UK Vape Store Ordered to Close for over 1,500 Illegal E-Cigarettes

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Apr.30.2024
UK Vape Store Ordered to Close for over 1,500 Illegal E-Cigarettes
Easi-Vape Store Ordered to Close for Illegal E-Cigarette Stash Worth Over £16,000 in Durham County.

According to a report from Yahoo News on April 26th, a store called "Easi-Vape" was ordered to close due to the discovery of over 1,500 illegal e-cigarettes hidden on the premises.

 

Since October 2021, the store located in Durham County has been found with illegal e-cigarettes three times, estimated to be worth over £16,000. Prior to this, the store had been issued with a closure order, and the store owner has been informed that they must comply with regulations related to e-cigarettes starting from October 2021.

 

Previously, city council members conducted a purchasing test at the establishment and found that the products being sold did not comply with regulations. The products had not been registered with relevant agencies, and the e-liquid content exceeded the regulatory limit of 2 milliliters. In June 2023, county council officials discovered 871 non-compliant e-cigarettes during an inspection at the store, with an estimated value of £8700, resulting in a warning for the shop owner.

 

In January 2024, authorities received intelligence and carried out enforcement action against the shop in March, seizing 746 non-compliant e-cigarettes worth approximately £7,500. The county council consulted with local retailers, the public, and schools on whether to seek a closure order for the store under the Anti-Social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014, and received unanimous support.

 

Subsequently, the shop owner sent an email apology to the county council. Authorities filed an application with the court for a closure order, and the court subsequently ruled to close the store for two months, citing that the illegal products were causing distress to local residents and businesses.

 

Gary Carr, the regulatory leader of Durham County Council, stated: "The vast majority of shop owners in Durham County are law-abiding. The closure of this particular shop for two months is intended to serve as a warning to any other stores that may be considering selling illegal products.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Glas Says FDA Scientific Review Backed Several Flavored Products Before Senior Leaders Blocked Them
Glas Says FDA Scientific Review Backed Several Flavored Products Before Senior Leaders Blocked Them
Glas says newly released internal FDA records show agency scientific reviewers supported authorization for several flavored G2 products before senior leadership halted them. According to documents obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request, FDA’s Office of Science first recommended marketing authorization for all eight products in December 2025 and later supported six of them in February 2026. FDA ultimately authorized only the G2 device and one tobacco-flavored pod in March.
Apr.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Kyrgyzstan Plans to Extend E-Cigarette Import Ban by Another Six Months
Kyrgyzstan Plans to Extend E-Cigarette Import Ban by Another Six Months
According to Kyrgyzstan’s Ministry of Economy, the government plans to extend the current ban on e-cigarette imports by another six months once the existing measure expires, with the new restriction set to take effect on July 10, 2026. The ban covers disposable e-cigarettes as well as nicotine-containing liquids for reusable systems.
Apr.17 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NACS Urges USTR to Address Illegal E-Cigarette Exports in China Trade Engagements
NACS Urges USTR to Address Illegal E-Cigarette Exports in China Trade Engagements
NACS submitted a comment letter to USTR in a proceeding examining unfair trade practices worldwide. The letter focuses on illicit nicotine products made in China and shipped to the United States in violation of U.S. law. NACS said the U.S. electronic nicotine delivery systems market has become dominated by illicit products, mainly disposable e-cigarettes manufactured in China and sold without the marketing authorization required by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Apr.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
RJR Vapor Loses Tax Refund Case as Texas High Court Finds VELO Pouches Taxable
The Texas Supreme Court issued a case summary on May 8, 2026, describing its decision in Hancock v. RJR Vapor Co. LLC. The dispute centered on whether RJR Vapor’s VELO oral nicotine pouches are taxable as “tobacco products” under the Texas Tax Code. Lower courts had held that the pouches were not taxable tobacco products, but the Texas Supreme Court reversed, concluding that VELO pouches are taxable because they are made of “a tobacco substitute.”
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Tobacco Center Plans Faster Review Process for Certain Supplemental PMTAs
FDA Tobacco Center Plans Faster Review Process for Certain Supplemental PMTAs
FDA Center for Tobacco Products Acting Director Bret Koplow issued a statement on May 7 outlining new steps to accelerate tobacco product premarket application review. The statement said CTP reduced the backlog of applications by approximately 70% in 2025 and that there is no longer a queue for PMTAs pending acceptance review.
May.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report | Russian Vape Compromise Faces First Hurdles
Special Report | Russian Vape Compromise Faces First Hurdles
Russia’s regional vape-ban model is facing early legal and political tests, as Perm Krai moves ahead before federal legislation is fully adopted. The case highlights uncertainty over regional authority, concerns from business groups about market fragmentation, and the risk that pressure against regional bans could revive calls for a stricter nationwide prohibition.
Industry Insight
May.28