2ONE Labs Wins Preliminary Injunction in Trademark Dispute

Jan.03.2025
2ONE Labs Wins Preliminary Injunction in Trademark Dispute
2ONE Labs and Performance Plus Marketing pay $1M bond for preliminary injunction in trademark dispute with ZONE.

According to Ein Presswire on January 2, the American nicotine pouch brand 2ONE Labs and distributor Performance Plus Marketing have paid a $1 million bond to the court in order to secure a preliminary injunction in their trademark dispute with the tobacco brand ZONE.


Vincent Schuman, CEO of 2ONE Labs, emphasized that...


The deposit reflects our commitment to protecting the intellectual property of 2ONE, ensuring the brand's unrestricted expansion in the market without any hindrance from trademark infringers.


Vincent pointed out that the guarantee was made in accordance with a court order and is a crucial step in protecting the company's brand. It is intended to cover any potential losses that may occur if the injunction is overturned. Such legal requirements are common in trademark disputes, and the guarantee amount is much lower than the $50 million initially proposed by Imperial.


2ONE Labs and Performance Plus Marketing remain optimistic during this litigation phase, anticipating a favorable outcome to protect 2ONE's extensive trademark rights in the nicotine pouch product field.


On December 23rd, the American nicotine pouch brand 2ONE Labs announced on its official website that the brand had obtained a favorable preliminary injunction (PI) ruling in a trademark dispute with distributor Performance Plus Marketing over the Empire Tobacco brand ZONE. According to a court order dated December 20, 2024, ZONE nicotine pouches are prohibited from being shipped to trade partners in the United States. (Related reading: 2ONE wins preliminary injunction, Empire Tobacco's ZONE nicotine pouch sales in the U.S. restricted)


We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
U.S. Company Seeks Cancellation of “Lost Mary” Vape Trademark
North Carolina hemp provider JLT Imports Inc. has filed suit in California federal court seeking cancellation of the “Lost Mary” vape trademark held by Chinese company Imiracle (HK) Ltd.
Mar.30 by 2FIRSTS.ai
HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” advances in House committee, proposing statewide licensing for vape shops
HB 5437 “Vape Safety Act” advances in House committee, proposing statewide licensing for vape shops
A committee substitute for House Bill 5437, the Vape Safety Act sponsored by Del. David McCormick (David McCormick), was recommended Monday afternoon by the House Health and Human Resources Committee to the full House, with the bill next heading to the House Judiciary Committee. HB 5437 would require specialty shops selling tobacco, tobacco-derived products, alternative nicotine, or vapor products and accessories to obtain a state license from the Alcohol Beverage Control Administration (ABCA)
Feb.26 by 2FIRSTS.ai
China’s tobacco regulator names Yao Laiying as top leader
China’s tobacco regulator names Yao Laiying as top leader
China’s tobacco regulator has undergone a top leadership change, according to an official announcement on March 20.
Mar.20
Oklahoma prisons to sell vapes and nicotine pouches to inmates in bid to curb contraband and violence
Oklahoma prisons to sell vapes and nicotine pouches to inmates in bid to curb contraband and violence
Oklahoma Department of Corrections (DOC) will launch a program allowing inmates to buy sealed disposable nicotine vapes and packs of nicotine pouches through prison commissaries. Tobacco has been banned in Oklahoma prisons for 10 years, and cigarettes and cigars will remain prohibited.
Feb.28
Special Report | Breeze and Glas Seek White House Review as FDA Advances Flavored ENDS Guidance
Special Report | Breeze and Glas Seek White House Review as FDA Advances Flavored ENDS Guidance
Breeze Smoke and Glas, Inc. have separately requested White House review under Executive Order 12866 as the FDA advances draft guidance on flavored ENDS (RIN 0910-ZC78). The guidance aims to clarify evidentiary standards under the statutory “appropriate for the protection of public health” (APPH) framework. The parallel filings highlight industry concern over regulatory predictability, particularly as Glas’s PMTA review status has recently drawn market attention.
Special Report
Mar.03
Fontem Sues FDA Over Refusal-to-File Decision for Nicotine Pouch PMTAs
Fontem Sues FDA Over Refusal-to-File Decision for Nicotine Pouch PMTAs
According to a complaint filed on March 17 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, Fontem US, LLC and Texas retailer OM Investment, LLC sued the Food and Drug Administration and the Department of Health and Human Services over FDA’s refusal-to-file decision for certain Zone nicotine pouch PMTAs.
Mar.19 by 2FIRSTS.ai