Advocates Seek Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored e-Cigarettes in Columbus

Oct.26.2022
Advocates Seek Ban on Menthol Cigarettes and Flavored e-Cigarettes in Columbus
Advocates call for ban on flavored tobacco products in Columbus stores to address marketing targeting vulnerable communities.

Health advocates are urging the Columbus City Council to ban the sale of menthol cigarettes and flavored electronic cigarettes in stores throughout the city.


Amanda Turner, the Executive Director of Tobacco 21, stated that the city council has not yet proposed any legislation, but the proposal is currently being drafted. Turner explained that this issue first arose approximately 18 months ago during a conversation with the Columbus Department of Public Health.


Dr. Phillip Gardner, a public health expert, has stated that 85 cities in the United States have already banned the sale of menthol cigarettes and flavored e-cigarettes, with an additional 300 cities recently banning the sale of flavored e-cigarettes. Gardner, who is co-chair of the African American Tobacco Control Leadership Council, also noted that Canada has a nationwide ban on the sale of menthol cigarettes.


Gardner and Turner stated that prohibiting the sale of these products in the city will begin to reverse the effects of decades of marketing aimed specifically at black people, other people of color, women, LGBTQ individuals, and other marginalized groups. Gardner said that the industry profits by using "disproportionate marketing and predatory plunder" to exploit vulnerable communities and make a profit.


According to him, tobacco marketers have discovered that promoting menthol cigarettes to black celebrities and athletes, even lowering their costs in communities with African Americans. Currently, 85% of black smokers use menthol cigarettes, while the same figure for white smokers is 30%. "In the early 1950s, only 5% of African Americans smoked menthol cigarettes. By 1968, this percentage had almost tripled to 14%. By 1976, it had tripled again to 42%," Gardner said.


He stated that despite critics suggesting that such a ban would only create an illegal market or push shoppers to other jurisdictions, the data indicates that this has not been the case in these areas. Turner further explained that the data shows that removing more addictive tobacco from the equation would aid individuals in quitting smoking.


Many individuals may switch products, but research indicates that if you are using menthol cigarettes and wish to quit smoking and switch to regular cigarettes, your chances of successfully quitting are higher because menthol is a flavoring. It is a cooling agent that can suppress coughing, Turner explained.


Gardner stated that this is "outrageous" because adding menthol makes people more susceptible to nicotine addiction and more difficult to quit. "Menthol is defined as an anesthetic that actually covers up the harsh taste of tobacco smoke. It has a numbing and cooling effect and allows for deeper inhalation. The deeper you inhale, the more toxins and nicotine you ingest," Gardner said. "The more nicotine and toxins you ingest, the more addicted you become. Quitting becomes even harder. That's why they put it in there. It's outrageous from the start.


Gardiner stated that the FDA is currently exploring the idea of banning the use of menthol in cigarettes, but the process would take too long. "The FDA is considering getting rid of menthol, but unfortunately, due to the FDA's delay, it is important for communities like Columbus to take action themselves. The FDA will need several years to accomplish this," he said.


Turner and Gardner stated that the ban would not prohibit products within the city, but only the sale of them. Therefore, individuals would not face trouble for purchasing and bringing them in from elsewhere. "These laws are about getting retailers to stop selling them and not about individuals using personal property or pursuing a percentage," said Gardner.


Critics say the ban is unfair to smokers who enjoy menthol or use flavored e-cigarettes as an alternative to traditional cigarettes. Some argue that it discriminates against Black smokers. In response, Gardner stated that "racists are not public health doctors, they're in the tobacco industry." "Indeed, it has been the tobacco industry that has been discriminatory, that has been racist," Gardner continued. "It is not the tobacco control movement that is trying to save lives.


When asked why health officials are taking action to prevent flavored tobacco instead of flavored alcohol, Gardner explained that occasional alcohol consumption, not including binge drinking, does not kill people. However, "if you use cigarettes as expected, 50% of people will die from smoking.


Cigarettes are more deadly. In fact, tobacco-related diseases are the leading cause of death in the world, including in the United States, Ohio, and unfortunately Columbus. This is the reality. We are working hard to save lives," Gardner said.


Art Way, a drug policy consultant who works with the tobacco industry, argues that focusing on smoking cessation is a more effective way to reduce nicotine addiction. Targeted bans like these, Way contends, are similar to "patronizing, drug war-type policies that do not benefit our communities.


Statement:


This article is based on compiled third-party information and is only intended for intra-industry communication and learning.


This article does not represent the views of 2FIRSTS and 2FIRSTS cannot confirm the truthfulness or accuracy of the content. The translation of this article is solely for industry research and communication purposes.


Due to limitations in translation abilities, the translated article may not express the same meaning as the original. Please refer to the original article for accuracy.


2FIRSTS maintains complete alignment with the Chinese government on any domestic, Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan or foreign-related expressions and perspectives.


The copyright of the compiled information belongs to the original media and authors. If there is any infringement, please contact us to delete it.



Disclaimer

This article is provided solely for professional research, industry discussion, and informational purposes. Any references to brands, companies, products, technologies, or policies are made for factual reporting and analytical purposes only, and do not constitute endorsement, recommendation, promotion, or advertising by 2Firsts.

Nicotine-containing products, including but not limited to cigarettes, e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products, and nicotine pouches, carry significant health risks. Readers are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions, including age restrictions and access limitations.

