US Graphic Warning Implementation Delayed to 2023

Aug.15.2022
US Graphic Warning Implementation Delayed to 2023
Implementation of US graphic health warnings delayed until October 6, 2023, due to legal challenges and Covid-19.

According to the Winston-Salem Journal, the implementation date for the U.S. graphic health warnings has been postponed by three months to October 6, 2023.


On August 10th, a judge from a Texas regional court approved the latest delay in the release date for the graphic health warnings. This is at least the ninth time a judge has ordered a delay.


The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final rule in March 2020 requiring new graphic warnings on cigarette packages. The rule mandates the use of labels featuring lesser-known smoking health risks, such as diabetes, and the warnings must cover the top 50% of both the front and back panels of packages and at least 20% of top advertising space.


In April and May of 2020, cigarette manufacturers and retailers sued the FDA, arguing that the graphic warning requirements were equivalent to government anti-smoking propaganda because the government has never forced legal product manufacturers to use their own ads to spread messages urging adults not to use their products.


In a recent challenge, tobacco companies argued that the deadline delay due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has become too burdensome. They also pointed out that if graphic health warnings are required to be rejected in court again, they face the risk of losing new packaging investments. In March 2021, a regional court in Texas approved the motion by the plaintiffs to postpone the effective date of the final rule until April 14, 2022. This resulted in an additional delay.


Statement:


This article is based on compiled information from a third party and is intended solely for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the compiler's abilities, this article's translation may not be an exact representation of the original. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues and stances.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

UK Disposable Vape Ban Fallout: Convenience Vape Units Down 20.8%, Retailers Hit by a “Triple Whammy,” Talysis Says
UK Disposable Vape Ban Fallout: Convenience Vape Units Down 20.8%, Retailers Hit by a “Triple Whammy,” Talysis Says
UK convenience insight agency Talysis says vape unit sales in convenience stores have fallen 20.8% and value sales 12.7% nearly eight months after the disposable vape ban took effect.
Jan.28 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Nepal: 80 cartons of e-cigarettes seized, valued at US$150,000
Nepal: 80 cartons of e-cigarettes seized, valued at US$150,000
In Nepal’s Mustang district, authorities seized 80 cartons of e-cigarettes valued at NPR 22,459,320 (approximately US$150,000) in Lomanthang Rural Municipality-4, Nechung, and detained a 32-year-old man, Pema Lama. The account says the e-cigarettes were allegedly brought illegally from China three to four days earlier and loaded near the Korala Nepal–China border point before being intercepted.
Jan.13 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Smoore, Distributors Move to Toss Cannabis Vape Price-Fixing Suit
Smoore, Distributors Move to Toss Cannabis Vape Price-Fixing Suit
Several vape manufacturers and distributors, including Shenzhen Smoore Technology Co. Ltd., Smoore International Holdings, 3Win Corp., Jupiter Research LLC, Canna Brand Solutions, and Greenlane Holdings Inc., have filed motions seeking dismissal of consumer claims in consolidated antitrust litigation in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.
Events
Feb.24
TPB Q4 FY2025 Revenue Rises 29% to $121 Million; Modern Oral Business Up 266% Year Over Year
TPB Q4 FY2025 Revenue Rises 29% to $121 Million; Modern Oral Business Up 266% Year Over Year
Turning Point Brands, a U.S. nicotine and tobacco-related consumer products company, reported its fiscal 2025 fourth-quarter results: quarterly revenue was $121 million, up 29% year over year; adjusted EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortization) was $30 million, up 14%. Net revenue from modern oral nicotine products was $41.3 million, up 266% year over year.
Mar.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Federal Register notice: FDA seeks comments on “Warning Plans for Certain Tobacco Products”
Federal Register notice: FDA seeks comments on “Warning Plans for Certain Tobacco Products”
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a notice stating it has submitted a proposed information collection to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review under the Paperwork Reduction Act.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
NJOY and Altria ask federal court to halt ITC proceeding, alleging multiple constitutional defects
A filing in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (Richmond Division) shows NJOY and Altria entities submitted a plaintiffs’ reply supporting their motion for summary judgment, arguing the challenged ITC proceeding is unconstitutional on multiple grounds, including ALJ appointment authority, removal protections, and Article III limits under the Jarkesy framework. The plaintiffs seek summary judgment and a permanent injunction barring continuation of the ITC proceeding.
Jan.08 by 2FIRSTS.ai