US Graphic Warning Implementation Delayed to 2023

Aug.15.2022
US Graphic Warning Implementation Delayed to 2023
Implementation of US graphic health warnings delayed until October 6, 2023, due to legal challenges and Covid-19.

According to the Winston-Salem Journal, the implementation date for the U.S. graphic health warnings has been postponed by three months to October 6, 2023.


On August 10th, a judge from a Texas regional court approved the latest delay in the release date for the graphic health warnings. This is at least the ninth time a judge has ordered a delay.


The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) issued a final rule in March 2020 requiring new graphic warnings on cigarette packages. The rule mandates the use of labels featuring lesser-known smoking health risks, such as diabetes, and the warnings must cover the top 50% of both the front and back panels of packages and at least 20% of top advertising space.


In April and May of 2020, cigarette manufacturers and retailers sued the FDA, arguing that the graphic warning requirements were equivalent to government anti-smoking propaganda because the government has never forced legal product manufacturers to use their own ads to spread messages urging adults not to use their products.


In a recent challenge, tobacco companies argued that the deadline delay due to the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic has become too burdensome. They also pointed out that if graphic health warnings are required to be rejected in court again, they face the risk of losing new packaging investments. In March 2021, a regional court in Texas approved the motion by the plaintiffs to postpone the effective date of the final rule until April 14, 2022. This resulted in an additional delay.


Statement:


This article is based on compiled information from a third party and is intended solely for industry exchange and learning purposes.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the authenticity or accuracy of the article's content. The translation of this article is only intended for industry exchange and research purposes.


Due to limitations in the compiler's abilities, this article's translation may not be an exact representation of the original. Please refer to the original text for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macau, Taiwan, and foreign issues and stances.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us for deletion.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
U.S. Fifth Circuit judges question FDA’s claim it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarettes
Law360 reports that a Fifth Circuit panel expressed skepticism about the FDA’s claim that it has no de facto ban on flavored refillable e-cigarette products, noting that only six applications had been approved out of hundreds of thousands and that near-100% denials look like a ban.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Reuters/AP: China Cancels E-cigarette Export Tax Rebate, Manufacturing Industry Faces Cost and Risk Pressures
Reuters/AP: China Cancels E-cigarette Export Tax Rebate, Manufacturing Industry Faces Cost and Risk Pressures
China officially cancels e-cigarette export tax rebate, putting manufacturing under cost and risk pressure.
Jan.16 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Police dismantle a network of 50+ stores selling unmarked nicotine products in the Moscow region
Police dismantle a network of 50+ stores selling unmarked nicotine products in the Moscow region
TASS reported that police dismantled a distribution network in the Moscow region selling nicotine-containing products, e-cigarettes and vapes without mandatory markings, with organizers earning more than 10 million rubles per month (more than about $130,000). Interior Ministry spokesperson Irina Volk said some items were labeled with counterfeit identification tools of the Chestny Znak system, while others had no codes.
Dec.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Product | Semi-Embedded Display + “Smart Memory System”: OXBAR Launches New Magnetic Vape MAGLINK
Product | Semi-Embedded Display + “Smart Memory System”: OXBAR Launches New Magnetic Vape MAGLINK
OXBAR has launched the MAGLINK vape on its official website, featuring a magnetic structure and a smart memory function. The website lists the device as offering 50,000 puffs, a 1500 mAh battery, and four adjustable power levels. The product has already appeared across multiple Canadian sales channels, where the stated puff count, e-liquid capacity, and other specifications differ notably from those shown on the official site.
Dec.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Mexican Senate Approves Nationwide Ban on E-Cigarettes and Vapes
Mexican Senate Approves Nationwide Ban on E-Cigarettes and Vapes
Mexico’s Senate passed a reform to the General Health Law banning the production, importation, sale, and advertising of e-cigarettes and vape products nationwide. The bill passed with 76 votes in favor, 37 against, and one abstention.
Dec.12 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Malaysia health minister says court conviction over vape promotion sets key precedent for Act 852 enforcement
Malaysia health minister says court conviction over vape promotion sets key precedent for Act 852 enforcement
Malaysia’s Health Minister Datuk Seri Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad said the Putrajaya Magistrate’s Court decision to convict a known personality for promoting vape has set an important legal precedent for enforcing the Control of Smoking Products for Public Health Act (Act 852).
Jan.09 by 2FIRSTS.ai