The information contained in this article should not be regarded as investment, legal, medical, regulatory, or commercial advice. While 2Firsts strives to ensure the accuracy and reliability of its content, it does not assume liability for any direct or indirect loss arising from errors, omissions, inaccuracies, or reliance on the information contained herein.

This article is not intended for individuals below the legal age for accessing tobacco or nicotine-related information in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright Notice

This article is either original content produced by 2Firsts or content reproduced, translated, summarized, or adapted from third-party sources with attribution where applicable. The intellectual property rights of the original content remain with 2Firsts or the respective original rights holders.

No individual or organization may copy, reproduce, distribute, republish, modify, translate, or otherwise use this content without prior authorization. Any unauthorized use may result in legal action.

For copyright-related inquiries, corrections, or removal requests, please contact: info@2firsts.com.

 

AI-Assisted Translation and Editing Notice

Portions of this article may have been translated, edited, or reviewed with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools to improve efficiency and readability. Due to the limitations of AI-assisted translation and editing, discrepancies, omissions, or inaccuracies may exist when compared with the original source.

Where applicable, readers are advised to refer to the original source for the most complete and accurate information. If you identify any errors or believe that any content infringes upon your rights, please contact us at info@2firsts.com, and we will review and address the matter promptly.

Reuters Tracks Big Tobacco’s Shift Beyond Cigarettes as Nicotine Pouches Vie for the Next Growth Curve
Reuters Tracks Big Tobacco’s Shift Beyond Cigarettes as Nicotine Pouches Vie for the Next Growth Curve
As cigarette markets face long-term pressure, major tobacco companies are increasingly turning to nicotine pouches in search of growth beyond combustible tobacco. Reuters has examined whether nicotine pouches can become the next strategic growth platform for companies including Philip Morris International, British American Tobacco and Japan Tobacco. PMI strengthened its position through the acquisition of Swedish Match and its ZYN brand, while BAT and JTI continue expanding their own nicotine pouch portfolios. The category has gained attention because of its smoke-free, device-free format, but regulation, youth-use concerns and market scale will determine whether it can become a long-term growth engine.
Regulations
Aug.18 by 2Firsts Perspectives
2Firsts Interview | Cigarette Sales Fall as Smokeless Alternatives Gain in U.S. Convenience Stores, NACS Says
2Firsts Interview | Cigarette Sales Fall as Smokeless Alternatives Gain in U.S. Convenience Stores, NACS Says
Ahead of the 2026 NACS Show, 2Firsts interviewed Chris Rapanick, NACS managing director of research, on changes reshaping the U.S. convenience-store tobacco and nicotine market. NACS data show cigarette sales declining while smokeless alternatives, including nicotine pouches, continue to grow. The interview also examines higher OTP margins, shifting backbar space, weaker store traffic, regulatory uncertainty and NACS’ outlook for 2027, offering a retailer-side view of one of the world’s largest nicotine markets.
Interview
Oct.03
China Tobacco Yunnan files patent for cellulose-free nicotine pouch scaffold to replace microcrystalline cellulose
China Tobacco Yunnan files patent for cellulose-free nicotine pouch scaffold to replace microcrystalline cellulose
China Tobacco Yunnan Industrial Co., Ltd. has filed a patent application for a cellulose-free scaffold material for nicotine pouches, proposing a combination of bioceramic material, polydextrose and sugar alcohols to replace conventional microcrystalline cellulose and cellulose derivatives. The filing aims to address issues including powdery mouthfeel, residue and limited release control, while also reducing reliance on existing cellulose-based patent portfolios. In patent examples, one fast-release formulation reached a nicotine release rate of 50% at 10 minutes and more than 90% at 20 minutes.
Sep.02
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
UK HMRC Launches Vape Duty Stamps on October 1, Ushering in Supply-Chain Traceability as Chinese Exporters Face New Compliance Hurdles
HM Revenue & Customs put the UK's Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme into effect on October 1. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK are now subject to duty at £2.20 per 10ml, regardless of nicotine content. The stamp regime will introduce digital functionality designed to provide traceability throughout the supply chain, with approved manufacturers, importers and warehousekeepers required to report product movements and retailers and consumers eventually able to scan stamps to verify authenticity. China exported $177 million of vape-related products to the UK in August, up 51.4% year over year, increasing the significance of the new compliance regime for China's Shenzhen-centered vape supply chain.
Regulations
Oct.04
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
Yinghe-Controlled Vape Maker SKE Ordered to Post £569,039 Security as It Pursues Crystal Bar Design Infringement Case in UK
The UK High Court has ordered Chinese vape manufacturer Shenzhen SKE Technology to provide £569,039 ($776,000) in security for costs in its design infringement proceedings against Vapepen London and other defendants over its Crystal Bar vape product. The court did not accept the defendants’ main argument that recovering costs from a China-based company would face significant enforcement obstacles, but found that SKE had not sufficiently disclosed its own financial position. The order is procedural and does not determine the underlying infringement claims.
News
Aug.21
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
U.S. Ninth Circuit Upholds FDA Denial of MH Global’s Flavored Vape PMTA Applications
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit upheld the FDA’s denial of MH Global LLC’s applications to market flavored electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS). The court ruled that FDA’s comparative-efficacy framework, which requires applicants to show that flavored products provide greater cessation or switching benefits than tobacco-flavored alternatives, is consistent with the Tobacco Control Act’s “appropriate for the protection of the public health” standard. The court also found that FDA was not required to establish the framework through notice-and-comment rulemaking.
Aug.26