Advocates Seek Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored e-Cigarettes in Columbus

Oct.26.2022
Advocates Seek Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored e-Cigarettes in Columbus
Advocates call for ban on flavored tobacco products in Columbus stores to address marketing targeting vulnerable communities.

Health advocates are urging the Columbus City Council to ban the sale of menthol cigarettes and flavored electronic cigarettes in stores throughout the city.


Amanda Turner, the Executive Director of Tobacco 21, stated that the city council has not yet proposed any legislation, but the proposal is currently being drafted. Turner explained that this issue first arose approximately 18 months ago during a conversation with the Columbus Department of Public Health.


Dr. Phillip Gardner, a public health expert, has stated that 85 cities in the United States have already banned the sale of menthol cigarettes and flavored e-cigarettes, with an additional 300 cities recently banning the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. Gardner, who is co-chair of the African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, also noted that Canada has a nationwide ban on the sale of menthol cigarettes.


Gardner and Turner stated that prohibiting the sale of these products in the city will begin to reverse the effects of decades of marketing aimed specifically at black people, other people of color, women, LGBTQ individuals, and other marginalized groups. Gardner said that the industry profits by using "disproportionate marketing and predatory plunder" to exploit vulnerable communities and make a profit.


According to him, tobacco marketers have discovered that promoting menthol cigarettes to black celebrities and athletes, even lowering their costs in communities with African Americans. Currently, 85% of black smokers use menthol cigarettes, while the same figure for white smokers is 30%. "In the early 1950s, only 5% of African Americans smoked menthol cigarettes. By 1968, this percentage had almost tripled to 14%. By 1976, it had tripled again to 42%," Gardner said.


He stated that despite critics suggesting that such a ban would only create an illegal market or push shoppers to other jurisdictions, the data indicates that this has not been the case in these areas. Turner further explained that the data shows that removing more addictive tobacco from the equation would aid individuals in quitting smoking.


Many individuals may switch products, but research indicates that if you are using menthol cigarettes and wish to quit smoking and switch to regular cigarettes, your chances of successfully quitting are higher because menthol is a flavoring. It is a cooling agent that can suppress coughing, Turner explained.


Gardner stated that this is "outrageous" because adding menthol makes people more susceptible to nicotine addiction and more difficult to quit. "Menthol is defined as an anesthetic that actually covers up the harsh taste of tobacco smoke. It has a numbing and cooling effect and allows for deeper inhalation. The deeper you inhale, the more toxins and nicotine you ingest," Gardner said. "The more nicotine and toxins you ingest, the more addicted you become. Quitting becomes even harder. That's why they put it in there. It's outrageous from the start.


Gardiner stated that the FDA is currently exploring the idea of banning the use of menthol in cigarettes, but the process would take too long. "The FDA is considering getting rid of menthol, but unfortunately, due to the FDA's delay, it is important for communities like Columbus to take action themselves. The FDA will need several years to accomplish this," he said.


Turner and Gardner stated that the ban would not prohibit products within the city, but only the sale of them. Therefore, individuals would not face trouble for purchasing and bringing them in from elsewhere. "These laws are about getting retailers to stop selling them and not about individuals using personal property or pursuing a percentage," said Gardner.


Critics say the ban is unfair to smokers who enjoy menthol or use flavored e-cigarettes as an alternative to traditional cigarettes. Some argue that it discriminates against Black smokers. In response, Gardner stated that "racists are not public health doctors, they're in the tobacco industry." "Indeed, it has been the tobacco industry that has been discriminatory, that has been racist," Gardner continued. "It is not the tobacco control movement that is trying to save lives.


When asked why health officials are taking action to prevent flavored tobacco instead of flavored alcohol, Gardner explained that occasional alcohol consumption, not including binge drinking, does not kill people. However, "if you use cigarettes as expected, 50% of people will die from smoking.


Cigarettes are more deadly. In fact, tobacco-related diseases are the leading cause of death in the world, including in the United States, Ohio, and unfortunately Columbus. This is the reality. We are working hard to save lives," Gardner said.


