Vietnam: Ban from Ministry of Health vs. Piloting Management from Ministry of Industry and Commerce

Regulations by 2FIRSTS, edited by Sophia
May.05.2024
Vietnam: Ban from Ministry of Health vs. Piloting Management from Ministry of Industry and Commerce
Vietnam debates whether to ban or regulate e-cigarettes due to potential health risks and widespread use among youth.

According to Vietnamese media outlet Viettimes, on May 4th, the issue of whether to ban or regulate e-cigarettes was discussed in the National Assembly by the Social Affairs Committee and the National Assembly's Committee on Cultural Education to address concerns about the harm caused by e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products.

 

Deputy Minister of Health Dao Honglan stated that the Ministry of Health has already done a lot of work, providing advice to the national management through evidence and impact assessment in order to revise the Tobacco Harmful Effects Law and make plans. Minister of Industry and Trade Pan Sheng proposed piloting management of e-cigarettes.

 

Faced with the conflicting views of the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Industry and Commerce on e-cigarettes, representatives in Congress raised pointed questions.

 

The Vice Chairman of the Vietnamese National Assembly, Tran Thanh Man, expressed concerns about the increasing prevalence of e-cigarette use, especially among young people, teenagers, and students, which are gradually replacing traditional tobacco. He emphasized that the health risks of e-cigarettes are similar to traditional tobacco, particularly the harm they pose to the brain development of children and adolescents, leading to addiction, cognitive and emotional disorders, reduced learning abilities, and psychological obstacles. E-cigarettes also have a negative impact on the quality of human resources, affecting social order and economic and social development.

 

Vice Chairperson of the Cultural and Education Committee, Ms. Ruan Mei, calls for clarity on the boundaries between the economic benefits of e-cigarettes and the negative impacts on health costs.

 

Speaking at the conference, Dr. Nguyen Vinh Chi firmly stated, "I find it strange, why test addictive substances, especially such deadly substances. There is absolutely no need for any testing! Because e-cigarettes have already proliferated globally and in Vietnam, their harm is widely recognized... As a doctor, I question whether anyone can find any benefits of this e-cigarette!"

 

Dao Honglan emphasized that e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products pose great risks to human health, and therefore should be banned from the start rather than being allowed on the market before becoming unmanageable. Even with the various current methods of e-cigarette regulation, the question of whether they can be effectively managed is a concerning issue. Who will be responsible for people's lives? Especially when around 40,000 people die from smoking each year.

 

Deputy Director Chen Ruanquan, of the Legal and Administrative Reform Department of the Ministry of Public Security, shares the same view as the Ministry of Health, believing that e-cigarettes pose a harm to human health, particularly for young people. He maintains that this product not only harms human health but also the economy. In particular, individuals who have been convicted of drug offenses are increasingly using e-cigarettes to soak and mix drugs.

 

Teenage use of e-cigarettes is widespread. People are always seen using e-cigarettes while waiting at red lights on the streets. This trend is growing at a concerning rate, so the harms of e-cigarettes outweigh the expected economic and social benefits, according to Rear Admiral Chen Ruanquan.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Product | PMI Japan Launches SENTIA Passion Fruit Capsule, Expanding the IQOS ILUMA Flavor Portfolio
Product | PMI Japan Launches SENTIA Passion Fruit Capsule, Expanding the IQOS ILUMA Flavor Portfolio
Philip Morris Japan (PM Japan) has introduced SENTIA Passion Fruit Capsule, a new tobacco stick designed for the IQOS ILUMA heated tobacco platform. Featuring a crush-activated capsule, the product combines menthol with passion fruit flavor to provide an additional flavor experience. The product launched in Japan from August 3, 2026, through IQOS official channels, convenience stores and tobacco retailers.
Aug.04
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
JTI Research Finds 31% of UK Respondents Offered Illicit Tobacco, While 63% of Ennis Packs Lack Duty Marks
Multiple JTI-backed studies in the UK and Ireland indicate that illicit tobacco remains visible across consumer interactions and local markets. In the UK, JTI research found that 31% of respondents said they had been offered illicit tobacco products. In Ireland’s Ennis area, a JTI-commissioned empty pack survey found that 63% of sampled cigarette packs did not carry Irish duty-paid markings. The findings come from industry research rather than official government estimates of illicit tobacco market size, but highlight continued concerns among regulators, legitimate retailers and tobacco companies over illicit trade.
Aug.19
Product | JTI Launches Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop in South Korea, Its First Dual-Color Edition
Product | JTI Launches Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop in South Korea, Its First Dual-Color Edition
JTI Korea launched the Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop limited edition in South Korea on September 1, 2026, marking the first dual-color design in the Ploom AURA range. The device combines a dark green body with teal accents and is accompanied by matching Front Panel, Back Cover and Pocket Bag accessories. The standalone device is priced at KRW 29,000, with three additional device-and-accessory bundles available. The release continues JTI Korea's use of limited colorways and interchangeable accessories to expand the Ploom AURA portfolio without introducing a new hardware platform.
Sep.03
FDA Authorizes JUUL2, Cites Adult Switching Amid Efforts to Speed PMTA Reviews
FDA Authorizes JUUL2, Cites Adult Switching Amid Efforts to Speed PMTA Reviews
The FDA authorized the JUUL2 device and tobacco- and menthol-flavored pods on Aug. 28, bringing the number of authorized e-cigarette products to 48. The agency highlighted complete switching among adult smokers, with six-week switching rates reaching 28.4%–49.3% for the menthol pod. The decision comes as FDA works to speed PMTA reviews, reduce application backlogs and expand authorized e-cigarette and nicotine-pouch products while maintaining enforcement priorities for unauthorized products.
Regulations
Aug.29
South Korea Vape Strategies Diverge as BAT Reconsiders Exit and PMI Takes VEEV to About 14,000 Stores
South Korea Vape Strategies Diverge as BAT Reconsiders Exit and PMI Takes VEEV to About 14,000 Stores
BAT Rothmans says it previously considered exiting South Korea's vaping market because of competitive pressure from unregulated products, but is now reassessing conditions following changes to the country's nicotine regulatory framework. Vuse and other BAT vaping products remain available through existing distribution channels. The statement followed a South Korean media report that interpreted BAT's broader withdrawal from selected Vapour markets as a full exit from South Korea. Meanwhile, Philip Morris International launched VEEV inPRIME in the country in June and began expanding distribution to around 14,000 convenience stores and other retail channels in July. The contrasting moves highlight differing investment strategies as South Korea's regulated vaping market evolves.
Aug.14
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
JUUL2 Sued Within a Week of FDA Authorization as AJ Marketing Alleges Infringement of Programmable Vape Patent
Less than a week after JUUL2 received U.S. FDA marketing authorization on August 28, 2026, JUUL Labs was sued for patent infringement in federal court in Delaware. AJ Marketing LLC filed the complaint on September 3, alleging that both JUUL 1 and JUUL2 infringe U.S. Patent No. 8,851,068 B2. The patent covers aspects of programmable electronic vaporization devices, including controls over dose delivery, usage frequency and operating parameters. The plaintiff is seeking reasonable royalties and ongoing royalties tied to the remaining life of the patent. JUUL has not yet publicly responded to the case.
Sep.10