Switching to E-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products Reduces Vascular Damage and Smoking-Related Illnesses: Study

Aug.16.2022
Switching to E-Cigarettes and Heated Tobacco Products Reduces Vascular Damage and Smoking-Related Illnesses: Study
CoEHAR researchers found using e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products can reduce smoking-related diseases. Their study challenges misconceptions about vaping.

Researchers from the Center of Excellence for the Acceleration of Harm Reduction (CoEHAR) involved in the Replica project have discovered that switching to electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products can reduce the incidence of vascular damage and smoking-related diseases. The findings challenge the prevailing misconception that using e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products is just as harmful as smoking.


The study has been published by an independent laboratory affiliated with the Replica Project, whose scientists are world leaders in harm reduction. The latest research assessed the damage caused to endothelial cells, which release substances that control the dilation and contraction of blood vessels, by cigarette smoke compared to electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products.


Damage to the inner lining of blood vessels known as endothelial damage is a primary pathology that leads to diseases such as atherosclerosis, with smoking being the main culprit. Smoking can impair the normal function of the endothelium, cause damage to the vascular system, and lead to the development of high blood pressure and atherosclerosis. Smoking and exposure to smoke toxins are related to the impairment of the repair mechanism needed for endothelial homeostasis, such as the inhibition of endothelial cell migration.


Reducing exposure to smoke toxins may mitigate the harmful effects on endothelial and cardiovascular disease development. Numerous international studies have investigated the impact of smoking on endothelial cell migration and associated vascular damage, particularly a study by Taylor et al. (2017). Compared to cigarette smoke, exposure to electronic cigarette aerosol significantly reduces inhibition of in vitro (in a test tube) endothelial cell migration. This means that endothelial cells exposed to electronic cigarette aerosol retain their ability to effectively heal small wounds in blood vessels, unlike those exposed to cigarette smoke and toxins, which severely limit their wound repair capacity.


One of CoEHAR's most successful projects is the Replica project, in which researchers have replicated some of the most significant international studies in the field of reducing tobacco harm via an independent laboratory network. They have demonstrated a reduction in the toxicity of electronic cigarettes and have established reference standards for scientific research. The goal of CoEHAR's scientists is to conduct a multicenter replication study to validate the results of Taylor and his colleagues.


A study titled "Comparative evaluation of e-cigarette aerosol and cigarette smoke on endothelial cell migration: a replication study" compared the effects of three commercial e-cigarette delivery systems and traditional cigarettes. Following international scientific standards and utilizing the latest technology and tools, the data collected by researchers at CoEHAR confirmed the findings of Taylor and colleagues: e-cigarettes do not induce inhibition of endothelial cell migration in vitro compared to cigarette smoke, thus reducing harm caused by tobacco smoke. Furthermore, CoEHAR researchers compared the results of two different heated tobacco products, which demonstrated significantly less impact than observed with cigarette smoke.


According to Professor Massimo Caruso, co-project leader of the Replica initiative, "As previously demonstrated by the Replica research team, the harm caused by electronic nicotine delivery systems is significantly lower than the harm caused by cigarette smoke. An interesting fact is that using non-combustible products can reduce vascular damage and prevent the likelihood of smoking-related diseases such as atherosclerosis and hypertension. Our research once again challenges the notion that electronic cigarettes or heated tobacco will cause similar damage to combustible cigarettes.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is only meant for industry-related communication and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness and accuracy of its content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research.


Due to limitations in the translation process, the translated article may not fully reflect the original expression. Therefore, please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS is fully aligned with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign-related statements and positions.


The compilation of information is subject to the copyright ownership of the original media outlet and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us to request removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia Brings in Deloitte to Support Illicit Tobacco and Vape Enforcement Across Data, Processes and Project Delivery
Australia’s Department of Home Affairs has hired Deloitte to provide data analytics, business-process, communications and project-delivery support to the Office of the Illicit Tobacco and E-Cigarette Commissioner. The government says Deloitte personnel do not provide policy advice to the Commissioner or the Australian government, with policy development and decision-making remaining with public officials. The arrangement has nevertheless drawn scrutiny because Deloitte has previously provided professional services to several tobacco and vaping companies.
Sep.03
Wall Street Journal: U.S. FDA Plans Faster Vape and Nicotine Pouch Reviews, Revisit of 2021 PMTA Rule
Wall Street Journal: U.S. FDA Plans Faster Vape and Nicotine Pouch Reviews, Revisit of 2021 PMTA Rule
The Trump administration is preparing changes intended to accelerate FDA market authorization reviews for e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches, according to The Wall Street Journal. The FDA is expected to revisit its 2021 PMTA rule and may simplify some scientific study requirements and shorten review times. The agency has not formally announced the changes. Over the past year, the FDA has already accelerated nicotine-pouch reviews, expanded ENDS authorizations and upgraded its CTP Portal NextGen application system. As of August 2026, 43 nicotine pouch products and 48 e-cigarette products had received FDA marketing authorization.
Sep.24
Bret Koplow Takes Permanent Charge of FDA Tobacco Center After Pushing Faster PMTA Reviews, as HHS Emphasizes Innovation and Access to Lower-Risk Alternatives
Bret Koplow Takes Permanent Charge of FDA Tobacco Center After Pushing Faster PMTA Reviews, as HHS Emphasizes Innovation and Access to Lower-Risk Alternatives
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has named Bret Koplow permanent director of the FDA’s Center for Tobacco Products, ending his period as acting chief. Koplow has spent years working on tobacco regulation, law and policy inside the FDA and, while serving as acting director, pushed for faster PMTA reviews and nicotine pouch review pilots. HHS also said CTP will prioritize innovation and access to less harmful alternatives for adult smokers while continuing efforts to protect youth.
Sep.09
IVG Parent Secures HMRC Excise Warehouse and Duty Stamp Approvals Ahead of UK Vape Tax
IVG Parent Secures HMRC Excise Warehouse and Duty Stamp Approvals Ahead of UK Vape Tax
Acme Vape Ltd, the company behind UK vaping brand IVG, has received HM Revenue & Customs approval to operate an excise warehouse for vaping products and participate in the Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme. The UK's Vaping Products Duty will take effect on October 1, 2026, at a flat rate of £2.20 per 10ml of vaping liquid. Acme Vape Ltd says its approved warehouse in Preston will become operational under the new regime on the same date.
Regulations
Sep.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia Adds Vapes to “Strategic Goods” List, Illegal Cross-Border Trade Faces Up to Five Years in Prison
Russia will place e-cigarettes and related nicotine products under its “strategic goods” framework from August 20, 2026. According to TVP World’s report published on August 19, the newly listed items include e-cigarettes, electronic smoking devices, vape liquids and nicotine salts. Individuals who illegally move these products across Russia’s customs border or its state border with other Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU) members could face up to five years in prison if shipment values exceed 100,000 rubles (about €1,000), provided all elements of a criminal offence are established.
Aug.20