Art Way, a drug policy consultant who works with the tobacco industry, argues that focusing on smoking cessation is a more effective way to reduce nicotine addiction. Targeted bans like these, Way contends, are similar to "patronizing, drug war-type policies that do not benefit our communities.


Statement:


This article is based on compiled third-party information and is only intended for intra-industry communication and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is solely for industry research and communication purposes.


Due to limitations in translation abilities, the translated article may not express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan or foreign-related expressions and perspectives.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us to delete it.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As Regulators Focus on Nicotine Pouch Child Safety, Safeguard Pursues an External Packaging Route
As regulators pay closer attention to child safety in nicotine pouches, manufacturers face a practical challenge: how to strengthen child-resistant packaging without unnecessarily reworking products, production lines and regulatory submissions already in place. In a written interview with 2Firsts, Chemular detailed Safeguard’s external packaging approach, its customer-specific testing requirements and possible PMTA pathways. The model remains early-stage, but it offers a new way to think about an increasingly important regulatory and manufacturing issue.
Industry Insight
Sep.19
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
U.S. Customs Plan to Require Foreign Export Declarations Could Deal ‘Devastating’ Blow to China’s Vape Exports, Logistics gl Expert Says
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection proposal to collect foreign export declarations and other overseas customs documents could expose discrepancies in the value, classification and description of China-made vape shipments entering the United States. A veteran Chinese logistics professional told 2Firsts that the measure, if implemented, could undermine the all-inclusive shipping model used by some unauthorized vape exporters and push parts of the trade toward costlier underground channels. The risk extends beyond higher duties: accurately declared products may also be more readily identified as unauthorized e-cigarettes subject to FDA enforcement.
Special Report
Sep.07
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
India Duty-Free Nicotine Pouch Sales Face Regulatory Test as ZYN, FOX Classification Remains Open
The Bombay High Court has ruled that airport duty-free shops are not exempt from India's domestic regulatory laws merely because they operate beyond the customs barrier, leaving in place a sales halt covering ZYN and FOX nicotine pouches at Mumbai's international airport. The court, however, did not determine that the products necessarily qualify as "drugs" under India's Drugs and Cosmetics Act. The retailers have four weeks to submit product information to the appropriate authorities, including CDSCO, which must complete its review within 30 days of receiving the submissions.
Sep.24
Product | JTI Launches Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop in South Korea, Its First Dual-Color Edition
Product | JTI Launches Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop in South Korea, Its First Dual-Color Edition
JTI Korea launched the Ploom AURA Teal Electric Pop limited edition in South Korea on September 1, 2026, marking the first dual-color design in the Ploom AURA range. The device combines a dark green body with teal accents and is accompanied by matching Front Panel, Back Cover and Pocket Bag accessories. The standalone device is priced at KRW 29,000, with three additional device-and-accessory bundles available. The release continues JTI Korea's use of limited colorways and interchangeable accessories to expand the Ploom AURA portfolio without introducing a new hardware platform.
Sep.03
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Pennsylvania Lists 163 Vape Products Eligible for Sale, Including Vuse and JUUL; Previously Pending Chinese Brands Such as OXBAR Remain Absent, While Unlisted Products Including Geek Bar Face Enforcement From October 19
Pennsylvania Lists 163 Vape Products Eligible for Sale, Including Vuse and JUUL; Previously Pending Chinese Brands Such as OXBAR Remain Absent, While Unlisted Products Including Geek Bar Face Enforcement From October 19
Pennsylvania begins enforcing its electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) directory restrictions on October 19, 2026. The October 18 directory contained 163 product records from seven manufacturers, including Vuse, JUUL, NJOY, Logic and Naked 100. Geek Bar, RAZ and Lost Mary were absent. BAT, Altria, Japan Tobacco and JUUL collectively accounted for 112 records, or 68.7%, while Imperial Brands' blu had no listings. The directory included 15 disposable vape records, 40 bottled e-liquids and 10 products labeled 0mg, but no open-system refillable devices. Twenty-two manufacturer certifications remained under review. Four Logic models corresponding to Smoore's pending records were listed under the brand owner, while LYCO, OXBAR and Boulder/Rock had no approved directory entries.
Regulations
Oct.19