US Court Orders Health Risk Warnings on Cigarettes in Retail Stores

Dec.08.2022
US Court Orders Health Risk Warnings on Cigarettes in Retail Stores
US court orders cigarette companies to display health risk labels and corrective statements in retail stores.

A US court has ordered tobacco companies to display health warning labels related to smoking in retail stores. On December 6, the US Department of Justice announced a court order requiring tobacco companies to display health warning labels in retail stores and to issue corrective statements regarding the health risks and addictive properties of cigarettes.


In a press release on Tuesday, the Department of Justice stated that the court order "resolved the government's long-standing civil extortion lawsuit against the largest tobacco company in the United States.


In 1999, a lawsuit was filed in the United States. The trial took place in the District Court of Washington D.C. between 2004 and 2005, with the court ruling that these companies had misled consumers regarding the health risks of smoking.


Since 2019, tobacco use among teenagers has decreased from 6 million to 3 million.


The court order applies to four cigarette brands owned by Altria, Philip Morris USA Inc., R.J.Reynolds Tobacco Company and ITG Brands LLC.


A new study from San Diego State University predicts that "heat-not-burn" tobacco products could soon dominate the US market.


The Deputy Attorney General, Vanita Gupta, stated that lawyers at the Department of Justice have been working tirelessly for over 20 years to hold tobacco companies accountable for deceiving consumers about the health risks of smoking. The resolution enforces the remedies of the lawsuit to ensure consumers are aware of the hazards of purchasing tobacco products.


It is estimated that out of the 300,000 retail stores selling cigarettes in the United States, 200,000 have entered into agreements with tobacco companies to display health warning labels on their tobacco products in the stores.


According to an order released on December 6th, companies are required to modify their agreements with retail stores and display correction statements in stores. These statements will be marked with colorful logos and designed to catch attention, while also highlighting information such as the negative health effects of smoking, the addictive nature of nicotine, and the harmful effects of secondhand smoke.


This directive will come into effect on July 1, 2023, and these companies will have a three-month window to make necessary changes. After that, retailers will be required to display signs in both English and Spanish for a period of 21 months.


William Klein, Deputy Director of the "Behavioral Research" project at the National Cancer Institute, called this a momentous occasion in the history of cancer control in the United States. Smoking accounts for approximately 30% of all cancer deaths in the country. Therefore, the corrective statements ordered by the court to be displayed at tobacco sales points will help support our mission of reducing the burden of cancer. We are grateful to our colleagues in the Department of Justice for completing this important work.


2FIRSTS will continue to report on this issue and future updates will be available on the "2FIRSTSAPP." Scan the QR code below to download the app.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
Law360 reports that a Fifth Circuit panel expressed skepticism about the FDA’s claim that it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarette products, noting that only six applications had been approved out of hundreds of thousands and that near-100% denials look like a ban.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia moves ahead with vape sales ban plan; PMI urges Japan-style differentiated excise taxes
Malaysia moves ahead with vape sales ban plan; PMI urges Japan-style differentiated excise taxes
Malaysia plans to implement a ban or restrictions on e-cigarettes and vaping products as early as mid-2026 and no later than year-end. The head of Philip Morris Malaysia and Singapore said the government should look to Japan’s approach of regulating and taxing different tobacco and nicotine products differently, warning that an outright ban could push demand into illicit channels.
Feb.02
Dalton, Georgia considers new licensing rules and caps for vape shops
Dalton, Georgia considers new licensing rules and caps for vape shops
Dalton, Georgia is weighing a proposal to require city licenses for vape shops, limit how many can operate within city limits, and impose a 1,000-foot buffer for new shops from schools and other community facilities. City officials say the ordinance would not eliminate existing vape shops outright, though some may be impacted if ownership changes or licenses expire.
Feb.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
Iowa urges Eighth Circuit to allow enforcement of challenged e-cigarette directory law
At the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit, Iowa asked judges to allow enforcement of a challenged 2024 state law that penalizes manufacturers selling e-cigarette products not listed on a state-run directory. Products are listed only when a manufacturer or retailer meets certain premarket requirements established under the federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA).
Jan.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Australia’s TGA Seizes Illicit Vaping Products Worth Over  US$670,000 in Bendigo
Australia’s TGA Seizes Illicit Vaping Products Worth Over US$670,000 in Bendigo
Australia’s Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) has seized illicit vaping products with an estimated street value exceeding A$1 million (approximately US$670,000) following an enforcement operation in Bendigo, Victoria.
Dec.24 by 2FIRSTS.ai
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
FDA Details Carcinogenicity Tiering and ELCR Framework as Small Manufacturers Press for Predictability
During the “Toxicological Profile” session at FDA’s Feb 10 PMTA roundtable, officials outlined the carcinogenicity tiering system and Excess Lifetime Cancer Risk (ELCR) framework used in ENDS reviews under the APPH standard. Small manufacturers questioned database transparency, exposure assumptions, and the existence of clear compliance benchmarks. FDA reiterated toxicological risk is assessed case by case within a broader population-level determination.
Feb.11