Advocates Seek Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored e-Cigarettes in Columbus

Oct.26.2022
Advocates Seek Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored e-Cigarettes in Columbus
Advocates call for ban on flavored tobacco products in Columbus stores to address marketing targeting vulnerable communities.

Health advocates are urging the Columbus City Council to ban the sale of menthol cigarettes and flavored electronic cigarettes in stores throughout the city.


Amanda Turner, the Executive Director of Tobacco 21, stated that the city council has not yet proposed any legislation, but the proposal is currently being drafted. Turner explained that this issue first arose approximately 18 months ago during a conversation with the Columbus Department of Public Health.


Dr. Phillip Gardner, a public health expert, has stated that 85 cities in the United States have already banned the sale of menthol cigarettes and flavored e-cigarettes, with an additional 300 cities recently banning the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. Gardner, who is co-chair of the African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, also noted that Canada has a nationwide ban on the sale of menthol cigarettes.


Gardner and Turner stated that prohibiting the sale of these products in the city will begin to reverse the effects of decades of marketing aimed specifically at black people, other people of color, women, LGBTQ individuals, and other marginalized groups. Gardner said that the industry profits by using "disproportionate marketing and predatory plunder" to exploit vulnerable communities and make a profit.


According to him, tobacco marketers have discovered that promoting menthol cigarettes to black celebrities and athletes, even lowering their costs in communities with African Americans. Currently, 85% of black smokers use menthol cigarettes, while the same figure for white smokers is 30%. "In the early 1950s, only 5% of African Americans smoked menthol cigarettes. By 1968, this percentage had almost tripled to 14%. By 1976, it had tripled again to 42%," Gardner said.


He stated that despite critics suggesting that such a ban would only create an illegal market or push shoppers to other jurisdictions, the data indicates that this has not been the case in these areas. Turner further explained that the data shows that removing more addictive tobacco from the equation would aid individuals in quitting smoking.


Many individuals may switch products, but research indicates that if you are using menthol cigarettes and wish to quit smoking and switch to regular cigarettes, your chances of successfully quitting are higher because menthol is a flavoring. It is a cooling agent that can suppress coughing, Turner explained.


Gardner stated that this is "outrageous" because adding menthol makes people more susceptible to nicotine addiction and more difficult to quit. "Menthol is defined as an anesthetic that actually covers up the harsh taste of tobacco smoke. It has a numbing and cooling effect and allows for deeper inhalation. The deeper you inhale, the more toxins and nicotine you ingest," Gardner said. "The more nicotine and toxins you ingest, the more addicted you become. Quitting becomes even harder. That's why they put it in there. It's outrageous from the start.


Gardiner stated that the FDA is currently exploring the idea of banning the use of menthol in cigarettes, but the process would take too long. "The FDA is considering getting rid of menthol, but unfortunately, due to the FDA's delay, it is important for communities like Columbus to take action themselves. The FDA will need several years to accomplish this," he said.


Turner and Gardner stated that the ban would not prohibit products within the city, but only the sale of them. Therefore, individuals would not face trouble for purchasing and bringing them in from elsewhere. "These laws are about getting retailers to stop selling them and not about individuals using personal property or pursuing a percentage," said Gardner.


Critics say the ban is unfair to smokers who enjoy menthol or use flavored e-cigarettes as an alternative to traditional cigarettes. Some argue that it discriminates against Black smokers. In response, Gardner stated that "racists are not public health doctors, they're in the tobacco industry." "Indeed, it has been the tobacco industry that has been discriminatory, that has been racist," Gardner continued. "It is not the tobacco control movement that is trying to save lives.


When asked why health officials are taking action to prevent flavored tobacco instead of flavored alcohol, Gardner explained that occasional alcohol consumption, not including binge drinking, does not kill people. However, "if you use cigarettes as expected, 50% of people will die from smoking.


Cigarettes are more deadly. In fact, tobacco-related diseases are the leading cause of death in the world, including in the United States, Ohio, and unfortunately Columbus. This is the reality. We are working hard to save lives," Gardner said.


