US Court Rules FDA Must Review PTMA of E-Cigarette Companies

Aug.25.2022
US Court Rules FDA Must Review PTMA of E-Cigarette Companies
US court rules FDA must review e-cigarette companies' PTMA applications, citing inadequate consideration of marketing and youth access plans.

On Tuesday, the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should not have denied PMTA review to six e-cigarette companies because it did not consider their marketing and sales plans aimed at reducing youth exposure created in response to tobacco company regulations.


Source: Tanasin


The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has approved the request for a review submitted by Bidi Vapor, Diamond Vapor, and four other companies questioning the FDA's rejection of their PTMA in a 2-1 vote. According to Chief Judge William Pryor, the agency failed to evaluate the companies' marketing and sales access restriction plan, aimed at minimizing the youth's exposure and access.


The court has deemed FDA's decision "arbitrary and capricious". Any decision made by the FDA must legally consider all relevant factors. In regards to the electronic cigarette manufacturers, the court has ruled that the FDA did not make such considerations.


The court stated in its opinion that "these tobacco companies have submitted information from surveys conducted with their customers about quitting smoking, literature reviews, scientific studies on switching to e-cigarettes, and detailed information about their marketing and youth access plans." "For example, Diamond's online sales use technology that relies on public records to verify the purchaser's age.


Advocates in the e-cigarette industry are welcoming the decision. Gregory Conley, Director of Legislative Affairs and External Affairs at the American Vaping Association, stated that although the court ruling did not order the FDA to grant PMTAs, the agency may still refuse these applications in the future, but these companies may still be in line for review by 2025 and can continue to operate in the meantime.


Conley wrote on Twitter, "Additionally, this opens the door for companies dissatisfied with the PMTA review to file lawsuits. The vague and undefined 'appropriate for the protection of public health' standard of the FDA has long been under attack. This is just the beginning.


Before the 11th Circuit Court ruled, information was disclosed that forced the FDA to acknowledge that evidence was not considered when issuing marketing denial orders (MDOs) to Juul and Turing Point Brands for their e-cigarette products. In the interest of public health, future FDA decisions must include all available evidence, not just evidence that leads to their preferred outcome.


The court recognized a distinction between disposable e-cigarettes and the e-liquids used in open systems. The court also found that the FDA's refusal to review the marketing plan was "wrong and not harmless" (in contrast to the opinions of the Fifth and D.C. Circuit Courts). All petitioners' appeals were approved, the refusal order was vacated, and sent back for reconsideration. Judge Robin Stacy Rosenbaum wrote in dissent that anyone familiar with all the relevant facts of the litigation may have already known how the case would ultimately end.


Statement


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not reflect the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation proficiency, the article may not express the original text accurately. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

ZYN ULTRA Expands Haypp’s U.S. E-Commerce Lineup With 9 mg Pouches
ZYN ULTRA Expands Haypp’s U.S. E-Commerce Lineup With 9 mg Pouches
Haypp Group said ZYN ULTRA became available nationwide in the United States on June 15 through its e-commerce platforms Nicokick.com and Northerner.com for verified adult nicotine consumers.
Jun.17
Chinese Disposable Brands OXBAR, LYCO Challenge Vuse and JUUL: Pennsylvania’s Pending List Offers a Glimpse of the Future Legal Vape Market
Chinese Disposable Brands OXBAR, LYCO Challenge Vuse and JUUL: Pennsylvania’s Pending List Offers a Glimpse of the Future Legal Vape Market
Pennsylvania’s June 26 ENDS Pending Certifications list previews the state’s future legal vape market, placing Vuse, JUUL and Logic alongside Chinese-linked disposable brands OXBAR and LYCO. Shaped by PMTA eligibility and state rules, the list shows competition shifting from market share to market access.
Special Report
Jul.06
 RFK Jr. Spokesman Resigns Over FDA Authorization of Fruit-Flavored Vapes
RFK Jr. Spokesman Resigns Over FDA Authorization of Fruit-Flavored Vapes
Richard Danker, a senior public affairs official in Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s team, resigned from his role at HHS over the FDA’s recent authorization of fruit-flavored vaping products. In a resignation letter addressed to President Donald Trump, Danker argued that the products could expose minors to nicotine addiction, lung damage, and increased cancer risks, while also conflicting with recent HHS guidance on youth risks associated with flavored nicotine products.
News
May.15
AIR Shares Drop 18.6% in Nasdaq Debut, Testing Hookah’s Move Toward Public Markets
AIR Shares Drop 18.6% in Nasdaq Debut, Testing Hookah’s Move Toward Public Markets
AIR Global’s Nasdaq debut under ticker AIIR ended with a 18.6% first-day decline, giving the global hookah industry a rare public-market reference point. Beyond one company’s share move, the listing raises a broader question: can a culturally rooted, fragmented and venue-based category evolve into a more scalable and investable consumer sector?
Special Report
May.19
France Bans Zyn and Other Nicotine Pouches, Violators Face Jail and Fines
France Bans Zyn and Other Nicotine Pouches, Violators Face Jail and Fines
France has officially banned nicotine pouches and other oral nicotine products, including Zyn. The new regulation classifies such products as “toxic substances” and imposes criminal penalties on their use, possession, purchase, and sale. Violators may face up to five years in prison and fines of up to €400,000 (approximately $436,600).
Regulations
May.25
Haypp Report: Women Emerge as a Key Growth Driver in the UK Nicotine Pouch Market
Haypp Report: Women Emerge as a Key Growth Driver in the UK Nicotine Pouch Market
According to Haypp’s 2026 UK Nicotine Report, women are a key growth driver in the UK nicotine pouch market. Overall sales for Haypp and Northerner rose 60% year‑on‑year in 2025, but purchases by women surged 202%, versus 25% for men. Women’s share of consumers jumped from 22% to 40%. The report attributes this to discretion, perceived health benefits, and more gender‑neutral product positioning, suggesting future growth will come from a broader range of adult nicotine users.
Jul.01