AVM Asks FDA to Delay Business-Killing Enforcement

Industry Insight
Jun.28.2022
AVM Asks FDA to Delay Business-Killing Enforcement
Small vaping manufacturers are challenging the FDA regulatory process for synthetic nicotine products, and they’re counting on vapers to help delay enforcement that could destroy many businesses.

Small vaping manufacturers are challenging the FDA regulatory process for synthetic nicotine products, and they’re counting on vapers to help delay enforcement that could destroy many businesses. A new FDA citizen petition submitted by a vape industry trade group could push the agency to give some manufacturers and sellers a chance at survival—at least in the near term.

 

The clock is ticking for synthetic nicotine products

 

Following passage in March of the omnibus spending bill that included language requiring that the FDA regulate synthetic nicotine, manufacturers were given 60 days to submit Premarket Tobacco Applications (PMTAs) for synthetic nicotine products. They were granted an additional 60 days after that to continue selling products with pending PMTAs, whether the FDA takes action on the applications or not.

 

As it stands now, all synthetic nicotine products that haven’t been granted FDA authorization or an extension—and none have or are likely to be—must be removed from the market by July 13 or be subject to immediate enforcement.

 

The PMTA process for tobacco-derived nicotine products, while also abbreviated, at least gave manufacturers 10 months to submit applications and a one-year grace period after the PMTA submission deadline for products to remain on the market without enforcement.

 

But the FDA timeline for assessing synthetic nicotine products—four months from announcement to removal from market—didn’t give manufacturers time to measure chemical constituents in e-liquid, let alone complete any of the complex studies now mandated for successful PMTA submissions.

 

Congress gave the FDA Center for Tobacco Products authority over synthetic nicotine with the express intention of shutting down manufacturers of disposable vapes like Puff Bar, which switched to using synthetic nicotine in early 2021 rather than seeking FDA authorization for its tobacco-derived nicotine products. 

Recent youth surveys have shown Puff Bar to be the most popular vape brand among high school vapers.

 

Small e-liquid manufacturers make products very few school-age vapers are interested in, and sell them almost exclusively in stores that exclude underage customers. Some of the companies making vape juice with synthetic nicotine have been doing so for years. Others launched synthetic e-liquids after the FDA issued millions of boilerplate denials for virtually all vape products in flavors other than tobacco or menthol.

 

More than 100 such businesses—including many members of the American Vapor Manufacturers Association (AVM)—have rushed to submit PMTAs for synthetic products, and many will face ruin if the FDA begins enforcement against synthetic products as scheduled in July.

 

Small vape companies ask FDA to delay enforcement

 

Vapers have an opportunity to help small manufacturers (and themselves!) by submitting comments in support of a citizen petition filed by AVM. The petition asks the FDA to use its enforcement discretion to allow synthetic products made by open-system manufacturers (bottled e-liquid) to remain on the market 

 

after the July 13 deadline, and to allow manufacturers to continue to add to and amend their PMTAs as more data on their products become available.

 

AVM’s request to the FDA only applies to bottled e-liquid manufacturers that have submitted PMTAs on time, whose applications meet the agency’s filing and acceptance requirements, that have taken steps to eliminate access to products by underage users. The group is not seeking enforcement discretion for disposable products like Puff Bar.

 

An FDA citizen petition isn’t a meaningless exercise like the petitions on Change.org. It’s a legitimate pathway, described in the Code of Federal Regulations, that allows individuals or companies to ask the FDA to “issue, amend, or revoke a regulation or order,” or “take or refrain from taking any other form of administrative action.”

 

In May 2017, vape manufacturer NJOY filed a citizen petition asking the FDA to delay the deadlines imposed by the Deeming Rule, including the original 2018 PMTA submission deadline. Two months later, then-FDA Commissioner Scott Gottlieb announced the agency would delay the PMTA deadline by four years. While the citizen petition probably wasn’t the only reason for Gottlieb’s decision, it may very well have helped.

 

Support AVM’s FDA citizen petition

 

Those supporting AVM’s effort can submit comments to the FDA docket electronically or by U.S. Mail, or take the easier route of commenting through CASAA’s call to action, which then automatically posts the comments to the FDA docket. The call to action includes prewritten comments from CASAA, which 

can be amended or added to, or deleted and replaced.

 

The important thing is to register your support of AVM’s request to the FDA.