Art Way, a drug policy consultant who works with the tobacco industry, argues that focusing on smoking cessation is a more effective way to reduce nicotine addiction. Targeted bans like these, Way contends, are similar to "patronizing, drug war-type policies that do not benefit our communities.


Statement:


This article is based on compiled third-party information and is only intended for intra-industry communication and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is solely for industry research and communication purposes.


Due to limitations in translation abilities, the translated article may not express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan or foreign-related expressions and perspectives.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us to delete it.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Inside Nicotine-Pouch M&A Through Imperial's Yoik Deal: Latham, KPMG, PwC, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Form the Adviser Lineup
Inside Nicotine-Pouch M&A Through Imperial's Yoik Deal: Latham, KPMG, PwC, Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley Form the Adviser Lineup
Imperial Brands' acquisition of Swedish Helwit owner Yoik Group AB has highlighted the professional-services firms supporting cross-border oral nicotine M&A. Latham & Watkins and KPMG advised Imperial, while PwC and TM & Partners advised Yoik. KPMG also appeared on Imperial's acquisition of Black Buffalo earlier in 2026, while PwC played an extensive role in KT&G's acquisition of Swedish nicotine-pouch company Another Snus Factory. Imperial's public disclosures put the global modern oral nicotine delivery market at approximately £8.8 billion in retail sales and 23.5 billion pouches in 2024
Sep.20
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
South Korea Fully Reviews Nicotine-Analog and Nicotine-Free Vape Liquid Imports, With Over 99% From China and Chinese Supply-Chain Documents Under Scrutiny
Korea Customs Service has tightened import controls on nicotine-analog and nicotine-free e-cigarette liquids, placing the products under 100% document review and subjecting all e-cigarette liquid import declarations to pre-clearance ingredient analysis. As of September 20, 2026, South Korea had imported about 15 metric tons of nicotine-analog liquids, 99.99% from China, and about 316 metric tons of nicotine-free liquids, including roughly 315 metric tons, or 99.7%, from China. The measures follow South Korea's April expansion of its tobacco definition to include synthetic nicotine products and include new checks on Chinese manufacturing, transaction and export documentation.
Sep.24
California Lawmakers Pass Disposable Nicotine Vape Ban, With Sales Prohibition Set for 2028
California Lawmakers Pass Disposable Nicotine Vape Ban, With Sales Prohibition Set for 2028
According to CBS Los Angeles on August 27, 2026, California lawmakers have passed Assembly Bill 762, which would phase out disposable, battery-embedded nicotine vapes in the state. If signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, manufacturing and importation of the covered products would be prohibited beginning January 1, 2027, followed by a sales ban on January 1, 2028. Driven primarily by concerns over electronic waste, lithium-battery fires and environmental pollution, the legislation would further shift California’s legal vape market toward rechargeable, refillable or replaceable-pod devices.
Aug.28
Kantar Study Finds More Than 93% of Vape Products in Ukraine Fail Regulatory Requirements
Kantar Study Finds More Than 93% of Vape Products in Ukraine Fail Regulatory Requirements
According to Interfax-Ukraine, a study conducted by market research firm Kantar Ukraine at the request of major tobacco companies found that more than 93% of vape products in Ukraine did not fully comply with regulatory requirements. The research examined product categories, brand distribution and consumer purchasing channels, showing that pod systems and disposable vapes represent major segments of the market, while offline retail remains the dominant purchasing channel. The findings highlight ongoing compliance challenges in Ukraine’s vape market.
Aug.26
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei explores staged nicotine pouch delivery, using dynamic membranes to slow early release and gradient particles to sustain later delivery
China Tobacco Hubei Industrial Co., Ltd. disclosed several oral nicotine-related patent applications in August 2026, including two that approach staged nicotine release from different directions. One uses a high-viscosity membrane that forms inside the pouch after contact with saliva to slow rapid early release, while the other uses gradient particles with a faster-disintegrating outer layer and a slower core to create a fast-to-sustained release profile. Together, the filings explore how nicotine pouches could balance initial delivery with release later in use.
Sep.03
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28