Altria pays $235 million to settle Juul lawsuits

May.11.2023
Altria pays $235 million to settle Juul lawsuits
Altria Group has agreed to pay $235 million to settle lawsuits related to its investment in Juul and youth vaping.

On May 10th, according to a report from Reuters, Altria Group announced it will pay $235 million to settle at least 6,000 lawsuits accusing the company of encouraging teenage e-cigarette use by investing in Juul, a leading e-cigarette manufacturer.


This deal settled nearly all lawsuits brought against Altria by local government agencies and individuals across the United States related to Juul. Altria anticipates recording a pre-tax charge of $235 million in the second quarter of 2023 and intends to exclude this charge from adjusted earnings per share.


Sarah London, one of the lead lawyers for the plaintiff, stated in a written statement regarding the settlement that it would provide "unprecedented and truly meaningful relief for youth, parents, and government organizations nationwide.


Murray Garnick, Altria's Executive Vice President and General Counsel, recently said that the claims against Altria are unfounded. However, he believes that settling the matter would be in the best interest of the company's shareholders.


However, we believe this resolution avoids the uncertainty and costs of lengthy legal proceedings, and is in the best interests of our shareholders.


The plaintiff in the lawsuit alleges that Juul employed inappropriate methods (such as promoting flavored e-cigarettes and utilizing internet and social media campaigns) to market their products to minors, and that Altria assisted Juul's marketing efforts by allowing them to use their sales team and display their products on shelves next to Altria's own products.


Altria has announced that it has relinquished its 35% stake in Juul. As of December 2022, its stake in Juul was worth $250 million, down from the $12.8 billion it invested in 2018.


Juul has reached settlements in the majority of its cases, paying over $1 billion to 48 states and territories, as well as $1.7 billion to individual and local government entities.


Beth Wilkinson, lawyer for Altria, stated in a recent lawsuit that the company did not benefit from its investment in JUUL.


This investment of 12.8 billion dollars did not result in any returns, and Altria did not benefit from it in any way.


References:


Altria has agreed to pay $235 million in order to settle all cases related to Juul, the vaping giant in which the cigarette maker has a 35% stake. This settlement will end all lawsuits that have been filed against Altria over Juul-related issues.


This document has been generated through artificial intelligence translation and is provided solely for the purposes of industry discourse and learning. Please note that the intellectual property rights of the content belong to the original media source or author. Owing to certain limitations in the translation process, there may be discrepancies between the translated text and the original content. We recommend referring to the original source for complete accuracy. In case of any inaccuracies, we invite you to reach out to us with corrections. If you believe any content has infringed upon your rights, please contact us immediately for its removal.

Japan Tobacco expands Ploom EVO stick lineup, rolling out four new variants in Japan in two phases
Japan Tobacco expands Ploom EVO stick lineup, rolling out four new variants in Japan in two phases
Japan Tobacco (JT) is adding four new EVO variants for its Ploom heated tobacco range—Green Mint, Cacao Mint Crystal, Tropical Lime Crystal and Sakura Regular—set to launch in two waves on Jan. 22 and Feb. 3. The initial release will be via the CLUB JT online store and Ploom retail stores.
Jan.23 by 2FIRSTS.ai
UK government letter agrees nicotine pouches are lower risk than smoking and a harm reduction tool
UK government letter agrees nicotine pouches are lower risk than smoking and a harm reduction tool
In correspondence with 20isPlenty campaigners, the government agreed nicotine pouches are likely to pose lower health risks than smoking and confirmed they are a harm reduction tool, while warning about their high nicotine content, fast absorption and potential to be flavoured.
Jan.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Fourth Circuit weighs federal preemption challenge to North Carolina’s vape sales restrictions
Vape manufacturers and sellers urged the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to find that the federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FDCA) preempts North Carolina’s new law restricting the sale of certain e-cigarette/ENDS products.
Feb.03 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Russian consumer group urges Kremlin administration to reject regional vape sales bans
Russian consumer group urges Kremlin administration to reject regional vape sales bans
A Russian consumer organization has urged the Presidential Administration to block proposals that would let regions ban ENDS and e-liquid sales, warning it would create fragmented regulation and turbocharge the illicit market. The group cites WHO statistics and overseas experiences to argue for a more targeted regulatory model.
Feb.06 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Croatian decree raises excise duties on tobacco products effective January 1, 2026
Croatian decree raises excise duties on tobacco products effective January 1, 2026
Croatian government decree provides that higher excise duties on tobacco manufactures and tobacco products take effect from January 1, 2026. Excise on e-liquid is set at €0.25 per millilitre, on heated tobacco products at €211.30 per kilogram, and on a new tobacco product at €126.90 per kilogram. The decree’s explanation says 2026 budget revenue from these excises is expected to increase by €129.1 million.
Jan.07 by 2FIRSTS.ai
Juul, NJOY and Altria Clash Over Use of UCSF Public Documents in U.S. Patent Litigation
Juul, NJOY and Altria Clash Over Use of UCSF Public Documents in U.S. Patent Litigation
Juul Labs has asked a U.S. federal court to prevent NJOY and Altria from using documents stored in a public UCSF database in an ongoing patent lawsuit, arguing they are protected by attorney–client privilege. The defendants say the files have long been public and may contain evidence relevant to Juul’s patent conduct.
Dec.29 by 2FIRSTS.ai