Australian Survey: Vape Shops in Poverty Areas 7 Times Higher than Affluent Areas, Highest Near Schools

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Feb.14.2024
Australian Survey: Vape Shops in Poverty Areas 7 Times Higher than Affluent Areas, Highest Near Schools
E-cigarette stores in Western Australia are disproportionately located in low-income areas, raising concerns about targeting vulnerable populations.

According to a report by Australian news outlet Pedestrian, researchers at the University of Western Australia have recently discovered that e-cigarette shops are disproportionately concentrated in disadvantaged areas of the state. In fact, nearly 90% of these shops are within walking distance of schools. When compared to wealthier areas within the state, impoverished areas have seven times more e-cigarette shops, with 88% of them being less than one kilometer away from schools.

 

Although the research is limited to Western Australia, researchers say that this is not surprising and similar situations may exist throughout the country, highlighting the need for further reforms in e-cigarette regulations.

 

We have learned from overseas studies that the tobacco industry often establishes stores in impoverished areas in order to target vulnerable populations. We have also found the same pattern here with e-cigarette retailers," said Dr. Matthew Taskan, a researcher.

 

The proximity of e-cigarette stores to schools has increased opportunities for young people to be exposed to e-cigarettes and marketing practices, ultimately normalizing their use. While our research was conducted in Western Australia, the density of e-cigarette retailers near schools and disadvantaged communities is expected to be a prevalent issue nationwide in Australia.

 

Researchers have described smoking as an "epidemic" and have stated that although disposable e-cigarettes are currently banned, the government still urgently needs to address some significant loopholes.

 

In recent years, e-cigarette retailers have seen rapid growth across the country," stated Professor Terry Sullivan. He welcomed the latest e-cigarette reforms while pointing out that they primarily target the supply chain and retailers, rather than the users themselves. "Smokers who have decided to quit and need the help of e-cigarettes can still obtain assistance through a prescription from healthcare professionals," he said. "We urge all state and federal legislators to prioritize the health of young people and support comprehensive e-cigarette reforms, as advocated by public health professionals, schools, and teachers.

 

The latest reform, which came into effect on January 1st, has successfully seized hundreds, and even thousands, of pre-ordered disposable e-cigarettes set to be launched. The government announced that they have confiscated millions of dollars' worth of e-cigarettes.

 

However, other experts argue that this may simply imply the influx of more illegal e-cigarettes into the country. They suggest that smoking will continue to be a harmful epidemic until the government adopts a health-based approach rather than a criminal one.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Official’s Claims on Chinese Vape Companies and 6-Methyl Nicotine Fuel US Regulatory Debate
Former ATF Deputy Director Edgar Domenech has warned that some Chinese vape companies may be using 6-methyl nicotine, a nicotine analogue, raising new questions over how US regulators should classify emerging nicotine compounds.
Jul.13
South Korea Rejects 16 Trillion Won Tax-Evasion Claim Over Chinese Synthetic Nicotine
South Korea Rejects 16 Trillion Won Tax-Evasion Claim Over Chinese Synthetic Nicotine
The South Korean government rejected allegations that Chinese synthetic-nicotine e-liquids were linked to about 16 trillion won in tobacco tax evasion, saying China does not ban synthetic nicotine exports and the estimate is difficult to verify, while acknowledging that pre-law synthetic-nicotine inventory is effectively difficult to tax.
Market
Jun.25
Illegal Vape Sellers Still Use TikTok and Other Platforms to Drive Sales Despite Australia’s Ad Ban
Illegal Vape Sellers Still Use TikTok and Other Platforms to Drive Sales Despite Australia’s Ad Ban
Illegal vape sellers are still promoting nicotine products on TikTok, Instagram and YouTube despite Australia’s 2024 advertising ban, while illicit tobacco sales are increasingly moving from physical stores to online marketplaces.
Jul.15
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Drug Regulator Target Illegal Vape Sales Disguised as Medical Devices, Define Six Violations
China’s Jiangsu Tobacco Monopoly Bureau and Jiangsu Provincial Medical Products Administration have issued a joint notice targeting illegal production and sales of vape products disguised as medical devices. The notice identifies six categories of violations, including obtaining medical licenses through false materials, misusing medical device credentials, expanding production beyond approved scopes, and using medical device-related online platforms to promote or sell vape products. The action is based on China’s tobacco and medical device regulations and aims to strengthen vape oversight and consumer protection.
Aug.04
FDA Sued Over Allowing Some Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches to Stay on Market
FDA Sued Over Allowing Some Unauthorized Vapes and Nicotine Pouches to Stay on Market
Public health groups, pediatricians and parents sued the U.S. Food and Drug Administration on July 14, 2026, challenging a May enforcement guidance that they say allows unauthorized e-cigarettes and nicotine pouches to remain on the market while applications are under review.
Jul.15
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
U.S. Appeals Court Says BAT Must Face Class Action Over Cigarette Labels
A U.S. appeals court ruled that British American Tobacco (BAT) must continue facing a consumer class action lawsuit over cigarette labels. The ruling allows the case to proceed but does not determine that BAT violated the law or is liable for damages. The case highlights ongoing legal risks facing major tobacco companies related to product labeling, consumer disclosures and product liability claims.
Jul.31