AVM Asks FDA to Delay Business-Killing Enforcement

Industry Insight
Jun.28.2022
AVM Asks FDA to Delay Business-Killing Enforcement
Small vaping manufacturers are challenging the FDA regulatory process for synthetic nicotine products, and they’re counting on vapers to help delay enforcement that could destroy many businesses.

Small vaping manufacturers are challenging the FDA regulatory process for synthetic nicotine products, and they’re counting on vapers to help delay enforcement that could destroy many businesses. A new FDA citizen petition submitted by a vape industry trade group could push the agency to give some manufacturers and sellers a chance at survival—at least in the near term.

 

The clock is ticking for synthetic nicotine products

 

Following passage in March of the omnibus spending bill that included language requiring that the FDA regulate synthetic nicotine, manufacturers were given 60 days to submit Premarket Tobacco Applications (PMTAs) for synthetic nicotine products. They were granted an additional 60 days after that to continue selling products with pending PMTAs, whether the FDA takes action on the applications or not.

 

As it stands now, all synthetic nicotine products that haven’t been granted FDA authorization or an extension—and none have or are likely to be—must be removed from the market by July 13 or be subject to immediate enforcement.

 

The PMTA process for tobacco-derived nicotine products, while also abbreviated, at least gave manufacturers 10 months to submit applications and a one-year grace period after the PMTA submission deadline for products to remain on the market without enforcement.

 

But the FDA timeline for assessing synthetic nicotine products—four months from announcement to removal from market—didn’t give manufacturers time to measure chemical constituents in e-liquid, let alone complete any of the complex studies now mandated for successful PMTA submissions.

 

Congress gave the FDA Center for Tobacco Products authority over synthetic nicotine with the express intention of shutting down manufacturers of disposable vapes like Puff Bar, which switched to using synthetic nicotine in early 2021 rather than seeking FDA authorization for its tobacco-derived nicotine products. 

Recent youth surveys have shown Puff Bar to be the most popular vape brand among high school vapers.

 

Small e-liquid manufacturers make products very few school-age vapers are interested in, and sell them almost exclusively in stores that exclude underage customers. Some of the companies making vape juice with synthetic nicotine have been doing so for years. Others launched synthetic e-liquids after the FDA issued millions of boilerplate denials for virtually all vape products in flavors other than tobacco or menthol.

 

More than 100 such businesses—including many members of the American Vapor Manufacturers Association (AVM)—have rushed to submit PMTAs for synthetic products, and many will face ruin if the FDA begins enforcement against synthetic products as scheduled in July.

 

Small vape companies ask FDA to delay enforcement

 

Vapers have an opportunity to help small manufacturers (and themselves!) by submitting comments in support of a citizen petition filed by AVM. The petition asks the FDA to use its enforcement discretion to allow synthetic products made by open-system manufacturers (bottled e-liquid) to remain on the market 

 

after the July 13 deadline, and to allow manufacturers to continue to add to and amend their PMTAs as more data on their products become available.

 

AVM’s request to the FDA only applies to bottled e-liquid manufacturers that have submitted PMTAs on time, whose applications meet the agency’s filing and acceptance requirements, that have taken steps to eliminate access to products by underage users. The group is not seeking enforcement discretion for disposable products like Puff Bar.

 

An FDA citizen petition isn’t a meaningless exercise like the petitions on Change.org. It’s a legitimate pathway, described in the Code of Federal Regulations, that allows individuals or companies to ask the FDA to “issue, amend, or revoke a regulation or order,” or “take or refrain from taking any other form of administrative action.”

 

In May 2017, vape manufacturer NJOY filed a citizen petition asking the FDA to delay the deadlines imposed by the Deeming Rule, including the original 2018 PMTA submission deadline. Two months later, then-FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb announced the agency would delay the PMTA deadline by four years. While the citizen petition probably wasn’t the only reason for Gottlieb’s decision, it may very well have helped.

 

Support AVM’s FDA citizen petition

 

Those supporting AVM’s effort can submit comments to the FDA docket electronically or by U.S. Mail, or take the easier route of commenting through CASAA’s call to action, which then automatically posts the comments to the FDA docket. The call to action includes prewritten comments from CASAA, which 

can be amended or added to, or deleted and replaced.

