Trulieve Faces Lawsuit Over Employee Firings in Florida

Dec.14.2022
Trulieve Faces Lawsuit Over Employee Firings in Florida
Trulieve, a multi-state marijuana operator based in Florida, faces a collective lawsuit for allegedly not providing adequate notice prior to employee layoffs.

Trulieve, a multi-state cannabis operator headquartered in Florida, recently terminated some of its employees in Gadsden County. This resulted in affected workers filing a collective lawsuit alleging that the company did not provide sufficient notice before their termination.


Trulieve, a Florida-based cannabis company, operates two cultivation sites in Quincy and a processing plant on Midway Island in Gadsden County. The company has not disclosed the number of employees who have been terminated but has stated that the move is aimed at reducing layoffs as the company continues to grow, according to the Tallahassee Democrat.


According to Trulieve spokesperson Steve Vancore, affected employees have been offered alternative jobs at the company's other factories in Jefferson and Madison counties. Those employees who were ultimately not able to secure another position will receive severance pay.


Vancore informed Democratic lawmakers in Tallahassee that the layoffs ultimately stemmed from Trulieve's acquisition of Harvest Health and Recreation, which is based in Arizona.


We merged and acquired Harvest a year ago," Vancore told the news media. "This was part of our consolidation strategy as we continue to develop in areas of redundancy and inefficiency. When you have 9,000 employees, this is indeed a measure to improve efficiency.


Last week, employees affected by layoffs filed a class-action lawsuit against Trulieve, alleging that the company failed to provide the required Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) Act notice regarding their termination.


According to Democrats in Tallahassee, the lawsuit alleges that if a company lays off "50 or more employees (excluding any part-time employees) at a single worksite within any 30-day period," it must provide a notice under the WARN Act.


According to a report by the Tampa Bay Times, the lawsuit was originally filed by attorney Tiffany Cruz on behalf of Langel O'Neil, who worked at Trulieve's Quincy facility. The plaintiff is seeking monetary compensation equivalent to the total amount of unpaid wages, salaries, commissions, bonuses, accrued vacation pay, accrued sick pay, and other benefits within 60 days after termination. This has been reported in the media.


Trulieve has contested these allegations, according to Tallahassee attorney and partner at Stearns Weaver Miller, Glenn Burhans Jr., who told the news media that Trulieve "has complied with all state and federal laws regarding the reduction of force.


In possible scenarios, Trulieve offers affected employees new positions at the same location or other locations within the area," he told the Tampa Bay Times. "If relocation is not feasible or not accepted, employees will receive severance pay.


In another statement provided to the news media, Trulieve expressed its commitment to the northwest region of Florida and highlighted the construction of a 750,000-square-foot facility in Jefferson County by the company.


According to a statement released by the company to the Tampa Bay Times, Trulieve has approximately 9,000 employees in the United States and is currently hiring for "additional positions in various fields".



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia Extends Illicit Tobacco Crackdown From Tougher Penalties to Customs and Logistics Supply Chains
Australia's federal government introduced a new illicit tobacco enforcement bill on September 10 that would strengthen evidentiary presumptions, representative sampling, seizure and forfeiture procedures, proceeds-of-crime powers and obligations for customs and logistics operators. The proposal follows the Combatting Illicit Tobacco Act 2026, which took effect in August and increased penalties while expanding investigative and asset-recovery tools. Together, the reforms extend Australia's crackdown from tougher criminal sanctions into import, logistics and evidentiary enforcement.
Sep.14
Reynolds Showcases Vuse Pro Flavors and VELO Nicotine Pouches at NACS Show 2026
Reynolds Showcases Vuse Pro Flavors and VELO Nicotine Pouches at NACS Show 2026
Reynolds American, a BAT subsidiary, showcased four Vuse Pro flavored e-cigarette pods and its VELO nicotine pouch portfolio at NACS Show 2026. Booth staff confirmed to 2Firsts that the Vuse Pro flavors are sold in the U.S., although they have not received FDA marketing authorization. BAT outlined plans to expand Vuse retail distribution and reported that VELO held a 30.5% year-to-date volume share of the U.S. modern oral nicotine category through August 2026. The booth also featured the newly launched VELO MAX range and merchandising displays combining cigarettes, vaping products and oral nicotine brands.
EXPO
Oct.09
Product | RELX Partners With UK E-Liquid Brand T-Juice for Prime Pro × Red Astaire Bundle in France
Product | RELX Partners With UK E-Liquid Brand T-Juice for Prime Pro × Red Astaire Bundle in France
RELX and UK e-liquid brand T-Juice have launched the Prime Pro × Red Astaire bundle in France, combining the RELX Prime Pro open-system pod device with T-Juice’s signature Red Astaire nicotine salt e-liquid. The collaboration retains the existing Prime Pro hardware platform while using an established flavor brand to create a complete open-system offering. The product appeared in French retail and distribution channels in August 2026 and represents a co-branded retail bundle rather than a new device launch.
Aug.27
Ireland Raises Nicotine Product Taxes Again as Cigarettes Gain €1 and Vape Duty Is Set to Jump 40%
Ireland Raises Nicotine Product Taxes Again as Cigarettes Gain €1 and Vape Duty Is Set to Jump 40%
Ireland has increased tobacco excise under Budget 2027 and announced a further rise in its E-liquid Products Tax. From Oct. 7, the tax burden on a pack of 20 cigarettes in the most popular price category increased by €1, with pro-rata increases on other tobacco products. The government plans to raise EPT from €0.50 to €0.70 per millilitre from Jan. 1, 2027, a 40% increase applying to both nicotine-containing and nicotine-free e-liquids. The tobacco duty increase is expected to raise about €63.1 million in a full year.
Regulations
Oct.09
Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
Australian Coalition Taskforce Calls for 80% Tobacco Tax Cut to Combat Illicit Market
According to SGST on August 26, 2026, Australia’s Coalition Illegal Tobacco Taskforce released a report recommending an up to 80% cut in tobacco excise to reduce the appeal of the illicit tobacco market. The report claimed organised crime groups now control about 80% of Australia’s tobacco market and argued that high excise rates have widened the price gap between legal and illegal products. The recommendation remains a policy proposal and has not been adopted by the Australian government, which said its focus remains on enforcement, compliance and additional resources.
Aug.27