Kenya Court of Appeal Halts BBC Defamation Case Linked to BAT Bribery Documentary

Dec.02.2025
Kenya Court of Appeal Halts BBC Defamation Case Linked to BAT Bribery Documentary
Kenya’s Court of Appeal has paused the defamation proceedings filed by National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula against the BBC. The case centers on a 2015 BBC documentary, Panorama: The Secret Bribes of Big Tobacco, which alleged that Wetang’ula received unlawful benefits from British American Tobacco (BAT) during his tenure as a senator.

Key Points

 

  • Court of Appeal suspends Wetang’ula’s defamation case against the BBC.
  • Dispute stems from a 2015 BBC documentary alleging BAT offered unlawful benefits to Wetang’ula.
  • BBC sought a stay of proceedings pending assistance from UK courts to obtain evidence.
  • High Court previously rejected multiple applications filed by the BBC.
  • Appellate court found the BBC’s appeal arguable and granted a stay.

 


 

2Firsts, December 2, 2025 — According to The Weekly Vision, Kenya’s Court of Appeal has suspended the defamation case filed by National Assembly Speaker Moses Wetang’ula against the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC). Wetang’ula seeks to stop the BBC from publishing the allegations and is claiming general and aggravated damages, costs, and interest.

 

The case arises from BBC broadcasts aired on November 30 and December 4, 2015, under the title Panorama: The Secret Bribes of Big Tobacco. The documentary alleged that British American Tobacco (BAT) provided bribes to several individuals, including Wetang’ula, who was then the Senator for Bungoma.

 

The BBC previously asked the High Court to issue a Letter of Request to enable it to seek witness statements and documents from UK courts, and to stay the proceedings pending the outcome. Wetang’ula opposed the application, arguing it was excessively delayed, insufficiently supported, and vague. The High Court dismissed the BBC’s application in October 2023, and further applications for a stay were also rejected.

 

The BBC subsequently filed a fresh application before the Court of Appeal, arguing that allowing the High Court case to proceed would render its appeal nugatory and prevent it from obtaining crucial evidence. In response, Wetang’ula stated in an affidavit that the BBC was attempting to gather evidence many years after the documentary was broadcast and that its application was procedurally flawed and unfounded.

 

The appellate court held that Rule 5(2)(b) grants it original and discretionary jurisdiction to issue a stay. The judges found that the BBC’s appeal raised an arguable point and that the delay was not excessive. The court added that the right to a fair trial under Article 25(c) of the Constitution cannot be limited, and that failing to first determine whether the BBC may seek the requested evidence could compromise that right.

 

The Court of Appeal ultimately allowed the BBC’s application and ordered a stay of further High Court proceedings until the appeal is heard and determined. Costs will follow the outcome of the appeal.

 

Caption of the cover image:Moses Wetang’ula | Image: The Weekly Vision

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

From Heating Blades to Heating Paper? CTHB Patent Points to Microwave Heated Tobacco Design
From Heating Blades to Heating Paper? CTHB Patent Points to Microwave Heated Tobacco Design
According to China’s patent office records, a patent owned by China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Corporation (CTHB) for “cigarette paper and a cigarette for microwave heating” was granted on May 19, 2026. The patent describes cigarette paper with an outer wrapping layer, a heating layer, and an isolation heat-conducting layer, allowing it to absorb microwave energy, convert it to heat, and transfer that heat to the aerosol-generating substrate.
Jun.10
EU Novel Tobacco Regulation Trends and Business Response | Guest Contribution by a European Legal and Compliance Expert
EU Novel Tobacco Regulation Trends and Business Response | Guest Contribution by a European Legal and Compliance Expert
Carlos Cabrera, founder of CabLab Law & Advocacy, contributes this article to 2Firsts, arguing that the EU’s evolving approach to novel tobacco regulation may unintentionally reinforce cigarette use by narrowing alternatives. He warns companies to watch signals on flavours, labelling, traceability, nicotine pouch rules and digital marketing, while grounding business decisions in realistic timelines, compliance planning and continuous monitoring.
Apr.22
Acting CTP Director Says FDA Cut Premarket Tobacco Application Backlog by About 70% Over the Past Year
Acting CTP Director Says FDA Cut Premarket Tobacco Application Backlog by About 70% Over the Past Year
FDA Center for Tobacco Products Acting Director Bret Koplow said at the American Tobacco and Nicotine Forum that the agency has reduced its premarket tobacco application backlog by about 70% over the past year and eliminated the acceptance queue. He said FDA has reviewed about 27 million applications, but only a small number have been authorized, mainly because most submissions lacked the scientific data needed to demonstrate public health benefits.
Apr.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysian Court Rules Liquid Nicotine Exemption Irrational, Renewing Vape Regulation Debate
Malaysian Court Rules Liquid Nicotine Exemption Irrational, Renewing Vape Regulation Debate
Malaysia’s High Court ruled that the government’s earlier decision to remove liquid nicotine from the country’s Poisons List was “irrational,” reigniting debate over vape regulation, illicit trade, and youth protection.
Regulations
May.18
Capital Group Takes 5.61% Stake in KT&G, Joining Major Foreign Shareholders
Capital Group Takes 5.61% Stake in KT&G, Joining Major Foreign Shareholders
KT&G disclosed in a regulatory filing on Friday that Capital Research and Management Company, the investment management arm of Capital Group, had acquired a 5.61% stake through purchases made on April 22 and May 4. The move places Capital Group among KT&G’s prominent foreign shareholders, alongside BlackRock, First Eagle Investment Management and Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund GIC.
May.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Special Report | Russian Vape Compromise Faces First Hurdles
Special Report | Russian Vape Compromise Faces First Hurdles
Russia’s regional vape-ban model is facing early legal and political tests, as Perm Krai moves ahead before federal legislation is fully adopted. The case highlights uncertainty over regional authority, concerns from business groups about market fragmentation, and the risk that pressure against regional bans could revive calls for a stricter nationwide prohibition.
Industry Insight
May.28