Trulieve Faces Lawsuit Over Employee Firings in Florida

Dec.14.2022
Trulieve Faces Lawsuit Over Employee Firings in Florida
Trulieve, a multi-state marijuana operator based in Florida, faces a collective lawsuit for allegedly not providing adequate notice prior to employee layoffs.

Trulieve, a multi-state cannabis operator headquartered in Florida, recently terminated some of its employees in Gadsden County. This resulted in affected workers filing a collective lawsuit alleging that the company did not provide sufficient notice before their termination.


Trulieve, a Florida-based cannabis company, operates two cultivation sites in Quincy and a processing plant on Midway Island in Gadsden County. The company has not disclosed the number of employees who have been terminated but has stated that the move is aimed at reducing layoffs as the company continues to grow, according to the Tallahassee Democrat.


According to Trulieve spokesperson Steve Vancore, affected employees have been offered alternative jobs at the company's other factories in Jefferson and Madison counties. Those employees who were ultimately not able to secure another position will receive severance pay.


Vancore informed Democratic lawmakers in Tallahassee that the layoffs ultimately stemmed from Trulieve's acquisition of Harvest Health and Recreation, which is based in Arizona.


We merged and acquired Harvest a year ago," Vancore told the news media. "This was part of our consolidation strategy as we continue to develop in areas of redundancy and inefficiency. When you have 9,000 employees, this is indeed a measure to improve efficiency.


Last week, employees affected by layoffs filed a class-action lawsuit against Trulieve, alleging that the company failed to provide the required Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act notice regarding their termination.


According to Democrats in Tallahassee, the lawsuit alleges that if a company lays off "50 or more employees (excluding any part-time employees) at a single worksite within any 30-day period," it must provide a notice under the WARN Act.


According to a report by the Tampa Bay Times, the lawsuit was originally filed by attorney Tiffany Cruz on behalf of Langel O'Neil, who worked at Trulieve's Quincy facility. The plaintiff is seeking monetary compensation equivalent to the total amount of unpaid wages, salaries, commissions, bonuses, accrued vacation pay, accrued sick pay, and other benefits within 60 days after termination. This has been reported in the media.


Trulieve has contested these allegations, according to Tallahassee attorney and partner at Stearns Weaver Miller, Glenn Burhans Jr., who told the news media that Trulieve "has complied with all state and federal laws regarding the reduction of force.


In possible scenarios, Trulieve offers affected employees new positions at the same location or other locations within the area," he told the Tampa Bay Times. "If relocation is not feasible or not accepted, employees will receive severance pay.


In another statement provided to the news media, Trulieve expressed its commitment to the northwest region of Florida and highlighted the construction of a 750,000-square-foot facility in Jefferson County by the company.


According to a statement released by the company to the Tampa Bay Times, Trulieve has approximately 9,000 employees in the United States and is currently hiring for "additional positions in various fields".



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippines Weighs Unified Vape Tax as Lawmakers Back Risk-Based Rates and Government Seeks to Fill ₱66 Billion Revenue Gap
Philippine lawmakers are considering an overhaul of the country's vape excise-tax regime to eliminate the wide gap between taxes on nicotine salt and freebase nicotine liquids and reduce incentives for misdeclaration. House Bill 5364, filed by Rep. Rufus Rodriguez and Rep. Maximo Rodriguez Jr., would impose a unified ₱10-per-milliliter tax on vapor products, with 5% annual increases beginning in 2027. Rodriguez says the proposal could generate an average ₱6 billion in annual collections from 2027 through 2030. The debate comes as the Philippine government considers tobacco, vape and other health-tax reforms to help offset around ₱66 billion in revenue expected to be forgone under a proposed tax-relief package.
Aug.18
Product | APUS Launches Chloe 50K, Bringing Purse-Inspired Design to the U.S. High-Puff Disposable Market
Product | APUS Launches Chloe 50K, Bringing Purse-Inspired Design to the U.S. High-Puff Disposable Market
APUS has introduced the Chloe 50K disposable vape, which has appeared across U.S.-facing online retail channels including Element Vape and Vapesourcing. The device combines a purse-inspired body and chain attachment with a 20ml e-liquid capacity, 1,250mAh rechargeable battery, dual mesh coil, and battery and e-liquid indicators. It is rated for up to 50,000 puffs. The product does not appear on the FDA’s current list of authorized e-cigarettes, and U.S. retail availability does not indicate FDA marketing authorization.
Jul.15
Putin Signs Russia’s Tobacco and Nicotine Product Licensing Law, Banning Unlicensed Sales From 2027
Putin Signs Russia’s Tobacco and Nicotine Product Licensing Law, Banning Unlicensed Sales From 2027
Russian President Vladimir Putin has signed a law introducing mandatory licensing for wholesale and retail trade in tobacco and nicotine-containing products, with the system taking effect on October 1, 2026, and unlicensed operations banned from March 1, 2027, while vape and e-liquid retail may also face uncertainty from temporary regional sales-ban powers.
Jul.01
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters: India Seeks to Dismiss Adani Nicotine Pouch Challenge as Mumbai Airport Dispute Moves to Court
Reuters reported on July 13, 2026, that India is seeking to dismiss Adani Airports’ legal challenge over nicotine pouch sales at Mumbai International Airport’s duty-free shops. Adani denies wrongdoing and argues that existing drug and cosmetics regulations do not apply to duty-free sales or nicotine pouches.
Innovation
Jul.14 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Malaysia Nicotine Vape Market Faces Legal Uncertainty Over Tax and Poisons List Ruling
Malaysia Nicotine Vape Market Faces Legal Uncertainty Over Tax and Poisons List Ruling
Malaysia’s Finance Minister Anwar Ibrahim said duties and taxes on nicotine-containing vape products will be determined in line with the Court of Appeal’s ruling on whether liquid or gel nicotine can be exempted from the Poisons List under the Poisons Act 1952, a case that could affect the legal basis for vape taxation, retail sales and future ban policy.
Jun.29
Exclusive: China Tobacco Launches Locally Made MODEN FREE Nicotine Pouches in Indonesia
Exclusive: China Tobacco Launches Locally Made MODEN FREE Nicotine Pouches in Indonesia
2Firsts exclusively reports that China Tobacco Zhejiang Industrial has launched MODEN FREE nicotine pouches in Indonesia. The locally manufactured product is sold through Sixhill, a next-generation tobacco channel under CFU Group, at about $1.80 per 18-pouch can. The launch moves China Tobacco’s nicotine pouch activity beyond trade-show displays and testing into local production and public retail.
Jul.16