a broader shift: tobacco transition is increasingly becoming a capital-allocation, governance and valuation question.
Capital Markets
Oct.05
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. disclosed several oral nicotine-related patent applications in August 2026, including two that approach staged nicotine release from different directions. One uses a high-viscosity membrane that forms inside the pouch after contact with saliva to slow rapid early release, while the other uses gradient particles with a faster-disintegrating outer layer and a slower core to create a fast-to-sustained release profile. Together, the filings explore how nicotine pouches could balance initial delivery with release later in use.
Sep.03
Special Report | Can Nicotine Be Replaced? 6-MN Is Already on the Market While Key Human Evidence Is Still Missing
Special Report | Can Nicotine Be Replaced? 6-MN Is Already on the Market While Key Human Evidence Is Still Missing
Nicotine analogues such as 6-methylnicotine are already appearing in e-cigarettes and oral pouches, even as key human evidence remains limited. A new Nixodine-S study adds nonclinical data showing differences from nicotine in cytotoxicity and receptor activity, while independent studies point to a more complex toxicological picture. With supply-chain activity growing and FDA seeking clearer authority over nicotine analogues, the industry now faces a larger question: what evidence is needed before these substances can credibly replace nicotine?
SCIENCE
Sep.23
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
U.S. Judge Stays Helix, NJOY Challenge to FDA PMTA Rule Pending New Rulemaking Court Stays Altria's Helix, NJOY Challenge to PMTA Rule as FDA Prepares New Rulemaking
A federal judge in Texas on Oct. 8 granted a joint request by the FDA and plaintiffs including Altria subsidiaries Helix Innovations and NJOY to stay litigation challenging the agency's 2021 PMTA rule. The court cited FDA's anticipated rulemaking concerning the regulation at issue. FDA announced on Sept. 28 that it intends to reassess the PMTA framework and could initiate new rulemaking to replace it. The parties must file a joint status report within 45 days and every 45 days thereafter. A motion by three Reynolds American companies to intervene remains pending.
Regulations
Oct.10