US Graphic Warning Implementation Delayed to 2023

Aug.15.2022
US Graphic Warning Implementation Delayed to 2023
Implementation of US graphic health warnings delayed until October 6, 2023, due to legal challenges and Covid-19.

According to the Winston-Salem Journal, the implementation date for the U.S. graphic health warnings has been postponed by three months to October 6, 2023.


On August 10th, a judge from a Texas regional court approved the latest delay in the release date for the graphic health warnings. This is at least the ninth time a judge has ordered a delay.


The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final rule in March 2020 requiring new graphic warnings on cigarette packages. The rule mandates the use of labels featuring lesser-known smoking health risks, such as diabetes, and the warnings must cover the top 50% of both the front and back panels of packages and at least 20% of top advertising space.


In April and May of 2020, cigarette manufacturers and retailers sued the FDA, arguing that the graphic warning requirements were equivalent to government anti-smoking propaganda because the government has never forced legal product manufacturers to use their own ads to spread messages urging adults not to use their products.


In a recent challenge, tobacco companies argued that the deadline delay due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has become too burdensome. They also pointed out that if graphic health warnings are required to be rejected in court again, they face the risk of losing new packaging investments. In March 2021, a regional court in Texas approved the motion by the plaintiffs to postpone the effective date of the final rule until April 14, 2022. This resulted in an additional delay.


Statement:


This article is based on compiled information from a third party and is intended solely for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the compiler's abilities, this article's translation may not be an exact representation of the original. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues and stances.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Product | Pixx Nicotine Toothpicks Listed on UK Retail Website, Said to Be Unaffected by Upcoming Vape Tax
Product | Pixx Nicotine Toothpicks Listed on UK Retail Website, Said to Be Unaffected by Upcoming Vape Tax
2Firsts has noted that a nicotine toothpick product named Pixx has appeared on a UK retailer website. The product page describes it as a smoke-free nicotine product, and the packaging image shows “UK MADE.” A nicotine-industry professional wrote on LinkedIn that the UK is set to introduce vape tax changes that may increase pressure on the retail side, and said Pixx is expected not to be included in the upcoming vape tax.
Mar.05 by 2FIRSTS.ai
USITC Issues Final Ruling in 337-TA-1392 Investigation, Imposes Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders
USITC Issues Final Ruling in 337-TA-1392 Investigation, Imposes Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders
USITC issues final ruling on oil vaporizing devices, components violating tariff law, with limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist orders.
Jan.21 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Canadians visiting Mexico warned of stricter penalties for bringing e-cigarettes or vaping devices
Canadians visiting Mexico warned of stricter penalties for bringing e-cigarettes or vaping devices
Canadians traveling to Mexico should avoid packing e-cigarettes or vaping devices, citing Canada’s travel advisory warning that tourists have been banned from bringing such items into Mexico since 2025. The advisory says customs officials could confiscate the items upon arrival and travelers could be fined or detained.
Feb.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Singapore to Extend Etomidate Controls and Table New Vape Legislation in 2026
Singapore to Extend Etomidate Controls and Table New Vape Legislation in 2026
Singapore will maintain etomidate’s classification under drug control laws while preparing new legislation targeting e-vaporisers, as authorities reinforce a hardline regulatory stance on vaping.
Feb.05
Kazakhstan: Over 131,000 vapes seized in Almaty and Pavlodar case; about $1.422 million cited
Kazakhstan: Over 131,000 vapes seized in Almaty and Pavlodar case; about $1.422 million cited
Kazakhstan’s financial monitoring authorities said a group is suspected of illicitly distributing vaping devices in Almaty and Pavlodar Region, using Telegram as a sales channel with courier delivery. During searches, investigators seized more than 131,000 vapes valued at 711 million tenge (about $1.422 million, using 1 tenge = $0.0020).
Mar.04 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Guam names retailers fined for selling tobacco to under-21 customers; penalties range from $2,000 to $4,000
Guam names retailers fined for selling tobacco to under-21 customers; penalties range from $2,000 to $4,000
Guam disclosed enforcement details for its 2025 tobacco retail compliance program, showing a 97.1% compliance rate among 277 inspected retailers. Nine violations were recorded, including eight underage sales cases and one signage violation, with fines ranging from $500 to $4,000.
Feb.10 by 2FIRSTS.ai