 

As of June 26, almost 3,000 electronic petition comments had been logged by the FDA. That’s not a large number, but the citizen petition has faced a lot of competition for publicity in the vaping world during the 10 days since it was posted. AVM President Amanda Wheeler told Vaping360 it’s important that comments are posted before the FDA enforcement deadline July 13.

 

Source:Vaping360

UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
UK HMRC Issues One-Month Countdown Warning, Urges Vape Businesses to Prepare for New Tax Rules
The UK’s Vaping Products Duty and Vaping Duty Stamps Scheme will take effect on October 1, 2026. All vaping liquids manufactured in or imported into the UK will face a flat excise duty of £2.20 per 10ml, whether or not they contain nicotine. Newly manufactured or imported products released onto the UK market from October 1 will require a valid duty stamp, while eligible existing unstamped inventory can continue to be sold through March 31, 2027. From April 1, 2027, all vaping products outside duty suspension must carry a valid stamp.
Sep.03
PMI Expands IQOS and VEEV Presence at Frankfurt Airport Through Travel Retail Pop-Ups
PMI Expands IQOS and VEEV Presence at Frankfurt Airport Through Travel Retail Pop-Ups
According to The Moodie Davitt Report, PMI Global Travel Retail and Frankfurt Airport Retail have launched new IQOS and VEEV retail spaces at Frankfurt Airport. The installations, located inside and outside duty-free areas, showcase IQOS heated tobacco products and VEEV e-vapor products through product education, consumer interaction and brand experiences. Frankfurt Airport Retail, operated by Fraport Group and Gebr. Heinemann, manages key retail activities at Frankfurt Airport. The initiative follows PMI’s broader strategy of expanding smoke-free products through global travel retail channels. PMI has previously introduced VEEV products across multiple European airports while continuing to expand IQOS and VEEV availability in international markets.
Jul.17
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
U.S. Fifth Circuit Vacates NicQuid Vape MDO, Says FDA Comparative-Efficacy Standard Violated APA Procedures
According to VitalLaw on August 27, 2026, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated an FDA marketing denial order (MDO) against NicQuid LLC, ruling that the agency’s comparative-efficacy standard for electronic nicotine delivery system (ENDS) applications had become a substantive rule requiring notice-and-comment rulemaking under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). The court did not reject FDA’s authority to compare the public health benefits and risks of flavored vapes, but held that the agency could not establish a broadly binding standard through informal adjudications. The case was remanded to FDA for further proceedings.
Aug.28
WIRED Investigation: Chinese-Made Vapes Turn to 6-Methyl-Nicotine and Other Analogs, Challenging U.S. Regulation
WIRED Investigation: Chinese-Made Vapes Turn to 6-Methyl-Nicotine and Other Analogs, Challenging U.S. Regulation
U.S. technology and investigative publication WIRED has examined how nicotine analogs are emerging as a new challenge for the country’s vape regulatory framework. The article argues that after the U.S. expanded federal oversight of nicotine products in 2022, some manufacturers began using nicotine-like compounds such as 6-methyl-nicotine that may fall outside existing definitions. Researchers cited by WIRED said some nicotine analogs could be more potent than traditional nicotine, although human health impacts remain unclear. U.S. policymakers are considering broader definitions of nicotine to bring these compounds under federal oversight.
Jul.27
UK PM Andy Burnham Reshapes Vape Retail Rules as Licensing Could Raise Barriers for New Shops
UK PM Andy Burnham Reshapes Vape Retail Rules as Licensing Could Raise Barriers for New Shops
UK Prime Minister Andy Burnham is pushing a high street reform agenda that could give local authorities greater powers over commercial activity, including vape retail. The reforms could involve expanded planning powers and a potential vape retail licensing system, allowing councils to play a larger role in store locations and market access. The measures are part of the UK’s broader shift toward tighter vape regulation, although no nationwide vape retail restrictions have yet been implemented.
Aug.11
U.S. House Defense Bill Includes Pilot Review of Vapes, Nicotine Pouches and Heated Tobacco for Military Smokers
U.S. House Defense Bill Includes Pilot Review of Vapes, Nicotine Pouches and Heated Tobacco for Military Smokers
On July 23, 2026, the U.S. House of Representatives passed its version of the Fiscal Year 2027 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which includes Section 707 provisions requiring the Department of Defense to evaluate tobacco use and nicotine alternatives among military personnel. The pilot program would examine products including vapes, nicotine pouches and heated tobacco products, primarily among active-duty service members who continue using combustible tobacco. The provision is a policy evaluation effort, not an authorization for military vaping promotion or a ban on vape products.
Jul.28