UKVIA Expresses Disappointment Over Welsh Tobacco Control Strategy

Aug.11.2022
UKVIA Expresses Disappointment Over Welsh Tobacco Control Strategy
The Welsh Tobacco Control Strategy lacks support for e-cigarettes and misses a significant opportunity for smoking cessation, says UKVIA.

The newly released Tobacco Control Strategy (TCS) in Wales has stated that it has not yet developed a position on e-cigarettes. The UKVIA has stated that, given the support of e-cigarettes in other parts of the UK, it will continue to engage with Welsh policymakers.


A plan to reduce smoking rates in Wales and achieve a "smoke-free" status by 2030 has been recently released. However, the plan has been criticized by the UK Vaping Industry Association (UKVIA) for lacking support for electronic cigarettes, which they describe as a missed opportunity. The UKVIA is the largest industry association representing the e-cigarette industry in the United Kingdom.


John Dunne, CEO of UKVIA stated, "While there are many commendable aspects to the strategy for reducing smoking rates in Wales, it is disappointing that the Welsh government hasn't gone further to seize this golden opportunity to embrace and advocate for e-cigarettes as the best and most effective way to help people quit smoking for good.


Although the Welsh TCS did mention e-cigarettes, it was only briefly noted that the Welsh government needs to develop its stance on e-cigarettes.


Dunne went on to say, "For this reason, we will continue to collaborate with the Welsh government, as in the recent example of the Khan review on smoking, which concluded that promoting e-cigarettes is absolutely crucial for achieving a smoke-free UK by 2030.


Welsh TCS has brought up the issue of preventing children and young people from smoking and using e-cigarettes - a topic that UKVIA has strongly advocated for. Dunne stated: "We welcome the Welsh government's plan to prevent young people from accessing e-cigarettes.


As an association, we have called on the UK government to impose stricter regulations on e-cigarette retailers who sell to young people. We recommend a fine of £10,000 for those caught in violation.


Returning to Wales, TCS lacks support for e-cigarettes as a tool to quit smoking. Dunne added, "There is indisputable evidence that e-cigarettes are effective in helping adults quit smoking. Support is growing among the scientific, academic, healthcare, and political communities, all of which now recognize e-cigarettes as an important component in helping smokers quit.


While it is disappointing to see that the Welsh government has not taken a more proactive stance on e-cigarettes, it is important to engage with politicians and decision-makers in the region to showcase the value of these devices and help the country achieve its smoke-free goals. Failing to do so could have serious consequences for Wales' ability to reduce smoking rates and minimize harm.


Meanwhile, in Scotland, a survey of 2,170 individuals found that 41% of respondents reported that e-cigarettes helped them quit smoking. The survey also found that only one-sixth of respondents wished for stricter regulations on e-cigarettes, while half hoped for more relaxed regulations. Scotland's government is currently considering whether to ban in-store promotions of e-cigarettes.


Statement:


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry professionals for educational and informational purposes only.


This article does not necessarily represent the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot verify the truth or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is intended only for internal industry discussion and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation skills, the translated article may not accurately convey the original meaning. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government in regard to any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign statements and positions.


All compiled information is owned by the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for removal.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
GAO Audit Finds Nearly 132,000 FDA Tobacco Applications Waiting an Average 1,266 Days as Nicotine Pouch Pilot Practices Move Into Vape PMTA Reviews
A U.S. Government Accountability Office audit found that 131,915 tobacco product applications submitted to the FDA since 2018 remained without a final review as of December 31, 2025, with pending applications waiting an average of 1,266 days. GAO also found FDA lacks the data needed to systematically determine whether scientific reviews meet applicable timelines. HHS agreed to upgrade the agency's tracking systems. At the same time, FDA has begun applying lessons from its nicotine pouch PMTA pilot to e-cigarette reviews, while changes to enforcement policy and electronic submissions are making the specific stage of a PMTA increasingly relevant to market access.
FDA
Oct.03
Product | KUMI SCENIC 50K Offers Nicotine and 6-Methyl Nicotine Versions as 6-MN Products Appear in Multiple U.S. State Directories, With Louisiana Listing FDA Exemption
Product | KUMI SCENIC 50K Offers Nicotine and 6-Methyl Nicotine Versions as 6-MN Products Appear in Multiple U.S. State Directories, With Louisiana Listing FDA Exemption
An October 2026 review of U.S. state vapor product directories found KUMI 6 SCENIC 50K listed in Louisiana and Nebraska. Louisiana classifies 20 related product entries as “FDA EXEMPTION.” The SCENIC platform is marketed in both conventional nicotine-salt and NoNic6 formulations, each advertised with 22mL e-liquid capacity and up to 50,000 puffs. U.S. wholesaler Midwest Goods listed both versions in August 2025 with a suggested retail price of $19.99 each. The NoNic6 version is associated with 6-methylnicotine and is also marketed by some distributors as “nicotine-free.”
product
Oct.27
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore Seeks to Toss CCELL Price-Fixing Claim as Court Weighs Vertical Distribution Versus Horizontal Conspiracy
Smoore and four authorized U.S. CCELL distributors are asking a California federal court to permanently dismiss a core antitrust claim brought by direct purchasers. Plaintiffs allege that Smoore coordinated minimum wholesale prices, customer allocation and limits on price competition among distributors, amounting to a per se unlawful horizontal conspiracy. The defendants say the alleged conduct reflects ordinary vertical relationships between a manufacturer and its distributors. The court previously dismissed a similar claim, and the latest dispute centers on whether the second amended complaint adds sufficient facts to establish a horizontal agreement.
Sep.14
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
STIIIZY Redesign Fails to Escape PAX Labs Patent Import Ban as Section 337 Case Also Involves China ALD
U.S. Customs and Border Protection ruled that STIIIZY had not shown that the redesigned cannabis-vape products covered by its latest request fall outside an ITC limited exclusion order tied to PAX Labs patents. CBP accepted some of STIIIZY’s claim-construction and non-infringement arguments, but the company did not address two additional claims in the same patent. Earlier STIIIZY redesigned cartridges and certain associated components imported with them had received separate CBP clearance.
Sep.16
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia Adds 6-Methylnicotine to Schedule 9 Prohibited Substances, Effective October 1
Australia's Therapeutic Goods Administration published a final decision on September 25 to classify 6-methylnicotine as a Schedule 9 prohibited substance under the Poisons Standard, effective October 1, 2026. TGA said the chemical has been reported in e-cigarette liquids sold in Australia and marketed as nicotine-free or nicotine alternatives, while evidence also indicates its use in preparations such as oral pouches. The government originally proposed a Schedule 7 classification but ultimately adopted the stricter Schedule 9 designation, citing acute toxicity, dependence risk, use in unapproved consumer products and misleading marketing.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
HG Innovation, linked to IMiracle and ELFBAR, wins China patent for 6-methylnicotine salts covering vaping and oral products
HG Innovation, linked to IMiracle and ELFBAR, wins China patent for 6-methylnicotine salts covering vaping and oral products
HG Innovation Limited has been granted a Chinese invention patent covering 6-methylnicotine salt formulations and their use in oral and vaping products. The technology forms salts between 6-methylnicotine and alicyclic carboxylic acids, with granted claims extending to oral products, atomization substrates and electronic atomization devices. Applicant-generated tests reported differences in oxidation stability, in-vitro cytotoxicity and aerosol heavy-metal performance compared with selected benzoate or lactate controls. HG Innovation is directly linked to the broader IMiracle and ELFBAR business network.
Sep.04