 

The important thing is to register your support of AVM’s request to the FDA.

 

As of June 26, almost 3,000 electronic petition comments had been logged by the FDA. That’s not a large number, but the citizen petition has faced a lot of competition for publicity in the vaping world during the 10 days since it was posted. AVM President Amanda Wheeler told Vaping360 it’s important that comments are posted before the FDA enforcement deadline July 13.

 

Source:Vaping360

U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
Italy and Greece Oppose Ireland’s Nicotine Product Bill, Raising EU Regulatory Concerns
Italy and Greece Oppose Ireland’s Nicotine Product Bill, Raising EU Regulatory Concerns
Italy and Greece have opposed Ireland’s proposed nicotine product regulations, arguing that the measures could affect EU market coordination and the free movement of products. Ireland plans to introduce stricter rules covering nicotine products including vapes and nicotine pouches, with measures involving packaging, marketing and sales controls. The dispute highlights differences among EU member states between stronger public health protections and maintaining regulatory consistency within the bloc’s single market.
Jul.29
Gallup Tracks Nicotine Pouch Use for the First Time: 11% of U.S. Adults Smoke, 9% Vape and 4% Use Nicotine Pouches
Gallup Tracks Nicotine Pouch Use for the First Time: 11% of U.S. Adults Smoke, 9% Vape and 4% Use Nicotine Pouches
Gallup’s 2026 Consumption Habits survey tracked nicotine pouch use for the first time. The survey found that 11% of U.S. adults reported smoking cigarettes in the past week, 9% reported vaping, and 4% reported using nicotine pouches. Cigarette smoking remained near Gallup’s long-term low, while adult vaping rates stayed relatively stable in recent years.
Market
Aug.25 by 2Firsts Perspectives
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia Withdraws Appeal Against Liquid Nicotine Ruling as Vape Regulation Framework Enters New Phase
Malaysia’s government has withdrawn its appeal against a High Court ruling concerning the regulatory status of liquid nicotine used in vape and e-cigarette products, according to reports by New Straits Times, Free Malaysia Today and CodeBlue on August 18, 2026. The Kuala Lumpur High Court ruled on May 15 that the government’s decision to remove liquid nicotine from the scheduled poisons list under the Poisons Act 1952 was irrational and made without proper consultation with the Poisons Board. The withdrawal ends the government’s appeal process, while the future regulatory framework for nicotine vape products remains under discussion.
Aug.21
UK Sets Oct. 29 Start for New Vape Retail Rules Covering Age Checks, Giveaways and Discounts
UK Sets Oct. 29 Start for New Vape Retail Rules Covering Age Checks, Giveaways and Discounts
The UK Department of Health and Social Care published new guidance on Aug. 11 outlining the next phase of retail rules under the Tobacco and Vapes Act 2026, which will take effect on Oct. 29, 2026. The measures extend the minimum age of sale of 18 to all vaping and consumer nicotine products and restrict proxy purchasing, promotional giveaways and substantial discounts. Relevant offences in England, Wales and Scotland may carry a £200 fixed penalty notice, while persistent offenders can face temporary sales bans.
Aug.12
UK Vape Duty Starts in October as Hayati, DOJO and Others Launch Lower-Capacity Products With Lower Per-Unit Tax
UK Vape Duty Starts in October as Hayati, DOJO and Others Launch Lower-Capacity Products With Lower Per-Unit Tax
The UK's Vaping Products Duty will take effect on October 1, 2026, at a flat rate of £2.20 per 10ml of vaping liquid. Ahead of implementation, DOJO, PIXL and Hayati have introduced or been reported to be adding lower-capacity tiers alongside larger products. DOJO has added a 6ml BLAST7K Fresh below its 10ml BLAST10K Fresh, PIXL offers both a 12ml 8000 and a 6ml 5K, while retailer Ninja Vapes says Hayati is preparing a 7ml 4K alongside its existing 12ml 6K. The pattern points to a growing lower-capacity tier in the UK market, although the brands have not all explicitly linked the changes to the new duty.
Sep.23