Turning Point Brands Canada Becomes Exclusive Distributor for VPRB's HoneyStick in Canada

Business by 2FIRSTS.ai
Jan.09.2024
Turning Point Brands Canada Becomes Exclusive Distributor for VPRB's HoneyStick in Canada
VPR Brands announces Turning Point Brands Canada as the exclusive distributor of its HoneyStick products in Canada.

VPR Brands (OTC: VPRB) recently announced that Turning Point Brands Canada (TPB) will serve as the exclusive distributor for its HoneyStick products in Canada.

 

VPR Brands (VPRB) is an e-cigarette manufacturer dedicated to introducing innovative products.

 

TPB is a Canadian marketing and distribution company in the field of tobacco, e-cigarettes, and alternative products.

 

HoneyStick is set to join TPB Canada's portfolio of leading global brand management, alongside iconic brands such as Zig-Zag, Clipper, Choice Leaf, HMP, Rebound, and Evolve, to enter the Canadian market.

 

In the future, TPB Canada will streamline the retail process by centralizing ordering, logistics, and warehousing in one location. This will ensure a steady supply of HoneyStick products and reduce delivery times, enabling faster product delivery across Canada.

 

Currently, HoneyStick has launched on the Canadian e-commerce platform tpbmarketplace. However, it is either marked as "sold out" or yet to be available on several other Canadian e-commerce platforms.

 

Mikail Fancy, Chief Operating Officer of Turning Point Brands Canada, expressed enthusiasm over the partnership with VPR Brands to bring HoneyStick to a wider audience in Canada. Fancy highlighted the combination of their expertise in marketing, sales, distribution, and logistics, along with the quality and innovation of HoneyStick products, as a perfect match. He emphasized their commitment to providing excellent service and support for retailers and consumers.

 

Daniel Hoff, Chief Operating Officer of VPR Brands, has stated that the collaboration with Turning Point Brands Canada is a significant milestone for HoneyStick in Canada. Their strong distribution network and successful experience in marketing, sales, and customer service make them an ideal partner to enhance our brand's presence and accessibility nationwide.

 

VPR is currently involved in a significant case regarding a legal dispute with IMiracle (Heaven Gifts). The main point of contention revolves around the usage rights of the term "Elf" on e-cigarette products.

 

VPR filed a lawsuit in October 2022 against the distributor Shenzhen Weibo Li Technology Co., Ltd and the manufacturer iMiracle (HK) Limited, alleging infringement of VPR's trademark rights on ELF during the sales of Elfbar. Elfbar is the most popular disposable e-cigarette brand among young users.

 

In response, Judge Cannon in the United States issued a temporary injunction on Chinese companies in February 2023, prohibiting them from selling any e-cigarette products bearing the name ELFBAR. Judge Cannon stated that there is currently "no dispute" that these companies intentionally infringed upon VPR's trademark rights.

 

Shenzhen V-Perfect and iMiracle have submitted their first document claiming that they can prove V-Perfect is not the original user of the ELF trademark. According to the documents submitted by these two companies on April 24th, they have discovered the true owner of the ELF trademark, another Chinese company called GD Sigelei Electronic Tech. This company first used the "ELF" to sell e-cigarette products in April 2016, almost a year and a half earlier than V-Perfect's first batch of ELF products.

 

In March of this year, two Chinese companies signed a trademark transfer agreement, claiming to have transferred the rights to the Elf trademark to iMiracle. Based on this, they have requested Judge Cannon to revoke the temporary injunction.

 

Another important document claims that VPR has utilized a court order prohibiting them from manufacturing ELFBAR in order to seek market share. According to the document from May, VPR has launched a "blatantly imitated" ELFBAR disposable e-cigarette, clearly copying iMiracle's product. Both of these Chinese companies argue that these inferior counterfeit products will confuse consumers, ultimately leading to ELFBAR losing market share and reputation.

 

Although both parties have informed the mediators that Judge Cannon's decision on these two motions will "guide their positions for settlement," the case remains at a standstill, waiting for the Chinese companies to appeal to the Federal Circuit in an attempt to overturn the injunction. These two Chinese companies are dissatisfied with the temporary ban and stated in their submission to the Federal Circuit that the injunction is erroneous and has resulted in them losing millions of dollars.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

More Than 500 Stores in Russia’s Nizhny Novgorod Region Voluntarily Stop Selling Vapes
More Than 500 Stores in Russia’s Nizhny Novgorod Region Voluntarily Stop Selling Vapes
According to the Nizhny Novgorod regional government, 550 stores in the region have voluntarily removed vapes and e-liquids from their product assortments. Regional officials said a public offer encouraging businesses to self-restrict vape sales has been in place since September 2025, and that a large retail chain with more than 40 outlets in Nizhny Novgorod joined the initiative. The regional government also said a federal ban on vape sales is expected in the near future.
Apr.15 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nicotine Beyond Tobacco? Cell Study Signals Emerging Shift in Production Systems
Nicotine Beyond Tobacco? Cell Study Signals Emerging Shift in Production Systems
Researchers at the Chinese Academy of Sciences reconstructed nicotine biosynthesis in non-tobacco plants and yeast systems, highlighting how advances in synthetic biology could gradually reshape future nicotine production technologies and challenge regulatory frameworks built around tobacco-derived definitions.
Special Report
May.07
UK Tobacco and Vapes Bill Receives Royal Assent, Banning Tobacco Sales to People Born After 2008
UK Tobacco and Vapes Bill Receives Royal Assent, Banning Tobacco Sales to People Born After 2008
The UK government announced on April 29 that the Tobacco and Vapes Bill had received Royal Assent and become law. Under the new law, it is illegal to sell tobacco to anyone born on or after Jan. 1, 2009. The government said the law creates the UK’s first “smoke-free generation” and includes measures to ban the advertising and sponsorship of vapes and nicotine products, as well as powers to restrict packaging, branding and displays designed to appeal to children.
Apr.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
South Korea Moves Against Synthetic Nicotine Regulatory Gap as Three Companies Face Tobacco Business Act Probe
South Korea Moves Against Synthetic Nicotine Regulatory Gap as Three Companies Face Tobacco Business Act Probe
South Korea’s Ministry of Finance and Economy said on May 4 that it requested the Daejeon Metropolitan Police Agency and Gyeonggi Nambu Provincial Police Agency to investigate three sales companies on suspicion of violating the Tobacco Business Act.
May.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
EU Novel Tobacco Regulation Trends and Business Response | Guest Contribution by a European Legal and Compliance Expert
EU Novel Tobacco Regulation Trends and Business Response | Guest Contribution by a European Legal and Compliance Expert
Carlos Cabrera, founder of CabLab Law & Advocacy, contributes this article to 2Firsts, arguing that the EU’s evolving approach to novel tobacco regulation may unintentionally reinforce cigarette use by narrowing alternatives. He warns companies to watch signals on flavours, labelling, traceability, nicotine pouch rules and digital marketing, while grounding business decisions in realistic timelines, compliance planning and continuous monitoring.
Apr.22
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai