Vietnam: Ban from Ministry of Health vs. Piloting Management from Ministry of Industry and Commerce

Regulations by 2FIRSTS, edited by Sophia
May.05.2024
Vietnam: Ban from Ministry of Health vs. Piloting Management from Ministry of Industry and Commerce
Vietnam debates whether to ban or regulate e-cigarettes due to potential health risks and widespread use among youth.

According to Vietnamese media outlet Viettimes, on May 4th, the issue of whether to ban or regulate e-cigarettes was discussed in the National Assembly by the Social Affairs Committee and the National Assembly's Committee on Cultural Education to address concerns about the harm caused by e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products.

 

Deputy Minister of Health Dao Honglan stated that the Ministry of Health has already done a lot of work, providing advice to the national management through evidence and impact assessment in order to revise the Tobacco Harmful Effects Law and make plans. Minister of Industry and Trade Pan Sheng proposed piloting management of e-cigarettes.

 

Faced with the conflicting views of the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Industry and Commerce on e-cigarettes, representatives in Congress raised pointed questions.

 

The Vice Chairman of the Vietnamese National Assembly, Tran Thanh Man, expressed concerns about the increasing prevalence of e-cigarette use, especially among young people, teenagers, and students, which are gradually replacing traditional tobacco. He emphasized that the health risks of e-cigarettes are similar to traditional tobacco, particularly the harm they pose to the brain development of children and adolescents, leading to addiction, cognitive and emotional disorders, reduced learning abilities, and psychological obstacles. E-cigarettes also have a negative impact on the quality of human resources, affecting social order and economic and social development.

 

Vice Chairperson of the Cultural and Education Committee, Ms. Ruan Mei, calls for clarity on the boundaries between the economic benefits of e-cigarettes and the negative impacts on health costs.

 

Speaking at the conference, Dr. Nguyen Vinh Chi firmly stated, "I find it strange, why test addictive substances, especially such deadly substances. There is absolutely no need for any testing! Because e-cigarettes have already proliferated globally and in Vietnam, their harm is widely recognized... As a doctor, I question whether anyone can find any benefits of this e-cigarette!"

 

Dao Honglan emphasized that e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products pose great risks to human health, and therefore should be banned from the start rather than being allowed on the market before becoming unmanageable. Even with the various current methods of e-cigarette regulation, the question of whether they can be effectively managed is a concerning issue. Who will be responsible for people's lives? Especially when around 40,000 people die from smoking each year.

 

Deputy Director Chen Ruanquan, of the Legal and Administrative Reform Department of the Ministry of Public Security, shares the same view as the Ministry of Health, believing that e-cigarettes pose a harm to human health, particularly for young people. He maintains that this product not only harms human health but also the economy. In particular, individuals who have been convicted of drug offenses are increasingly using e-cigarettes to soak and mix drugs.

 

Teenage use of e-cigarettes is widespread. People are always seen using e-cigarettes while waiting at red lights on the streets. This trend is growing at a concerning rate, so the harms of e-cigarettes outweigh the expected economic and social benefits, according to Rear Admiral Chen Ruanquan.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Product | KIWI Launches Spark 2 and Spark 2 Pro in Germany, Two Hardware Tiers Share Backward-Compatible 2ml Pods
Product | KIWI Launches Spark 2 and Spark 2 Pro in Germany, Two Hardware Tiers Share Backward-Compatible 2ml Pods
KIWI has launched the Spark 2 and Spark 2 Pro refillable pod systems in Germany at official prices of €18 and €29, respectively. Spark 2 uses an 800mAh removable lithium-ion battery in a pen-style body, while Spark 2 Pro features a 1,400mAh removable battery, a box-shaped design and vibration feedback every 20 puffs. Both devices use the same 2ml Spark V2 pods in 0.8Ω and 1.2Ω versions, with AirSync airflow adjustment and a choice between Cotton Tips and conventional Drip Tips. The new pods also remain compatible with the original KIWI Spark.
News
Sep.29 by 2Firsts Perspectives
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
The UK’s Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme will take effect on October 1, 2026. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK will face a flat excise duty of £2.20 per 10ml, whether or not they contain nicotine. Newly manufactured or imported products released onto the UK market from October 1 will require a valid duty stamp, while eligible existing unstamped inventory can continue to be sold through March 31, 2027. From April 1, 2027, all vaping products outside duty suspension must carry a valid stamp.
Sep.03
U.S. Expands Illicit Vape Enforcement as ATF Brings PACT Act Powers Into Trade Fraud Task Force
U.S. Expands Illicit Vape Enforcement as ATF Brings PACT Act Powers Into Trade Fraud Task Force
The U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives said on September 23 that it has joined the interagency Trade Fraud Task Force to strengthen enforcement against illegal, misdeclared and smuggled vape and tobacco products. ATF will bring its authority under the Prevent All Cigarette Trafficking Act into the task force, including registration, reporting, shipping and record-inspection requirements covering interstate sales of electronic nicotine delivery systems. ATF said the move will strengthen its ability to trace illicit products from U.S. points of entry through domestic trafficking and distribution networks.
News
Sep.28 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Gallup Tracks Nicotine Pouch Use for the First Time: 11% of U.S. Adults Smoke, 9% Vape and 4% Use Nicotine Pouches
Gallup Tracks Nicotine Pouch Use for the First Time: 11% of U.S. Adults Smoke, 9% Vape and 4% Use Nicotine Pouches
Gallup’s 2026 Consumption Habits survey tracked nicotine pouch use for the first time. The survey found that 11% of U.S. adults reported smoking cigarettes in the past week, 9% reported vaping, and 4% reported using nicotine pouches. Cigarette smoking remained near Gallup’s long-term low, while adult vaping rates stayed relatively stable in recent years.
Market
Aug.25 by 2Firsts Perspectives
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
JUUL Purchasers Ask Ninth Circuit to Preserve Antitrust Classes in Case Over Altria’s $12.8 Billion Investment
Private antitrust litigation stemming from Altria's 2018 $12.8 billion investment for a 35% economic interest in JUUL is advancing before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. Direct purchasers, indirect purchasers and indirect resellers of JUUL products filed answering briefs this week seeking to preserve class certifications granted by a California federal court in February. Altria and JUUL argue that individual consumers and large distributors differ too much in purchasing terms to remain in a single direct-purchaser class, while a separate dispute concerns whether California antitrust law can apply to indirect purchasers across 27 jurisdictions. A September trial has been put on hold during the appeal.
Sep.23