US Court Rules FDA Must Review PTMA of E-Cigarette Companies

Aug.25.2022
US Court Rules FDA Must Review PTMA of E-Cigarette Companies
US court rules FDA must review e-cigarette companies' PTMA applications, citing inadequate consideration of marketing and youth access plans.

On Tuesday, the US Court of Appeals for the 11th Circuit ruled that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) should not have denied PMTA review to six e-cigarette companies because it did not consider their marketing and sales plans aimed at reducing youth exposure created in response to tobacco company regulations.


Source: Tanasin


The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit has approved the request for a review submitted by Bidi Vapor, Diamond Vapor, and four other companies questioning the FDA's rejection of their PTMA in a 2-1 vote. According to Chief Judge William Pryor, the agency failed to evaluate the companies' marketing and sales access restriction plan, aimed at minimizing the youth's exposure and access.


The court has deemed FDA's decision "arbitrary and capricious". Any decision made by the FDA must legally consider all relevant factors. In regards to the electronic cigarette manufacturers, the court has ruled that the FDA did not make such considerations.


The court stated in its opinion that "these tobacco companies have submitted information from surveys conducted with their customers about quitting smoking, literature reviews, scientific studies on switching to e-cigarettes, and detailed information about their marketing and youth access plans." "For example, Diamond's online sales use technology that relies on public records to verify the purchaser's age.


Advocates in the e-cigarette industry are welcoming the decision. Gregory Conley, Director of Legislative Affairs and External Affairs at the American Vaping Association, stated that although the court ruling did not order the FDA to grant PMTAs, the agency may still refuse these applications in the future, but these companies may still be in line for review by 2025 and can continue to operate in the meantime.


Conley wrote on Twitter, "Additionally, this opens the door for companies dissatisfied with the PMTA review to file lawsuits. The vague and undefined 'appropriate for the protection of public health' standard of the FDA has long been under attack. This is just the beginning.


Before the 11th Circuit Court ruled, information was disclosed that forced the FDA to acknowledge that evidence was not considered when issuing marketing denial orders (MDOs) to Juul and Turing Point Brands for their e-cigarette products. In the interest of public health, future FDA decisions must include all available evidence, not just evidence that leads to their preferred outcome.


The court recognized a distinction between disposable e-cigarettes and the e-liquids used in open systems. The court also found that the FDA's refusal to review the marketing plan was "wrong and not harmless" (in contrast to the opinions of the Fifth and D.C. Circuit Courts). All petitioners' appeals were approved, the refusal order was vacated, and sent back for reconsideration. Judge Robin Stacy Rosenbaum wrote in dissent that anyone familiar with all the relevant facts of the litigation may have already known how the case would ultimately end.


Statement


This article is compiled from third-party information and is intended for industry exchange and learning purposes only.


This article does not reflect the views of 2FIRSTS, and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity and accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry communication and research purposes.


Due to limitations in translation proficiency, the article may not express the original text accurately. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS fully aligns with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan, or foreign-related statements and positions.


The copyright of compiled information belongs to the original media and author. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Product | DOJO Launches BLAST10K Fresh in UK With 0+10ml E-Liquid Structure, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility
Product | DOJO Launches BLAST10K Fresh in UK With 0+10ml E-Liquid Structure, Retaining 2+8ml Pod Compatibility
DOJO launched the BLAST10K Fresh in the UK on September 4, 2026, introducing its INSTA-JUICED™ technology and a new 0+10ml structure that keeps e-liquid separated from the coil before activation. The device features a 1000mAh rechargeable battery, COREX BLAST dual-mesh technology and SSS leak-resistant technology, with a manufacturer-rated capacity of up to 10,000 puffs. It also retains compatibility with existing 2+8ml pods across the BLAST ecosystem. The launch introduces eight new flavors, including Matcha Strawberry, which DOJO describes as an industry first.
Market
Sep.04
Special Report|AIR H1 Revenue Rises 3.7% as Shisha Volumes Fall 9%, Testing Its Shift Beyond Traditional Hookah
Special Report|AIR H1 Revenue Rises 3.7% as Shisha Volumes Fall 9%, Testing Its Shift Beyond Traditional Hookah
AIR’s first half-year results as a listed company offer a new test of how far a traditional hookah business can transform. H1 2026 revenue rose 3.7%, even as Flavored Shisha Molasses shipments fell 9%, with pricing and mix supporting growth. Traditional shisha still generates almost all revenue, while OOKA, Crown Switch, Greentank and U.S. regulatory spending point to accelerating diversification. The next test is whether those investments can become a second business of meaningful scale and profitability.
Capital Markets
Aug.21
Product | R.J. Reynolds Launches Four Flavored Vuse Pro Pods for Vuse Alto Devices in U.S.
Product | R.J. Reynolds Launches Four Flavored Vuse Pro Pods for Vuse Alto Devices in U.S.
R.J. Reynolds Vapor Company has introduced Vuse Pro prefilled pods in Peach, Berry, Watermelon and Fresh Mint in selected U.S. states. Vuse’s U.S. website says the pods are intended for use with existing Vuse Alto devices. Each contains 2.0 mL of e-liquid at 5.0% nicotine by weight, uses nicotine salts and is offered in two- and four-pod packs. Reynolds said the rollout includes mandatory ID scanning for every purchase, purchase limits, stronger retailer-accountability requirements and strict age-restricted marketing standards. The four pods have not received marketing authorization from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration.
Sep.10
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
SMOORE’s DOJO by VAPORESSO to Launch New Global Brand Identity on September 1
According to recent LinkedIn posts from people at VAPORESSO, SMOORE and a German distribution partner, vape brand DOJO will begin rolling out a new global brand identity on September 1, 2026, led by a redesigned handwritten logo. The new visual system will be gradually applied across product packaging, marketing materials and digital assets over the following months. Fabio Corsaro, Head of Marketing and Purchasing at MG Wesel GmbH, said the rebrand was related to trademark issues, but that explanation has not been publicly confirmed by DOJO, VAPORESSO or SMOORE. DOJO is currently promoting its Blast X product in Germany.
Aug.31
UK Directors Banned After 352,688 Vapes Imported From China Were Misdeclared as Medical Nebulizers in £15 Million Tax Case
UK Directors Banned After 352,688 Vapes Imported From China Were Misdeclared as Medical Nebulizers in £15 Million Tax Case
The UK Insolvency Service said YSK Enterprises imported large quantities of vapes from China in 2023, with a shipment addressed to the company declared as medical nebulizers before Border Force found 352,688 vaping products. HMRC calculated nearly £15 million ($20.3 million) in unpaid VAT and customs duty, alongside about £437,000 in corporation tax. Two directors were disqualified for nine years. The case predates the UK's Vaping Products Duty, which will introduce vape-specific excise and duty-stamp requirements from October 2026.
Regulations
Sep.11
China’s Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute develops end-to-end heated tobacco analysis to trace aerosol compound origins
China’s Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute develops end-to-end heated tobacco analysis to trace aerosol compound origins
The Zhengzhou Tobacco Research Institute of China National Tobacco Corporation has filed a patent application for an end-to-end method to analyze the migration and transformation of chemical compounds in heated tobacco products. Using GC-Orbitrap/MS non-targeted analysis, the method compares tobacco substrate and aerosol samples to distinguish compounds transferred directly from the substrate from those newly formed during heating, while also calculating transfer rates. In an example involving nine heated tobacco products, the patent identified 17 newly formed thermal decomposition compounds and 38 transferred compounds.
Aug.13