Vietnam: Ban from Ministry of Health vs. Piloting Management from Ministry of Industry and Commerce

Regulations by 2FIRSTS, edited by Sophia
May.05.2024
Vietnam: Ban from Ministry of Health vs. Piloting Management from Ministry of Industry and Commerce
Vietnam debates whether to ban or regulate e-cigarettes due to potential health risks and widespread use among youth.

According to Vietnamese media outlet Viettimes, on May 4th, the issue of whether to ban or regulate e-cigarettes was discussed in the National Assembly by the Social Affairs Committee and the National Assembly's Committee on Cultural Education to address concerns about the harm caused by e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products.

 

Deputy Minister of Health Dao Honglan stated that the Ministry of Health has already done a lot of work, providing advice to the national management through evidence and impact assessment in order to revise the Tobacco Harmful Effects Law and make plans. Minister of Industry and Trade Pan Sheng proposed piloting management of e-cigarettes.

 

Faced with the conflicting views of the Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Industry and Commerce on e-cigarettes, representatives in Congress raised pointed questions.

 

The Vice Chairman of the Vietnamese National Assembly, Tran Thanh Man, expressed concerns about the increasing prevalence of e-cigarette use, especially among young people, teenagers, and students, which are gradually replacing traditional tobacco. He emphasized that the health risks of e-cigarettes are similar to traditional tobacco, particularly the harm they pose to the brain development of children and adolescents, leading to addiction, cognitive and emotional disorders, reduced learning abilities, and psychological obstacles. E-cigarettes also have a negative impact on the quality of human resources, affecting social order and economic and social development.

 

Vice Chairperson of the Cultural and Education Committee, Ms. Ruan Mei, calls for clarity on the boundaries between the economic benefits of e-cigarettes and the negative impacts on health costs.

 

Speaking at the conference, Dr. Nguyen Vinh Chi firmly stated, "I find it strange, why test addictive substances, especially such deadly substances. There is absolutely no need for any testing! Because e-cigarettes have already proliferated globally and in Vietnam, their harm is widely recognized... As a doctor, I question whether anyone can find any benefits of this e-cigarette!"

 

Dao Honglan emphasized that e-cigarettes and heated tobacco products pose great risks to human health, and therefore should be banned from the start rather than being allowed on the market before becoming unmanageable. Even with the various current methods of e-cigarette regulation, the question of whether they can be effectively managed is a concerning issue. Who will be responsible for people's lives? Especially when around 40,000 people die from smoking each year.

 

Deputy Director Chen Ruanquan, of the Legal and Administrative Reform Department of the Ministry of Public Security, shares the same view as the Ministry of Health, believing that e-cigarettes pose a harm to human health, particularly for young people. He maintains that this product not only harms human health but also the economy. In particular, individuals who have been convicted of drug offenses are increasingly using e-cigarettes to soak and mix drugs.

 

Teenage use of e-cigarettes is widespread. People are always seen using e-cigarettes while waiting at red lights on the streets. This trend is growing at a concerning rate, so the harms of e-cigarettes outweigh the expected economic and social benefits, according to Rear Admiral Chen Ruanquan.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Germany Probes 7.6 Million Illegal Vape Case With Estimated €33.3 Million Tax Loss; Four Chinese Manufacturer Employees Under Investigation, Some Packaging in Enforcement Images Resembles FUMOT Products
Germany Probes 7.6 Million Illegal Vape Case With Estimated €33.3 Million Tax Loss; Four Chinese Manufacturer Employees Under Investigation, Some Packaging in Enforcement Images Resembles FUMOT Products
German prosecutors and customs authorities are conducting a criminal investigation into an alleged cross-border organised vape network. Authorities say that between January 2024 and March 2025, four employees of an unnamed Chinese e-cigarette manufacturer allegedly built a network of sales agents and wholesalers that brought more than 7.6 million nicotine disposable vapes into Germany, causing an estimated €33.3 million in excise-tax losses. The manufacturer has not been named. Some products visible in enforcement images have packaging resembling products from FUMOT’s portfolio. European regulatory records from 2024, FUMOT’s public overseas-sales materials and records involving German vape importer and distribution company Zamu-Pro GmbH also show FUMOT/RandM products and German distribution activity during the period covered by the investigation.
Sep.21
Product | IVG Launches NEXiO Prefilled Pod System, Expanding Beyond Disposable Vapes
Product | IVG Launches NEXiO Prefilled Pod System, Expanding Beyond Disposable Vapes
UK vape brand IVG has launched the NEXiO reusable prefilled pod system, expanding its product portfolio beyond disposable vape products. The device features a 1,000mAh rechargeable battery, prefilled pods with a refill reservoir structure and a claimed capacity of up to 10,000 puffs. Officially launched in the UK on July 9, 2026, NEXiO debuted with 17 flavor options, reflecting IVG’s move into reusable pod formats.
Aug.19
Product | BAT Expands VELO Travellers’ Collection With Mexico, Spain and Sweden Summer Edition Nicotine Pouches
Product | BAT Expands VELO Travellers’ Collection With Mexico, Spain and Sweden Summer Edition Nicotine Pouches
British American Tobacco (BAT) Global Travel Retail has expanded the VELO Travellers’ Collection with three new Summer Editions: Mexico, Spain and Sweden. Inspired by destination themes, the new nicotine pouch variants are designed for global travel-retail channels. The launch further strengthens VELO’s positioning as a travel-retail exclusive product collection.
Aug.27
Malaysia Police Seize RM12.7 Million in Illegal Vapes and Cigarettes as Probe Points to Sea Shipments From China
Malaysia Police Seize RM12.7 Million in Illegal Vapes and Cigarettes as Probe Points to Sea Shipments From China
Police in Malaysia’s Selangor state seized illegal vape products and contraband cigarettes worth about RM12.7 million (approximately $3 million) in two enforcement operations. According to New Straits Times and The Star, the vape-related operation uncovered 131,036 boxes of vape products, 4,900 bottles of e-liquid and 25,510 vape devices, valued at about RM9.4 million. Police said preliminary investigations indicated that some illegal vape products entered Malaysia through sea shipments from China before moving through storage and distribution networks.
Aug.10
Switzerland Tightens Vape Checks as Only 3 of 32 Tested Products Meet New Tobacco Rules
Switzerland Tightens Vape Checks as Only 3 of 32 Tested Products Meet New Tobacco Rules
According to Swiss media outlet Blick, local authorities are strengthening compliance checks on vape products, nicotine pouches and other tobacco-related products following the implementation of Switzerland’s revised Tobacco Products Act. A Basel laboratory tested 32 disposable vapes and e-liquids, with only three meeting regulatory requirements and 21 products banned from sale. Swiss authorities are also expanding retail inspections, laboratory testing and youth purchase checks to enforce the new tobacco and nicotine product rules.
Aug.12
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26