California Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Retailers

Regulations by 2FIRSTS.ai
Dec.15.2023
California Attorney General Files Lawsuit Against E-cigarette Retailers
California Attorney General Rob Bonta has filed a lawsuit against e-cigarette retailers Ejuicesteals and E-juice Vapor for age verification violations.

On December 14, according to a report by U.S. news website einnews, Rob Bonta, the Attorney General of California, filed a lawsuit against two e-cigarette online retailers - Ejuicesteals and E-juice Vapor.

 

Legal proceedings are currently underway in federal courts in the eastern and central regions of California, as Banta accuses these two companies of failing to properly verify the age of California consumers. This alleged failure is seen as a violation of state and federal laws designed to protect the general public, particularly vulnerable groups such as teenagers, from the harm caused by harmful and addictive tobacco products.

 

In the lawsuit, Attorney General Banta argues that the actions of these two companies are in violation of the PACT Act, California Cigarette and Tobacco Products Tax Law, STAKE Act, and Unfair Competition Law. He is seeking legal accountability through civil fines, compensation, and injunctions against the behavior of these companies.

 

Banta expressed, "As the legal representative of the people, I cannot stand idly by as e-cigarette online retailers continue to lead our young people into using harmful e-cigarettes and tobacco products. We will take all legal actions against anyone who engages in illegal practices to profit from ensnaring our children in harmful addictive behaviors. Companies such as Ejuicesteals, E-juice Vapor, and others manufacturing this public health hazard will be held accountable.

 

In today's lawsuit, Bonta claims that Ejuicesteals and E-juice Vapor have violated federal and state regulations, including failing to verify the age of consumers and engaging in remote sales transactions that violate California's tobacco product delivery sales regulations.

 

Previously, a multi-state settlement agreement worth $460 million was reached between attorney generals and e-cigarette manufacturer JUUL. California is set to receive the highest portion of this settlement, amounting to $175.8 million, making it the largest settlement amount between JUUL and any state.

 

The settlement funds will assist California in financing research, education, and enforcement efforts related to e-cigarettes. Additionally, JUUL will be prohibited from targeting adolescents in its advertisements and promotions, as stated in the agreement terms.

 

We welcome news tips, article submissions, interview requests, or comments on this piece.

Please contact us at info@2firsts.com, or reach out to Alan Zhao, CEO of 2Firsts, on LinkedIn


Notice

1.  This article is intended solely for professional research purposes related to industry, technology, and policy. Any references to brands or products are made purely for objective description and do not constitute any form of endorsement, recommendation, or promotion by 2Firsts.

2.  The use of nicotine-containing products — including, but not limited to, cigarettes, e-cigarettes, nicotine pouchand heated tobacco products — carries significant health risks. Users are responsible for complying with all applicable laws and regulations in their respective jurisdictions.

3.  This article is not intended to serve as the basis for any investment decisions or financial advice. 2Firsts assumes no direct or indirect liability for any inaccuracies or errors in the content.

4.  Access to this article is strictly prohibited for individuals below the legal age in their jurisdiction.

 

Copyright

 

This article is either an original work created by 2Firsts or a reproduction from third-party sources with proper attribution. All copyrights and usage rights belong to 2Firsts or the original content provider. Unauthorized reproduction, distribution, or any other form of unauthorized use by any individual or organization is strictly prohibited. Violators will be held legally accountable.

For copyright-related inquiries, please contact: info@2firsts.com

 

AI Assistance Disclaimer

 

This article may have been enhanced using AI tools to improve translation and editorial efficiency. However, due to technical limitations, inaccuracies may occur. Readers are encouraged to refer to the cited sources for the most accurate information.

We welcome any corrections or feedback. Please contact us at: info@2firsts.com

FIFA Bans Vaping in 2026 World Cup Stadiums, Putting Nicotine Rules in Event Compliance Focus
FIFA Bans Vaping in 2026 World Cup Stadiums, Putting Nicotine Rules in Event Compliance Focus
FIFA’s 2026 World Cup stadium rules prohibit smoking, vaping and the use of any tobacco products or electronic smoking devices inside stadiums, including inner and outer perimeters, while electronic smoking devices, tobacco products, lighters and matches are listed as prohibited items, bringing nicotine-product management, venue compliance and cross-border legal differences into focus at a major global sporting event.
Jul.06
Global Tobacco Control Faces Regional Adaptation Test as Nicotine Markets Evolve, Asian Specialist Says
Global Tobacco Control Faces Regional Adaptation Test as Nicotine Markets Evolve, Asian Specialist Says
As e-cigarettes, heated tobacco products and nicotine pouches expand across global markets, a central question is gaining urgency: can tobacco control rely on a universal policy model? In an interview with 2Firsts, Asian public health and addiction medicine specialist Dr. Rashidi Mohamed bin Pakri Mohamed says Western experience remains relevant, but policies must be adapted to local culture, healthcare systems, enforcement capacity, illicit markets and clinical evidence.
Jul.08
UK HMRC Plans 30,000 Retail Enforcement Actions as Illegal Tobacco and Vape Sellers Face Tougher Crackdown
UK HMRC Plans 30,000 Retail Enforcement Actions as Illegal Tobacco and Vape Sellers Face Tougher Crackdown
The UK government has announced that HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) will carry out more than 30,000 interventions targeting businesses and retail premises during the 2026-2027 financial year. The actions will focus on tax fraud, illegal goods sales and businesses involved in unlawful activities through retail channels. The government said illegal tobacco and illegal vape sales remain areas of concern. The move shows that UK enforcement against illegal nicotine products is expanding from import and supply channels toward retail-level oversight, alongside the upcoming introduction of the Vaping Products Duty.
Jul.24
UK Disposable Vape Ban Marks One Year as Adult Use Falls to 8% and Youth Use to 13%
UK Disposable Vape Ban Marks One Year as Adult Use Falls to 8% and Youth Use to 13%
One year after the UK ban on single-use disposable vapes took effect, YouGov data commissioned by Action on Smoking and Health shows that 13% of 11-17-year-old vapers and 8% of adult vapers now mainly use disposable products.
Jun.18
Italy and Greece Oppose Ireland’s Nicotine Product Bill, Raising EU Regulatory Concerns
Italy and Greece Oppose Ireland’s Nicotine Product Bill, Raising EU Regulatory Concerns
Italy and Greece have opposed Ireland’s proposed nicotine product regulations, arguing that the measures could affect EU market coordination and the free movement of products. Ireland plans to introduce stricter rules covering nicotine products including vapes and nicotine pouches, with measures involving packaging, marketing and sales controls. The dispute highlights differences among EU member states between stronger public health protections and maintaining regulatory consistency within the bloc’s single market.
Jul.29
FTC Scrutinizes Fifty Bar’s “Made in America” Claims as Vape Marketing Faces New Compliance Risk
FTC Scrutinizes Fifty Bar’s “Made in America” Claims as Vape Marketing Faces New Compliance Risk
The Federal Trade Commission sent a warning letter to Lucky Bar Holdings LLC over “Made in the USA” claims tied to Fifty Bar vape products, saying staff had reason to believe the products may be imported in whole or in significant part despite unqualified U.S.-origin marketing claims.
Jul.20