Trulieve Faces Lawsuit Over Employee Firings in Florida

Dec.14.2022
Trulieve Faces Lawsuit Over Employee Firings in Florida
Trulieve, a multi-state marijuana operator based in Florida, faces a collective lawsuit for allegedly not providing adequate notice prior to employee layoffs.

Trulieve, a multi-state cannabis operator headquartered in Florida, recently terminated some of its employees in Gadsden County. This resulted in affected workers filing a collective lawsuit alleging that the company did not provide sufficient notice before their termination.


Trulieve, a Florida-based cannabis company, operates two cultivation sites in Quincy and a processing plant on Midway Island in Gadsden County. The company has not disclosed the number of employees who have been terminated but has stated that the move is aimed at reducing layoffs as the company continues to grow, according to the Tallahassee Democrat.


According to Trulieve spokesperson Steve Vancore, affected employees have been offered alternative jobs at the company's other factories in Jefferson and Madison counties. Those employees who were ultimately not able to secure another position will receive severance pay.


Vancore informed Democratic lawmakers in Tallahassee that the layoffs ultimately stemmed from Trulieve's acquisition of Harvest Health and Recreation, which is based in Arizona.


We merged and acquired Harvest a year ago," Vancore told the news media. "This was part of our consolidation strategy as we continue to develop in areas of redundancy and inefficiency. When you have 9,000 employees, this is indeed a measure to improve efficiency.


Last week, employees affected by layoffs filed a class-action lawsuit against Trulieve, alleging that the company failed to provide the required Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act notice regarding their termination.


According to Democrats in Tallahassee, the lawsuit alleges that if a company lays off "50 or more employees (excluding any part-time employees) at a single worksite within any 30-day period," it must provide a notice under the WARN Act.


According to a report by the Tampa Bay Times, the lawsuit was originally filed by attorney Tiffany Cruz on behalf of Langel O'Neil, who worked at Trulieve's Quincy facility. The plaintiff is seeking monetary compensation equivalent to the total amount of unpaid wages, salaries, commissions, bonuses, accrued vacation pay, accrued sick pay, and other benefits within 60 days after termination. This has been reported in the media.


Trulieve has contested these allegations, according to Tallahassee attorney and partner at Stearns Weaver Miller, Glenn Burhans Jr., who told the news media that Trulieve "has complied with all state and federal laws regarding the reduction of force.


In possible scenarios, Trulieve offers affected employees new positions at the same location or other locations within the area," he told the Tampa Bay Times. "If relocation is not feasible or not accepted, employees will receive severance pay.


In another statement provided to the news media, Trulieve expressed its commitment to the northwest region of Florida and highlighted the construction of a 750,000-square-foot facility in Jefferson County by the company.


According to a statement released by the company to the Tampa Bay Times, Trulieve has approximately 9,000 employees in the United States and is currently hiring for "additional positions in various fields".



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
Philippines BIR Steps Up Illicit Vape Enforcement Ahead of Christmas Shopping
The Philippines’ Bureau of Internal Revenue is intensifying enforcement against illicit vape and tobacco products ahead of the Christmas shopping season, directing regional and enforcement offices to strengthen monitoring of production sites, warehouses, distribution channels and retail outlets. The BIR destroyed 240,550 illicit vape products in August with an estimated tax liability of about PHP1.53 billion. A nationwide tax-compliance operation in July also inspected 3,590 businesses involved in tobacco and vapor products.
Regulations
Sep.17 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Swedish-Founded Nicotine Pouch Retailer GotPouches Shifts to U.S.-Based Operations, Reaching Over 25 States
Swedish-Founded Nicotine Pouch Retailer GotPouches Shifts to U.S.-Based Operations, Reaching Over 25 States
Swedish-founded online nicotine pouch retailer GotPouches has completed the localization of its U.S. operations under UpNorth Retail LLC, with corporate operations in Franklin, Tennessee, domestic fulfillment from Nashville and U.S.-based customer support. The company says its catalog covers more than 20 nicotine pouch brands and it currently serves customers in more than 25 U.S. states.
Sep.18
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
Juul Sublicense Reshapes Vuse Alto Patent Bill as Court Ends R.J. Reynolds’ 5.25% Royalty Obligation to Altria
According to Law360 on August 31, 2026, a federal judge in North Carolina ruled that a patent sublicense between R.J. Reynolds Vapor Co. and Juul Labs Inc. relieves Reynolds of its obligation to continue paying royalties to Altria Client Services LLC over Vuse Alto. A jury had previously found that Vuse Alto infringed three Altria patents and awarded approximately $95.2 million in past damages, after which Reynolds was ordered to pay an ongoing royalty equal to 5.25% of positive net sales. The new ruling finds that a valid sublicense can eliminate future infringement, potentially ending what Altria described as hundreds of millions of dollars in future royalties.
Sep.01
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
Scottish Vape Display Rules Could Cost Businesses £61 Million, Affecting More Than 11,000 Retail Outlets
A Scottish government impact assessment estimates that proposed vape display and packaging rules could create up to £61 million ($82 million) in compliance costs for businesses, affecting more than 11,000 retail outlets. The estimated costs are mainly linked to inventory adjustments, retail storage changes and the resources required for businesses to understand and implement the new requirements. The measures form part of the UK’s broader efforts to tighten vape regulation, particularly around product displays, packaging and sales practices.
Aug.10
Inside Nicotine-Pouch M&A Through Imperial's Yoik Deal: Latham, KPMG, PwC, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Form the Adviser Lineup
Inside Nicotine-Pouch M&A Through Imperial's Yoik Deal: Latham, KPMG, PwC, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Form the Adviser Lineup
Imperial Brands' acquisition of Swedish Helwit owner Yoik Group AB has highlighted the professional-services firms supporting cross-border oral nicotine M&A. Latham & Watkins and KPMG advised Imperial, while PwC and TM & Partners advised Yoik. KPMG also appeared on Imperial's acquisition of Black Buffalo earlier in 2026, while PwC played an extensive role in KT&G's acquisition of Swedish nicotine-pouch company Another Snus Factory. Imperial's public disclosures put the global modern oral nicotine delivery market at approximately £8.8 billion in retail sales and 23.5 billion pouches in 2024
Sep.20
Altria Smokeable Profit Rises 2.4% as Marlboro Share Falls and U.S. Discounts Gain
Altria Smokeable Profit Rises 2.4% as Marlboro Share Falls and U.S. Discounts Gain
Altria’s second-quarter results show a U.S. nicotine market splitting across price, product and regulation. Smokeable profit rose 2.4% as Marlboro pricing offset lower volumes, while discount brand Basic gained share among value-conscious smokers. In oral nicotine, on! PLUS expanded distribution but faced intensifying competition from ZYN and Velo. NJOY remained off the market as patent and regulatory hurdles delayed its return. The broader lesson: U.S. growth increasingly depends on price-tier strategy, retail execution, authorisation and enforcement readiness across the industry.
Special Report
Jul.31